PURPOSE: This rule establishes the methodology for the provision of reasonable cost for foster care case management contracted services as set forth in section 210.112.4.(6), RSMo.

1. (1) Payment to foster care case management providers contracted by the Children’s Division (CD) shall be based on the reasonable cost of services as determined through the competitive procurement process. Providers shall certify their bid covers all reasonable costs.

   1. (A) Upon request by CD, the provider shall submit a written explanation and supporting documentation detailing how the provider calculated the reasonable costs of services. The CD may not award a contract to any provider which fails to submit such information when requested by CD.

   2. (B) CD, in its sole discretion, may reject any bid where CD determines that the bid amount for a service or services exceeds the reasonable cost of the service or services. CD shall use federal guidelines, OMB Circular A-122, to define reasonable costs as follows:

      1. 1. Reasonable costs. A cost is reason-

able if, in its nature or amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the costs. The question of the reasonableness of specific costs must be scrutinized with particular care in connection with organizations or separate divisions thereof which receive the preponderance of their support from awards made by federal agencies. In determining the reasonableness of a given cost, consideration shall be given to—

1. A. Whether the cost is of a type gen-

erally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the operation of the organization or the performance of the award;

1. B. The restraints or requirements

imposed by such factors as generally-accepted sound business practices, arms-length bargaining, federal and state laws and regulations, and terms and conditions of the award;

1. C. Whether the individuals concerned

acted with prudence in the circumstances, considering their responsibilities to the organization, its members, employees, and clients, the public at large, and the federal government; and

1. D. Significant deviations from the

established practices of the organization which may unjustifiably increase the award costs.

1. (2) CD may, in its sole discretion, establish a cap on the highest amount that CD will pay for the reasonable cost of services identified in the Request for Proposal (RFP) or Invitation for Bid (IFB). CD will announce the cap for services in the RFP or IFB. CD shall utilize one (1) or more of the following methods to establish the cap as part of the competitive procurement process:

   1. (A) Industry cost reports for the previous three (3) calendar years which demonstrate the costs to the provider to deliver the services identified in the RFP or IFB. Such reports shall include costs for case management services, community resource development, treatment services, special expenses, crisis expenses, administrative costs, and any other cost incurred to provide the services identified in the RFP or IFB. Upon request by CD, case management providers or prospective case management providers who submit a proposal or bid for a contract shall provide CD with cost reports and supporting documentation. The format for submission of cost report information shall be included in the RFP or IFB.

      1. 1. Cost for case management services

shall include all costs associated with assessments, case planning, placement services, service planning, permanency planning, and concurrent planning. Such costs shall include salaries and benefits for required staff.

1. A. Assessments shall be defined as

the consideration of all social, psychological, medical, educational, and other factors to determine diagnostic data to be used as a basis for the case plan.

1. B. Case planning is a process of nego-

tiation between the family case manager, parent(s) or guardian(s) from whom the child was removed, and the juvenile officer which describes the services and activities necessary for the purpose of achieving a permanent familial relationship for the child.

1. C. Placement services is the selection

of the most appropriate placement resource for children in out-of-home care based on the assessment of the child’s unique needs and personality and the out-of-home care provider’s capacity and skills in meeting those needs.

1. D. Service planning is the provision

of any services indicated and identified as needed through an assessment and case plan or ordered by the juvenile court.

1. E. Permanency planning is determin-

ing the permanent plan which best meets the needs of the child.

1. F. Concurrent planning is a process of

pursuing a primary permanency goal for children in out-of-home care, such as reunification, while simultaneously establishing and implementing an alternative permanency plan for that child.

1. 2. Cost for community resource devel-

opment shall include all costs associated with the recruitment, assessment, training, and maintenance and retention of out-of-home care providers. It shall also include the development of those services which shall best meet the needs of the child and his/her family.

1. 3. Cost for treatment services shall

include all services designed to meet the service and treatment needs of an individual.

1. 4. Cost for special expenses shall

include all costs associated with needs of children which are not designed to meet a service or treatment need. These costs would not be included in the foster care maintenance payment to the placement provider. An example is a clothing allowance.

1. 5. Cost for crisis expenses shall include

all costs incurred to address the critical financial and resource needs of families. Crisis funds are utilized to purchase specific items family members need to alleviate a crisis. An example is payment to have utilities restored so that a child may be returned home.

