Mo. Code Regs. Ann. tit. 10, § 60-4.055
PURPOSE: This rule establishes minimum disinfectant levels and treatment requirements to assure the inactivation and removal of pathogenic organisms.
PUBLISHER’S NOTE: The secretary of state has determined that the publication of the entire text of the material which is incorporated by reference as a portion of this rule would be unduly cumbersome or expensive. Monthly verification that 100% of flow was filtered through both stages and that first stage was preceded by coagulation step
Monthly verification that both a slow sand filter and a preceding separate stage of filtration treated 100% of flow from surface water and ground water under the direct influence of surface water sources Summary of CT values for each day as described in section (18) of this rule
Summary of CT values for each day as described in section (18) of this rule
Validation test results demonstrating operating conditions that achieve required UV dose Monthly report summarizing the percentage of water entering the distribution system that was not treated by UV reactors operating within validated conditions for the required dose specified in subsection (18)(D) of this rule
This material as incorporated by reference in this rule shall be maintained by the agency at its headquarters and shall be made available to the public for inspection and copying at no more than the actual cost of reproduction. This note applies only to the reference material. The entire text of the rule is printed here.
(1) The requirements of this rule apply to primary community and noncommunity public water systems that the department has required to disinfect and to secondary systems with a source of water from a primary water system that the department has required to disinfect, even if the water is obtained through another secondary system.
Within 10 days following the month in which monitoring was conducted, beginning on the applicable treatment compliance date in section (12) of this rule Within 10 days following the month in which monitoring was conducted, beginning on the applicable treatment compliance date in section (12) of this rule
Within 10 days following the month in which monitoring was conducted, beginning on the applicable treatment compliance date in section (12) of this rule Within 10 days following the month in which monitoring was conducted, beginning on the applicable treatment compliance date in section (12) of this rule No later than the applicable treatment compliance date in section (12) of this rule
Within 10 days following the month in which monitoring was conducted, beginning on the applicable treatment compliance date in section (12) of this rule
conventional filtration treatment as a required treatment technique within eighteen (18) months of the determination.
have changed to be under the direct influence of surface water, the water system must submit, at the department’s written request, an engineer-prepared report that describes the current condition of the water source. If a report is not submitted, the source will be reclassified as groundwater supply under the direct influence of surface water.
(2) Contact Time and Removal Credit.
(C) disinfectant contact time (T) values in the Missouri Guidance Manual for Surface Water System Treatment Requirements, 1992, must be used for determining the percentage of Giardia lamblia cyst and virus removal or inactivation by disinfection.
(3) For any water system adding a disinfectant, only free available chlorine or chloramines will be accepted as the disinfectant entering the distribution system. The residual disinfectant concentration in the water entering the distribution system cannot be less than 0.5 milligrams per liter (mg/L) free available chlorine or 1.0 mg/L chloramines for more than four (4) hours.
(4) The residual disinfectant concentration in the distribution system measured as total chlorine or combined chlorine cannot be less than 0.2 mg/L in more than five percent (5%) of the samples each month for any two (2) consecutive months that the system supplies water to the public.
(5) Maximum Residual Disinfectant Levels.
Disinfectant Residual MRDL (mg/L) Chlorine 4.0 (as Cl2) Chloramines 4.0 (as Cl2) Chlorine dioxide 0.8 (as ClO2)
(6) Enhanced Disinfection Requirements.
(B) General Requirements.
treatment technique requirements in lieu of maximum contaminant levels for the following contaminants: Giardia lamblia, viruses, heterotrophic plate count bacteria, Legionella, Cryptosporidium, and turbidity. Each surface water and groundwater under the direct influence of surface water system must provide treatment of its source water that complies with these treatment technique requirements and are in addition to those identified in sections (1)–(4) of this rule. The treatment technique requirements consist of installing and properly operating water treatment processes which reliably achieve:
(2-log) removal of Cryptosporidium between a point where the raw water is not subject to recontamination by surface water runoff and a point downstream before or at the first customer; and
benchmark requirements under the provisions of subsection (6)(C) of this rule.
requirements of this section (6) is in compliance with the requirements of paragraph (6)(B)1. of this rule if it meets the applicable filtration requirements in 10 CSR 60-4.050 and the disinfection requirements in sections (2)–(4) and subsection (6)(C) of this rule.
