MPEP § 1502
In a design patent application, the subject matter which is claimed is the design embodied in or applied to an article of manufacture (or portion thereof) and not the article itself. Ex parte Cady, 1916 C.D. 62, 232 O.G. 621 (Comm’r Pat. 1916). "[35 U.S.C.] 171 refers, not to the design of an article, but to the design for an article, and is inclusive of ornamental designs of all kinds including surface ornamentation as well as configuration of goods." In re Zahn, 617 F.2d 261, 204 USPQ 988 (CCPA 1980).
The design for an article consists of the visual characteristics embodied in or applied to an article.
Since a design is manifested in appearance, the subject matter of a design patent application may relate to the configuration or shape of an article, to the surface ornamentation applied to an article, or to the combination of configuration and surface ornamentation.
Design is inseparable from the article to which it is applied and cannot exist alone merely as a scheme of surface ornamentation. It must be a definite, preconceived thing, capable of reproduction and not merely the chance result of a method. See In re SurgiSil, L.L.P., 14 F.4th 1380, 1382, 2021 USPQ2d 1008 (Fed. Cir. 2021) ("A design claim is limited to the article of manufacture identified in the claim; it does not broadly cover a design in the abstract."); Curver Luxembourg, SARL v. Home Expressions, Inc., 938 F.3d 1334, 1340, 2019 USPQ2d 341902 (Fed. Cir. 2019) (noting "that long-standing precedent, unchallenged regulation, and agency practice all consistently support the view that design patents are granted only for a design applied to an article of manufacture, and not a design per se").
In general terms, a "utility patent" protects the way an article is used and works (35 U.S.C. 101 ), while a "design patent" protects the way an article looks (35 U.S.C. 171 ). The ornamental appearance for an article includes its shape/configuration or surface ornamentation applied to the article, or both. Both design and utility patents may be obtained on an article if invention resides both in its utility and ornamental appearance.
While utility and design patents afford legally separate protection, the utility and ornamentality of an article may not be easily separable. Articles of manufacture may possess both functional and ornamental characteristics.
Some of the more common differences between design and utility patents are summarized below:
Other distinctions between design and utility patent practice are detailed in this chapter and MPEP Chapter 2900 for international design applications. Unless otherwise provided, the rules for applications for utility patents are equally applicable to applications for design patents (35 U.S.C. 171 and 37 CFR 1.151 and 1.1061 ).
*****
*****
*****
*****
Effective January 2, 2024, the USPTO created a separate design patent practitioner bar whereby admitted design patent practitioners would practice in design patent proceedings only. See Representation of Others in Design Patent Matters Before the United States Patent and Trademark Office, 88 FR 78644 (November 16, 2023). Expanding the admission criteria of the patent bar encourages broader participation and keeps up with the ever-evolving technology and related teachings that qualify someone to practice before the USPTO.
Design patent practitioners (attorneys and agents) have to pass the same registration exam and moral character evaluation as required for all patent practitioners, which ensures they have the requisite knowledge of Office rules, policies, and procedures. However, the scientific and technical requirements for admission as a design patent practitioner have been modified. Specifically, applicants to the design patent practitioner bar should have a bachelor’s, master’s, or doctorate of philosophy degree in any of the following areas from an accredited college or university: industrial design, product design, architecture, applied arts, graphic design, fine/studio arts, or art teacher education, or a degree equivalent to one of these listed degrees. See the Office of Enrollment and Discipline webpage at www.uspto.gov/about-us/organizational-offices/ office-general-counsel/office-enrollment-and- discipline-oed for more information. Design patent practitioners, like all patent practitioners, are required to provide competent representation to their clients. This includes properly informing their clients of practice limitations. See 37 CFR 11.101.
Design patent practitioners are registered under 37 CFR 11.6(d) and can only practice in design patent matters. 37 CFR 1.32(a)(1). Therefore, a design patent practitioner cannot sign papers in a utility (including provisional) or plant application. A patent practitioner who is registered to practice in all patent matters under 37 CFR 11.6(a) -(c) can sign papers in a design application. In other words, all patent practitioners can practice in design patent matters, but only patent practitioners that can practice in all patent matters can practice in utility, plant, and design patent matters. A power of attorney naming the practitioners associated with a customer number filed in an application may only include practitioners who are authorized to practice in that application. If a design patent practitioner is associated with a customer number, that customer number cannot be used to establish power of attorney in a utility or plant application. This applies even if a practitioner that is authorized to practice before the Office in all patent matters is also associated with that same customer number. See MPEP §§ 402, subsection II and 403, subsection I. A listing of registered patent attorneys and agents (including design patent attorneys and agents) is available at www.uspto.gov/FindPatentAttorney. Interested parties may also obtain a list of registered patent practitioners located in their area by writing to the Office of Enrollment and Discipline (OED) at Mail Stop OED, Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. The Office cannot aid in selecting a patent practitioner. See 37 CFR 1.31 and MPEP § 401.
In addition to the signature requirements for patent practitioners registered under 37 CFR 11.6(a) -(c), design patent practitioners must indicate their design patent practitioner status in order to avoid public confusion and make the record clear. For handwritten signatures, a design patent practitioner must place the word "design" (in any format) adjacent to their signature (37 CFR 1.4(d)(1) ), and for S-signatures, a design patent practitioner must place the word "design" (in any format) adjacent to the last forward slash of their S-signature (37 CFR 1.4(d)(2)(ii) ).