S.C. Code Ann. § 12-60-2150
(H) A property taxpayer or the local governing body who disagrees with the department determination may request a contested case hearing before the Administrative Law Court by filing the request in accordance with the Administrative Law Court rules within thirty days of the date of the department determination.
If a taxpayer requests a contested case hearing before the Administrative Law Court without exhausting his prehearing remedy because he failed to file a protest, the administrative law judge shall dismiss the action without prejudice. If the taxpayer failed to provide the department with the facts, law, and other authority supporting his position, he shall provide the department with the facts, law, and other authority he failed to present to the department earlier. The administrative law judge shall then remand the case to the department for reconsideration in light of the new facts or issues unless the department elects to forego the remand.
Upon remand the department has thirty days, or a longer period ordered by the administrative law judge, to consider the new facts and issues and amend its department determination. The department shall issue its amended department determination in the same manner as the original. The taxpayer has thirty days after the date the department amended determination was sent by first class mail or delivered to the taxpayer to again request a contested case hearing. Requests for a hearing before the Administrative Law Court must be made in accordance with its rules. If the department fails to issue its amended department determination within thirty days of the date of the remand, or a longer period ordered by the administrative law judge, the taxpayer can again request a contested case hearing. At the new hearing the facts, law, and other authority presented at the original hearing must be deemed to have been presented in a timely manner for purposes of exhausting the taxpayer's prehearing remedy. The statute of limitations remains suspended by Section 12-54-85(G) during this process.
HISTORY: 1995 Act No. 60, Section 4A; 1996 Act No. 456, Section 12; 1997 Act No. 106, Section 5; 2018 Act No. 265 (S.1043), Section 8.F, eff October 3, 2018.
2018 Act No. 265, Section 8.F, in (B), in the first sentence, inserted "by notifying the chief executive officer, auditor, assessor, and treasurer of each affected county" at the end, and in the second sentence, substituted "the chief administrative official of any local governing bodies affected by the claim for refund" for "any affected municipalities or other political subdivisions"; in (D), in the first sentence, inserted ", but not later than six months after the date the claim for refund was filed with the department" at the end, and added the second sentence; and in (F), in the first sentence, substituted "written protest" for "claim" and "a department determination in accordance with the provisions of Section 12-60-450(E)" for "necessary orders".
Subarticle 9
Appeals, Protests, and Refunds for Property Valued by County Assessors