A petition should include a verified statement of the relevant facts, the points to be reviewed, the requested action or relief, and the fee required by 37 C.F.R. §2.6. 37 C.F.R. §2.146(c). The petition should be accompanied by a supporting brief and any evidence to be considered.

A person must have standing to file a petition to the Director under 37 C.F.R. §2.146. See Ex parte Lasek, 115 USPQ 145 (Comm’r Pats. 1957).

There is no provision in the Trademark Act or Rules of Practice for intercession by a third party in an ex parte matter. Accordingly, petitions by third parties to review actions taken in ex parte matters will generally be dismissed for a lack of standing.

See TMEP §1715 regarding letters of protest filed by third parties to bring to the attention of the USPTO evidence bearing on the registrability of a mark in pending applications.

A petition must be accompanied by the fee required by 37 C.F.R. §2.6. 37 C.F.R. §§2.66(b)(1), 2.146(c), 2.147(a)(2)(iv), (b)(2)(v).

Any petition that is not accompanied by the required fee is incomplete. A staff attorney or paralegal in the Office of the Deputy Commissioner for Trademark Examination Policy will notify the petitioner in writing that the petition is incomplete and grant the petitioner 30 days to submit the fee. If the fee is not submitted within the time allowed, the petition is denied without consideration on the merits, because the petitioner has not met the requirements for filing a petition.

If a petition is permitted to be filed on paper, and a check submitted as a petition fee is returned to the USPTO unpaid, or an electronic funds transfer or credit card is refused or charged back by a financial institution, the petitioner must resubmit the petition fee, along with a fee for processing the payment that was refused or charged back, before the petition will be considered on the merits. See 37 C.F.R. §2.6(b)(10). See TMEP §405.06 regarding payments refused or charged back by financial institutions.

A petition must include a statement of the relevant facts and be accompanied by any evidence to be considered. 37 C.F.R. §§2.146(c), 2.147(a)(2)(ii)-(iii), (b)(2)(i)-(iii). Any recitation of facts or evidence submitted with the petition or to supplement the petition must be verified with an affidavit or declaration under 37 C.F.R §2.20. 37 C.F.R §§2.146(c), 2.147(a)(2)(iii), (b)(2)(i). When facts are to be proved on petition, petitioner must submit proof in the form of verified statements signed by someone with firsthand knowledge of the facts to be proved. 37 C.F.R §2.146(c)(1). For example, if the petitioner seeks waiver of a provision of the rules under 37 C.F.R §2.146(a)(5) and §2.148, a declaration or affidavit submitted as evidence of an extraordinary situation must be signed by an individual with firsthand knowledge of the circumstances asserted to be extraordinary. See TMEP §1708 regarding petitions to the Director seeking waiver of rules.

Petitioners should not submit as evidence any documents that are already part of the record for the subject application or registration, or any USPTO records that are not relevant to the petition. For example, in most circumstances, submitting the entire record of a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Board) proceeding or the entire record of an application or registration would not be necessary to support a petition; only relevant documents from such records should be submitted. Further, it is inappropriate for the petitioner to "dump" evidence and leave it to the Office to determine its possible relevance. Therefore, a petition accompanied by more than 75 pages of evidence must include a separate itemized index listing the supporting evidence and identifying what fact(s) it supports, along with an explanation of why it is necessary to include more than 75 pages of evidence, or the petition may be considered incomplete. In such a case, a staff attorney or paralegal in the Office of the Deputy Commissioner for Trademark Examination Policy will notify the petitioner that an index and explanation are required, and grant the petitioner 30 days to submit these items. If the petitioner does not submit the index and explanation within the time allowed, the petition will be denied, or, in appropriate cases, a decision on petition will be rendered based on the first 75 pages of evidence.

When a petition includes an unverified assertion that is not supported by evidence, a staff attorney or paralegal in the Office of the Deputy Commissioner for Trademark Examination Policy will notify the petitioner that an affidavit or declaration is required, and grant the petitioner 30 days to submit the necessary verification. If the petitioner does not submit a verification within the time allowed, the petition will be denied, or, in appropriate cases, a decision on petition will be rendered based on the information in the record, without consideration of the unverified assertion.

If physical evidence is available, such as a printout of the trademark electronic filing system submission confirmation page that shows the date of actual receipt of a document by the USPTO (see TMEP §303.02(a)), the petitioner should include the evidence with the initial petition. Evidence consisting only of a verified statement without supporting evidence may not be sufficient.

