TMEP § 305
Paper trademark documents – general. Except for documents sent to the Assignment Recordation Branch for recordation, requests for copies of trademark documents, specimens for scent, flavor, or similar non-traditional marks, and certain documents filed under the Madrid Protocol (listed below), all paper trademark-related correspondence to be delivered by the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) must be addressed to:
Commissioner for Trademarks
P.O. Box 1451
Alexandria,
Virginia
22313-1451
The names of individual employees should not be placed on the envelopes in which official communications are sent to the USPTO. See TMEP §301.01 regarding the limited exceptions when paper submissions may be submitted and §301.02(b) regarding submitting specimens for scent, flavor, or similar non-traditional marks.
Documents filed under the Madrid Protocol. International applications under 37 C.F.R. §7.11, subsequent designations under 37 C.F.R. §7.21, responses to irregularity notices under 37 C.F.R. §7.14, requests to record changes in the International Register under 37 C.F.R. §7.23 and §7.24, requests for transformation under 37 C.F.R. §7.31, requests to note replacements under 37 C.F.R. §7.28, and petitions to the Director to review the actions of the USPTO’s Madrid Processing Unit, when filed by mail, must be mailed to:
Madrid Processing Unit
600 Dulany Street
Alexandria
Virginia
22314-5796
Documents to be recorded in Assignment Recordation Branch. To expedite processing, the USPTO recommends filing requests to record documents through Assignment Center at https://assignmentcenter.uspto.gov/. Documents filed electronically are recorded much faster than their paper counterparts. Unless they are filed together with new applications, paper documents and cover sheets to be recorded in the Assignment Recordation Branch should be mailed to:
Mail Stop Assignment Recordation Services
Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
P. O. Box 1450
Alexandria,
Virginia
22313-1450
Requests for copies of Trademark documents. Copies of trademark documents can be ordered through the USPTO website at https://certifiedcopycenter.uspto.gov/. Requests for copies of documents can also be emailed to the USPTO at dsd@uspto.gov, with an authorization to charge the fee to a credit card or USPTO deposit account. See TMEP §111 for additional information regarding requesting copies.
All other requests for certified or uncertified copies of trademark documents should be mailed to:
Mail Stop Patent and Trademark Copy Fulfillment Branch
Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
P. O. Box 1450
Alexandria,
Virginia
22313-1450
For permitted paper filings (see TMEP §301.01), Trademark Rule 2.197 provides a "certificate of mailing" procedure to avoid lateness due to mail delay with the U.S. Postal Service (USPS). 37 C.F.R. §2.197. Under this procedure, correspondence is considered to be timely even if received after the due date, if the correspondence was:
Filers must retain a copy of the correspondence, including the signed and dated certificate. See In re Sasson Licensing Corp., 35 USPQ2d 1510, 1512 (Comm’r Pats. 1995).
See TMEP §305.02(a)–(h) regarding the certificate of mailing procedure.
The certificate of mailing procedure may be used for any trademark correspondence that may be filed on paper. See TMEP §301.02 regarding the limited exceptions when paper submissions may be submitted.
The correspondence must be properly addressed (see TMEP §305.01 for mailing addresses), and must be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) with sufficient postage as first-class mail. 37 C.F.R. §2.197(a)(1).
Since first-class mail services of the USPS are not available in foreign countries, the certificate of mailing procedure may not be used for sending mail to the USPTO from a foreign country.
The certificate of mailing must provide the following for each piece of correspondence submitted:
The best location for the certificate of mailing is at the beginning of the correspondence to which it pertains, typed in its entirety. The certificate of mailing should be separated from contents of the correspondence that are on the same page. Several blank lines between the contents and the certificate will suffice.
If the certificate of mailing does not fit on the correspondence to which it pertains, the certificate may be placed on a separate sheet of paper that is attached securely to the correspondence. The separate sheet may be a cover letter, with the certificate placed at the bottom of the letter and signed separately from the letter. If there is any doubt concerning the correspondence to which a certificate of mailing on a separate sheet relates, the USPTO will not accept the certificate.
When correspondence for more than one application or registration is mailed in a single envelope, each item of correspondence must have its own certificate of mailing. Similarly, when more than one type of correspondence is submitted in connection with the same application, each item of correspondence must have its own certificate of mailing.
