(a) Program purpose and priorities. All grant applications submitted to the department for community outdoor outreach programs are evaluated for program eligibility and prioritized according to the Project Priority Scoring System set forth in this section. In general, recommended priorities for community outdoor outreach projects are:
- (1) to ensure sponsor compliance on previous grants;
- (2) to improve community outdoor outreach opportunities for inner-city, rural, low-income, ethnic minority, female, physically/mentally challenged, and youth citizens;
- (3) to reward partnerships between local sponsors and other organized groups;
- (4) to increase the number of participants served;
- (5) to maximize the use of funds for direct community outdoor outreach opportunities;
- (6) to reward commitment of sponsor resources;
- (7) to increase use of TPWD programs and facilities;
- (8) to serve youth-at-risk;
- (9) to promote activities related to TPWD initiatives;
- (10) to promote outdoor educational activities; and
- (11) to reduce priority of new funding for sponsors who have not fulfilled all previous grant reimbursement requirements.
(b) Community outdoor outreach program project priority scoring system.
- (1) Community outdoor outreach projects shall be scored according to the criteria, rating factors, and point values set forth in this subsection.
- (2) The priority ranking of a project will depend on its score in relation to the scores of other projects under consideration.
- (3) Funding of projects will depend on the availability of TRPA funds.
- (4) If the sponsor is in full compliance with previously assisted grant projects in accordance with the provisions of this subchapter, the application will be scored and presented for award consideration. If the sponsor does not meet the requirements of this paragraph, the application will not be scored or considered further.
(5) A project proposal meeting the requirements of paragraph (4) of this subsection shall be evaluated according to:
(A) Proposed project's primary constituency. Maximum of 12 points.
- (i) inner city (city must have population of 100,000 or greater): 2 points, based on population figures of sponsor location (may be inner-city or rural or neither, but not both);
- (ii) rural (cities or counties of 20,000 or less population: 2 points, based on population figures of sponsor location (may be inner-city or rural or neither, but not both);
- (iii) ethnic minority (ethnic minorities within served population greater than or equal to 50% of total served population): 2 points;
- (iv) female (females within served population greater than or equal to 50% of total served population): 2 points;
- (v) low-income (as determined by the "USDA National School Lunch Program Income Eligibility Guidelines" federal poverty definition midpoint) greater than or equal to 50% of total served population (including participants on free and reduced lunch program): 2 points;
- (vi) physically/mentally challenged (includes ADD, ADHD): 2 points;
- (vii) youth (age 17 and under) : 2 points.
- (B) Proposed project encourages partnerships with organized groups. Application must include current written and signed agreements between the project sponsor and the proposed partnership group. Letters of endorsement by themselves will not receive credit. One point shall be awarded for each partnership agreement that commits cash contributions, volunteer labor, program materials, physical facilities use, transportation, food, etc. Maximum of 4 points.
- (C) Number of program participants the proposed project will serve. One point awarded per 25 persons served, up to a maximum of 10 points.
- (D) The extent to which the proposed project prioritizes direct service costs. Points shall be awarded on a percentage basis, determined by dividing the direct service delivery costs by the total project cost and multiplying the result by 10. Maximum of 10 points.
- (E) The extent to which the sponsor's funds and resources are committed to the project. Points shall be awarded on a percentage basis, determined by dividing the local/sponsor funds by the total project cost and multiplying the result by 4. Sponsor must provide auditable proof of the contribution. Maximum of 4 points.
(F) The extent of the proposed project's direct relationship with TPWD programs and/or facilities. Maximum of 5 points. One point shall be awarded per instance of:
- (i) TPWD facility used (facility must be named);
- (ii) TPWD personnel involvement (must provide letter of coordination from TPWD staff); and/or
- (iii) TPWD program provided.
- (G) Project specifically serves at-risk youth. A definition of at-risk youth must be included, as well as a description of each activity designed to serve at-risk youth. One point shall be awarded for each activity serving at-risk youth as defined in the project. Maximum of 3 points.
- (H) Project proposes activities related to TPWD initiatives. One point shall be awarded for each proposed activity related to a TPWD initiative (e.g., fishing, camping, hunting, environmental education, or other outdoor activity). Maximum of 5 points.
(I) Project promotes outdoor educational activities. Each educational element must be demonstrated by a discussion of the curriculum to be employed. Maximum of 4 points. Points will be awarded according to the curriculum's potential to increase participants':
- (i) awareness;
- (ii) knowledge, skills, and abilities;
- (iii) critical thinking; and
- (iv) behavioral change.
- (J) Applicant has fulfilled all previous community outdoor outreach grant reimbursement requirements. If no, deduct points from the application score determined by multiplying the remaining unspent grant balance by .0015 percent.
Source Note:The provisions of this §61.135 adopted to be effective August 31, 2000, 25 TexReg 8409; amended to be effective May 1, 2005, 30 TexReg 2556.