MPEP § 2683
*****
A patent owner, or a third-party requester in an inter partes reexamination proceeding, who is in any reexamination proceeding dissatisfied with the final decision in an appeal to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences under section 134 may appeal the decision only to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
*****
Section 13106 of Public Law 107-273, 116 Stat. 1758, 1899-1906 (2002), newly granted the inter partes reexamination third party requester the right to appeal an adverse decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board) to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit). 35 U.S.C. 315 (b)(1). It further authorized the third party requester to be a party to any appeal taken by the patent owner to the Federal Circuit. 35 U.S.C. 315 (b)(2). Also, section 13106 of Public Law 107-273 implicitly permitted the patent owner to be a party to the newly provided for appeal taken by the third party requester to the Federal Circuit. This is because 35 U.S.C. 315 (a)(2) states that the patent owner involved in an inter partes reexamination proceeding "may be a party to any appeal taken by a third party requester under subsection (b)." The effective date for this revision to the statute is provided in section 13106 of Public Law 107-273 as follows: "The amendments made by this section apply with respect to any reexamination proceeding commenced on or after the date of enactment of this Act."
A patent owner and/or a third party requester in an inter partes reexamination proceeding who is a party to an appeal to the Board and who is dissatisfied with the decision of the Board may, subject to 37 CFR 41.81 , appeal to the Federal Circuit. Pursuant to 37 CFR 41.81 , the patent owner and/or third party requester may not appeal to the Federal Circuit until all parties’ rights to request rehearing have been exhausted, at which time the decision of the Board is final and appealable to the Federal Circuit.
A patent owner or a third party requester appellant must take the following steps in such an appeal to the Federal Circuit (37 CFR 1.983 (b)):
If the patent owner has filed a notice of appeal to the Federal Circuit, the third party requester may cross appeal to the Federal Circuit if also dissatisfied with the decision of the Board. 37 CFR 1.983 (c).
If the third party requester has filed a notice of appeal to the Federal Circuit, the patent owner may cross appeal to the Federal Circuit if also dissatisfied with the decision of the Board. 37 CFR 1.983 (d).
Such cross appeals would be taken under the rules of the Federal Circuit for cross appeals.
The patent owner and the third party requester may each be a party to, i.e., participate in, each other’s appeal to the Federal Circuit from an inter partes reexamination decision of the Board (37 CFR 1.983 (e)).
A party electing to participate in an appellant’s appeal must, within fourteen days of service of the appellant’s notice of appeal (37 CFR 1.983 (b)(3)) or notice of cross appeal (37 CFR 1.983 (c) or (d)), take the following steps:
In any reexamination proceeding commenced prior to November 2, 2002, only the patent owner can appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 134 (c), as it existed prior to its November 2, 2002 revision via Public Law 107-273, the third party requester is expressly precluded from appealing (and cross appealing) any decision of the Board in an inter partes reexamination proceeding commenced prior to November 2, 2002, to the Federal Circuit. The third party requester is also precluded from participating in any appeal taken by the patent owner to the Federal Circuit.
Pursuant to 37 CFR 1.983, a patent owner in a reexamination proceeding commenced prior to November 2, 2002, who is dissatisfied with the decision of the Board may, subject to 37 CFR 41.81 , appeal to the Federal Circuit. Under 37 CFR 41.81 , the patent owner may not appeal to the Federal Circuit until all parties’ rights to request rehearing of the Board’s decision have been exhausted, at which time the decision of the Board is final and appealable by the patent owner to the Federal Circuit.
The patent owner must take the following steps in such an appeal:
The remedy by civil action under 35 U.S.C. 145 is not available to the patent owner and the third party requester in an inter partes reexamination proceeding. Patent owners and third party requesters dissatisfied with a decision of the Board in an inter partes reexamination proceeding are not permitted to file a civil action against the Director of the USPTO in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Instead, they are limited to appealing decisions of the Office to the Federal Circuit.
When the optional inter partes reexamination alternative was added to the reexamination statute, the legislation did not provide the parties an avenue of judicial review by civil action under 35 U.S.C. 145 in inter partes reexamination proceedings (nor is this avenue available for ex parte reexamination of a patent that issued from an original application filed on or after November 29, 1999; see MPEP § 2279). Federal District Court proceedings are generally complicated and time consuming and, therefore, are contrary to the goal of expeditious resolution of reexamination proceedings. Accordingly, the first sentence of 35 U.S.C. 145 was amended to read: "An applicant dissatisfied with the decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in an appeal under 134 (a) of this title may, unless appeal has been taken to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, have remedy by civil action against the Director in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia if commenced within such time after such decision, not less than sixty days, as the Director appoints." (emphasis added). Note that 35 U.S.C. 134 part (a), which is included by 35 U.S.C. 145 is limited to applicants and applications, while 35 U.S.C. 134 parts (b) and (c) which are not included by 35 U.S.C. 145 are directed to reexamination and the patent owner and the third party requester, respectively.