It is suggested that the certificate be signed by the applicant, registrant, or the party involved in the proceeding, or by the attorney for such person. If someone else signs, it should be a responsible person in a position to know that the mail will be deposited on the date specified. See 37 C.F.R. §2.197(a)(2)(iii).
The USPTO accepts the date of deposit stated in the certificate of mailing on the basis of the statement of personal knowledge. The USPTO does not normally inspect the postmark on the envelope.
The following wording is suggested for a certificate of mailing for a paper trademark document. See TMEP §305.01 regarding the mailing address for this type of document and others.
![Sample certificate of mailing with the text "I hereby certify that this correspondence, [state the name of the document], which pertains to U.S. Application Serial/Registration No. or USPTO Reference No. [Enter Number Here], is being deposited with the U.S. Postal Service as first-class mail in an envelope addressed to: Commissioner for Trademarks, P.O. Box 1451, Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1451 on the date shown below:" and lines for the typed or printed name of the signatory, the signature, the signatory's title, and the date.](https://tmep.uspto.gov/RDMS/TMEP/graphics/May2026/certtrans_305-02d.jpg)
The filing date assigned to paper correspondence submitted with a certificate of mailing is the date of its deposit with the USPS when filed pursuant to the requirements of 37 C.F.R. §2.197. 37 C.F.R. §2.195(b)(2). If the certificate of mailing does not meet the requirements of 37 C.F.R. §2.197(a)(2), the filing date is the date the USPTO receives the submission. 37 C.F.R. §2.197(c).
See TMEP §§206–206.04 regarding changes in the effective filing date of an application.
The USPTO does not retain the envelopes in which material is received or record the date of the postmark.
If permitted paper correspondence (see TMEP §301.01) mailed with a certificate of mailing is not received by the USPTO, the party who mailed the correspondence may file a petition to the Director under 37 C.F.R. §2.146(a)(2) to consider the correspondence filed in the USPTO on the date of deposit with the USPS.
The petition must:
37 C.F.R. §2.197(b). See TMEP §§1702–1708 regarding petitions under 37 C.F.R. §2.146.
The two-month time period for notifying the USPTO begins to run from the date that the party who filed the correspondence became aware that the USPTO has no evidence of receipt of the correspondence, unless the USPTO has issued a written action, such as a notice of abandonment or cancellation. In such situations, the issue date of the USPTO written action will serve as the starting point for measuring timeliness. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.146(d), 2.197(b)(1); TMEP §1705.04.
Correspondence must be deposited with the USPS as first-class mail in compliance with any and all applicable requirements of the USPS to be considered "[d]eposited with the USPS," within the meaning of 37 C.F.R. §2.197(a)(1). Therefore, correspondence returned by the USPS as not mailed in compliance with USPS requirements, including concerning mail weighing more than the USPS maximum permissible weight, is not entitled to any benefit under 37 C.F.R. §2.197.
The requirements of 37 C.F.R. §2.197 are strictly enforced, and the USPTO denies petitions to consider a document timely filed as of the date on the certificate if a party fails to comply with these requirements.
A party’s inadvertent failure to comply with the requirements of a rule is not considered an extraordinary situation that would warrant waiver of a rule on petition under 37 C.F.R. §2.146(a)(5) or 37 C.F.R. §2.148. See Honigsbaum v. Lehman, 903 F. Supp. 8, 37 USPQ2d 1799 (D.D.C. 1995) (finding Commissioner did not abuse discretion in refusing to waive requirements of 37 C.F.R. §1.10(c) and grant filing date to patent application, where applicant failed to produce "Express Mail" customer receipt or any other evidence that application was actually deposited with USPS as "Express Mail"), aff’d mem., 95 F.3d 1166 (Fed. Cir. 1996); In re Sasson Licensing Corp., 35 USPQ2d 1510, 1512 (Comm’r Pats. 1995) (noting that failure to retain an executed hard copy of documents filed with the USPTO is not an extraordinary circumstance that would justify waiver of 37 C.F.R. §1.8); Gustafson v. Strange, 227 USPQ 174 (Comm’r Pats. 1985) (finding counsel’s unawareness of the provisions of 37 C.F.R. §1.8 is not an extraordinary situation warranting waiver of the rule); In re Chicago Historical Antique Auto. Museum, Inc., 197 USPQ 289 (Comm’r Pats. 1978) (finding lateness caused by mailing documents on the last day of the filing period is not an extraordinary situation justifying waiver of the rules, because certificate of mailing procedure under 37 C.F.R. §1.8 was available to petitioner).
