(1)

1. (a) A petition for judicial review of an order or decision, as allowed under this part or in Subsection 63G-2-701(6)(a)(ii), shall be filed no later than 30 days after the date of the order or decision.
2. (b) The State Records Committee is a necessary party to a petition for judicial review of a State Records Committee order.
3. (c) The executive secretary of the State Records Committee shall be served with notice of a petition for judicial review of a State Records Committee order, in accordance with the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure.

(2) A petition for judicial review is a complaint governed by the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure and shall contain:

1. (a) the petitioner's name and mailing address;
2. (b) a copy of the State Records Committee order from which the appeal is taken, if the petitioner is seeking judicial review of an order of the State Records Committee;
3. (c) the name and mailing address of the governmental entity that issued the initial determination with a copy of that determination;
4. (d) a request for relief specifying the type and extent of relief requested; and
5. (e) a statement of the reasons why the petitioner is entitled to relief.

(6)

1. (a) The court shall:

   1. (i) make the court's decision de novo, but, for a petition seeking judicial review of a State Records Committee order, allow introduction of evidence presented to the State Records Committee;
   2. (ii) determine all questions of fact and law without a jury; and
   3. (iii) decide the issue at the earliest practical opportunity.

2. (b) A court may remand a petition for judicial review to the State Records Committee if:

   1. (i) the remand is to allow the State Records Committee to decide an issue that:

      1. (A) involves access to a record; and
      2. (B) the State Records Committee has not previously addressed in the proceeding that led to the petition for judicial review; and
   2. (ii) the court determines that remanding to the State Records Committee is in the best interests of justice.

(7)

1. (a) Except as provided in Section 63G-2-406, the court may, upon consideration and weighing of the various interests and public policies pertinent to the classification and disclosure or nondisclosure, order the disclosure of information properly classified as private, controlled, or protected if the interest favoring access is greater than or equal to the interest favoring restriction of access.
2. (b) The court shall consider and, where appropriate, limit the requester's use and further disclosure of the record in order to protect privacy interests in the case of private or controlled records, business confidentiality interests in the case of records protected under Subsections 63G-2-305(1) and (2), and privacy interests or the public interest in the case of other protected records.