1. 6. Administrative costs are those which

are incurred to deliver the case management services defined in the RFP or IFB which are not included above in paragraph (2)(A)1., (2)(A)2., (2)(A)3., (2)(A)4., or (2)(A)5. Such costs include expenses for general administrative functions and overhead.

1. 7. Provider costs shall be determined

and validated by a third-party contractor retained by CD or the Department of Social Services for that purpose. The provider shall submit any and all information that CD, the Department of Social Services, or the thirdparty contractor may require to validate the cost report. The provider shall certify such information is truthful, accurate, and complete.

1. 8. Provider costs shall include any appli-

cable credits or payments received through federal or state funding sources or private contributions.

1. 9. Industry cost reports shall include any

audited financial statements for the applicable time period under review;

1. (B) Cost to CD for the three (3) previous calendar years for similar services identified in the RFP or IFB;
2. (C) Historical expenditures of agencies contracted to provide the services identified in the RFP or IFB for up to three (3) previous calendar years. These expenditures shall include any payments the contractor has made on behalf of the children and families receiving services identified in the RFP or IFB;
3. (D) Historical expenditures of the CD for up to three (3) previous calendar years for all services identified in the RFP or IFB which have been provided to children placed in outof-home care in the regions to be served by the foster care case management contractors. CD expenditures shall only be utilized in conjunction with industry cost reports and/or historical expenditures of agencies contracted to provide the services identified in the RFP or IFB; and
4. (E) CD shall consider all applicable state and federal laws and regulations when a cap is established.

1. (3) Awards shall be made to the lowest and best qualified bidder(s), subject to applicable procurement law and available appropriation. A qualified bidder is a provider which meets all of the requirements in law, regulation, and policy related to the services identified in the RFP or IFB. A qualified bidder must also meet the qualifications outlined in the RFP or IFB.
2. (4) The number of bids and cases awarded to any given provider are subject to available appropriation.
3. (5) The contract shall specify the monthly amount which is to be paid based on the number of cases awarded unless payment has been reduced for reasons specified in this regulation. The contract may include a provision that the parties to the contract may amend the contract to increase the rate if specifically authorized by statute or appropriation.

4. (6) The contract shall provide for the payment of incentives to recognize accomplishment of case goals and corresponding cost savings to the state.

   1. (A) For contracts effective on or before September 30, 2011, incentives shall be provided when contractors exceed the permanency expectations identified in the contract as follows:

      1. 1. The contract shall identify the per-

centage of children who are to achieve permanency in a twelve (12)-month period. Permanency shall be defined as reunification with the child’s parent(s) or legal guardian(s), a finalized adoption, or establishment of a legal guardianship;

1. 2. CD shall refer the number of cases in

the Notice of Award during the first month of the contract year. CD shall refer additional cases throughout the contract year with the intention of replacing cases which are expected to move to permanency each month based on the percentage of children who are to achieve permanency as identified in the contract; and

1. 3. The contractor shall be paid monthly

for the number of cases awarded, regardless of the number they actually serve, except in the following situations:

1. A. CD shall reduce the payment when

CD determines it is in the best interest of a child to reassign the case to CD staff and the case is not replaced. CD shall reduce payment by the number of cases which have been disenrolled and reassigned for case management which were not replaced;

1. B. CD shall reduce payment when the

contractor is placed on referral hold as the result of the contractor’s staff involvement with an unacceptable, egregious situation as defined in the contract. Payment shall be reduced by the number of cases which CD is unable to refer while the contractor is on referral hold due to an egregious situation. 13 CSR 35-32

Egregious situations are defined in this rule to include any situation which seriously impacts the delivery of services to a child or family assigned to the contractor, including a material breach of the contract with the division, and shall include, but is not limited to, the following:

1. (I) Court contempt order;
2. (II) Violating the condition(s) of a

court order;

1. (III) Unsafe environments or inap-

propriate out-of-home provider as evidenced by the following:

1. (a) Placement in unlicensed fos-

ter homes or facilities unless approved by the court;

1. (b) Placements with a provider

without conducting a background screening;

1. (c) Placements with a provider

with a failed background screening as defined in the CD Child Welfare Manual;

1. (d) Placements without full com-

pliance with the requirements of the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children (section 210.620, RSMo); and

1. (e) Placements without court

approval where court approval is required;

1. (IV) Breaches of confidentiality as

defined in the contract;