To avoid prejudicing the rights of third parties, petitions must be filed within a reasonable time after the disputed event. In many cases, deadlines for filing petitions are expressly stated in the rules. The following petition deadlines run from the issue date of the action or order of which the petitioner seeks review:

1. Petition to revive an abandoned application – by not later than two months after the issue date of the notice of abandonment or two months after the date of actual knowledge of the abandonment and not later than six months after the date the trademark electronic records system indicates that the application is abandoned, where the applicant declares under 37 C.F.R. §2.20 or 28 U.S.C. §1746 that it did not receive the notice of abandonment (37 C.F.R. §2.66(a); see TMEP §§1705.05, 1714–1714.01(g));
2. Petition to revive goods/services/classes deleted for failure to respond to a partial refusal or requirement – by not later than two months after the issue date of the examiner’s amendment deleting (abandoning) the goods/services/classes to which the refusal or requirement pertained or two months after the date of actual knowledge of the issuance of the examiner’s amendment deleting (abandoning) the goods/services/classes to which the refusal or requirement pertained and not later than six months after the date the trademark electronic records system indicates that the application is abandoned in part by examiner’s amendment, where the applicant declares under 37 C.F.R. §2.20 or 28 U.S.C. §1746 that it did not receive the examiner’s amendment (37 C.F.R. §2.66(a); see TMEP §§718.02(a), 1705.05, 1714–1714.01(g));
3. Petition to reverse an examining attorney’s holding of abandonment for failure to file a complete response to an Office action – by not later than two months after the issue date of the notice of abandonment or two months after the date of actual knowledge of the abandonment and not later than six months after the date the trademark electronic records system indicates that the application is abandoned, where the applicant declares under 37 C.F.R. §2.20 or 28 U.S.C. §1746 that it did not receive the notice of abandonment (see 37 C.F.R. §2.146(d)(2)(i) );
4. Petition to review an examining attorney’s formal requirement – by not later than the end of the response period for the Office action maintaining the requirement (15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62, 2.63(a), (b) ) (see TMEP §711 regarding the deadline for response to an Office action and §711.01 regarding requests for an extension of time to respond to an Office action with a three-month response period);
5. Petition to reinstate a registration and accept a late response to an Office action issued in connection with a timely filed affidavit of use or excusable non-use under Section 8 or 71 of the Act, or a renewal application under Section 9 of the Act– by not later than two months after the issue date of the cancellation notice or two months of actual knowledge of the cancellation and not later than six months after the date the trademark electronic records system indicates that the registration is cancelled/expired (see 37 C.F.R. §2.146(d); see TMEP §1712.02(b));
6. Petition to review a Section 8 or 71 rejection – by not later than six months after the issue date of the Office action maintaining a refusal of the affidavit (37 C.F.R. §2.165(b); see TMEP §§1604.18–1604.18(a), 1613.18–1613.18(a));
7. Petition to review a Section 7 rejection – by not later than six months after the issue date of the Office action refusing to enter an amendment or correction (37 C.F.R. §2.176 );
8. Petition to review the denial of a request for an extension of time to file a notice of opposition – by not later than 15 days after the issue date of the grant or denial of the request (37 C.F.R. §2.146(e)(1) );
9. Petition to review an interlocutory order of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board – by not later than 30 days after the issue date of the order from which relief is requested (37 C.F.R. §2.146(e)(2) );
10. Petition to review the denial of certain timely filed paper submissions with statutory deadlines – by not later than two months after the issue date of the notice denying acceptance of the paper filing (37 C.F.R. §2.147(b)(2) );
11. Request for reconsideration of decision on petition – by not later than two months after the issue date of the decision denying the petition or two months after the date of actual knowledge of the decision denying the petition and not later than six months after the issue date of the decision, where the applicant declares under 37 C.F.R. §2.20 or 28 U.S.C. §1746 that it did not receive the decision (37 C.F.R. §§2.66(e)(1), 2.146(i)(1) );
12. Petition to review the denial of certification of an international application – by not later than two months after the date of actual knowledge of the denial of certification of an international application under §7.13(b) and not later than six months after the trademark electronic records system indicates that certification is denied where the applicant or registrant declares under 37 C.F.R. §2.20 or 28 U.S.C. §1746 that it did not receive the action, or no action was issued (37 C.F.R. §2.146(d)(2)(iii) ).

If the rules do not provide an express deadline, the petition must be filed by not later than two months after the issue date of the action from which relief is requested. 37 C.F.R. §2.146(d)(1).

