Mo. Code Regs. Ann. tit. 13, § 35-36.010
PURPOSE: This rule defines the Alternative Care Review Board (ACRB), discusses the purpose of the board, and explains the process for requesting an alternative care review hearing.
(1) Definitions.
(3) Alternative Care Review Board Composition. Each administrative region of the Children’s Division will establish an Alternative Care Review Board composed of seven (7) members and two (2) alternates. Members and alternates for these boards are selected as follows:
(C) Three (3) members and two (2) alternates from the following fields or professions:
knowledge of the provision of alternative care services;
employee of the Juvenile Office;
gist;
medical professional; or
vate agency that provides services to families and/or children; and
(4) ACRB Terms of Office.
(1) time per month depending on the number of requests being filed. Meetings are not required if there are no pending reviews.
(F) The CD Regional Director may remove and/or replace a member of the ACRB for the following reasons:
which limits the member from actively serving; or
division director.
(5) The process for requesting an ACRB review shall be as follows:
(10) days of notification of the disputed decision and request a meeting to review the matter. The written request for review shall specify the decision being grieved, and the reason for the grievance;
shall take no action to implement the decision being grieved until the matter is resolved through the grievance process. The following actions shall not be stayed pending resolution of the grievance:
division to protect the health, safety, or wellbeing of the child in care as determined by the Children’s Division; or
competent authority;
(G) The review proceedings described in this subsection are informal and administrative in nature and therefore not subject to the Rules of Civil Procedure, to include the rules of discovery, employed by the civil courts of the state of Missouri. The Rules of Evidence, aside from those regarding relevancy, shall not apply to the review proceedings described in this subsection. The review proceedings set forth in this proceeding shall not be governed by those procedures set forth in Chapter 536, RSMo, but shall be governed by the following procedures:
case management decision and the rationale thereof. CD staff may participate in the review proceeding in person or through a telephone *Original authority: 207.020, RSMo 1945, amended 1961, conference with or without legal counsel; 1965, 1977, 1981, 1982, 1986, 1993 and 210.566, RSMo
provider/representative and/or legal counsel shall present a summary of the grievance. The resource provider’s presence is not mandatory for a review to be held. He/she may submit a written statement and/or participate in the review through a telephone or video conference if equipment is available;
may have witnesses provide information at the review. Information will not be taken under oath and the witnesses shall not be sworn, however, the division and/or the alternative care resource provider may submit information by affidavit. However, no party to the review proceeding, to include the review panel itself, shall have the power to compel the appearance of any witness through the use of a subpoena or other means;
election of either party, be recorded through the use of an audio recording device or a court reporter. However, the review process shall not be a hearing on the record. All expenses associated with the recording of the review proceedings shall be the sole responsibility of the party desiring them; and
the ACRB shall be confidential and protected from disclosure to the extent required and authorized by law. The ACRB shall review and discuss all relevant materials and information and vote individually on whether to uphold, modify, or reverse the division’s finding and/or decision. The ACRB shall prepare a written summary of its findings and recommended decision and present it to the CD Deputy Director upon completion. The deputy director shall discuss the recommendation with the division director. The division director shall provide the final written decision to all parties within thirty (30) days of receipt of the ACRB recommendation. The decision of the division director shall be the final decision of the division. (6) If at any time the matter pending before the ACRB becomes the subject of a motion or other proceeding before a court of competent authority, the ACRB proceedings shall be stayed pending the resolution of the issue before the court. In the event that the matter is decided by the court, the ACRB proceedings shall be dismissed.
AUTHORITY: section 207.020, RSMo 2000, and section 210.566.6, RSMo Supp. 2013.* Original rule filed Oct. 29, 2013, effective April 30, 2014.