PURPOSE: This rule establishes the qualifications, duties and responsibilities of a Type II permittee and establishes a maintenance report to be used for each of the approved breath analyzers in 19 CSR 20-30.050.

1. (1) A Type II permit authorizes an individual to operate a breath analyzer and to perform any of the following duties: to conduct training courses for the operation of breath analyzers that are approved by the department, to conduct training courses approved by the department to qualify for a Type II permit, to make field repairs on breath analyzers as indicated on the permit, to perform maintenance checks on breath analyzers as required by the department and to supervise operators of breath analyzers.
2. (2) An applicant for a Type II permit shall not be less than twenty-one (21) years of age. In addition, the applicant successfully shall complete a training course approved by the department for obtaining a Type II permit.

3. (3) A Type II permittee shall perform maintenance checks on breath analyzers under his/her supervision at intervals not to exceed thirty-five (35) days. The permittee shall retain the original report of the maintenance check and submit a copy of the report so that it shall be received by the department within fifteen (15) days from the date the maintenance check was performed. In addition, maintenance checks shall be completed when—

   1. (A) A new instrument is placed into service; or
   2. (B) The instrument has been repaired or recalibrated.
4. (4) Type II permittees shall maintain complete records as required in 19 CSR 25- 30.021(3) and in 19 CSR 25-30.011(5)(A). Type II permittees shall provide oversight and assistance to assure the competency of the operators under their supervision. They shall conduct training courses as approved by the department.
5. (5) To renew a Type II permit, the applicant shall have completed at least two (2) maintenance checks and at least ten (10) tests on drinking subjects, following the operational checklists, within the past year on each breath analyzer for which renewal is requested. If these conditions are not met or if the permit has expired for more than thirty (30) days, the applicant shall perform two (2) maintenance checks and five (5) subject tests for each breath analyzer for which renewal is requested. Copies of the maintenance checks and the operational checklists and printouts for the five (5) subject tests shall accompany the application for renewal.
6. (6) Type II permits issued before September 29, 1988, shall be considered valid under the conditions of this rule.

7. (7) For the maintenance checks referred to in sections (3)–(5) of this rule, the appropriate maintenance report form for the specific instrument being checked shall be used—

   1. (A) When performing a maintenance check on the CMI Intoxilyzer, Model 5000, Report No. 4 shall be used;
   2. (B) When performing a maintenance check on the BAC Verifier, Report No. 5 shall be used;
   3. (C) When performing a maintenance check on the Data Master, Report No. 6 shall be used;
   4. (D) When performing a maintenance check on the Alco-Sensor IV/RBT IV, Report No. 7 shall be used;
   5. (E) When performing a maintenance check on the Intoxilyzer 1400, Report No. 8 shall be used; and
   6. (F) When performing a maintenance check on the CMI Intoxilyzer 5000 CD, Report No. 9, shall be used.
8. (8) Maintenance report forms required in section (7) of this rule prior to June 7, 1993, and completed on maintenance checks before that date shall be considered valid under this rule.
9. (9) Maintenance reports completed before the effective date of this rule, including maintenance reports completed prior to March 26, 1996, and not having a certificate of analysis for the simulator solution, shall be considered valid under this rule.

AUTHORITY: sections 192.006, 577.020 and 577.041, RSMo Supp. 1997 and 577.026, RSMo 1994.* This rule previously filed as 19 CSR 20-30.031. Original rule filed July 15, 1988, effective Sept. 29, 1988. Emergency amendment filed Dec. 2, 1992, effective Dec. 12, 1992, expired April 10, 1993. Emergency amendment filed April 1, 1993, effective April 11, 1993, expired June 6, 1993. Amended: Filed Dec. 2, 1992, effective June 7, 1993. Emergency amendment filed Nov. 9, 1993, effective Nov. 19, 1993, expired March 18, 1994. Emergency amendment filed March 1, 1994, effective March 11, 1994, expired July 8, 1994. Emergency amendment filed July 12, 1994, effective July 22, 1994, expired Nov. 18, 1994. Emergency amendment filed Oct. 28, 1994, effective Nov. 7, 1994, expired March 6, 1995. Amended: 19 CSR 25-30 Filed July 22, 1994, effective Dec. 30, 1994. Changed to 19 CSR 25-30.031 Jan. 1, 1995. Emergency amendment filed March 3, 1995, effective March 13, 1995, expired July 1, 1995. Emergency amendment filed June 21, 1995, effective July 1, 1995, expired Oct. 28, 1995. Amended: Filed March 3, 1995, effective July 30, 1995. Emergency amendment filed March 15, 1996, effective March 25, 1996, expired Sept. 20, 1996. Amended: Filed March 15, 1996, effective Aug. 30, 1996. Amended: Filed Aug. 25, 1997, effective Feb. 28, 1998. *Original authority: 192.006, RSMo 1993, amended 1995; 577.020, RSMo 1977, amended 1982, 1983, 1996; 577.026, RSMo 1982; and 577.041, RSMo 1982, amended 1987, 1991, 1993, 1996. Stuart v. Director of Revenue, 761 SW2d 234 (Mo. App. 1988). A Type II permittee is qualified to testify as an expert on technical matters and permissible temperature tolerances. Miller v. Director of Revenue, 719 SW2d 787 (Mo. banc 1986); Elkins v. Director of Revenue, 728 SW2d 567 (Mo. App. 1987). Possession of a permit is a matter within the personal knowledge of the permittee. Testimony by a permittee is sufficient to prove the permittee’s qualifications to administer the tests. and Determination for the Presence of Drugs in Blood and Urine 19 CSR 25-30 and Determination for the Presence of Drugs in Blood and Urine 19 CSR 25-30 and Determination for the Presence of Drugs in Blood and Urine 19 CSR 25-30 and Determination for the Presence of Drugs in Blood and Urine 19 CSR 25-30