Mo. Rev. Stat. § 311.310
3. It shall be a defense to prosecution under this section if:
(L. 1947 V. I p. 373 § 4885a, A.L. 1990 H.B. 1180, A.L. 2005 H.B. 972 merged with S.B. 37, et al. and S.B. 402, A.L. 2005 1st Ex. Sess. H.B. 2)
Effective 9-15-05
CROSS REFERENCE:
Action for personal injuries or death when sale is proximate cause and party is convicted under 311.310, 537.053
(1964) Evidence was sufficient for superintendent to find that licensee had sold intoxicating liquor to minor and it was not necessary that licensee's guilt be determined by court or jury or that supervisor overcome any presumption of innocence of licensee in order for superintendent to suspend licensee's license. Crooms v. Ketchum (Mo.), 379 S.W.2d 580.
(1976) Held that it is not a defense to regulatory action under this section to assert that minor was acting as an agent for an adult. May Dept. Stores v. Supervisor of Liquor Control (A.), 530 S.W.2d 460.
(1980) Civil cause of action can arise in favor of a minor who suffers injury as result of becoming intoxicated on liquor illegally sold to him in a drinking establishment. Sampson v. W. F. Enterprises, Inc. (A.), 611 S.W.2d 333.
(1985) This statute does not impose civil liability upon a social host for serving alcohol to an intoxicated guest who subsequently injures a third party. Harriman v. Smith (A.), 697 S.W.2d 219.
(1987) Neither the local chapter nor the national parent of a fraternity have any civil duty to refrain from serving alcohol to any person under this section. Andres v. Alpha Kappa Lambda Fraternity, 730 S.W.2d 547 (Mo. banc).
(1989) Civil liability cause of action under statute limited to tavern owners who dispense alcoholic beverages by the drink. Passenger injured in accident while riding in automobile operated by allegedly intoxicated underage driver did not have cause of action against another passenger who had given intoxicating beverages to driver nor did he have cause of action against the operator of package liquor store who allegedly sold the alcoholic beverages. (Mo.App. W.D.) Leimkuehler v. Myers, 780 S.W.2d 653.
(2012) Amendment to section in 2005 adding to list of possible offenders the owners and occupiers of land did not create a new civil duty and cause of action against landowners as social hosts. Otte v. Edwards, 370 S.W.3d 898 (Mo.App.E.D.).