Mo. Code Regs. Ann. tit. 12, § 10-103.610
PURPOSE: This rule explains, pursuant to section 144.034, RSMo, when sales of advertising are sales of a service, which are not subject to tax, and when such sales of advertising are sales of tangible personal property, which are subject to tax.
an exempt business is tangible personal property, it is subject to tax.
(2) Definition of Terms.
(3) Basic Application.
(4) Examples.
(A) The following items are generally considered to be tangible personal property, not advertising, although they may have promotional value:
sales of products or services;
ing sales of products or services;
sales of products or services;
sales of products or services;
descriptions not promoting sales of products or services;
tionery designs;
low pages;
tions not promoting sales of products or services; and
in quantities in excess of that reasonably anticipated to be necessary for an advertising campaign and sold for purposes other than promoting sales of a particular product or service.
(B) The following items are generally considered to be advertising:
products and services, including fliers, handouts, brochures and sales promotion materials;
materials (not distributed by mail), promoting sales of products and services;
banners, posters and table tents and package designs, promoting sales of products and services;
and video cassettes and tapes of them;
film and video cassettes and tapes of them;
motional or merchandising purposes, including audio and visual tapes, cassettes and films of them;
magazine ads, newspaper ads, periodical ads, trade journal ads, publication ads, book ads, other printed material, ads and newspaper inserts;
ing (bus, rail, taxi and airport) and shopping mall and sports arena advertising and displays, promoting sales or products or service;
for dealers, distributors and other sales persons; and
(C) The following services are generally considered not to be taxable if the charges for such services are separately stated:
news releases;
statistical or other information;
tising;
ing in newspapers, magazines, television, radio, billboards, transportation facilities or other media;
tors and artists; and
brochures, pamphlets, cards and similar items after passage of title.
AUTHORITY: section 144.270, RSMo 1994.* Original rule filed Jan. 3, 2000, effective July 30, 2000.
*Original authority: 144.270, RSMo 1939, amended 1941, 1943, 1945, 1947, 1955, 1961. Gammaitoni v. Director of Revenue, 786 S.W.2d 126 (Mo. banc 1990). The taxpayer produced commercials on videotape as well as instructional and other non-advertising videotapes. The court held that the true object of the sales of these videotapes was the finished videotapes themselves. The court also held that the taxpayer was not an exempt business under section 144.034, RSMo. The taxpayer did not meet the definition of a broadcast station because it did not transmit by radio or television nor was it a facility equipped for radio or television transmissions. It did not qualify as an advertising agency because it did not contract with advertisers to place the advertising in the media. Travelhost v. Director of Revenue, 785 S.W.2d 541 (Mo. banc 1990). The taxpayer sold advertising in a magazine it purchased but then distributed for free. The court held that the taxpayer was an advertising agency and therefore exempt pursuant to section 144.034, RSMo from tax on its sales. The court also held that the express terms of section 144.034, RSMo required the taxpayer to pay tax on its purchases of the magazines. The Hearst Corp. v. Director of Revenue (AHC 1992). The taxpayer, a video production house, produced commercials for advertisers. The taxpayer retained the master tape and provided duplicates for use by the advertisers. The commission held that the taxpayer was not an exempt business pursuant to section 144.034, RSMo. However, the commission found that the true object of these transactions was the production services provided by the taxpayer. The taxpayer retained the master and the advertisers had no need for the physical copy of the tape once the commercial was broadcast. Neely v. Director of Revenue (AHC 1990). The taxpayer, a broadcast station, purchased advertising to promote the station from a production house. The commission held that section 144.034, RSMo, was inapplicable because it relates only to sales of advertising by exempt businesses. The taxpayer, an exempt business, was purchasing, not selling, advertising. The production house was not an exempt business. The commission, however, also held that the true object of the transaction was the purchase of advertising services. Therefore, the taxpayer was liable for tax only on the separately stated charge for the finished master tape.