250-RICR-140-30-1
C. Functions
D. Environmental Justice and Public Involvement:
A. For the purpose of these Rules and Regulations, the following terms shall have the following meanings:
12. "Clean soil" means soil that has not been impacted, contaminated, adversely affected, or subject to a Release of Hazardous Materials, State or federally defined Hazardous Waste, petroleum, asbestos, PCB’s, radioactive materials, or solid waste.
a. Soil meeting:
21. "Environmentally sensitive area" means any of the following areas:
36. "Imminent hazard" means a Release of Hazardous Material meeting any of the following criteria:
c. The Release poses an immediate threat of fire or explosion. Further factors to consider when evaluating Releases resulting in a threat of fire and explosion shall include:
38. "Incompatible materials" means materials which are unsuitable for:
52. "Operator" means the Person who is responsible for the operation of the activities at the Contaminated-Site. For the purposes of these regulations, Persons who create or maintain a security interest in land by making loans, administering loans or participating in the financial workout of defaulted loans are not Operators, and such acts of themselves are not considered participation in management of a Contaminated-Site. Activities that are considered appropriate activities of a secured lender include, without limitation:
59. "Petroleum" means any virgin petroleum product including the following products:
62. "Recreational facility for public use" means a building or place, owned or controlled by a government agency or not-for-profit entity, that provides the public the opportunity to engage in active and/or passive recreation. The payment of a membership fee or other user fee shall not be determinative for said building or place to be deemed a recreational facility for public use. The terms active recreation and passive recreation shall be interpreted broadly and are defined as follows:
a. Active Recreation:
(1) Generally sports related and may be defined as activities that combine one or more of the following features:
b. Passive Recreation:
63. "Release" means as defined in 40 C.F.R. § 300.5, incorporated above at § 1.3(A) of this Part, for purposes of the Remediation Regulations.
a. A release shall exclude any of the following:
68. "Residential activity" means any activity related to a
70. "Responsible party" or "parties" means
a. Any or all of the following Persons:
b. The following parties are not Responsible Parties and shall not be held liable for costs or damages associated with a Release of Hazardous Materials:
(3) Persons who are not Operators and who act solely as custodial receivers or who can establish by a preponderance of evidence that they are an innocent land Owner and the Release or threat of Release were caused solely by an act or omission of a third party other than an employer or agent of the defendant, or whose act or omission occurs in connection with a contractual relationship, existing directly or indirectly, with the defendant if the defendant establishes:
c. For the purposes of this definition, a secured lender is not deemed an Owner or an Operator if in order to protect its security interest the secured lender accepts title to a Contaminated-Site through foreclosure, or by accepting the deed to the Contaminated-Site in lieu of foreclosure, and meeting the following requirements:
No Person shall release any Hazardous Material in any manner which may impact the classification or uses of the land, ground water, or Surface Water without complying with all applicable Rules and Regulations.
B. Sites listed on the National Priorities List shall comply with the requirements of the National Contingency Plan, 40 C.F.R. § 300, incorporated above at § 1.3(A) of this Part. Said sites shall also comply with these regulations where applicable or relevant and appropriate, or more stringent than EPA requirements, including, but not limited to, the requirements of § 1.9 of this Part.
Any action taken pursuant to the requirements of these regulations shall be done in compliance with all applicable environmental statutes and regulations. Nothing in these regulations shall be construed to limit the authority of the Department to act pursuant to other existing statutes and regulations.
A. For purposes of enforcement of these regulations, the Director may:
4. Inspect and copy records, reports, information, or test results kept or maintained at any place, on any vessel or transport vehicle, that the Director has reason to believe is associated with a Release of Hazardous Material.
C. Reportable Concentrations for Soil
2. Notification of a Release for soil is not required provided that all of the following site conditions are met:
D. Reportable Concentrations for Groundwater
1. Responsible Parties that have had a Release which has impacted or threatens to impact groundwater shall notify the Department when:
c. A Responsible Party has reasonable cause to believe that a discharge or Release has occurred which may result in an exceedance of any appropriate groundwater objective.
A. For any Release of Hazardous Materials which triggers notification pursuant to § 1.6.1 of this Part the written notification shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, all of the following information (a form is on the Department's Office of Land Revitalization and Sustainable Materials Management Site Remediation web page at http://www.dem.ri.gov/pubs/forms/hwreleas.pdf which may be used as the notification submittal for all Releases except for those Releases posing an Imminent Hazard):
7. Any other relevant information relating to the potential for environmental impacts and other factors evaluated in determining whether or not the Release presents an Imminent Hazard, including but not limited to:
C. No Emergency or Short-Term Response Action undertaken by the Responsible Party may be conducted in a manner which increases the potential for harm, either short-term or long-term, to human health or the environment.
All Emergency or Short-Term Response Actions which include the treatment of Hazardous Material or of substances contaminated by a Release of Hazardous Material shall be approved by the Director prior to initiation.
B. The duration of any portion of an approved Emergency or Short-Term Response Action involving Hazardous Waste treatment is limited to less than twenty-four (24) hours from the time of discovery of the Release.
D. Emergency Permits may be granted orally with a written permit subsequently issued.
Emergency Permits shall not exceed ninety (90) days in duration.
B. The notice shall contain, at a minimum, the following information:
D. For Emergency or Short-Term Response Actions approved under § 1.7 of this Part, compliance with § 1.7.6 of this Part shall constitute full Public Involvement, except for locations identified in § 1.8.7(A)(3) of this Part. Locations specifically identified in § 1.8.7(A)(3) of this Part shall also meet the additional Public Involvement requirements of § 1.8.7 of this Part.
The Director may order, via an Immediate Compliance Order or Order to Cease and Desist, the immediate cessation of any Emergency or Short-Term Response Action without process if the Director has reason to believe that the termination of that response action is necessary to protect human health or the environment. An order may also be issued if the Director finds that the Responsible Party has not complied with the terms and conditions of an Emergency Permit, or if the known or suspected Imminent Hazard has been removed.
In all cases where an Emergency or Short-Term Response Action is initiated, the Responsible Party shall, throughout the implementation of that action, monitor and evaluate the performance, effectiveness and completeness of the action in abating, preventing or eliminating contamination and, more specifically, the Imminent Hazard. The Director may require the submittal of progress reports on a specified schedule throughout the Emergency or Short-Term Response Action.
B. The Emergency or Short-Term Response Report shall contain, where applicable, at least the following information:
8. In cases where an Emergency Permit was issued, evidence that Public Notice was issued pursuant to the requirements of § 1.7.6 of this Part.
A. The Emergency or Short-Term Response Report and all associated progress reports shall include the following statements signed by an authorized representative of the party specified:
2. A statement signed by the Responsible Party responsible for the submittal of the Emergency or Short-Term Response Report certifying that the report is a complete and accurate representation of the circumstances known about the Release and the subsequent response activities to the best of their knowledge.
F. The Performing Party shall post signs at all Contaminated-Sites located in Environmental Justice Focus Areas to inform local residents about the project. When deemed appropriate signs will be required to be posted in a language (or languages) other than English. Signs shall be:
5. Include the name/phone number/address of an individual from whom any interested person may obtain information about the site or remediation and any web site address containing such information.
Upon formal written notification from the Department that a Site Investigation is necessary, the Performing Party may develop, and submit to the Department for review, comment, guidance and approval, a work plan detailing the specific objectives of the Site Investigation, the data that is necessary to meet those objectives, and the methods which will be used to collect that data. Unless otherwise specified by the Director, submittal of the Site Investigation Work Plan is voluntary. If the Performing Party elects to submit a Site Investigation Work Plan to the Department, that work plan shall be submitted in both hard copy and electronic format (as specified by the Department).