For permitted paper filings (see TMEP §301.02), Trademark Rule 2.198 provides a procedure for obtaining a filing date as of the date that correspondence is deposited as Priority Mail Express® with the USPS, as shown by the "date accepted" on the Priority Mail Express® label or other official USPS notation. 37 C.F.R. §2.198(a).
If the USPS deposit date cannot be determined, the filing date is the date the USPTO receives the submission. 37 C.F.R. §2.198(b).
If there is a discrepancy between the filing date given by the USPTO to the correspondence and the "date accepted," the party who submitted the correspondence may file a petition to the Director under 37 C.F.R. §2.146(a)(2) to have the correspondence be given a filing date as of the "date accepted." 37 C.F.R. §2.198(c).
The petition must:
If the party who submitted the correspondence can show that the "date accepted" was incorrectly entered or omitted by the USPS, the party may file a petition to the Director under 37 C.F.R. § 2.146(a)(2) to have the correspondence be given a filing date as of the date the correspondence is shown to have been deposited with the USPS. 37 C.F.R. §2.198(d).
The petition must:
If correspondence is properly addressed to the USPTO pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §2.190 (see TMEP §305.01) and deposited with sufficient postage in the Priority Mail Express® Post Office to Addressee service of the USPS, but not received by the USPTO, the party who submitted the correspondence may file a petition to the Director under 37 C.F.R. §2.146(a)(2) to consider the correspondence filed in the USPTO on the USPS deposit date. 37 C.F.R. §2.146(e).
The petition must:
The certificate of mailing procedure of 37 C.F.R. §2.197 may be used for documents sent by Priority Mail Express® as well as documents sent by first-class mail. Correspondence sent by Priority Mail Express® is deemed to meet the requirements of 37 C.F.R. §2.197(a)(1) for postage as first-class mail, because the postage for Priority Mail Express® exceeds the postage required for first-class mail. However, to use the certificate of mailing procedure for documents mailed by Priority Mail Express®, the filer must place a certificate meeting the requirements of 37 C.F.R. §2.197(a)(2) on the document prior to mailing. See TMEP §§305.02–305.02(h) for further information about the certificate of mailing procedure.
The following wording is suggested for a certificate of mailing for a paper trademark document when correspondence is sent by Priority Mail Express®. See TMEP §305.01 regarding mailing address for this type of document and others.
![Sample certificate of mailing for express mail with the following text "I hereby certify that this correspondence, [state the name of the document], which pertains to U.S. Application Serial/Registration No. or USPTO Reference No. [Enter the Number Here], is being deposited with the U.S. Postal Service as Priority Mail Express® in an envelope addressed to: Commissioner for Trademarks, P.O. Box 1451, Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1451 on the date shown below:" and lines for the typed or printed name of the signatory, the signatory's title, the signature, and the date.](https://tmep.uspto.gov/RDMS/TMEP/graphics/May2026/certmail_305-03.jpg)
When correspondence to which 37 C.F.R. §2.198(a) applies is placed in a Priority Mail Express® drop box after the box has been cleared for the last time on a given day, it is considered to have been deposited as of the date of receipt indicated on the Priority Mail Express® mailing label by the USPS employee. See Communications with the Patent and Trademark Office, 61 Fed. Reg. 56,439, 56,445 (Nov. 1, 1996).
The Director may by rule prescribe that any paper or fee required to be filed in the Patent and Trademark Office will be considered filed in the Office on the date on which it was deposited with the United States Postal Service or would have been deposited with the United States Postal Service but for postal service interruptions or emergencies designated by the Director.
If the Director designates a postal service interruption or emergency within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. 21(a), any person attempting to file correspondence by Priority Mail Express® Post Office to Addressee service who was unable to deposit the correspondence with the USPS due to the interruption or emergency may petition the Director to consider such correspondence as filed on a particular date in the Office. The petition must:
Under 35 U.S.C. §21(a) and 37 C.F.R. §2.195(d), if the Director designates a postal interruption or emergency, any person who attempted to file correspondence by Priority Mail Express® Post Office to Addressee service but was unable to deposit such correspondence with the USPS due to the postal interruption or emergency may petition the Director to consider the correspondence to have been filed in the USPTO on a particular date.
The petition must: