S.C. Code Ann. § 56-1-286
(C) A law enforcement officer who has arrested a person under the age of twenty-one for a violation of Chapter 5 of this title (Uniform Act Regulating Traffic on Highways), or any other traffic offense established by a political subdivision of this State, and has reasonable suspicion that the person under the age of twenty-one has consumed alcoholic beverages and driven a motor vehicle may order the testing of the person arrested to determine the person's alcohol concentration.
A law enforcement officer may detain and order the testing of a person to determine the person's alcohol concentration if the officer has reasonable suspicion that a motor vehicle is being driven by a person under the age of twenty-one who has consumed alcoholic beverages.
(D) A test must be administered at the direction of the primary investigating law enforcement officer. At the officer's direction, the person first must be offered a breath test to determine the person's alcohol concentration. If the person physically is unable to provide an acceptable breath sample because the person has an injured mouth or is unconscious or dead, or for any other reason considered acceptable by licensed medical personnel, a blood sample may be taken. The breath test must be administered by a person trained and certified by the South Carolina Criminal Justice Academy, pursuant to the State Law Enforcement Division's policies. The primary investigating officer may administer the test. Blood samples must be obtained by physicians licensed by the State Board of Medical Examiners, registered nurses licensed by the State Board of Nursing, or other medical personnel trained to obtain these samples in a licensed medical facility. Blood samples must be obtained and handled in accordance with procedures approved by the division. The division shall administer the provisions of this subsection and shall promulgate regulations necessary to carry out the subsection's provisions. The costs of the tests administered at the officer's direction must be paid from the state's general fund. However, if the person is subsequently convicted of violating Section 56-5-2930, 56-5-2933, or 56-5-2945, then, upon conviction, the person shall pay twenty-five dollars for the costs of the tests. The twenty-five dollars must be placed by the Comptroller General into a special restricted account to be used by the State Law Enforcement Division to offset the costs of administration of the breath testing devices, breath testing site video program, and toxicology laboratory.
The person tested or giving samples for testing may have a qualified person of the person's choice conduct additional tests at the person's expense and must be notified in writing of that right. A person's request or failure to request additional blood tests is not admissible against the person in any proceeding. The person's failure or inability to obtain additional tests does not preclude the admission of evidence relating to the tests or samples taken at the officer's direction. The officer shall provide affirmative assistance to the person to contact a qualified person to conduct and obtain additional tests. Affirmative assistance shall, at a minimum, include providing transportation for the person to the nearest medical facility which provides blood tests to determine a person's alcohol concentration. If the medical facility obtains the blood sample but refuses or fails to test the blood to determine the person's alcohol concentration, the State Law Enforcement Division shall test the blood and provide the result to the person and to the officer. Failure to provide affirmative assistance upon request to obtain additional tests bars the admissibility of the breath test result in a judicial or administrative proceeding.
(F) If a person refuses upon the primary investigating officer's request to submit to chemical tests as provided in subsection (C), the department shall suspend the person's license, permit, or nonresident operating privilege, or deny the issuance of a license or permit to the person for:
(G) If a person submits to a chemical test and the test result indicates an alcohol concentration of two one-hundredths of one percent or more, the department shall suspend the person's license, permit, or nonresident operating privilege, or deny the issuance of a license or permit to the person for:
(I) A test may not be administered or samples taken unless, upon activation of the video recording equipment and prior to the commencement of the testing procedure, the person has been given a written copy of and verbally informed that:
(5) the person shall enroll in an Alcohol and Drug Safety Action Program within thirty days of the issuance of the notice of suspension if the person does not request a contested case hearing or within thirty days of the issuance of notice that the suspension has been upheld at the contested case hearing.
The primary investigating officer promptly shall notify the department of a person's refusal to submit to a test requested pursuant to this section as well as the test result of a person who submits to a test pursuant to this section and registers an alcohol concentration of two one-hundredths of one percent or more. The notification must be in a manner prescribed by the department.
(K) Within thirty days of the issuance of the notice of suspension the person may:
(2) request a contested case hearing before the Office of Motor Vehicle Hearings pursuant to its rules of procedure.
At the contested case hearing if:
(O) A contested case hearing must be held after the request for the hearing is received by the Office of Motor Vehicle Hearings. The scope of the hearing is limited to whether the person:
(4) consented to taking a test pursuant to this section, and the:
(d) the machine was operating properly.
Nothing in this section prohibits the introduction of evidence at the contested case hearing on the issue of the accuracy of the breath test result.
The Department of Motor Vehicles and the arresting officer shall have the burden of proof in contested case hearings conducted pursuant to this section. If neither the Department of Motor Vehicles nor the arresting officer appears at the contested case hearing, the hearing officer shall rescind the suspension of the person's license, permit, or nonresident's operating privilege regardless of whether the person requesting the contested case hearing or the person's attorney appears at the contested case hearing.
A written order must be issued to all parties either reversing or upholding the suspension of the person's license, permit, or nonresident's operating privilege, or denying the issuance of a license or permit. If the suspension is upheld, the person must receive credit for the number of days the person's license was suspended before the person received a temporary alcohol license and requested the contested case hearing.
HISTORY: 1998 Act No. 434, Section 2; 2000 Act No. 390, Sections 3-5; 2001 Act No. 79, Section 2.C; 2003 Act No. 61, Section 4; 2006 Act No. 381, Section 8, eff June 13, 2006; 2008 Act No. 201, Section 2, eff February 10, 2009; 2012 Act No. 212, Section 2, eff June 7, 2012; 2012 Act No. 264, Section 2, eff June 18, 2012; 2014 Act No. 158 (S.137), Section 2, eff October 1, 2014; 2016 Act No. 275 (S.1258), Section 17, eff July 1, 2016.
At the direction of the Code Commissioner, the references, in subsection (A), to former Children's Code Sections 20-7-8920 and 20-7-8925 were changed to new South Carolina Children's Code Sections 63-19-2440 and 63-19-2450 enacted by 2008 Act No 361.
The 2006 amendment, in subsection (O), rewrote the first undesignated paragraph to substitute "Division of Motor Vehicle Hearings" for "Department of Motor Vehicles" and make conforming and nonsubstantive changes, and in the third undesignated paragraph in the first sentence substituted "all parties either reversing or" for "the person"; and, in subsection (P), in the first sentence substituted "appeal the decision of the hearing officer" for "judicial review" and added "to the Administrative Law Court in accordance with its appellate rules", and in the second sentence substituted "an appeal" for "a petition for review".
The 2008 amendment, in subsection (C), substituted "reasonable suspicion" for "probable cause to believe" in two places; in subsection (D) in the fourth sentence substituted "South Carolina Criminal Justice Academy, pursuant to SLED policies" for "State Law Enforcement Division, using methods approved by the division", in the fifth sentence deleted "if the person's conduct during the twenty minute pre-test waiting period is videotaped pursuant to Section 56-5-2953(A)(2)(d), and added the tenth and eleventh sentences; in subsection (I), added the provision relating to videotaping verbal warning; in subsections (J), (K)(1), (L) and the undesignated paragraph at the end of (O), deleted "restricted" preceding "license"; rewrote the introductory paragraph of subsection (O), in paragraph (2) added the requirement as to verbal warning of rights, and in the last undesignated paragraph at the end of the first sentence deleted "within thirty days after the conclusion of the administrative hearing"; and made nonsubstantive language changes.
The first 2012 amendment substituted "contested case" for "administrative" throughout; added "before the Office of Motor Vehicle Hearings pursuant to its rules of procedure" in subsection (K)(2); and substituted "Office" for "Division" and inserted language regarding burden of proof and failure to appear for a hearing in subsection (O).
The second 2012 amendment, in subsection (K)(1), substituted "Department of Motor Vehicles" for "department", and substituted "collected by the Department of Motor Vehicles must be distributed to" for "must be retained by".
2014 Act No. 158, Section 2, in subsections (F)(2) and (G)(2), substituted "three years" for "five years", substituted ", or a law of another state" for "or any other law of this State or another state", substituted "or other drugs" for "or another drug", deleted reference to Section 56-5-2950, and added reference to Section 56-5-2990; in subsections (I)(4) and (I)(5), substituted "contested case hearing" for "administrative hearing"; and made other nonsubstantive and gender neutral changes throughout.
2016 Act No. 275, Section 17, amended (K)(1), providing that all or a portion of the fees or fines collected by the department of motor vehicles shall be credited to the state highway fund.