A. The Site Investigation Report shall contain the following information on the Contaminated-Site where the spill or Release occurred, as appropriate:
8. A site plan, drawn to scale, showing the locations of all buildings, activities and structures on the Contaminated-Site including, but not limited to:
9. A general characterization of the property surrounding the area affected by the Release including, but not limited to:
11. A description of the contamination resulting from the Release including, but not limited to:
14. A listing and evaluation of the site-specific hydrogeological properties that could influence the migration of Hazardous Substances throughout and away from the Contaminated-Site, including but not limited to, where appropriate:
24. Any other site-specific factor that the Director has reason to believe is necessary to make an accurate decision as to the appropriate Remedial Action to be taken at the Contaminated-Site.
B. All alternatives shall be supported by relevant data contained in the Site Investigation Report and consistent with the current and reasonably foreseeable land usage, and documentation of the following:
4. The ability of the Performing Party to perform the preferred remedial alternative.
A. The Site Investigation Report and all associated progress reports shall include the following statements signed by an authorized representative of the party specified:
2. A statement signed by the Performing Party responsible for the submittal of the Site Investigation Report certifying that the report is a complete and accurate representation of the Contaminated-Site and the Release and contains all known facts surrounding the Release to the best of their knowledge.
Unless otherwise specified by the Director, the Performing Party shall during the implementation of the Site Investigation, submit periodic progress reports in both hard copy and electronic format (as specified by the Department) on the status of the investigation and interim reports on any milestones achieved in the project.
A. Public Notice: Public Notice is required at two (2) points during the Site Investigation.
3. Whenever a site that is known to be contaminated or is suspected of being contaminated based upon its past use is considered for possible reuse as the location of a School, Child-Care Facility, or as a Recreational Facility for Public Use that supports existing or proposed Active Recreation, the person proposing such reuse shall, prior to the establishment of a final scope of investigation for the site and after the completion of All Appropriate Inquiries, hold a public meeting for the purposes of obtaining information about conditions at the site and the environmental history at the site that may be useful in establishing the scope of the investigation of the site and/or establishing the objectives for the environmental clean-up of the site. The public meeting shall be held in the city or town in which the site is located; public notice shall be given of the meeting at least ten (10) business days prior to the meeting; public notice of the meeting shall be provided to all abutting property owners, tenants, easement holders and the municipality; the public meeting shall be conducted in a manner consistent with the requirements in § 1.8.7(C) of this Part regarding Community Meetings; and following the meeting, the record of the meeting shall be open for a period of not less than ten (10) and not more than twenty (20) business days for the receipt of public comment. The results of All Appropriate Inquiries, analysis and the public meeting, including the comment period, shall be documented in a written report submitted to the Department in both hard copy and electronic format (as specified by the Department) within 72 hours of the meeting.
a. No work (remediation or construction), shall be permitted at the property until the public meeting and comment period regarding the site's proposed reuse has closed except where the Director determines that such work is necessary to mitigate or prevent:
C. Community Meetings
1. Whenever requested by twenty-five (25) persons, or by a governmental subdivision or agency, or by an association having not less than twenty-five (25) members, who are either located near a Contaminated-Site or are potential users of the Contaminated-Site after redevelopment, an initial community meeting will be held. The request for said community meeting shall be submitted in writing to the Performing Party and the Department. The purpose of the meeting is to:
3. A written summary of all public meetings must be submitted to the Department in both hard copy and electronic format (as specified by the Department) by the Performing Party within 72 hours of the meeting. At a minimum, the written meeting summary must:
D. Information Repositories
1. When the Department receives a request to make information more available in the community, the Department may require the Performing Party to establish an informational repository in the community near the Contaminated-Site in accordance with the following requirements:
The Performing Party shall develop, and submit to the Department for review and approval in both hard copy and electronic format (as specified by the Department), a site-specific public involvement plan for any Contaminated-Site for which the Department has received a Notification of Release and for which a minimum of twenty-five (25) residents, local officials or other interested parties have requested, in writing and in the form of a petition, that a formal process be set up for their participation in cleanup planning. The Public Involvement Plan shall address all relevant and applicable requirements of §§ 1.8.7(A) through (D) of this Part.
B. All sources of information and assumptions presented in the Site Investigation Report and any other report incorporated therein shall be properly referenced and documented.
B. The Director's decision regarding the appropriateness of the site remedy shall be based upon the information contained within the decision record for the Contaminated-Site. The decision record shall include the following:
A. The appropriate remedial objectives for all Hazardous Substances in all impacted media at a Contaminated-Site shall be consistent with this rule so as to manage the actual or potential risks to human health and the environment by ensuring that the following requirements are met:
B. Specific requirements for the development and application of concentration-based soil and groundwater objectives are presented throughout the remainder of this section. Concentration-based soil and groundwater objectives may consider background conditions.
B. General Requirements for Soil Objectives:
1. General Requirements for Direct Exposure Criteria:
c. The industrial/commercial direct exposure criterion may be applied to a depth of at least 2 feet below ground surface for each Hazardous Substance in soil if all of the following conditions are met:
2. General Requirements for Leachability Criteria:
a. With respect to any Hazardous Substance in soil at a Contaminated-Site, the Director may approve a leachability criterion provided it is demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Director that the application of such leachability criterion at the Contaminated-Site is protective of the following:
c. The GB leachability criterion may be applied throughout the vadose zone for each substance in soil if both of the following conditions are met:
3. Method Requirements for Soil Objectives:
b. If no Method 1 Soil Objective has been promulgated for one or more Hazardous Substances in soil at a Contaminated-Site, then the following options are available:
c. If a Method 1 Soil Objective has been promulgated for one or more Hazardous Substances in soil at a Contaminated-Site, then the following options are available:
4. Soil Objectives for Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPH):
b. Accordingly, the Department shall require that soil objectives for TPH as described in this Rule be applied to a Contaminated-Site in conjunction with soil objectives for the Hazardous Substances established pursuant to this section. The Director shall approve the application of the functional equivalent of a direct exposure criterion and leachability criterion for TPH provided that the application of the criteria is consistent with §§ 1.9.1 and 1.9.2(A) of this Part. The Performing Party shall apply the soil objectives for TPH described below.
(1) The following shall be considered the Method 1 Direct Exposure Criteria for TPH, subject to the provided requirements:
(2) The following shall be considered the Method 1 Leachability Criteria for TPH, subject to the provided requirements:
C. Method 1 Soil Objectives:
1. Unless otherwise prohibited by the Director, the Method 1 Soil Objectives specified in Tables 1 and 2, §§ 1.9.2(C)(2) and (3) of this Part may be applied to a Contaminated-Site provided that the conditions set forth in §§ 1.9.1 and 1.9.2(A) of this Part are met.
