Mo. Code Regs. Ann. tit. 13, § 70-3.030
PURPOSE: This rule establishes the basis on which certain claims for Title XIX services or merchandise will be determined to be false or fraudulent and lists the sanctions which may be imposed and the method of imposing those sanctions. (1) The following definitions will be used in administering this rule:
any other kind of patient charge without corresponding adequate medical records do not constitute adequate documentation;
(2) Program Violations.
(1) or more of the following reasons:
ed, for payment any false or fraudulent claim for services or merchandise in the course of business related to Medicaid;
ted, false information for the purpose of obtaining greater compensation than that to which the provider is entitled under applicable Medicaid program policies or rules, including, but not limited to, the billing or coding of services which results in payments in excess of the fee schedule for the service actually provided or billing or coding of services which results in payments in excess of the provider’s charges to the general public for the same services, or altering or falsifying medical records to obtain or verify a greater payment than authorized by a fee schedule or reimbursement plan;
ted, false information for the purpose of meeting prior authorization requirements or for the purpose of obtaining payments in order to avoid the effect of those changes;
the Medicaid agency or its authorized agents, all records relating to services provided to Medicaid recipients and Medicaid payments, whether or not the records are commingled with non-Title XIX records is mandatory for all providers. Copies of records must be provided upon request of the Medicaid agency or its authorized agents. Failure to make these records available on a timely basis at the same site at which the services were rendered, or failure to provide copies as requested, or failure to keep and make available adequate records which adequately document the services and payments shall constitute a violation of this section and shall be a reason for sanction;
ity, necessary and appropriate services, including adequate staffing for long-term care facility Medicaid recipients, within accepted medical community standards as adjudged by a body of peers, as set forth in both federal and state statutes or regulations. Failure shall be documented by repeat discrepancies. The discrepancies may be determined by a peer review committee, medical review teams, independent professional review teams, utilization review committees or by Professional Standards Review Organizations (PSRO). The medical review may be conducted by qualified peers employed by the single state agency;
act deemed improper or abusive of the Medicaid program or continuing the conduct following notification that the conduct should cease. This will include inappropriate or improper actions relating to the management of recipients’ personal funds or other funds;
caid provider agreement of any current written and published policies and procedures of the Medicaid program (such as are contained in provider manuals or bulletins) or failing to comply with the terms of the provider certification on the Medicaid claim form;
program as evidenced by a documented pattern of inducing, furnishing or otherwise causing a recipient to receive services or merchandise not otherwise required or requested by the recipient, attending physician or appropriate utilization review team; a documented pattern of performing and billing tests, examinations, patient visits, surgeries, drugs or merchandise that exceed limits or frequencies determined by the department for like practitioners for which there is no demonstrable need, or for which the provider has created the need through ineffective services or merchandise previously rendered;
of a fee or charge for a Medicaid patient referral; or collecting a portion of the service fee from the recipient, except this shall not apply to Title XIX services for which recipients are responsible for payment of a copayment or coinsurance in accordance with 13 CSR 70-4.051 and 13 CSR 70-55.010; 13 CSR 70-3
Medical Assistance Act or any corresponding rule;
application for provider status which misrepresents material facts. This shall include concealment or misrepresentation of material facts required on any provider agreements or questionnaires submitted by affiliates when the provider knew or should have known the contents of the submitted documents;
code of ethics governing the conduct of occupations or professions or regulated industries. In addition to all other laws which would commonly be understood to govern or regulate the conduct of occupations, professions or regulated industries, this provision shall include any violations of the civil or criminal laws of the United States, of Missouri or any other state or territory, where the violation is reasonably related to the provider’s qualifications, functions or duties in any licensed or regulated profession or where an element of the violation is fraud, dishonesty, moral turpitude or an act of violence;
by state or federal law for participation (for example licensure);
reason arising out of improper conduct related to the Medicare program;
as payment in full for covered services or collecting additional payment from a recipient or responsible person, except this shall not apply to Title XIX services for which recipients are responsible for payment of a copayment or coinsurance in accordance with 13 CSR 70-4.051 and 13 CSR 70-55.010;
agreement when requested to do so by the single state agency in order to preserve the single state agency’s compliance with federal and state requirements; or failure to execute an agreement within twenty (20) days for compliance purposes;
provider operations within ten (10) days after receiving written notice established by a signed receipt of delivery of these deficiencies from the single state agency or within the time frame provided from any other agency having licensing or certification authority;
sured by a board of licensure or an association of the provider’s peers for unethical, unlawful or unprofessional conduct; any termination, removal, suspension, revocation, denial, probation, consented surrender or other disqualification of all or part of any license, permit, certificate or registration related to the provider’s business or profession in Missouri or any other state or territory of the United States;
participation in another governmental medical program such as Workers’ Compensation, Crippled Children’s Services, Rehabilitation Services and Medicare;
arising from billings to third parties for costs of services or merchandise or for negligent practice resulting in death or injury or substandard care to persons including, but not limited to, the provider’s patients;
ments for the repayment of identified overpayments or otherwise erroneous payments prior to the allowed forty-five (45) days which the provider has to refund the requested amount;
for the same service when the billings were not caused by the single state agency or its agents;
for services not provided prior to the date of billing (prebilling), except in the case of prepaid health plans or pharmacy claims submitted by point-of-service technology; whether or not the prebilling causes loss or harm to the Medicaid program;
claims submitted by point-to-service technology, while representing services not received by the recipient, by the time established by pharmacy manual on the Friday evening following the date the claim was submitted by point-of-service technology.