The time limits set forth in the rules are strictly enforced. Petitions filed after the expiration of the deadlines are denied as untimely. If the petitioner can show that extraordinary circumstances caused the delay in filing the petition, the petitioner may request waiver of these time limits, pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §2.146(a)(5) and §2.148. See TMEP §1708 regarding waiver of rules.

On the rare occasions when filing on paper is permitted, petitions mailed to the USPTO by the due date in accordance with 37 C.F.R. §2.197 or §2.198 will be considered timely. See 37 C.F.R. §2.195(b)(1)-(2). See TMEP §§301.02-301.02(e) regarding the limited exceptions for paper submissions, §§305.02-305.02(h) regarding certificate of mailing procedures, and §§305.03-305.03(e) regarding Priority Mail Express® procedures.

See TMEP §1705.05 regarding the duty to exercise due diligence in monitoring the status of pending trademark matters.

37 C.F.R. 2.23 (Extract) Requirement to correspond electronically with the Office and duty to monitor status.

. . .

1. (d) Notices issued or actions taken by the USPTO are displayed in the USPTO's publicly available electronic systems. Applicants and registrants are responsible for monitoring the status of their applications and registrations in the USPTO's electronic systems during the following time periods:
2. (1) At least every six months between the filing date of the application and issuance of a registration;
3. (2) After filing an affidavit of use or excusable nonuse under section 8 or section 71 of the Act, or a renewal application under section 9 of the Act, at least every six months until the registrant receives notice that the affidavit or renewal application has been accepted; and
4. (3) After notice of the institution of an expungement or reexamination proceeding under § 2.92, at least every three months until the registrant receives a notice of termination under § 2.94.

Applicants and registrants are responsible for tracking the status of matters pending before the USPTO. 37 C.F.R. §2.23(d); TMEP §108.03. It is reasonable to expect some notice from or action by the USPTO within six months of submitting a document in an application or registration. A party who has not received a notice or action from the USPTO within that time frame is responsible for checking the matter’s status and requesting corrective action, if necessary. 37 C.F.R. §2.23(d).

Applicants and registrants can check the status of an application or registration through the TSDR database on the USPTO website at https://tsdr.uspto.gov/, which is generally available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The party should print the TSDR screen and place it in the party’s own file, in order to have a record of the status inquiry and the information learned.

A party who does not have access to the Internet can call the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC) at (571) 272-9250 or (800) 786-9199 to determine the status or to obtain clarification about the status. After making a telephone status inquiry, a party should make a note in the party’s own file as to the date of the status inquiry and the information learned. No further documentation is required to establish that the status inquiry was made.

If a status inquiry reveals that a document submitted to the USPTO is not in the electronic record or was not received in the USPTO, that an Office action or notice was issued but not received by the applicant or registrant, that an application has been abandoned or a registration cancelled or expired, or that some other problem exists, then the applicant or registrant is responsible for promptly requesting corrective action in writing.

If an application has been abandoned, a petition to revive under 37 C.F.R. §2.66 (if not due to USPTO error) or request for reinstatement under 37 C.F.R. §2.64(a) (if due to USPTO error) must be filed through the trademark electronic filing system. See TMEP §§1702–1708, 1713, 1714. If a registration has been cancelled or expired, a request for reinstatement under 37 C.F.R. §2.64(b) (if due to USPTO error) or formal petition under 37 C.F.R. §2.146 (if not due to USPTO error) should generally be filed through the trademark electronic filing system. See TMEP §1712. See TMEP §301.02 regarding the limited exceptions for paper submissions.

In all cases, petitions and requests for reinstatement will be denied if filed more than six months after the electronic record is updated to reflect that an application is abandoned or that a registration is cancelled or expired. 37 C.F.R. §§2.64(a)(1)(ii), (b)(1)(ii), 2.66(a)(2), 2.146(d)(2).

These deadlines protect third parties who rely on the Trademark electronic record to determine whether a chosen mark is available for use or registration. For example, a third party may search USPTO records and understand that an earlier-filed potentially conflicting mark will not be revived or reinstated more than six months after the date the electronic record indicates that it was abandoned.

37 C.F.R. §2.146(g)

The mere filing of a petition to the Director will not act as a stay in any appeal or inter partes proceeding that is pending before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, nor stay the period for replying to an Office action in an application, except when a stay is specifically requested and is granted or when §§ 2.63(a) and (b) and 2.65(a) are applicable to an ex parte application.

