(1) In order to accomplish the goals of 52-2-301, the department shall establish a pool of qualified in-state providers identified as willing and able to meet the significant needs of high-risk children with multiagency service needs who are currently placed or may be placed out of state. Using existing staff resources, the department shall design and implement a process in which licensed providers qualify for a pool by demonstrating their ability to provide mental health services for children:
- (a) through use of available federal and state special revenue and state general fund money;
- (b) in the least restrictive setting available;
- (c) in accordance with the state's goal of using a wraparound philosophy of care and planning process; and
- (d) using criteria established by the department to address the specialized needs of high-risk children with multiagency service needs.
(2)
(a) Except as provided in subsection (3), the department shall:
- (i) allow any willing and qualified in-state provider to review a case involving a high-risk child with multiagency service needs and to propose a plan of care for providing in-state services to the child; and
(ii) require an in-state provider to review each case involving a high-risk child with multiagency service needs and to propose a plan of care for providing in-state services to the child if:
- (A) the provider is receiving an enhanced medicaid reimbursement rate because the provider has increased access to in-state care for medicaid-eligible Montana children who would otherwise be placed out of state to receive necessary care; and
- (B) the provider offers services appropriate to the needs of the child.
- (b) Prior to contracting with a provider for the delivery of in-state services, the department shall determine that the plan of care submitted by the in-state provider is both cost-effective and in the best interests of the child.
- (c) If a qualified in-state provider proposes a plan of care for providing in-state services to the child, the department may not certify a child for placement with an out-of-state provider unless it denies the plan of care proposed by the in-state provider.
(3)
- (a) The department is not required to seek a plan of care from an in-state provider if doing so would delay placement and create a higher level of risk for the child in need of services or if the out-of-state provider is located nearer to the child's home or family than the in-state provider.
(b) An in-state provider is not required to review a case and propose a plan of care:
- (i) for a child who has medically complex needs that cannot be met in the state;
- (ii) for a child who is developmentally disabled with comorbidities;
- (iii) if the provider's licensure precludes accepting the child; or
- (iv) when accepting a child would pose a demonstrable risk to the child seeking admission, to other children currently receiving services from the provider, or to the provider's staff.
- (c) The department shall adopt rules to outline the circumstances under which a provider would qualify for the exception allowed under subsection (3)(b)(iv).
(d)
- (i) A provider shall submit a plan of care within 2 working days of receiving a case for review.
- (ii) A provider seeking an exception under subsection (3)(b)(iv) shall provide a statement in a form prescribed by the department to demonstrate the risk to the child seeking admission, to other children currently receiving services from the provider, or to the provider's staff.
History: En. Sec. 1, Ch. 430, L. 2009; amd. Sec. 2, Ch. 377, L. 2011; amd. Sec. 1, Ch. 159, L. 2023.