reduction or depletion of a long-term care facility Medicaid recipient’s personal funds or reserve account, unless specifically authorized in writing by the recipient, relative or responsible person;
person without the direct supervision of a provider and billed by the provider as having performed those services, or services billed by a provider but performed by a similarly licensed practitioner, nonenrolled due to Medicaid sanction, whether or not the performing practitioner was under supervision of the billing provider;
in return for referring an individual to the provider for the delivery of any goods or services for which payment may be made in whole or in part under Medicaid. Soliciting or receiving any payment from any person in return for referring an individual to another supplier of goods or services regardless of whether the supplier is a Medicaid provider for the delivery of any goods or services for which payment may be made in whole or in part under Medicaid is also prohibited. Payment includes, without limitation, any kickback, bribe or rebate made, either directly or indirectly, in cash or in-kind;
which were upgraded from those actually ordered or billing or coding services in a manner that services are paid for as separate procedures when, in fact, the services were performed concurrently or sequentially and should have been billed or coded as integral components of a total service as prescribed in Medicaid policy for payment in a total payment less than the aggregate of the improperly separated services;
against the Missouri Medicaid program or any other state Medicaid (medical assistance) program, or any criminal fraud related to the conduct of the provider’s profession or business;
adverse action invoked by another state Medicaid program;
to review claims for payment for accuracy, duplication or other errors caused or committed by employees when the failure allows material errors in billing to occur. This includes failure to review remittance advice statements provided with the payment document which results in payments which do not correspond with the actual services rendered;
to the state or its fiscal agent by an agent or employee of the provider;
documents and records verifying data transmitted to a billing intermediary, whether the intermediary is owned by the provider or not. The documentation must be retained for five (5) years. Long-term care providers are required to retain financial records for seven (7) years;
session or control of a recipient any item of durable medical equipment which has reached Medicaid-defined purchase price through Medicaid rental payments or otherwise become the property of the recipient without paying fair market value to the recipient;
compliance data or information or failure to timely take corrective action for civil rights compliance deficiencies within thirty (30) days after notification of these deficiencies or failure to cooperate or supply information required or requested by civil rights compliance officers of the single state agency; and
services rendered to a recipient in a longterm care facility when the resident resided in a portion of the facility which was not Medicaid-certified or properly licensed or was placed in a nonlicensed or Medicaid-noncertified bed.
(3) Any one (1) or more of the following sanctions may be invoked against providers for any one (1) or more of the program violations specified in section (2) of this rule:
(4) Imposition of a Sanction.