Filing a petition does not stay the period for replying to an Office action, except when a stay is specifically requested and granted under 37 C.F.R. §2.146(g), or when 37 C.F.R. §§2.63(a) and (b) and 2.65(a) are applicable. Any request to stay a deadline for filing a response to an Office action or notice of appeal should be submitted using the Response to Office action form, explaining that a petition on the outstanding issue(s) is currently pending. The examining attorney should then request permission from the Petitions Office, which is part of the Office of the Deputy Commissioner for Trademark Examination Policy, to suspend action on the case pending a decision on the petition. The examining attorney must not suspend action on an application pending a decision on petition to the Director except upon permission from the Petitions Office or when expressly permitted. 37 C.F.R. §2.146(g). See TMEP §716.02(l) for circumstances when an examining attorney may suspend action pending a decision on a petition to the Director requesting waiver of the domicile address requirement.

A request to suspend a proceeding before the Board pending a decision on petition should be directed to the Board. 37 C.F.R. §2.117(c); TBMP §510.03(a). See TBMP §§510–510.03(b), 1213 regarding suspension of Board proceedings.

Filing a petition to revive an application abandoned for failure to file a proper statement of use or request for an extension of time to file a statement of use does not stay the time for filing a statement of use or further extension request(s). See TMEP §1714.01(b)(i).

A petitioner’s domicile will determine whether the petitioner is required to be represented before the USPTO by an attorney who is an active member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state, Commonwealth, or territory or the District of Columbia (a qualified U.S. attorney). 37 C.F.R. §§2.11(a), 11.1, 11.14(e); TMEP §601. A petitioner whose domicile is not located within the United States or its territories must be represented by a qualified U.S. attorney. 37 C.F.R. §2.11(a); TMEP §601. See TMEP §601.01 regarding determining domicile and §602 regarding persons authorized to practice before the USPTO in trademark matters.

If the USPTO receives a petition filed by an unrepresented foreign domiciliary, an attorney or paralegal in the Office of the Deputy Commissioner for Trademark Examination Policy will follow the procedures in TMEP §601.01(a) and grant the petitioner additional time to appoint a qualified U.S. attorney and to supplement the petition, as appropriate. If the petitioner does not appoint a qualified U.S. attorney and submit any additional necessary information within the time allowed, the petition will be denied.

Regardless of the type of petition, if it appears that a petition (or a response accompanying a petition) was signed by an improper or excluded party, the staff attorney or paralegal reviewing the petition will follow the procedures in TMEP §611.05 for processing documents signed by unauthorized parties.

Petitions to the Director under Trademark Rule 2.146 and/or 2.147. See 37 C.F.R. §2.193(e)(5) and TMEP §611.03(e) regarding persons who may sign petitions to the Director and TMEP §§611.06–611.06(h) for guidelines on persons with legal authority to bind various types of legal entities.

Petitions to the Director under Trademark Rule 2.146 and/or 2.147 are often accompanied by separate verifications. See TMEP §1705.02 regarding who may sign verifications.

Petitions to Revive under Trademark Rule 2.66. See TMEP §611.03(d) and §1714.01(e) regarding who may sign petitions to revive and §611.03(b) regarding who may sign a response to an Office action, if one is provided with the petition.

See also TMEP §611.01(c) regarding signature of documents filed electronically.

Under 37 C.F.R. §2.146(i), if a petition is denied, the petitioner may request reconsideration by: (1) filing the request for reconsideration within two months after the issue date of the decision denying the petition; and (2) paying a second petition fee under 37 C.F.R. §2.6. The petitioner must use the trademark electronic filing system's Petition to Director form to file the request for reconsideration.

If the petitioner presents new facts that warrant equitable relief, the request for reconsideration may be granted. Any request for reconsideration that merely reiterates or expands on arguments previously presented will be denied.

Since contested matters must be brought to a conclusion within a reasonable time, a second request for reconsideration of a decision on petition will be granted only in rare situations, when the petitioner presents significant facts or evidence not previously available. In re Am. Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. of Chi., 33 USPQ2d 1535, 1537 (Comm’r Pats. 1993).

A registrant who is adversely affected by the Director’s decision regarding a filed §8 affidavit, filed §71 affidavit, or filed §9 renewal application may appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit or commence a civil action for review of the decision on petition. 15 U.S.C. §§1071(a)(1), (b)(1); 37 C.F.R. §§2.145(a), (c).

Other types of Director’s decisions are not subject to appeal. See In re Marriott-Hot Shoppes, Inc., 411 F.2d 1025, 1028, 162 USPQ 106, 109–110 (C.C.P.A. 1969).

The deadline for filing an appeal or commencing a civil action is 63 days from the issuance date of the decision. 15 U.S.C. §1071(a)(2), (b)(1); 37 C.F.R. §2.145(d)(1), (d)(3).