b. Method 1 Leachability Criteria:
2. Table 1
| DIRECT EXPOSURE CRITERIA | ||
| Substance | Residential(mg/kg) | Industrial/Commercial(mg/kg) |
| Volatile Organics | ||
| Acetone | 7,800 | 10,000 |
| Benzene | 2.5 | 200 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 10 | 92 |
| Bromoform | 81 | 720 |
| Bromomethane | 0.8 | 2900 |
| Carbon tetrachloride | 1.5 | 44 |
| Chlorobenzene | 210 | 10,000 |
| Chloroform | 1.2 | 940 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 7.6 | 68 |
| 1,2- Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) | 0.5 | 4.1 |
| 1,1-Dichloroethane | 920 | 10,000 |
| 1,2-Dichloroethane | 0.9 | 63 |
| 1,1-Dichloroethene | 0.2 | 9.5 |
| cis-1,2-Dichloroethene | 630 | 10,000 |
| Trans-1,2-Dichloroethene | 1,100 | 10,000 |
| 1,2-Dichloropropane | 1.9 | 84 |
| Ethylbenzene | 71 | 10,000 |
| Ethylene dibromide (EDB) | 0.01 | 0.07 |
| Isopropyl benzene | 27 | 10,000 |
| Methyl ethyl ketone | 10,000 | 10,000 |
| Methyl isobutyl ketone | 1200 | 10,000 |
| Methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE) | 390 | 10,000 |
| Methylene chloride | 45 | 760 |
| Styrene | 13 | 190 |
| 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane | 2.2 | 220 |
| 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane | 1.3 | 29 |
| Tetrachloroethene | 12 | 110 |
| Toluene | 190 | 10,000 |
| 1,1,1-Trichloroethane | 540 | 10,000 |
| 1,1,2-Trichloroethane | 3.6 | 100 |
| Trichloroethene | 13 | 520 |
| Vinyl chloride | 0.02 | 3.0 |
| Xylenes (Total) | 110 | 10,000 |
| Semivolatiles | ||
| Acenaphthene | 43 | 10,000 |
| Acenaphthylene | 23 | 10,000 |
| Anthracene | 35 | 10,000 |
| Benzo(a)anthracene | 0.9 | 7.8 |
| Benzo(a)pyrenea | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Benzo(b)fluoranthene | 0.9 | 7.8 |
| Benzo(g,h,i)perylene | 0.8 | 10,000 |
| Benzo(k)fluoranthene | 0.9 | 78 |
| 1,1-Biphenyl | 0.8 | 10,000 |
| Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate | 46 | 410 |
| Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether | 0.6 | 5.2 |
| Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether | 9.1 | 82 |
| 4-Chloroaniline (p-) | 310 | 8200 |
| 2-Chlorophenol | 50 | 10,000 |
| Chrysene | 0.4 | 780 |
| Dibenzo(a,h)anthracenea | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| 1,2-Dichlorobenzene (o-DCB) | 510 | 10,000 |
| 1,3-Dichlorobenzene (m-DCB) | 430 | 10,000 |
| 1,4-Dichlorobenzene (p-DCB) | 27 | 240 |
| 3,3-Dichlorobenzidine | 1.4 | 13 |
| 2,4-Dichlorophenol | 30 | 6,100 |
| 2,4-Dimethyl phenol | 1,400 | 10,000 |
| Diethyl phthalate | 340 | 10,000 |
| Dimethyl phthalate | 1,900 | 10,000 |
| 2,4-Dinitrophenol | 160 | 4,100 |
| 2,4-Dinitrotoluene | 0.9 | 8.4 |
| Fluoranthene | 20 | 10,000 |
| Fluorene | 28 | 10,000 |
| Hexachlorobenzene | 0.4 | 3.6 |
| Hexachlorobutadiene | 8.2 | 73 |
| Hexachloroethane | 46 | 410 |
| Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene | 0.9 | 7.8 |
| 2-Methyl naphthalene | 123 | 10,000 |
| Naphthalene | 54 | 10,000 |
| Pentachlorophenol | 5.3 | 48 |
| Phenanthrene | 40 | 10,000 |
| Phenol | 6,000 | 10,000 |
| Pyrene | 13 | 10,000 |
| 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene | 96 | 10,000 |
| 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol | 330 | 10,000 |
| 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol | 58 | 520 |
| Pesticides/PCBs | ||
| Chlordane | 0.5 | 4.4 |
| Dieldrin | 0.04 | 0.4 |
| Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)b | 10 | 10 |
| Inorganics | ||
| Antimony | 10 | 820 |
| Arsenicc | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| Barium | 5,500 | 10,000 |
| Berylliumc | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Cadmium | 39 | 1,000 |
| Chromium III (Trivalent) | 1,400 | 10,000 |
| Chromium VI (Hexavalent) | 390 | 10,000 |
| Copper | 3,100 | 10,000 |
| Cyanide | 200 | 10,000 |
| Leadd | 150 | 500 |
| Manganese | 390 | 10,000 |
| Mercury | 23 | 610 |
| Nickel | 1,000 | 10,000 |
| Selenium | 390 | 10,000 |
| Silver | 200 | 10,000 |
| Thallium | 5.5 | 140 |
| Vanadium | 550 | 10,000 |
| Zinc | 6,000 | 10,000 |
| aEstimated quantitation limits. | ||
| bDirect Exposure Criteria for PCBs consistent with the Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA) | ||
| cBackground Levels of Priority Pollutant Metals In Rhode Island Soils, T. O'Connor, RIDEM – Standard set @ statistical 95% upper confidence limit of natural background data across State. For arsenic, see also § 1.13 of this Part. | ||
| dDirect Exposure Criteria for Lead consistent with the Rhode Island Department of Health Lead Poisoning Prevention regulations, 216-RICR-50-15-3 |
3.Table 2
| LEACHABILITY CRITERIA | ||
| Substance | GALeachability(mg/kg except as otherwise noted) | GBLeachability(mg/kg) |
| Volatile Organics | ||
| Benzene | 0.2 | 4.3 |
| Carbon tetrachloride | 0.4 | 5.0 |
| Chlorobenzene | 3.2 | 100 |
| 1,2-Dichloroethane | 0.1 | 2.3 |
| 1,1-Dichloroethene | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| cis-1,2-Dichloroethene | 1.7 | 60 |
| Trans-1,2-Dichloroethene | 3.3 | 92 |
| 1,2-Dichloropropane | 0.1 | 70 |
| Ethylbenzene | 27 | 62 |
| Ethylene dibromide (EDB) | 5E-04 | - |
| Methyl–tertiary-butyl-ether (MTBE) | 0.9 | 100 |
| Styrene | 2.9 | 64 |
| Tetrachloroethene | 0.1 | 4.2 |
| Toluene | 32 | 54 |
| 1,1,1-Trichloroethane | 11 | 160 |
| 1,1,2-Trichloroethane | 0.1 | - |
| Trichloroethene | 0.2 | 20 |
| Vinyl chloride | 0.3 | - |
| Xylenes | 540 | - |
| Semivolatiles | ||
| Benzo(a)pyrene | 240 | - |
| Dichlorobenzene (all isomers) | 41 | - |
| Diethylhexyl phthalate | 120 | - |
| Napthalene | 0.8 | - |
| Pentachlorophenol | 7.1 | - |
| 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene | 140 | - |
| Pesticides/PCBs | ||
| Chlordane | 1.4 | - |
| Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)a | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Inorganics | ||
| Antimony (TCLP/SPLP) | 0.05 | - |
| Barium (TCLP/SPLP) | 23 | |
| Beryllium (TCLP/SPLP) | 0.03 | |
| Cadmium (TCLP/SPLP) | 0.03 | - |
| Chromium (TCLP/SPLP) | 1.1 | - |
| Cyanide (TCLP/SPLP) | 2.4 | - |
| Lead (TCLP/SPLP) | 0.04 | - |
| Mercury (TCLP/SPLP) | 0.02 | - |
| Nickel (TCLP/SPLP) | 1 | - |
| Selenium (TCLP/SPLP) | 0.6 | - |
| Thallium (TCLP/SPLP) | 0.005 | - |
| "-"No Method 1 GB Leachability Criteria promulgated | ||
| aLeachability criteria for PCBs consistent with the Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA) |
D. Method 2 Soil Objectives
3. Method 2 Soil Objectives shall be consistent with §§ 1.9.1, and 1.9.2(B) of this Part and shall meet all of the following conditions in §§ 1.9.2(D)(3)(a) through (d) of this Part listed below:
b. Method 2 Soil Objectives shall be developed for Hazardous Substances on the basis of the following assumptions and procedures:
(6) Specifically, Method 2 Leachability Criteria shall be determined by performing the following:
d. The development of Method 2 Soil Objectives shall be based upon information which is scientifically justified and completely documented with site data collected from the Contaminated-Site. At a minimum, Method 2 Soil Objective development shall be documented with sufficient information to allow the Director to evaluate the following factors:
(4) Background levels for the applicable Hazardous Substances, if determined.
D. General Requirements for Groundwater Objectives:
1. General Requirements for GA Groundwater Objectives:
2. General Requirements for GB Groundwater Objectives:
b. The GB Groundwater Objectives shall be applied to the restoration of groundwater in GB Areas under the control of the Performing Party, provided that the Department determines that the following conditions apply to the contaminated groundwater:
E. Method Requirements for Groundwater Objectives:
1. Method Requirements for GA Groundwater Objectives
2. Method Requirements for GB Groundwater Objectives:
b. The following options are also available to the Performing Party with respect to GB Groundwater Objective development
F. Method 1 Groundwater Objectives:
4. Table 3: GA Groundwater Objectives
| GA Groundwater Objectives | |
| Substance | GA Groundwater Objective (mg/l) |
| Volatile Organics | |
| Benzene | 0.005 |
| Carbon tetrachloride | 0.005 |
| Chlorobenzene | 0.1 |
| 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) | 0.0002 |
| 1,2-Dichloroethane | 0.005 |
| 1,1-Dichloroethene | 0.007 |
| cis-1,2-Dichlorothene | 0.07 |
| trans-1,2-Dichloroethene | 0.1 |
| 1,2-Dichloropropane | 0.005 |
| Ethylbenzene | 0.7 |
| Ethylene dibromide (EDB) | 0.00005 |
| Methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE) | 0.04 |
| Methylene chloride | 0.005 |
| Styrene | 0.1 |
| Tetrachloroethene | 0.005 |
| Toluene | 1 |
| 1,1,1-Trichloroethane | 0.2 |
| 1,1,2-Trichloroethane | 0.005 |
| Trichloroethene (TCE) | 0.005 |
| Trihalomethanes (Total) | 0.08 |
| Vinyl chloride | 0.002 |
| Xylenes (Total) | 10 |
| Semivolatiles | |
| Benzo(a)pyrene | 0.0002 |
| o-Dichlorobenzene | 0.6 |
| m-Dichlorobenzene | 0.6 |
| p-Dichlorobenzene | 0.075 |
| Diethylhexyl phthalate | 0.006 |
| Hexachlorobenzene | 0.001 |
| Naphthalene | 0.10 |
| Pentachlorophenol | 0.001 |
| 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene | 0.07 |
| Pesticides/PCBs | |
| Chlordane | 0.002 |
| Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) | 0.0005 |
| Inorganics | |
| Antimony | 0.006 |
| Arsenic | 0.01 |
| Barium | 2 |
| Beryllium | 0.004 |
| Cadmium | 0.005 |
| Chromium (Total) | 0.1 |
| Cyanide | 0.2 |
| Lead | 0.015 |
| Mercury | 0.002 |
| Nickel | 0.1 |
| Selenium | 0.05 |
| Thallium | 0.002 |
5. Table 4: GB Groundwater Objectives
| GB Groundwater Objectives | |
| Substance | GB Groundwater Objective (mg/l) |
| Benzene | 0.14 |
| Carbon Tetrachloride | 0.07 |
| Chlorobenzene | 3.2 |
| 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) | 0.002 |
| 1,2-Dichloroethane | 0.11 |
| 1,1-Dichloroethene | 0.007 |
| cis-1,2-Dichloroethene | 2.4 |
| trans-1,2-Dichloroethene | 2.8 |
| 1,2-Dichloropropane | 3.0 |
| Ethylbenzene | 1.6 |
| Styrene | 2.2 |
| Methyl Tertiary-Butyl Ether (MTBE) | 5.0 |
| Tetrachloroethene | 0.15 |
| Toluene | 1.7 |
| 1,1,1-Trichloroethane | 3.1 |
| Trichloroethene | 0.54 |
| Vinyl Chloride | 0.002 |
G. Method 2 GB Groundwater Objectives:
3. Method 2 GB Groundwater Objectives shall be consistent with §§ 1.9.1 and 1.9.3(D) of this Part and shall meet all of the following conditions in §§ 1.9.3(G)(3)(a) through (d) of this Part listed below.
a. The Method 2 GB Groundwater Objective shall be based, at a minimum, on the following:
d. Method 2 GB Groundwater Objectives shall be scientifically justified and sufficiently documented to demonstrate that the developed objectives are protective against migration of Hazardous Substances into indoor air or any other site-specific considerations. At a minimum, Method 2 GB Groundwater Objective development shall be documented with sufficient information to allow the Director to evaluate the following:
(4) Background levels for the applicable Hazardous Substances, if determined.
F. In addition, in reviewing the site-specific Method 3 Remedial Objectives derived pursuant to this rule, the Director may evaluate the following factors:
H. If any Method 3 Remedial Objective results in an exceedance of any Upper Concentration Limit as described in § 1.9.7 of this Part, then the Department reserves the right to require that the Method 3 Remedial Objective be adjusted downward to a concentration which prevents the exceedance.
A. Based on information provided in the Notification, Site Investigation or any other source, if a Release of Hazardous Materials has the potential to adversely impact an Environmentally Sensitive Area, then the Director may require the following, including but not limited to:
2. An Ecological Risk Assessment Report, submitted in both hard copy and electronic format (as specified by the Department), which proposes remedial objectives demonstrated to mitigate any risks to the impacted media identified in the Ecological Risk Assessment. Soil objectives which result from the Ecological Risk Assessment Report shall be considered Method 3 Soil Objectives.
D. For purposes of estimating background concentrations, values below the method detection limit shall be assigned a value equal to one-half of the method detection limit. Measurements above the method detection limit, but below the practical quantitation limit shall be assigned a value equal to the method detection limit. The Department may approve the use of alternate statistical procedures for handling data below the method detection limit or practical quantitation limit.
B. All remedial objectives shall address the following concentrations or conditions:
5. Table 5: Upper Concentration Limits for GB Groundwater
| Upper Concentration Limits for GB Groundwater | |
| Substance | GB Groundwater UCL (mg/l) |
| Benzene | 18 |
| Chlorobenzene | 56 |
| 1,2-Dichloroethane | 670 |
| 1,1-Dichloroethene | 23 |
| cis-1,2-Dichloroethene | 69 |
| trans-1,2-Dichloroethene | 79 |
| 1,2-Dichloropropane | 140 |
| Ethylbenzene | 16 |
| Styrene | 50 |
| Toluene | 21 |
| 1,1,1-Trichloroethane | 68 |
| Trichloroethene | 87 |
A. Points of Compliance for Soils:
3. The Performing Party shall take affirmative steps to manage the Contaminated-Site such that the Contaminated-Site does not impact property which is not within the control of Performing Party, by ensuring that, at a minimum, the following requirements are met:
c. The Performing Party shall provide formal written documentation to the Department demonstrating the Performing Party's control over the full areal extent of the Method 1 Residential Direct Exposure Criterion exceedance including, but not limited to the following, as appropriate:
B. Points of Compliance for Groundwater:
2. Points of Compliance with the GB Groundwater Objectives:
a. Points of compliance with GB Groundwater Objectives shall be established at locations which provide ample warning prior to groundwater flow into, under and around structures. Specifically:
b. The Performing Party shall take affirmative steps to eliminate migration of any Hazardous Substance in groundwater to a GB area which is not under the control of the Performing Party, by ensuring that, at a minimum, the following requirements are met:
c. The Performing Party shall provide formal written documentation to the Department demonstrating the Performing Party's control over the full areal extent of the Method 1 GB Groundwater Objective exceedance including, but not limited to the following, as appropriate:
d. Points of compliance for groundwater based on impacts to Environmentally Sensitive Areas shall be established throughout the Contaminated-Site or as determined in the ecological risk assessment performed in accordance with § 1.9.5 of this Part (Ecological Protection).
B. The Owner(s) of the Contaminated-Site shall document their concurrence with this restriction by recording an Environmental Land Usage Restriction, and filing it with the Department. The standard format for this agreement can be found on the Department’s Office of Land Revitalization and Sustainable Materials Management Site Remediation web page at http://www.dem.ri.gov/programs/wastemanagement/site-remediation/#process The executed Environmental Land Usage Restriction shall run with the land, as recorded on the title(s) to the property (or properties) on which the Contaminated-Site is situated, and shall be binding on all Owners, successors and/or assigns. This notice, and the associated restrictions and controls shall be subject to approval by the Director and shall include provisions to accomplish all of the following:
C. A copy of the final, recorded notice shall be submitted to the Department within fifteen (15) days of the date that it is entered into the Land Evidence Records.
A. A Contaminated-Site is considered by the Director to be compliant with the Remediation Regulations when it is demonstrated that the appropriate remedial objectives have been met at all Source Areas within the Contaminated-Site. This rule specifies procedures for determining compliance with the appropriate soil objectives and groundwater objectives applied to the Contaminated-Site. Compliance procedures with all other remedial objectives shall be determined on a site-specific basis. § 1.13 of this Part specifies requirements specific to arsenic in soil.
1. Compliance with the Soil Objectives:
a. All Performing Parties have, unless otherwise specified by the Director, two (2) alternatives for determining compliance with soil objectives. These alternatives are:
(2) A Performing Party may propose in the Remedial Action Work Plan to verify compliance by geometrically gridding the former Source Area and taking not less than twenty compliance samples for laboratory analysis at the intersecting points of the grid. If a Performing Party utilizes this criteria they may also propose a statistical analysis methodology for determining compliance. The Department reserves the right to take or require additional compliance samples as warranted, and the statistical evaluation shall account for all samples taken. The methodology shall meet the following criteria:
Compliance with the groundwater objectives shall be determined through laboratory analysis of representative samples used to characterize the distribution and concentration of Hazardous Substances migrating from the Contaminated-Site. The analytical results of all samples taken using this approach shall be below the appropriate groundwater objective in order for the Contaminated-Site to be considered compliant with these Regulations.
A. All remedial objectives shall be approved by the Department at one of two points in the site management process. These are:
C. A Performing Party shall complete a Remedial Action work plan in accordance with § 1.10 of this Part, as required by the Director, and submit said report for review and approval.
A. The Remedial Action Work Plan shall present a Remedial Action which addresses remedial objectives for all impacted media at the Contaminated-Site in a manner consistent with § 1.9 of this Part (Risk Management), including, as appropriate, the following:
D. The Performing Party shall estimate the time period necessary to meet all appropriate remedial objectives for groundwater, surface water, sediment, soil and air. In every case, a Remedial Action should be designed, whenever practicable, as a permanent solution to meet the remedial objectives for Hazardous Substances in all affected media in the shortest time frame feasible.
A. The Remedial Action Work Plan shall clearly explain the proposed remedy and justify the ability of the remedy to meet the remedial objectives. For remedies that include on-site treatment and/or containment of contaminated media, the Remedial Action Work Plan shall include the best management practices proposed to:
4. Minimize and manage surface runoff from the area including during and after the Remedial Action. The plan shall identify all locations of existing and/or proposed infiltration systems.
The Remedial Action Work Plan shall clearly explain how impacted groundwater will be remediated. Remediation of groundwater shall meet the requirements of the Department’s Groundwater Quality Rules, Part 150-05-3 of this Title as well as the requirements of § 1.9 of this Part. Any Remedial Action Work Plan which includes the proposal of a discharge zone and/or a residual zone shall submit the required proposals and meet the required demonstrations of the Department’s Groundwater Quality Rules, Part 150-05-3 of this Title, respectively.
The Director may require the Performing Party to include a proposed Limited Design Investigation in the Remedial Action Work Plan in order to gather information necessary for the design and construction of a specific remedy. The Performing Party may also propose to include a Limited Design Investigation in the Remedial Action Work Plan in order to gather information necessary for the design and construction of a specific remedy. Activities proposed as part of this Limited Design Investigation shall meet the requirements of § 1.8 of this Part.
The Remedial Action Work Plan shall clearly indicate the locations, for each impacted medium where Hazardous Substances will be measured in order to determine if the remedial objectives have been met. These points will be designated Points of Compliance. Remedial Actions will be initially focused on meeting remedial objectives set for the Contaminated-Site, and compliance shall be measured throughout that Contaminated-Site. The Points of Compliance shall be managed in a manner consistent with § 1.9.8 of this Part. § 1.13 of this Part specifies requirements unique to arsenic in soil.
The Remedial Action Work Plan shall include a proposed schedule for implementing the proposed Remedial Action.
The Performing Party shall include the names, addresses and telephone numbers of the contact Persons of any contractors or consultants hired to implement or operate the remedy proposed in the Remedial Action Work Plan. The responsibilities of each consultant and/or contractor shall be clearly explained. If the actual consultant or contractor has not been determined at the time of application, the expected duties of each company shall be explained and the Department shall be notified as soon as the specific companies are selected.
The Remedial Action Work Plan shall include a site plan. The site plan submitted as part of the Site Investigation, conducted pursuant to § 1.8.3(A)(6) of this Part, shall be amended to include any further information available to the Performing Party, and the locations of all proposed remedial units and monitoring points. The Points of Compliance shall also be clearly marked on the site plan.
A. The Remedial Action Work Plan shall include all design standards and technical specifications necessary for the design of the proposed remedy. Design standards and technical specifications will include, where appropriate:
5. These portions of the Remedial Action Work Plan shall be prepared under the supervision of a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of Rhode Island, and stamped by that engineer prior to submittal.
The Remedial Action Work Plan shall explain any pre-operational staging or construction requirements which shall be completed prior to the installation and operation of the proposed Remedial Actions. These pre-operational staging or construction activities may include the installation of pads, liners, or berms; any intrusive activities; or any Contaminated-Site contouring or grading which may be necessary. The Set-Up Plan shall show how any construction or staging activities will be done in a manner in compliance with any applicable laws, Rules and Regulations.
The Remedial Action Work Plan shall include specific plans for the management and disposal of any products or by-products from the proposed Remedial Action. This section shall also identify what regulations shall be complied with during, and what permits or approvals shall be obtained prior to, any planned effluent disposal actions.
A. The Remedial Action Work Plan shall include a Contingency Plan which clearly explains the procedures to be followed and the Persons to be notified in the event of an unexpected incident involving Hazardous Materials at the Contaminated-Site. The Contingency Plan shall include, at a minimum, the following information:
B. The Contingency Plan shall be available at the Contaminated-Site at all times during the implementation and operation of the Remedial Action.
A. The Remedial Action Work Plan shall include a proposed Operating Log which clearly and completely records activities on-site and shows how the implementation and operation of the Remedial Action is progressing. This Operating Log shall include, at a minimum, the following information:
D. The Operating Log shall be kept for at least three (3) years following completion of the Remedial Action.
The Remedial Action Work Plan shall include a description of the security procedures proposed to prevent unknowing access to the Contaminated-Site or key features identified at the Contaminated-Site. This section shall include descriptions of any natural boundaries or any existing or proposed walls or fences surrounding the Contaminated-Site. Means to control entry to the Contaminated-Site or key features identified at the Contaminated-Site shall also be clearly explained.
The Remedial Action Work Plan shall contain a section outlining the procedures required to shut-down and close the remedial units. This section shall also outline any proposed post-closure activities, including monitoring and/or institutional controls restricting future land usage at the Contaminated-Site. All post-closure groundwater monitoring shall be done in accordance with a program meeting the requirements of the Department’s Groundwater Quality Rules, Part 150-05-3 of this Title.
The Remedial Action Work Plan shall indicate a methodology for providing notice to the general community, and contain specific plans and implementation procedures for land usage restrictions, restrictions on the use of groundwater on the Contaminated-Site, and institutional controls in accordance with § 1.9.9 of this Part for all Remedial Actions that are not determined by the Director to provide a permanent solution.
The Remedial Action Work Plan shall include a section outlining the procedures to be employed in order to demonstrate that the remedial objectives for the Contaminated-Site have been met. Such compliance determination shall be proposed in a manner consistent with § 1.9.10 of this Part.
A. The Remedial Action Work Plan and all associated progress reports shall include the following statements signed by an authorized representative of the party specified:
D. The Director may issue conditions to the Remedial Action Approval when the Director finds that those conditions are necessary to protect human health and the environment. Conditions may include, but not necessarily be limited to, requirements that the Performing Party provide financial assurances that the Remedial Action will continue.
The application fee for Remedial Action Approvals shall be one thousand ($1,000.00) dollars.
