B. Where complaints or notices of violations arise under R.I. Gen. Laws Chapters 23-24.6, 42-128.1, and/or regulations promulgated thereto, or when a pregnant woman or a family with one or more children under age six (6) seeks to enforce their right to housing in which lead hazards have been corrected in accordance with R.I. Gen. Laws Chapters 23-24.6 or 42-128.1, retaliatory conduct as defined at R.I. Gen. Laws § 34-18-46 shall include, but is not limited to, the following actions taken by the landlord and/or the landlord's agent:
1. Arbitrarily and unreasonably increasing rent: There shall be a presumption that an increase in rent is retaliatory if it is arbitrary and unreasonable. The presumption may be rebutted by a showing that the proposed rent is reasonably related to:
- a. the cost of lead hazard abatement or mitigation as required by the Lead Hazard Reduction Act or the Lead Hazard Mitigation Act;
- b. another cost associated with the operation or maintenance of the rental property that has increased within six months before a landlord has received notice of a complaint or notice of a lead-based paint or lead-based paint hazard; and/or
- c. a reasonable rate of return for the property. When a landlord attempts to rebut this presumption by reliance on the cost of lead-hazard abatement or mitigation, the finder of fact should consider whether the abatement/mitigation has been funded through a publicly-financed grant or loan, which does not require repayment until the sale of the property.
- 2. Arbitrarily and unreasonably decreasing services: There shall be a presumption that a decrease in services is retaliatory if it is arbitrary and unreasonable. The presumption may be rebutted by showing that the proposed decrease in services does not materially change the terms, conditions, and/or privileges of a written or oral lease, and was not implemented to retaliate against a tenant for a complaint or notice of lead-based paint and/or lead-based paint hazards.
- 3. Arbitrarily refusing to renew lease: There shall be a presumption that a refusal to renew a written or oral lease is retaliatory if it is arbitrary and unreasonable. The presumption may be rebutted by a showing that the lease was not renewed for a reason other than to retaliate against a tenant for a complaint or notice of lead-based paint and/or lead-based paint hazards.
- 4. Arbitrarily terminating a tenancy or other form of constructive eviction: There shall be a presumption that the termination of a tenancy or other form of constructive eviction is retaliatory if it is arbitrary and unreasonable. The presumption may be rebutted by a showing that the lease, written or oral, was terminated, expressly or constructively, for some reason other than to retaliate against a tenant for a complaint or notice of lead-based paint and/or lead-based paint hazards.