50 U.S.C. § 2538a
(a) Requirement Consistent with the requirements of the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Energy shall ensure that the nuclear security enterprise—
(Pub. L. 107–314, div. D, title XLII, § 4219, as added Pub. L. 113–291, div. C, title XXXI, § 3112(b)(1), , 128 Stat. 3886; amended Pub. L. 116–92, div. C, title XXXI, § 3116(b), , 133 Stat. 1952.)
2019—Subsec. (a)(5). Pub. L. 116–92, § 3116(b)(1), added par. (5) and struck out former par. (5) which read as follows: “during a pilot period of not less than 90 days during 2027 (subject to subsection (b)), demonstrates the capability to produce war reserve plutonium pits at a rate sufficient to produce 80 pits per year.”
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 116–92, § 3116(b)(2)–(4), redesignated subsec. (c) as (b), substituted “2030” for “2027 (or, if the authority under subsection (b) is exercised, 2029)”, and struck out former subsec. (b) which authorized a two-year delay of the demonstration requirement.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 116–92, § 3116(b)(3), (5), redesignated subsec. (d) as (c) and substituted “subsection (b)” for “subsection (c)”. Former subsec. (c) redesignated (b).
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 116–92, § 3116(b)(3), redesignated subsec. (d) as (c).
Pub. L. 116–92, div. C, title XXXI, § 3116(a), , 133 Stat. 1951, provided that:
“It is the sense of Congress that—
- “(1) rebuilding a robust plutonium pit production infrastructure with a capacity of up to 80 pits per year is critical to maintaining the viability of the nuclear weapons stockpile;
- “(2) that effort will require cooperation from experts across the nuclear security enterprise; and
- “(3) any further delay to achieving a plutonium sustainment capability to support the planned stockpile life extension programs will result in an unacceptable capability gap to our deterrent posture.”