B. Remedial Action Approvals shall be voidable whenever there is a change in Ownership of the Contaminated-Site or a change in Operator of the Remedial Action.
C. The Director may require a new Remedial Action Work Plan in cases where the Director determines that the proposed modifications substantially alter any process or the results of the remedy.
These rules apply to all Performing Parties conducting any Remedial Action activities. A Performing Party shall complete Remedial Action, as required by the Director.
The Performing Party shall operate and maintain all portions, activities and/or operations in accordance with all the terms and conditions of its Remedial Action Approval, and all other applicable laws and regulations. The Department shall be notified in writing immediately if the Performing Party suspects or has reason to believe that any of the remedial objectives will not be met.
The Performing Party shall maintain an operating log as specified in § 1.10.14 of this Part or as otherwise specified by the Director in the Remedial Action Approval.
The Performing Party shall maintain a Personnel training program as specified in the Remedial Action Approval.
C. After completion of the Remedial Action, the results of all post-closure monitoring shall be submitted to the Director.
The Performing Party shall dispose of all treated effluent, products and/or byproducts from the proposed Remedial Action in the manner specified in the Remedial Action Approval and in compliance with any other applicable Rules and Regulations.
B. The Performing Party shall comply with the requirements of the Solid Waste Regulations, Subchapter 05 of this Chapter, as amended, for all solid waste shipments that they initiate.
The Performing Party shall maintain a Contaminated-Site security program equivalent to that specified in the Remedial Action Approval.
§ 1.13 of this Part shall only apply for the investigation and remediation of Source Area(s) involving only exceedances of the contaminant arsenic. All other exceedances and reportable contaminants of concern shall be addressed as required elsewhere in these regulations.
B. Plan and Approval Requirements
1. The Performing Party shall:
f. File a post-closure report in both hard copy and electronic format (as specified by the Department) with the Department. The report shall document:
(6) Details of institutional controls required (ELUR’s per § 1.13.6 of this Part if required).
B. Minimum Sampling Frequency: The following number of samples, at a minimum, shall be collected and analyzed for arsenic * to evaluate site conditions against the standard. Additional samples may be required based upon site-specific conditions.
| Site Size (acres) | Minimum of Site Samples Required |
| 1 acre or less | 8 samples minimum |
| 1 to 5 acres | 8 samples + 2 per additional acre over 1st acre |
| Greater than 5 acres | 16 samples + 1 per additional acre over 5th acre |
| *Given the statistically significant number of arsenic samples on file at the Department and evaluated to make the background determination for arsenic across the state, the requirements herein have been set to evaluate site-specific arsenic conditions against the standard, in lieu of the minimum 20 samples required per § 1.9.6 of this Part. |
A. Given the statistically significant number of arsenic samples evaluated by the Department across the state to determine natural background levels, the following procedures may be utilized for evaluating data collected in accordance with §§ 1.13.2(A) and (B) of this Part, to determine compliance with the 7.0 ppm Method 1 Direct Exposure Criterion for arsenic. Site arsenic conditions meeting all these requirements shall be deemed consistent with state background levels, and hence be non-jurisdictional for arsenic:
B. The laboratory method reporting limit shall be set at or below the standard (i.e. no greater than 7.0 ppm). Analytical results indicating “non-detect”, shall be evaluated at half the method reporting limit value when determining compliance with the standard above. A Performing Party may address exceedances of § 1.13.3(A)(1) of this Part, and then re-evaluate compliance with the standard.
B. Average Source Area arsenic levels between 7 and 15 ppm:
C. Source Area arsenic levels between 15 - 43 ppm:
D. Source Area arsenic levels above 43 ppm:
5. A site-specific remediation plan that has been reviewed and approved in writing by the Department. Capping alternatives proposed shall include a two-foot (2’) soil cap, or equivalent.
An Owner of a Contaminated-Site formerly jurisdictional under this Part for arsenic in soil (as the only contaminant of concern), may record on the property title a completed Release Form which can be found on the Department’s Office of Land Revitalization and Sustainable Materials Management Site Remediation Program web page to certify compliance with the current arsenic standard if they meet the requirements of § 1.13.3 of this Part, after forwarding said release form to the Department. This rule applies to sites where a previously approved remedy required the recording of an ELUR on the title to address arsenic in soil.
A. The following institutional control requirements shall be required to maintain capping and engineering controls, at Contaminated-Sites where jurisdictional arsenic is the only remaining contaminant of concern above standards.
1. Residential Properties with Four (4) Units or Less
2. Residential Properties with Five (5) units or more, and Recreational Properties
3. Industrial/Commercial Properties
An applicant may apply to the Director for a variance from or extension to any of these Rules and Regulations. The Director may require the collection and/or submission of information the Director deems necessary to fully evaluate such application.
The Director may upon request, issue an extension to any of the time tables and schedules required by these regulations in the form of a variance.
A. The Director may upon application, issue a variance under this rule when compliance with these Rules and Regulations would cause unreasonable or undue hardship to the applicant, provided the applicant can also present substantial evidence that the issuance of a variance will, at a minimum:
C. The Director reserves the right to limit the effective time period for a variance.
The Department, through its authorized agents, may present evidence to the Director relative to any application or request for an extension or variance.
Remonstrants who have been notified, as required by this rule, may present evidence to the Director relative to any application or request for an extension or variance it submits for approval or modification.
