Okla. Stat. tit. 10A, § 2-2-403
Child is Charged Offense Which Would be a Felony if Committed by an Adult - Trial as Adult - Certification Order - Bail
Effective Jul 1, 1995Laws 1968, SB 446, c. 282, § 112, eff. January 13, 1969; Amended by Laws 1973, SB 215, c. 227, § 1, emerg. eff. May 24, 1973; Amended by Laws 1974, SB 82, c. 35, § 1, emerg. eff. April 13, 1974; Amended by Laws 1974, SB 587, c. 272, § 2, emerg. eff. May 29, 1974; Amended by Laws 1977, HB 1125, c. 79, § 2; Amended by Laws 1978, SB 359, c. 231, § 2, eff. October 1, 1978; Amended by Laws 1979, HB 1493, c. 257, § 4, eff. October 1, 1979; Amended by Laws 1981, HB 1353, c. 141, § 1, eff. October 1, 1981; Amended by Laws 1988, SB 623, c. 76, § 2, emerg. eff. March 25, 1988; Amended by Laws 1989, SB 292, c. 363, § 7, eff. November 1, 1989; Amended by Laws 1993, SB 371, c. 342, § 7, emerg. eff. July 1, 1993; Amended by Laws 1994, HB 2640, c. 290, § 39, emerg. eff. July 1, 1994; Amended by Laws 1995, HB 1978, c. 352, § 126, emerg. eff. July 1, 1995; Renumbered from 10 O.S. § 1112 by Laws 1995, HB 1978, c. 352, § 199, emerg. eff. July 1, 1995.
- A. Except as otherwise provided in the Oklahoma Juvenile Code, a child who is charged with having violated any state statute or municipal ordinance other than those enumerated in Section 7306-1.1 of this title, shall not be tried in a criminal action but in a juvenile proceeding. If, during the pendency of a criminal or quasi-criminal charge against any person, it shall be ascertained that the person was a child at the time of committing the alleged offense, the district court or municipal court shall transfer the case, together with all the papers, documents and testimony connected therewith, to the juvenile division of the district court. The division making such transfer shall order the child to be taken forthwith to the place of detention designated by the juvenile division, to that division itself, or release such child to the custody of some suitable person to be brought before the juvenile division. However, nothing in this act shall be construed to prevent the exercise of concurrent jurisdiction by another division of the district court or by municipal courts in cases involving children wherein the child is charged with the violation of a state or municipal traffic law or ordinance.
B. Except as otherwise provided by law, if a child is charged with delinquency as a result of an offense which would be a felony if committed by an adult, the court on its own motion or at the request of the district attorney shall conduct a preliminary hearing to determine whether or not there is prosecutive merit to the complaint. If the court finds that prosecutive merit exists, it shall continue the hearing for a sufficient period of time to conduct an investigation and further hearing to determine if the child should be held accountable for his acts as if he were an adult if he should be found to have committed the alleged act or omission.
- 1. The seriousness of the alleged offense to the community, and whether the alleged offense was committed in an aggressive, violent, premeditated or willful manner;
- 2. Whether the offense was against persons or property, greater weight being given to transferring the accused person to the adult criminal justice system for offenses against persons especially if personal injury resulted;
- 3. The sophistication and maturity of the juvenile and his capability of distinguishing right from wrong as determined by consideration of his psychological evaluation, home, environmental situation, emotional attitude and pattern of living;
- 4. The record and previous history of the accused person, including previous contacts with community agencies, law enforcement agencies, schools, juvenile or criminal courts and other jurisdictions, prior periods of probation or prior commitments to juvenile institutions;
- 5. The prospects for adequate protection of the public and the likelihood of reasonable rehabilitation of the juvenile if he is found to have committed the alleged offense, by the use of procedures and facilities currently available to the juvenile court; and
6. Whether the offense occurred while the juvenile was escaping or in an escape status from an institution for delinquent children.
After such investigation and hearing, the court may in its discretion proceed with the juvenile proceeding, or it shall state its reasons in writing and shall certify that such child shall be held accountable for his acts as if he were an adult and shall be held for proper criminal proceedings for the specific offense charged, by any other division of the court which would have trial jurisdiction of such offense if committed by an adult. The juvenile proceeding shall not be dismissed until the criminal proceeding has commenced and if no criminal proceeding commences within thirty (30) days of the date of such certification, unless stayed pending appeal, the court shall proceed with the juvenile proceeding and the certification shall lapse.
If not included in the original summons, notice of a hearing to consider whether a child should be certified for trial as an adult shall be given to all persons who are required to be served with a summons at the commencement of a juvenile proceeding, but publication in a newspaper when the address of a person is unknown is not required. The purpose of the hearing shall be clearly stated in the notice.
Consideration shall be given to:
- C. Prior to the entry of any order of adjudication, any child in custody shall have the same right to be released upon bail as would an adult under the same circumstances. Subsequent to the entry of an order that a child stand trial as an adult, said child shall have all the statutory and constitutional rights and protections of an adult accused of a crime but shall, while awaiting trial and for the duration of the trial, be detained in a jail cell or ward entirely separate from prisoners who are eighteen (18) years of age or over. Upon conviction, the juvenile may be incarcerated with the adult population. If, prior to the entry of any order of adjudication, the child becomes eighteen (18) years of age, the child may be detained in a county jail or released on bail. If a child is certified to stand trial as an adult, the court shall make every effort to avoid duplication of the adult preliminary hearing and the prosecutorial hearing in the juvenile certification process. The parties may jointly stipulate to the court that the record for the prosecutorial merit hearing in the juvenile proceeding be used for all or part of the preliminary hearing.
- D. Any child who has been certified to stand trial as an adult pursuant to any certification procedure provided by law and is subsequently convicted of the alleged offense or against whom the imposition of judgment and sentencing has been deferred shall be tried as an adult in all subsequent criminal prosecutions, and shall not be subject to the jurisdiction of the juvenile court in any further proceedings.
- E. An order either certifying a person as a child pursuant to subsection B of this section or denying such certification shall be a final order, appealable when entered.
Laws 1968, SB 446, c. 282, § 112, eff. January 13, 1969; Amended by Laws 1973, SB 215, c. 227, § 1, emerg. eff. May 24, 1973; Amended by Laws 1974, SB 82, c. 35, § 1, emerg. eff. April 13, 1974; Amended by Laws 1974, SB 587, c. 272, § 2, emerg. eff. May 29, 1974; Amended by Laws 1977, HB 1125, c. 79, § 2; Amended by Laws 1978, SB 359, c. 231, § 2, eff. October 1, 1978; Amended by Laws 1979, HB 1493, c. 257, § 4, eff. October 1, 1979; Amended by Laws 1981, HB 1353, c. 141, § 1, eff. October 1, 1981; Amended by Laws 1988, SB 623, c. 76, § 2, emerg. eff. March 25, 1988; Amended by Laws 1989, SB 292, c. 363, § 7, eff. November 1, 1989; Amended by Laws 1993, SB 371, c. 342, § 7, emerg. eff. July 1, 1993; Amended by Laws 1994, HB 2640, c. 290, § 39, emerg. eff. July 1, 1994; Amended by Laws 1995, HB 1978, c. 352, § 126, emerg. eff. July 1, 1995; Renumbered from 10 O.S. § 1112 by Laws 1995, HB 1978, c. 352, § 199, emerg. eff. July 1, 1995.