PURPOSE: This rule establishes guidelines regarding modifications made to premises for a handicapped person.

1. (1) It shall beunlawfulforany person to refuse to permit, at the expense of a handicapped person, reasonable modifications of existing premises occupied or to be occupied by a handicapped person, if the proposed modifications may be necessary to afford the handicapped person full enjoyment of the premises. In the case of a rental, the landlord, where it is reasonable to do so, may condition permission for a modification on the rent& agreeing to restore the interior of the premises to the condition that existed before the modification, reasonable wear and tear excepted. The landlord may not increase any customarily required security deposit for handicapped persons. However, where it is necessary to ensure with reasonable certainty that funds will be available to pay for the restorations at the end of the tenancy, the landlord may negotiate as part of a restoration agreement, a provision requiringthat thetenant pay into an interest-bearing escrow account, over a reasonable period, a reasonable amount of money not to exceed the cost of the restma. tions. The interest in this account shall accrue to the benefit of the tenant.
2. (2) A landlord may condition permission for a modification on the renter providing a reasonable description of the proposed modifications as well as reasonable asuranw that the work will be done in a satisfactory manner and that any required building permits will be obtained.

3. (3) The application of this rule may be illustrated by the following examples:

   1. (A) Example 1: A tenant with a handicap asks his/her landlord for permission to install grab bars in the bathroom at the tenant’s expense. It is necessary to reinforce the walls with blocking between studs in order to affix the grab bars. It is unlawful for the landlord to refuse to permit thetenant, at the tenant’s own expense, from making the modifications necessary to add the grab bars. However, the landlord may condition permission for the modification on the tenant agreeing to restore the bathroom to the condition that existed before the modification, reasonable wear and tear excepted. It would be reasonable for the landlord to require the tenant to remove the grab bars at the end of the tenancy. Tbe landlord also may reasonably require that the wall to which the grab bars are to be attached be repaired and restored to its original condition, reasonable wear and tear excepted. However, it would be unreasonable for the landlord to require the tenant to remove the blocking, since the reinforced walls will not interfere in any way with the landlord’s or the next tenant’s use and enjoyment of the premises and may be needed by some future tenant.
   2. (B) Example 2: An applicant for rental housing has a child who uses a wheelchair. The bathroom door in the dwelling unit is too narrow to permit the wheelchair to pass. The applicant asks the landlord for permission to widen the doorway at the applicant’s own expense. It is unlawful for the landlord to refuse to permit the applicant to make the modification. Further, the landlord, in usual circumstances, may not condition permission for the modification on the applicant paying forthedoorway to benarrowedattheendofthf lease because a wider doorway will not interfere with the landlord’s or the next tenant’s use and enjoyment of the premises.

   Auth: sections 213.030 and 213.040, RSMo (Cum. Supp. 1992).” Original rule filed Dec. 2,1992, effective June 7,1993. ‘Original authority: 213.030, RSMo fl9591, amended 1978, 1986, 1992 and 213.040, RSMo (19861, amended 1932.