Administrative penalties may be assessed for any violation of these regulations and will be calculated based on the methodology specified in the Department of Environmental Management Rules and Regulations for Assessment of Administrative Penalties, Part 130-00-1 of this Title.
D. Inorganics - Compound Specific Applicable EPA Method
| Compound | EPA Method |
| Antimony | 6010, 6020, 7040, 7041, 7062 |
| Arsenic | 6010, 6020, 7060, 7061, 7062, 7063 |
| Beryllium | 6010, 6020, 7090, 7091 |
| Cadmium | 6010, 6020, 7130, 7131 |
| Chromium III | Subtract Chromium VI from Total Chromium |
| Chromium VI | 7195, 7196, 7197, 7198, 7199 |
| Total Chromium | 6010, 6020, 7190, 7191 |
| Copper | 6010, 6020, 7210, 7211 |
| Cyanide | 9010, 9012, 9013, 9213 |
| Lead | 6010, 6020, 7420, 7421 |
| Manganese | 6010, 6020, 7460, 7461 |
| Mercury | 7470, 7471, 7472 |
| Nickel | 6010, 6020, 7520, 7521 |
| Selenium | 6010, 7740, 7741, 7742 |
| Silver | 6010, 6020, 7760, 7761 |
| Zinc | 6010, 6020, 7950, 7951 |
A. Ingestion
1. Residential Activity
c. Acute Toxicity - Acute Ingestion Algorithm for Soil
A. Method 2 Residential Default Values
1. Industrial/Commercial Activity
b. Non-Carcinogenic Substances - Industrial/Commercial Ingestion Algorithm for Carcinogens in soil
| ORAL INGESTION | |||
| TERM | DESCRIPTION | UNITS | VALUE |
| C | Concentration of Contaminant in Soil | mg/kg | Calculated |
| CPSo | Carcinogenic Potency Slope Factor (Oral) | (mg/kg/d)-1 | Chemical Specific |
| RfDo | Reference Dose (Oral) | mg/kg/d | Chemical Specific |
| RISK | Target Cancer Risk Level | Dimensionless | 1 E-06 |
| HI | Hazard Index | Dimensionless | 1.0 |
| BWa | Body Weight (Adult) | kg | 70 |
| BWc | Body Weight (Child Ages 1-6) | kg | 15 |
| AT | Averaging Time (Carcinogens) | yr | 70 |
| ATc | Averaging Time (Child Ages 1-6) | yr | 6 |
| IRSa | Soil Ingestion (Adult) | mg/d | 100 |
| IRSc | Soil Ingestion (Child Ages 1-6) | mg/d | 200 |
| CF | Conversion Factor | mg-d/kg-yr | 3.65 E08* |
| EF | Exposure Frequency | d/yr | 350 |
| EDa | Exposure Duration (Adult) | yr | 24 |
| EDc | Exposure Duration (Child Ages 1-6) | yr | 6 |
| ORAL ACUTE TOXICITY | |||
| TDHA | Ten Day Health Advisory (10 kg Child) | mg/l | Chemical Specific |
| IRat-w | Ingestion Rate of Water | l/d | 1 |
| IRat-s | Ingestion Rate of Soil | g/d | 1 |
| CFat | Conversion Factor (Acute Toxicity) | kg/g | 1 E-03 |
A. Method 2 Industrial/Commercial Default Values
| Industrial/Commercial Default Input Parameters | |||
| TERM | DESCRIPTION | UNITS | VALUE |
| C | Concentration of Contaminant in Soil | mg/kg | Calculated |
| CPSo | Carcinogenic Potency Slope Factor (Oral) | (mg/kg/d)-1 | Chemical Specific |
| RfDo | Reference Dose (Oral) | mg/kg/d | Chemical Specific |
| RISK | Target Cancer Risk Level | Dimensionless | 1 E-06 |
| HI | Hazard Index | Dimensionless | 1 |
| BWa | Body Weight (Adult) | kg | 70 |
| AT | Averaging Time (Carcinogens) | yr | 70 |
| ATa | Averaging Time, Adult (Non-carcinogens) | yr | 25 |
| IRSa | Soil Ingestion Rate (Adult) | mg/d | 50 |
| EF | Exposure Frequency | d/yr | 250 |
| ED | Exposure Duration | yr | 25 |
| CF | Conversion Factor | mg-d/kg-yr | 3.65 E08* |
B. Inhalation
1. The Residential inhalation concentration shall be calculated using the following equations and the appropriate default input values:
c. Volatilization Factor - Volatilization Factor Algorithm
| INHALATION | |||
| TERM | DESCRIPTION | UNITS | VALUE |
| C | Concentration of Contaminant in Soil | mg/kg | Calculated |
| RISK | Target Cancer Risk Level (Carcinogens) | Dimensionless | 10-6 |
| HI | Hazard Index (Noncarcinogens) | Dimensionless | 1 |
| AT | Averaging Time (Carcinogens) | years | 70 |
| AT | Averaging Time (Noncarcinogens) | years | 30 |
| URF | Inhalation Unit Risk Factor (Carcinogens) | (µg/m3)-1 | Chemical Specific |
| RfC | Inhalation Reference Concentration (Noncarcinogens) | mg/m3 | ChemicalSpecific |
| EF | Exposure Frequency | days/year | 350 |
| ED | Exposure Duration | years | 30 |
| VF | Soil-To-Air Volatilization Factor | m3/kg | Chemical Specific |
| PEF | Particulate Emission Factor | m3/kg | 4.51 x 109 |
| TA | Time Adjustment Factor | Dimensionless | 1 |
A. Volatilization Factor
1. Soil Saturation Limit (Csat) - Soil Saturation Limit Algorithm for Unsaturated Soils (Csat)
| Volatilization Factor | |||
| TERM | DESCRIPTION | UNITS | VALUE |
| VF | Soil-To-Air Volatilization Factor | m3/kg | Calculated |
| (Q/C) | Inverse Of The Mean Concentration At The Center Of A 0.5 Acre Square Source | g/m2-s per kg/m3 | 101.8 |
| T | Exposure Interval | seconds | 7.9 x 108 |
| Dei | Effective Diffusivity | cm2/s | Di(Pa3.33/Pt2) |
| Pa | Air-Filled Soil Porosity | Dimensionless | Pt-Tß |
| Pt | Total Soil Porosity | Dimensionless | 1-(ß/?s) |
| T | Soil Moisture Content | cm3-water/g-soil | 0.1 (10%) |
| ß | Soil Bulk Density | g/cm3 | 1.5 |
| ?s | True Soil Density Or Particle Density | g/cm3 | 2.65 |
| Kas | Soil-Air Partition Coefficient | g-soil/cm3-air | (H/Kd) x 41 |
| Di | Diffusivity In Air | cm2/s | ChemicalSpecific |
| H | Henry's Law Constant | atm-m3/mol | ChemicalSpecific |
| Kd | Soil-Water Partition Coefficient | cm3/g | Koc x OC |
| Koc | Organic Carbon Partition Coefficient | cm3/g | ChemicalSpecific |
| OC | Organic Carbon Content Of Soil | fraction | 0.02 (2%) |
A. Soil Saturation (Csat) Default Input Parameters
| TERM | DESCRIPTION | UNITS | VALUE |
| Csat | Soil Saturation Concentration | mg/kg | Calculated |
| Kd | Soil-Water Partition Coefficient | L/kg | Chemical Specific/or Koc * OC |
| Koc | Organic Carbon Partition Coefficient | L/kg | Chemical Specific |
| OC | Organic Carbon Content Of Surface Soil | % | 2 |
| S | Solubility | mg/L-water | ChemicalSpecific |
| nm | Soil Moisture Content | WeightFraction | 0.1 |
| Tm | Soil Moisture Content | L-water/kg-soil | 0.1 |
Method 2 Leachability Criteria for Organic Hazardous Substances: The Method 1 Leachability Criteria were derived utilizing the SESOIL and AT123D models (available from General Science Services Corporation) to simulate the transport of organic Hazardous Substances and estimate levels of soil contamination which are protective of the appropriate groundwater objectives. The following tables provide the inputs to the models which were used to estimate the Method 1 Leachability Criteria for organic substances.
| Station Name - Providence WSO AP (Green State Airport) | ||
| TERM | UNITS | VALUE |
| Latitude | Degrees | 41.733 |
| Longitude | Degrees | 71.433 |
| Number of Years of Climate Data | Years | 1 |
| Number of Years of Simulation | Years | 5 |
A. Initial evapotranspiration set to zero; SESOIL approximates evapotranspiration using the water budget method (mass balance).