1. (V) Intentionally, recklessly, know-

ingly, or negligently entering false data in CD’s automated case management system;

1. (VI) Failure to comply with the

requirement to report suspected child abuse and neglect, child injuries, child fatalities, or other critical incidents as required by contract and/or as required by section 210.115, RSMo; and

1. (VII) Other violations of federal or

state law;

1. C. The contractor shall not invoice

for reentries into care within twelve (12) months of previous exit except under those circumstances described below—

1. (I) The contractor shall be paid for

reentries into care during the contract year whereby the number of cases replacing those which are expected to move to permanency each month shall be reduced to correspond with the number of reentries when—

1. (a) The contractor does not have

an opportunity to serve the case or the court terminates jurisdiction and there is clear and convincing documentation to support the contractor was against the release of jurisdiction;

1. (b) Reunification does not occur;

and

1. (c) The case has been replaced;

and

1. (II) The contractor shall be paid for

reentries into care during the next contract year whereby the reentry into care shall count as an active case at the beginning of the contract year when—

1. (a) The contractor does not have

an opportunity to serve the case or the court terminates jurisdiction and there is clear and convincing documentation to support the contractor was against the release of jurisdiction; and

1. (b) Reunification did occur when

the court first terminated jurisdiction after assignment to the contractor;

1. D. CD shall reduce the monthly case

rate to remove the foster care maintenance payment for those children who have been enrolled in the interdivisional agreement through the Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities (MRDD) waiver with the Missouri Department of Mental Health; and

1. E. CD shall reduce the monthly case

rate to reimburse the contractor for only case management services when a child meets the definition of a catastrophic case as defined in the contract and CD is providing additional funding for the child.

1. (B) For new contracts issued based on an RFP or IFB on or after October 1, 2011, subject to available appropriation, CD shall pay an incentive for the sum of the monthly differences between the number of children who are expected to achieve permanency as defined in the contract and the number of children who do achieve permanency when the one-for-one case replacement methodology is utilized. Permanency shall be defined as reunification with the child’s parent(s) or legal guardian(s), a finalized adoption, or establishment of a legal guardianship. The following provisions shall apply to the administration of the incentive:

   1. 1. The percentage of children which are

to achieve permanency in a twelve (12)- month period shall be based on the following percentage, whichever number is higher:

1. A. The percentage of children who

move to permanency within a region, utilizing an average for all counties served within the region; or

1. B. The percentage of children con-

tractors serve who move to permanency within a region, utilizing an average of the performance of contractors serving the region;

1. 2. The contractor may return cases to

CD when children have been placed with their parent(s) for more than ninety (90) days. The contractor may return cases to CD when children have been placed with their legal guardian(s), from whom they were removed, for more than ninety (90) days. The contractor may retain management of the case after ninety (90) days only with the prior, written permission of the CD. When permission is granted, the contractor shall understand the permanency expectation will not change. The contractor shall return cases when an adoption has been finalized, the courts have awarded a legal guardianship, and when the juvenile court has terminated jurisdiction over the child. CD may replace such cases on a one-for-one basis. When the one-for-one case replacement methodology is utilized, CD shall replace cases in the following order of preference if cases are available:

1. A. The next child and any sibling who

enter care within ten (10) calendar days in the county where the case was returned;

1. B. A child and any sibling currently

case managed by CD in the county where the case was returned with services being provided by a supervisor or coworker due to the extended absence of the service worker;

1. C. A child and any sibling which

entered care within thirty (30) calendar days in the county where the case was returned which is case managed by CD;

1. D. A child and any sibling from a

county other than the one where the record was returned which is served by the contracted provider and meets the criteria set forth in subparagraph (6)(B)2.A., (6)(B)2.B., or (6)(B)2.C. above, when agreeable to the contractor; and

1. E. In the event the contractor is

assigned more active cases than awarded in an effort to keep one (1) worker assigned to a sibling group, cases shall not be replaced until such a time when the contractor is serving the amount of active cases awarded. Active cases do not include children who have been placed with their parent(s) for more than ninety (90) days unless the CD has granted permission for the contractor to keep the case; children who have been placed with their legal guardian(s), from whom they were removed, for more than ninety (90) days unless the CD has granted permission for the contractor to keep the case; children who have been adopted; those situations where the courts have awarded a legal guardianship; situations where the juvenile court has terminated jurisdiction over the child; or reentries into care unless they meet the criteria specified in part (6)(A)3.C.(I) above or the rate of re-entries or the number of re-entries into care within twelve (12) months has not exceeded the allowable rate or number as defined in (6)(B) 3.D. below. The contractor shall not be assigned a sibling group which would increase the number of cases awarded by more than two percent (2%). The contractor shall inform CD of the additional number of cases which may need to be replaced to keep the contractor at the number of cases awarded by the end of the contract year;