(A) The decision as to the sanction to be imposed shall be at the discretion of the Medicaid agency. The following factors shall be considered in determining the sanction(s) to be imposed:
state agency shall consider the seriousness of the offense(s) including, but not limited to, whether or not an overpayment (that is, financial harm) occurred to the program, whether substandard services were rendered to Medicaid recipients, or circumstances were such that the provider’s behavior could have caused or contributed to inadequate or dangerous medical care for any patient(s), or a combination of these. Violation of pharmacy laws or rules, practices potentially dangerous to patients and fraud are to be considered particularly serious;
icaid agency shall consider the extent of the violations as measured by, but not limited to, the number of patients involved, the number of Medicaid claims involved, the number of dollars identified in any overpayment and the length of time over which the violations occurred. The Medicaid agency may calculate an overpayment or impose sanctions under this rule by reviewing records pertaining to all or part of a provider’s Medicaid claims. When records are examined pertaining to part of a provider’s Medicaid claims, no random selection process in choosing the claims for review as set forth in 13 CSR 70- 3.130 need be utilized by the Medicaid agency. But, if the random selection process is not used, the Medicaid agency may not construe violations found in the partial review to be an indication that the extent of the violations in any unreviewed claims would exist to the same or greater extent;
agency shall consider whether or not the provider has been given notice of prior violations of this rule or other program policies. If the provider has received notice and has failed to correct the deficiencies or has resumed the deficient performance, a history shall be given substantial weight supporting the agency’s decision to invoke sanctions. If the history includes a prior imposition of sanction, the agency should not apply a lesser sanction in the second case, even if the subsequent violations are of a different nature;
Medicaid agency shall consider more severe sanctions in cases where a provider has been subject to sanctions by the Missouri Medicaid program, any other governmental medical program, Medicare or exclusion by any private medical insurance carriers for misconduct in billing or professional practice. Restricted or limited participation in compromise after being notified or a more severe sanction should be considered as a prior imposition of a sanction for the purpose of this subsection;
tion—In cases where sanctions are being considered for billing deficiencies only, the Medicaid agency may mitigate its sanction if it determines that prior provider education was not provided. In cases where sanctions are being considered for billing deficiencies only and prior provider education has been given, prior provider education followed by a repetition of the same billing deficiencies shall weigh heavily in support of the medical agency’s decision to invoke severe sanctions; and
peer review groups, licensing boards or Professional Review Organizations (PRO) or utilization review committees—Actions or recommendations by a provider’s peers shall be considered as serious if they involve a determination that the provider has kept or allowed to be kept, substandard medical records, negligently or carelessly performed treatment or services, or, in the case of licensing boards, placed the provider under restrictions or on probation.
formance may be imputed to an affiliate when the affiliate knew or should have known of the provider’s actions.
(J) Except where termination has been imposed, a provider who has been sanctioned may be required to participate in a provider education program as a condition of continued participation. Provider education programs may include:
provider manuals;
codes;
gram;
and
coding or billing problems.
(5) Amounts Due the Department of Social Services From a Provider.
(45) days from the date the provider receives the notice, established by a signed receipt of delivery, may take appropriate action to collect the overpayment. The single state agency may recover the overpayment by withholding from current Medicaid reimbursement. The withholding may be taken from one (1) or more payments until the funds withheld in the aggregate equal the amount due as stated in the notice.
(30) days after the provider receives notice of the overpayment, the Medicaid agency may take appropriate action to collect the balance of the amount due.
AUTHORITY: section 208.201, RSMo Supp. 1987.* This rule was previously filed as 13 CSR 40-81.160. Original rule filed Sept. 22, 1979, effective Feb. 11, 1980. Amended: Filed Nov. 25, 1981, effective March 11, 1982. Emergency amendment filed April 14, 1982, effective April 24, 1982, expired July 10, 1982. Amended: Filed April 14, 1982, effective July 11, 1982. Amended: Filed April 16, 1985, effective Sept. 1, 1985. Emergency amendment filed Dec. 5, 1986, effective Dec. 15, 1986, expired April 13, 1987. Amended: Filed Dec. 16, 1986, effective April 11, 1987. Amended: Filed Jan. 7, 1987, effective April 26, 1987. Emergency amendment filed April 15, 1988, effective April 25, 1988, expired Aug. 22, 1988. Amended: Filed June 2, 1988, effective Aug. 25, 1988. Amended: Filed Aug. 2, 1990, effective Feb. 14, 1991. Emergency amendment filed Dec. 17, 1993, effective Jan. 1, 1994, expired April 30, 1994. Emergency amendment filed April 15, 1994, effective April 30, 1994, expired Aug. 13, 1994. Amended: Filed Feb. 16, 1994, effective Aug. 28, 1994. *Original authority: 208.201 RSMo 1987.