Okla. Stat. tit. 12, § 2015
B. AMENDMENTS TO CONFORM TO THE EVIDENCE. When issues not raised by the pleadings or by the pretrial conference order, where the order has superseded the pleadings, are tried by express or implied consent of the parties, they shall be treated in all respects as if they had been raised in the pleadings or the pretrial conference order. Such amendment as may be necessary to cause the pleadings or the pretrial conference order to conform to the evidence and to raise these issues may be made upon motion of any party at any time, even after judgment; but failure so to amend does not affect the result of the trial of these issues. If evidence is objected to at the trial on the ground that it is not within the issues made by the pleadings or the pretrial conference order, the court may allow the pleadings or the pretrial conference order to be amended and shall do so freely when the presentation of the merits of the action will be served thereby and the objecting party fails to satisfy the court that the admission of such evidence would prejudice him or her in maintaining the action or defense upon the merits. The court may grant a continuance to enable the objecting party to meet such evidence.
Where the pretrial conference order has superseded the pleadings, it is sufficient to amend the order and the pleadings shall not be amended.
C. RELATION BACK OF AMENDMENTS. An amendment of a pleading relates back to the date of the original pleading when:
3. The amendment changes the party or the naming of the party against whom a claim is asserted if paragraph 2 of this subsection is satisfied and, within the period provided by subsection I of Section 2004 of this title for service of the summons and petition, the party to be brought in by amendment:
b. knew or should have known that, but for a mistake concerning the identity of the proper party, the action would have been brought against him or her.
An amendment to add an omitted counterclaim does not relate back to the date of the original answer.
The delivery or mailing of process to the Attorney General of Oklahoma, or an agency or officer who would have been a proper defendant if named, satisfies the requirements of subparagraphs a and b of this paragraph with respect to the State of Oklahoma or any agency or officer thereof to be brought into the action as a defendant.
Laws 1984, SB 417, c. 164, § 15, eff. November 1, 1984. Amended by Laws 1993, HB 1468, c. 351, § 3, eff. September 1, 1993; Amended by Laws 2018, SB 1503, c. 37, § 1, eff. November 1, 2018 (superseded document available); Amended by Laws 2022, HB 3450, c. 60, § 1, eff. November 1, 2022 (superseded document available).