1. 3. The contractor shall be paid for the

number of cases awarded except in the following situations:

1. A. Payment shall be reduced in the

following and subsequent months during the contract year and subsequent renewal periods to correspond with the number of cases which could not be assigned when the counties have no case which meets any of the criteria identified in subparagraph (6)(B)2.A., (6)(B)2.B., (6)(B)2.C., or (6)(B)2.D. above. CD reserves the right to increase the number of referrals during subsequent renewal periods when the number of children entering CD’s custody increases in the geographic region served by the contractor, when the provider is agreeable to such;

1. B. CD shall reduce the payment when

CD determines it is in the best interest of a child to reassign the case to CD staff and the case is not replaced. CD shall reduce payment by the number of cases which have been disenrolled and reassigned for case management which were not replaced;

1. C. CD shall reduce payment when the

contractor is placed on referral hold as the result of the contractor’s staff involvement with an unacceptable, egregious situation as defined in the contract. Payment shall be reduced by the number of cases which CD is unable to refer while the contractor is on referral hold;

1. D. CD shall set an allowable rate of

re-entries or the number of re-entries into care within twelve (12) months of previous exit, which shall not include the re-entries defined below. The rate or the number allowed shall be based on historical data. CD, at its sole discretion, may adjust this rate or number based on mitigating factors. The contract shall set forth that after the rate is exceeded, the contractor shall not be paid for cases exceeding the allowable number of reentries set forth in the contract or shall be assessed a penalty after the rate is exceeded. If a penalty is assessed, the penalty shall be based on a methodology set forth in the contract.

1. (I) The reentry into care will count

as an active case and the contractor will be paid for the case when CD is able to determine that the contractor did not have an opportunity to serve the case or the court terminated jurisdiction and there is clear and convincing documentation to support the contractor was against the release of the jurisdiction. In the event the contractor is serving more active cases than awarded as the result of the reentry into care, they shall not be paid for such. However, cases shall not be replaced until such a time when the contractor is serving the amount of active cases awarded;

1. E. The monthly case rate shall be

reduced to remove the foster care maintenance when the contract specifies the division shall be responsible for such; and

1. F. CD shall reduce the monthly case

rate to reimburse the contractor for only case management services when a child meets the definition of a catastrophic case as defined in the contract and CD is providing additional funding for the child;

1. 4. CD shall determine the number of

children achieving permanency during the contract year while being served by the contractor. The contractor will be paid for the sum of the monthly differences between the number of children who are expected to achieve permanency as defined in the contract and the number of children who do achieve permanency, subject to available appropriation, as follows:

1. A. Contractors shall be paid the

monthly amount bid and awarded for the sum of the monthly differences during the contract year as identified in paragraph (6)(B)4. above, subject to available appropriation; and

1. B. The incentive shall be a one (1)-

time payment for the number of children who exceeded the permanency standard during the contract year as identified in paragraph (6)(B)4. above; and

1. 5. CD reserves the right in its sole dis-

cretion to reduce the number of cases assigned in subsequent contract years with payment reduced to correspond when the contractor fails to meet the permanency standard defined in the contract. CD also reserves the right to terminate the contract. In the event the contractor fails to meet the permanency standard and the number of cases are reduced in subsequent contract years, CD may reduce the number of cases awarded as follows:

1. A. CD may request the return of

active cases;

1. B. CD may not replace cases which

are closed by the contractor; and

1. C. CD will reduce payment to corre-

spond with the number of active cases served.

AUTHORITY: section 207.020, RSMo 2000, section 210.112, RSMo Supp. 2010,* and Young v. Children’s Division, State of Missouri Department of Social Services, 284 S.W.3d 553 (Mo. 2009). Original rule filed Feb. 28, 2011, effective Oct. 30, 2011. *Original authority: 207.020, RSMo 1945, amended 1961, 1965, 1977, 1981, 1982, 1986, 1993 and 210.112, RSMo 2004, amended 2005.