Mo. Code Regs. Ann. tit. 7, § 10-10.030
Rating Categories for Evaluating the Performance of a Contractor
Effective Jun 30, 2003sections 226.020, 226.130 and 227.030, RSMo 2000 and 227.100, RSMo Supp. 2002.* Original rule filed Dec. 31, 1990, effective July 8, 1991. Emergency amendment filed Nov. 20, 1997, effective Jan. 1, 1998, expired June 29, 1998. Amended: Filed Nov. 20, 1997, effective May 30, 1998. Emergency amendment filed Dec. 1, 2000, effective Jan. 1, 2001, expired June 29, 2001. Amended: Filed Dec. 1, 2000, effective May 30, 2001. Amended: Filed Nov. 20, 2002, effective June 30, 2003. *Original authority: 226.020, RSMo 1939; 226.130, RSMo 1939, amended 1993, 1995; 227.030, RSMo 1939; and 227.100, RSMo 1939, amended 1963, 1967, 1969, 2002Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission
PURPOSE: This rule sets forth the rating criteria used in evaluating the performance of contractors awarded commission projects.
(1) Contractors awarded commission projects shall be rated on the following four (4) categories:
- (A) Quality of work includes, but is not limited to, construction methods, materials, structural adequacy, appearance, workmanship, attention to detail and acceptable work;
- (B) Contract compliance includes, but is not limited to, timely compliance, compliance with traffic control, handling of traffic, maintenance of the work site and adherence to environmental requirements;
- (C) Prosecution and progress includes, but is not limited to, proper planning and execution, achieving the progress schedule, coordinating subcontractors and timely completion; and
- (D) Contract administration includes, but is not limited to, submittal of required documents.
- (2) Each question will be assigned to a category and will be assigned a point value for comparison purposes. Questions will be completed according to the guidelines shown on the questionnaire. Not all questions will be applicable and will, therefore, not be completed.
- (3) A contractor’s individual category ratings in the category of “Quality” and “Contract Compliance” will be determined by comparing the total number of points awarded to the total number of points possible for each question completed, based on the weighted average of the total dollar value of work completed during the rated period and pertaining to applicable sections of the questionnaire. A contractor’s individual category ratings, in the category of “Prosecution & Progress” and “Contract Administration” will be deter- Transportation Commission
mined by comparing the total number of points awarded to the total number of points possible for each question completed, based on the weighted average of the contract dollar value.
- (4) For overall rating purposes, the categories are assigned importance factors as follows: quality of work, thirty percent (30%); contract compliance, twenty percent (20%); prosecution and progress, thirty percent (30%); and contract administration, twenty percent (20%).
AUTHORITY: sections 226.020, 226.130 and 227.030, RSMo 2000 and 227.100, RSMo Supp. 2002.* Original rule filed Dec. 31, 1990, effective July 8, 1991. Emergency amendment filed Nov. 20, 1997, effective Jan. 1, 1998, expired June 29, 1998. Amended: Filed Nov. 20, 1997, effective May 30, 1998. Emergency amendment filed Dec. 1, 2000, effective Jan. 1, 2001, expired June 29, 2001. Amended: Filed Dec. 1, 2000, effective May 30, 2001. Amended: Filed Nov. 20, 2002, effective June 30, 2003. *Original authority: 226.020, RSMo 1939; 226.130, RSMo 1939, amended 1993, 1995; 227.030, RSMo 1939; and 227.100, RSMo 1939, amended 1963, 1967, 1969, 2002.