PURPOSE: This rule sets forth the criteria and standards of the Coordinating Board for Higher Education, under which residence centers may be established.

1. (1) Definition of Residence Center.

   1. (A) A residence center is defined as a site separate from the established existing campus of a four (4)-year institution or outside the district boundaries of a two (2)-year institution and as having the following characteristics:

      1. 1. There is a continuing administrative

presence, as evidenced by at least one (1) fullor part-time administrative position based at the location. Part-time administration refers to the presence of one (1) or more persons based at the site to assume responsibilities on a continuing, day-to-day basis. Part-time administration in this instance does not refer to those administrative services rendered from the main campus related to establishing the courses of instruction to be offered, such as registration;

1. 2. Courses are to be offered in every

semester at the location;

1. 3. There may or may not be a complete

academic program offered at the location; and

1. 4. There may or may not be a physical

facility owned by the parent institution but acquisition of an instructional facility qualifies the location as a residence center regardless of the other criteria.

1. (2) Submission of Proposals for Residence Centers.

   1. (A) At such time as the governing board of a public college or university adopts a plan to establish a residence center as previously defined in section (1) or is asked by representatives of a community to establish such a center, the institution may submit a proposal to the Coordinating Board for Higher Education (CBHE) for approval.
   2. (B) Proposals for the establishment of residence centers shall be submitted in a format specified by the commissioner of higher education.

2. (3) Criteria and Standards for Approval of Residence Centers.

   1. (A) Proposals for the establishment of residence centers shall address the following criteria and standards:

      1. 1. An assessment of the residence’s spe-

cific services academic programs or both of the residence center as they relate to the role and scope of the parent institution.

1. A. The proposal must demonstrate

that the programs and services to be offered at a residence center are consonant with the role and scope of the main campus. Academic programs to be offered at a residence center shall be programs which are offered on the parent campus, though degree programs to be offered at a residence center must be separately approved. The proposal also must identify changes in program structure, instructional methods and support services which will be necessary to accommodate the clientele of the residence center and demonstrate that these needs will be appropriately addressed.

1. B. Coordinating board approval of a

residence center is for specific purposes in consonance with the role and scope of the parent institution. Any subsequent change in plans for a residence center will require coordinating board review and approval;

1. 2. An assessment of the need for the

center.

1. A. Need must be clearly established

in terms of the total area to be served, including educational interests of citizens, manpower needs of local industry, business, government and other consumers, and compatibility with the statewide policy goals established by the CBHE. Clear and convincing evidence of need for the proposed center shall be demonstrated by providing information which will be generated by a survey, the form and method for administration to be determined by the CBHE. The cost of the administration of the survey shall be borne by the sponsors of the proposed center, that is, by requesting the parent institution, community organization(s) requesting such a center or both. So that respondents to the survey can make an informed judgment, information will be provided regarding any probable local cost, including, but not limited to, student fees and any local tax or other funding necessary to support a center.

1. B. Supplemental to the results of the

survey, additional demographic information shall be provided to the coordinating board to further substantiate the need for a center. The format and method for providing this information will be determined by the coordinating board.

1. C. Proposals also must include evi-

dence that the proposed center has the support of the local business, industrial and governmental organizations which are expected to benefit from the center. This supporting evidence shall demonstrate an understanding of the plans and expectations for the center and may be provided in the form of letters of support which indicate a knowledge of the plans for the center.

1. D. If the coordinating board deter-

mines that a bona fide need exists after examining the proposal, the coordinating board will examine whether other alternatives for delivering the services would provide quality educational services more efficiently and effectively. If the review establishes that the need can be met by such alternative agencies, approval for the establishment of a residence center will be denied;

1. 3. An evaluation of the programs and

courses to be offered at the center.

1. A. Proposals shall address the rela-

tionship between the planned programs and courses and the needs assessment, the potential for duplication of the offerings of other institutions in the area, and the planned staffing and academic administration of courses. The parent institution shall indicate the planned ratio of regular faculty and adjunct faculty by discipline and whether regular faculty will teach courses at the center as a part of their regular load or as an overload. Also, the parent institution shall indicate whether programs offered at the proposed center will be under the direction and control of the same academic units which administer the programs on campus. Where there are significant differences between the staffing and administration of on-campus programs and those to be offered at the proposed center, the institution shall provide an explanation of the means by which consistency in the quality of outcomes will be ensured. Approval of this plan does not negate the need for coordinating board review and approval of individual programs proposed for a center;

1. 4. An evaluation of the five (5)-year

expenditure and revenue plan for the center.

1. A. The coordinating board will spec-

ify a format for presenting the following financial information for the proposed center: anticipated revenues by source, including student fees, local support and allocation from the parent institution; planned operating expenditures by standard program classification categories; and planned expenditures for physical facilities acquisition, maintenance and operation. Proposals shall specifically address the availability of facilities, adequacy of such facilities to support planned programming and the location of facilities in relation to the population to be served.

1. B. There shall be clear evidence of

sufficient local support to ensure financial access and quality of programming. Residence center proposals also shall include displays of financial information indicating the extent of fixed costs and anticipated constant revenues and variable costs and revenues; and 6 CSR 10-6

1. 5. An assessment of the procedures to

be used for periodic evaluation of the center.

1. A. A proposal for a new residence

center shall include objectives to be used in evaluating the center after three (3) years of operation. These objectives shall be phrased in measurable terms and shall state the minimum and the most desirable levels of performance in terms of the following variables: student enrollment, student retention rates in degree programs, revenues by source, physical facilities and support services offered.

1. B. The evaluation plan also shall des-

ignate positions within the parent institution having responsibility for carrying out the evaluation and the time frame in which the evaluation will be completed.

1. (B) The coordinating board may request that the parent institution submit a general plan for phasing out the residence center in the event that performance objectives are not met.

AUTHORITY: section 173.005.2(3) RSMo 1986.* Original rule filed Nov. 2, 1987, effective Jan. 29, 1988. *Original authority: 173.005.2(3), RSMo 1973, amended 1983, 1985, 1999.