Oklahoma Rules of Professional Conduct
Chapter 1, App. 3-A
Advocate

1. (a) refrain from prosecuting a charge that the prosecutor knows is not supported by probable cause;
2. (b) make reasonable efforts to assure that the accused has been advised of the right to, and the procedure for obtaining counsel and has been given reasonable opportunity to obtain counsel;
3. (c) not seek to obtain from an unrepresented accused a waiver of important pretrial rights, such as the right to a preliminary hearing;
4. (d) make timely disclosure to the defense of all evidence or information known to the prosecutor that tends to negate the guilt of the accused or mitigates the offense, and, in connection with sentencing, disclose to the defense and to the tribunal all unprivileged mitigating information known to the prosecutor, except when the prosecutor is relieved of this responsibility by a protective order of the tribunal;
5. (e) exercise reasonable efforts to prevent investigators, law enforcement personnel, employees or other persons assisting or associated with the prosecutor in a criminal case from making an extrajudicial statement that the prosecutor would be prohibited from making under Rule 3.6;
6. (f) except for statements that are necessary to inform the public of the nature and extent of the prosecutor's action and that serve a legitimate law enforcement purpose, refrain from making extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused; and
7. (g) not subpoena a lawyer in a grand jury or other criminal proceeding to present evidence about a past or present client unless the prosecutor reasonably believes:
8. (1) the information sought is not protected from disclosure by an applicable privilege and
9. (2) the evidence sought is essential to the successful completion of an ongoing investigation or prosecution and

10. (3) there is no other feasible alternative to obtain the information.

    The lawyer upon whom a subpoena is served shall be afforded a reasonable time to file a motion to quash compulsory process of his/her attendance. Whenever a subpoena is issued for a lawyer who then moves to quash it by invoking attorney/client privilege, the prosecutor may not press further in any proceeding for the subpoenaed lawyer's appearance as a witness until an adversary in camera hearing has resulted in a judicial ruling which resolves all the challenges advanced in the lawyer's motion to quash.

    Comment

    A prosecutor has the responsibility of a minister of justice and not simply that of an advocate. This responsibility carries with it specific obligations to see that the defendant is accorded procedural justice and that guilt is decided upon the basis of sufficient evidence. Precisely how far the prosecutor is required to go in this direction is a matter of debate and varies in different jurisdictions. Many jurisdictions have adopted the ABA Standard of Criminal Justice Relating to Prosecution Function, which in turn are the product of prolonged and careful deliberation by lawyers experienced in both criminal prosecution and defense. See also Rule 3.3(d), governing ex parte proceedings, among which grand jury proceedings are included. Applicable law may require other measures by the prosecutor, and knowing disregard of those obligations or a systematic abuse of prosecutorial discretion could constitute a violation of Rule 8.4.

    Paragraph (c) does not apply to an accused appearing pro se with the approval of the tribunal. Nor does it forbid the lawful questioning of a suspect who has knowingly waived the rights to counsel and silence.

    The exception in paragraph (d) recognizes that a prosecutor may seek an appropriate protective order from the tribunal if disclosure of information to the defense could result in substantial harm to an individual or to the public interest.

    Rule 3.8 applies to all government lawyers. The prosecuting attorney has an affirmative duty to prevent law enforcement personnel and others associated with the prosecution from making extrajudicial statements.

    In the context of a criminal prosecution, a prosecutor's extrajudicial statement can create the additional problem of increasing public condemnation of the accused. Although the announcement of an indictment, for example, will necessarily have severe consequences for the accused, a prosecutor can, and should, avoid comments which have no legitimate law enforcement purpose and have a substantial likelihood of increasing public opprobrium of the accused. Paragraph (f) prohibits such comments. Nothing in this Comment is intended to restrict the statements which a prosecutor may make which comply with Rule 3.6(b).

    Paragraph (g) is intended to limit the issuance of lawyer subpoenas in grand jury and other criminal proceedings to those situations in which there is a genuine need to intrude into the client-lawyer relationship. It ensures that a subpoena caused to be issued by a prosecutor to the lawyer requesting evidence about a past or present client of a lawyer will be subject to judicial review upon a timely challenge by the subpoenaed lawyer.
    

    Code Comparison

    DR 7-103(A) provides that "A public prosecutor ... shall not institute ... criminal charges when he knows or it is obvious that the charges are not supported by probable cause." DR 7-103(B) provides that "A public prosecutor ... shall make timely disclosure ... of the existence of evidence, known to the prosecutor ... that tends to negate the guilt of the accused, mitigate the degree of the offense, or reduce the punishment."
    

    Oklahoma Modification

    The Oklahoma Rule that was most recently amended effective October 1, 1997, differs from the ABA Rule in effect on that date in the following respects:

    The word "care" in ABA Model Rule 3.8(c) was changed to "efforts" in Oklahoma Rule 3.8(e) to emphasize the prosecutor's duty to prevent extrajudicial statements.

    Oklahoma added language to the Comment to the effect that Rule 3.8 applies to all government lawyers.

    Oklahoma's Rule 3.8(f) is the same as ABA Rule 3.8(g).

    Oklahoma's Rule 3.8(g) parallels ABA Rule 3.8(f), but unlike its ABA counterpart, Oklahoma's Rule 3.8(g) prescribes a procedure by which a lawyer who is subpoenaed in a grand jury or other criminal proceeding may challenge the subpoena, and it imposes restrictions on prosecutors during the pending of any such challenge.

Rule 3.8. Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor

The prosecutor in a criminal case shall:

Adopted effective July 1, 1988; amended effective June 4, 1991; October 1, 1997.