Mo. Code Regs. Ann. tit. 20, § 300-2.200
PURPOSE: This regulation describes the requirements for recordkeeping for insurance companies and related entities doing business in this state. This regulation was adopted pursuant to the provisions ojsection 374.045, RSMo (1986) and to implement sections 287.350, 354.190, 354.465, 374.190, 374.210, 375.158, 379.343 and 379.475, RSMo (1986) and 144.027, 354.149, 354.717, 375.022, 375.150, 375.151, 375.926, 375.932, 375.938, 375.1002 and 375.1009, RSMo (Cum. Supp. 1991).
(1) Definitions.
(A) A Missouri policy record file shall be maintained for each Missouri policy issued. All Missouri policy records shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years, provided, however, that any records bearing the signature of the policyholder shall be maintained for the duration of the policy, plus three (3) years, in a form authorized under section (4) of this rule. Missouri policy records must be maintained so as to show clearly the policy period, basis for rating and, if terminated, return premium amounts, if any. Missouri policy records need not be segregated from the policy records of other states so long as they are readily available to Missouri market conduct examiners as required under this rule. Missouri policy records shall include:
application shall bear the signature of the applicant whenever the insurer intends to retain any right to contest any warranty, representation or condition contained in the application which is attributed to the applicant and which is intended to become part of the policy. The application shall also bear the signature of the soliciting agent or broker, as
CODE OFSTWTE REGULATIONS
well as a clearly legible alternative method by which an examiner can identify the agent or broker. These alternative methods of identification may include an identification number of the licensee or the licensee’s mechanically printed or hand-printed name. These alternative methods of identification may be placed on the application by the licensee, the licensee’s employee or an employee of the insurer during the insurer’s initial processing of the application;
riders or binders associated with a policy. Where this record has already been filed with the department, a separate copy of the record need not be maintained in lbeindividual policy files to which the record pertains, provided it is clear from the insurer’s other records or systems that the record applies to a particular policy and that any data contained on the record relating to that policy can be retrieved or recreated; and
rating and underwriting of the policy. The maintenance at the site of a market conduct examination of a single copy of each guideline or manual used for the rating and underwriting of each of the insurer’s outstanding policies shall satisfy this requirement.
immediately preceding three (3) years, the classification of each complaint by line of insurance, the nature of each complaint, the disposition of each complaint and the time it took to process each complaint. The complaint log also shall contain a reference to the location of the file where each written complaint listed in the complaint log is maintained. (4) Form of Record. Photographs, microfilms or other image-processing reproductions of records shall be equivalent to the originals and may be certified as same in actions or proceedings before the Department of Insurance unless inconsistent with 20 CSR 800. 1.100. However, the maintenance of records in a computer-based format shall be archival in nature only, so as to preclude the possibility of alteration of the contents of the record by computer after the initial transfer of the record to this format. In addition, all records must be capable of duplication to hard copy upon the request of a market conduct examiner.
(6) Time Limits. The insurer shall provide, within five (5) working days? any record requested by any duly appomted market conduct examiner of the director conducting an on-site market conduct examination. When the requested record is not or cannot be produced by the insurer within five (5) working days, this nonproduction shall be deemed a violation of this rule, unless the insurer can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the director that there is a reasonable justification for that delay.
Auth: sections 287.350,354.190,354.465, 374.045, 374.190, 374.210, 375.158, 379.343 and 379.475, RSMo (1986) and 144.027, 354.717, 375.022, 375.149, 375.150, 375.151, 375.926, 375.932, 375.938, 375.1002 and 375.1009, RSMo (Cum. Supp. 1991). This rule was preuiously filed as 4 CSR 190-11.050. Original rule Fled Dec. 20, 1974, effective Dec. 30, 1974. Amended: Filed Sept. 5, 1975, effectiue Sept. 15,1975. Amended: Filed Aprill, 1991, effective Oct. 31,199l.
CODE OFSTATE REGULATIONS (10/21/91) Roy D. Blunt