1 Tex. Admin. Code § 3.2525
Evaluating Project Effectiveness
Effective Aug 6, 200732 TexReg 4747Source Note: The provisions of this §3.2525 adopted to be effective February 24, 2000, 25 TexReg 1297; amended to be effective December 16, 2002, 27 TexReg 11729; amended to be effective June 9, 2004, 29 TexReg 5575; amended to be effective August 6, 2007, 32 TexReg 4747.Texas Secretary of State
- (a) CJD grantees must regularly evaluate the effectiveness of their projects. This includes a reassessment of project activities and services to determine whether they continue to be effective. Grantees must show that their activities and services effectively address and achieve the project's stated purpose. CJD will monitor grantee success through required progress reports, on-site visits, and desk reviews. Grantees must maintain information related to project evaluations in the project's files, and that information must be available for review by CJD.
- (b) Grantees are responsible for managing the day-to-day operations of grant and subgrant supported activities, including those of their contractors and subcontractors. Grantee monitoring must cover each program, function and activity. Grantees must develop, implement, and maintain a standardized monitoring program incorporating best practices to continuously assure grant and subgrant supported activities are monitored. The monitoring program will include, at a minimum, mechanisms by which grantees will ensure they are achieving performance goals and receiving contracted deliverables as specified in agreements and contracts.
Source Note:The provisions of this §3.2525 adopted to be effective February 24, 2000, 25 TexReg 1297; amended to be effective December 16, 2002, 27 TexReg 11729; amended to be effective June 9, 2004, 29 TexReg 5575; amended to be effective August 6, 2007, 32 TexReg 4747.