| TERM | UNITS | OCT | NOV | DEC | JAN | FEB | MAR |
| Air Temperature | °C | 12.330 | 6.720 | 0.280 | -1.560 | -1.110 | 2.720 |
| Cloud Cover Fraction | fraction | 0.500 | 0.600 | 0.600 | 0.600 | 0.600 | 0.600 |
| Relative Humidity | fraction | 0.750 | 0.700 | 0.750 | 0.700 | 0.700 | 0.700 |
| Short Wave Albedo | - | 0.180 | 0.190 | 0.270 | 0.290 | 0.330 | 0.290 |
| Evapotranspiration* | cm/day | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Rainfall Depth (Precipitation) | cm | 9.010 | 10.980 | 11.170 | 10.170 | 9.500 | 10.670 |
| Mean Storm Duration | days | 0.560 | 0.530 | 0.560 | 0.560 | 0.600 | 0.570 |
| Number of Storms per Month | - | 4.390 | 5.720 | 6.000 | 5.660 | 5.260 | 5.890 |
| Length of Rainy Season Within Month | days | 30.400 | 30.400 | 30.400 | 30.400 | 30.400 | 30.400 |
| SESOIL CLIMATE INPUT PARAMETERS BY MONTH (CONTINUED) | |||||||
| TERM | UNITS | APR | MAY | JUN | JUL | AUG | SEP |
| Air Temperature | °C | 8.170 | 13.280 | 18.440 | 21.610 | 20.940 | 17.330 |
| Cloud Cover Fraction | fraction | 0.600 | 0.600 | 0.600 | 0.500 | 0.500 | 0.500 |
| Relative Humidity | fraction | 0.700 | 0.700 | 0.750 | 0.800 | 0.800 | 0.800 |
| Short Wave Albedo | - | 0.190 | 0.180 | 0.180 | 0.180 | 0.180 | 0.180 |
| Evapotranspiration* | cm/day | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Rainfall Depth (Precipitation) | cm | 10.590 | 9.060 | 7.370 | 7.490 | 9.900 | 8.620 |
| Mean Storm Duration | days | 0.540 | 0.470 | 0.370 | 0.310 | 0.390 | 0.420 |
| Number of Storms per Month | - | 5.600 | 5.830 | 5.190 | 4.750 | 5.220 | 4.500 |
| Length of Rainy Season Within Month | days | 30.400 | 30.400 | 30.400 | 30.400 | 30.400 | 30.400 |
| TERM | UNITS | VALUE |
| Soil Name | - | - |
| Soil Bulk Density | g/cm3 | 1.50 |
| Intrinsic Permeability | cm2 | 1.50E-07 |
| Soil Disconnetedness Index | - | 7.50 |
| Effective Porosity | - | 0.300 |
| Organic Carbon Content (Subsurface Soil) | % | 0.100 |
| Cation Exchange Coefficient (Capacity) | milli eq.100g dry soil | 0.000 |
| Freundlich Equation Exponent | - | 1.00 |
A. LC* = the back-calculated leachability criterion. This value can be converted to a mass concentration by the following:
| TERM | UNITS | VALUE | ||
| Number of Years | years | 1 | ||
| Number of Soil Layers | layers | 3 | ||
| Application Area of Compartment | cm2 | 0.10E+07 | ||
| Latitude of the Site (Application Area) | Degrees | 41.733002 | ||
| Loading Type - (1) Spill - Instantaneous or (0) Steady Application - Continuous | - | 0 | ||
| Loading Unit - (1) Mass per Unit Area or (0) Concentration | - | 0 | ||
| Initial Chemical Concentration Given (1) or Not Given (0) | - | 0 | ||
| Layer Number | - | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Depths (Layer Thickness) | cm | 0.10E+03 | 0.10E+03 | 0.10E+03 |
| Number of Sublayers/Layer | - | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Ph of Each Layer | - | default | default | default |
| Intrinsic Permeability of Each Layer | cm2 | 1.5E-7 | 1.5E-7 | 1.5E-7 |
| Liquid Biodegradation (KDEL Ratios) | - | - | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Solid Biodegradation (KDES Ratios) | - | - | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Organic Carbon (OC) Content Ratios for Lower Layers | - | - | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Cation Exchange Coefficient (CEC) Ratios for Lower Layers | - | - | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Freundich (FRN) Ratio | - | - | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Adsorption (ADS) Ratio | - | - | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Pollutant Load Entering Each Layer | µg/cm2 | 0.00 | LC* | 0.00 |
| Initial Pollutant Concentration for Any Sublayer | µg/g(ppm) | - | - | - |
| Mass Transformed | µg/cm2 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Sink | µg/cm2 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Ligand Input Mass | µg/cm2 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Volatilization Index | - | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 |
| Surface Runoff Participation Index | - | 0.00 | - | - |
| Ratio Pollutant Concentration in Rain to Pollutant Maximum Solubility in Water | - | 0.00 | - | - |
| Modified Summers Model Used (1) or Not (0) for Groundwater Concentration | - | 0 |
| TERM | UNITS | VALUE |
| Base Hydrolysis Constant | l/mol-day | 0.00 |
| Acid Hydrolysis Constant | l/mol-day | 0/00 |
| Biodegradation Rate in Moisture | 1/day | 0.00 |
| Biodegradation Rate on Soil | 1/day | 0.00 |
| Ligand-Pollutant Stability Constant | - | 0.00 |
| No. Moles Ligand/Mole Pollutant | - | 0.00 |
| Ligand Molecular Weight | g/mole | 0.00 |
| TERM | UNITS | VALUE |
| No. of Points in X-Direction | - | 1 |
| No. of Points in Y-Direction | - | 1 |
| No. of Points in Z-Direction | - | 1 |
| No. of Roots: No. of Series Terms | - | 400 |
| No. of Beginning Time Step | - | 13 |
| No. of Ending Time Step | - | 61 * |
| No. of Time Intervals for Printed Out Solution | - | 1 |
| Instantaneous Source Control = 0 for Instant Source | - | 1 |
| Source Condition Control = 0 for Steady Source | - | 60 |
| Intermittent Output Control = 0 No Such Output | - | 1 |
| Case Control = 1 Thermal, = 2 for Chemical, = 3 RAD | - | 2 |
| Aquifer Depth, = 0.0 for Infinite Deep | m | 0 |
| Aquifer Width, = 0.0 for Infinite Wide | m | 0 |
| Begin Point of X-Source Location | m | -5 |
| End Point of X-Source Location | m | 5 |
| Begin Point of Y-Source Location | m | -5 |
| End Point of Y-Source Location | m | 5 |
| Begin Point of Z-Source Location | m | 0 |
| End Point of Z-Source Location | m | 0 |
| Hydraulic Conductivity | m/hr | 0.53 |
| Hydraulic Gradient | - | 0.005 |
| Longitudinal Dispersivity | m | 20 |
| Lateral Dispersivity | m | 2 |
| Vertical Dispersivity | m | 2 |
| X Dimension | m | 15 |
| Y Dimension | m | 0 |
| Z Dimension | m | 0 |
| 61 * = The SESOIL program only allows a maximum time interval run of 19 months. Sixty-one months (5 years of simulation) was the total time interval used to determine the maximum groundwater impact. |
A. Site-Specific Dilution Factor Algorithm
| SITE-SPECIFIC DILUTION FACTOR | |||
| TERM | DESCRIPTION | UNITS | VALUE |
| DF | Site-specific dilution factor | Calculated | |
| K | Hydraulic conductivity of the unconsolidated aquifer underlying the Release area | ft/yr | 15000 |
| I | Horizontal hydraulic gradient | ft/ft | 0.005 |
| D | Distance | ft | 15 |
| I | Infiltration rate | ft/yr | 2.0 |
| L | Length of the Release area parallel to the direction of groundwater flow | ft | 50 |
| Fadj | Background concentration for groundwater divided by the appropriate groundwater objective for the Hazardous Substance, or, where the background concentration for groundwater cannot be quantified, 1/2 the minimum detection limit for the Hazardous Substance divided by the appropriate groundwater objective for the Hazardous Substance. | Chemical -Specific |
A. Method 2 GB Groundwater Objective Algorithm and Input Parameters
1. GB Groundwater Objective Algorithm
| TERM | DESCRIPTION | UNITS | VALUE |
| Cw | Water Concentration | mg/L | Calculated |
| Ca | Air Concentration | mg/L | Chemical Specific PEL* |
| T | Temperature of groundwater | °K | 293 |
| WS | Solubility | mg/L-water | ChemicalSpecific |
| VP | Vapor Pressure | mm Hg | Chemical Specific |
| MW | Molecular Weight | g/mole | Chemical Specific |
A. The following information shall be completed and submitted with the SIR
B. Office Use Only
C. Directions: The box to the left of each item listed below is for the administrative review of the SIR submission and is for RIDEM Use Only. Under each item listed below, cross-reference the specific sections and pages in the SIR that provide detailed information that addresses each stated requirement. Failure to include cross-references shall delay review and approval. If an item is not applicable, simply state that it is not applicable and provide an explanation in the SIR.
8. § 1.8.3(A)(8) of this Part - Include a site plan, to scale, showing:
9. § 1.8.3(A)(9) of this Part - Include a general characterization of the property surrounding the area including, but not limited to:
11. § 1.8.3(A)(11) of this Part - Include a description of the contamination from the Release, including:
14. § 1.8.3(A)(14) of this Part. Include a listing and evaluation of the site specific hydrogeological properties which could influence the migration of Hazardous Substances throughout and away from the site, including but not limited to, where appropriate:
24. § 1.8.4 of this Part - Include Remedial Alternatives. The Site Investigation Report shall contain a minimum of 2 remedial alternatives other than no action/natural attenuation alternative, unless this requirement is waived by the Department. It should be clear which of these alternatives is most preferable. All alternatives shall be supported by relevant data contained in the Site Investigation Report and consistent with the current and reasonably foreseeable land usage, and documentation of the following:
25. § 1.8.5 of this Part - The Site Investigation Report and all associated progress reports shall include the following statements signed by an authorized representative of the party specified: