31 Tex. Admin. Code § 355.5
Criteria
Effective Sep 11, 200227 TexReg 8598Source Note: The provisions of this §355.5 adopted to be effective October 11, 1991, 16 TexReg 5329; amended to be effective October 18, 1995, 20 TexReg 8075; amended to be effective February 11, 1999, 24 TexReg 765; amended to be effective September 11, 2002, 27 TexReg 8598.Texas Secretary of State
Applications will be evaluated by the executive administrator, considering, at a minimum, the following criteria:
(1) Research project evaluation criteria for unsolicited applications:
- (A) relationship of project to current needs for water resource research;
- (B) description of the proposed research project;
- (C) approach to organizing and managing the research project;
- (D) detailed estimate of the cost of the proposed research project;
- (E) estimated time required to complete the research project;
- (F) ability to perform the research and complete the project;
- (G) potential economic impact; and
- (H) environmental enhancement and conservation impact.
(2) Research project evaluation criteria for solicited applications:
- (A) description of the proposed research project;
- (B) responsiveness of the application to the request for proposals for requests for qualifications;
- (C) approach to organizing and managing the research project;
- (D) detailed estimate of the cost of the proposed research project;
- (E) estimated time required to complete the research project; and
- (F) ability to perform the research and complete the project.
(3) Flood control planning project criteria:
- (A) degree to which proposed planning duplicates previous or ongoing flood plans;
- (B) project service area is regional versus local;
- (C) history of flooding in project area;
- (D) participation in National Flood Insurance Program;
- (E) project organization and budget; and
- (F) scope and potential benefits of project.
(4) Regional facility planning project criteria:
- (A) degree to which proposed planning duplicates previous or ongoing plans;
- (B) regional nature of project;
- (C) conformance to certified water quality management plans;
- (D) adequacy of water conservation plan and commitment to water conservation;
- (E) project organization and budget;
- (F) scope and potential benefits of project;
- (G) the degree to which the regional facility planning is consistent with an approved regional water plan for the area in which the political subdivision is located; and
- (H) ability of a recipient of funds to repay the assistance if a project is not constructed according to §355.10(f) of this title (relating to Funding Limitations).
Source Note:The provisions of this §355.5 adopted to be effective October 11, 1991, 16 TexReg 5329; amended to be effective October 18, 1995, 20 TexReg 8075; amended to be effective February 11, 1999, 24 TexReg 765; amended to be effective September 11, 2002, 27 TexReg 8598.