History
  • No items yet
midpage
09-09 325
09-09 325
| Board of Vet. App. | Oct 31, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Veteran served active duty 1968–1972 and 1977–1980; appeal from RO decisions denying multiple service-connection and rating issues.
  • Veteran has current combined 100% rating (effective July 28, 2009) and SMC for loss of use of a creative organ.
  • Board previously remanded several issues (May 2015); additional development produced VA exams (2016) and a May 2016 RO grant for sleep apnea (50%, effective Oct 26, 2006) and tibial tendon dysfunction (10%, effective Aug 2, 2006).
  • Veteran sought service connection for pes planus, bilateral retinal detachment, left ankle arthritis; higher/compensable ratings for bilateral trigger fingers/Dupuytren’s; and earlier effective date for chloracne.
  • Board received VA exam evidence (2010, 2012, 2016) and a private podiatrist opinion; Court previously vacated part of the Board’s May 2015 decision concerning chloracne effective date and remanded for further consideration.

Issues

Issue Veteran's Argument VA/RO Argument Held
Service connection — pes planus Pes planus present at entry and worsened by service Pre-existing condition not aggravated by service; VA exam shows no service aggravation Denied — preponderance shows pes planus clearly & unmistakably existed pre-service and not aggravated by service
Service connection — bilateral detached retinas Retinal detachments related to service and/or secondary to diabetes No current diagnosed retinal detachment during appeal; existing evidence shows resolved past detachments Denied — no competent evidence of current retinal detachment disability
Service connection — left ankle arthritis Ongoing ankle pain and imaging suggest arthritis; possibly secondary to diabetes Exams show tibial tendon tear (post-service) and no arthritis; left ankle symptoms rated under tibial tendon dysfunction Denied — arthritis not documented within relevant period; pain rated under other service-connected condition
Increased rating — right & left trigger fingers/Dupuytren’s Functional loss, pain, reduced grip merit compensable rating VA exams show full ROM, no required gaps/limitations; grip 5/5; symptoms accounted for by current ratings Denied — findings do not meet compensable criteria under DCs 5228–5230
Effective date — chloracne earlier than Nov 27, 2002 Chloracne since service; presumptive Agent Orange exposure in Vietnam qualifies for earlier effective date RO awarded direct service connection effective Nov 27, 2002; must consider presumptive provisions and liberalizing law Granted in part — chloracne presumptively established as of Feb 6, 1991; effective date set to Nov 27, 2001 (one year before claim)

Key Cases Cited

  • Nieves-Rodriguez v. Peake, 22 Vet. App. 295 (2008) (medical opinions are more probative when they include a reasoned analysis linking data to conclusions)
  • Jandreau v. Nicholson, 492 F.3d 1372 (2007) (limits on lay competence for medical etiology and diagnosis)
  • Shedden v. Principi, 381 F.3d 1163 (2004) (elements required to establish service connection)
  • Stegall v. West, 11 Vet. App. 268 (1998) (VA must substantially comply with Board remand directives)
  • Walker v. Shinseki, 708 F.3d 1331 (2013) (continuity of symptomatology can establish presumptive nexus)
  • McClain v. Nicholson, 21 Vet. App. 319 (2007) (requirement that a current disability exist during the claims period)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: 09-09 325
Court Name: Board of Veterans' Appeals
Date Published: Oct 31, 2017
Docket Number: 09-09 325
Court Abbreviation: Board of Vet. App.