(C) Disinfection Profiling and Benchmarking.
profile is a summary of Giardia lamblia inactivation through the treatment plant measured through the course of a year. A public water system subject to the requirements of this section (6) must determine its total trihalomethanes (TTHM) annual average and its HAA5 annual average. The annual average is the arithmetic average of the quarterly averages of four (4) consecutive quarters of monitoring. If the annual average exceeds the levels in subparagraph (6)(C)1.D. then the requirements in paragraph (6)(C)2. apply.
be the annual average during the same period as is used for the HAA5 annual average.
the annual average during the same period as is used for the TTHM annual average.
ed four (4) quarters of HAA5 occurrence data that meets the routine monitoring sample number and location requirements for TTHM in 10 CSR 60-4.094 may use those data to determine whether the requirements of this section apply.
lect four (4) quarters of HAA5 occurrence data that meets the provisions of part (6)(C)1.B.(I) of this rule by March 31, 2000 must either:
HAA5 that meets the routine monitoring sample number and location requirements for TTHM in 10 CSR 60-4.094 to determine the HAA5 annual average and whether the requirements of paragraph (6)(C)2. of this rule apply; or
sions of this section as if the HAA5 monitoring had been conducted and the results required compliance with paragraph (6)(C)2. of this rule.
department on the schedule required by the department.
annual average greater than or equal to 0.064 mg/L or an HAA5 annual average greater than or equal to 0.048 mg/L during the period identified in subparagraphs (6)(C)1.A. and B. of this rule must comply with paragraph (6)(C)2. of this rule.
and compliance dates vary depending on system size. Surface water and groundwater under the direct influence of surface water systems serving a population of more than ten thousand (10,000) must monitor profiling data according to subparagraph (6)(C)2.B. through (6)(C)2.C. Surface water and groundwater under the direct influence of surface water systems serving a population of less than ten thousand (10,000) must monitor profiling data according to subparagraph (6)(C)2.D.
in subparagraph (6)(C)1.D. of this rule must develop a disinfection profile of its disinfection practice for a period of up to three (3) years.
a period of twelve (12) consecutive calendar months to determine the total logs of inacti- 10 CSR 60-4
vation for each day of operation, based on the CT99.9 values in Tables 1 through 8 of the Missouri Guidance Manual for Surface Water System Treatment Requirements, 1992, as appropriate, through the entire treatment plant. This system must begin this monitoring when requested by the department. As a minimum, the system with a single point of disinfectant application prior to entrance to the distribution system must conduct the monitoring set forth in this subparagraph (6)(C)2.B. A system with more than one (1) point of disinfectant application must conduct this monitoring for each disinfection segment. The system must monitor the parameters necessary to determine the total inactivation ratio, using analytical methods in 10 CSR 60-5.010, as follows:
fected water must be measured once per day at each residual disinfectant concentration sampling point during peak hourly flow;
pH of the disinfected water must be measured once per day at each chlorine residual disinfectant concentration sampling point during peak hourly flow;
time(s) must be determined for each day during peak hourly flow; and
centration(s) of the water before or at the first customer and prior to each additional point of disinfection must be measured each day during peak hourly flow.
ed under the provisions of subparagraph (6)(C)2.B. of this rule to develop the disinfection profile the system may elect to meet the requirements of part (6)(C)2.C.(I) of this rule. In addition to the monitoring conducted under the provisions of subparagraph (6)(C)2.B. of this rule to develop the disinfection profile, the system may elect to meet the requirements of part (6)(C)2.C.(II) of this rule.
existing operational data may submit those data, a profile generated using those data, and a request that the department approve use of those data in lieu of monitoring under the provisions of paragraph (6)(C)2. of this rule. The department must determine whether these operational data are substantially equivalent to data collected under the provisions of subparagraph (6)(C)2.B. of this rule. These data must also be representative of Giardia lamblia inactivation through the entire treatment plant and not just of certain treatment segments. Until the department approves this request, the system is required to conduct monitoring under the provisions of subparagraph (6)(C)2.B. of this rule.
profile generated under subparagraph (6)(C)2.B. of this rule, a PWS that has existing operational data may use those data to develop a disinfection profile for additional years. Such systems may use these additional yearly disinfection profiles to develop a benchmark under the provisions of paragraph (6)(C)3. of this rule. The department will determine whether these operational data are substantially equivalent to data collected under the provisions of subparagraph (6)(C)2.B. of this rule. These data must also be representative of inactivation through the entire treatment plant and not just of certain treatment segments.
week on the same calendar day, for a period of twelve (12) consecutive calendar months, to determine the total logs of inactivation for each week of operation, based on the CT99.9 values in Tables 1 through 8 of the Missouri Guidance Manual for Surface Water System Treatment Requirements, 1992, as appropriate, through the entire treatment plant. As a minimum, the system with a single point of disinfectant application prior to entrance to the distribution system must conduct the monitoring set forth in this subparagraph. A system with more than one (1) point of disinfectant application must conduct this monitoring for each disinfection segment. The system must monitor the parameters necessary to determine the total inactivation ratio, using analytical methods in 10 CSR 60-5.010, as follows:
fected water must be measured at each residual disinfectant concentration sampling point during peak hourly flow;
pH of the disinfected water must be measured at each chlorine residual disinfectant concentration sampling point during peak hourly flow;
must be determined during peak hourly flow; and
centration(s) of the water before or at the first customer and prior to each additional point of disinfection must be measured during peak hourly flow.
inactivation ratio as follows:
total inactivation ratio for the disinfection segment based on either of the following methods:
tion ratio (CTcalc/CT99.9) before or at the first customer during peak hourly flow; or
(CTcalc/CT99.9) values, representing sequential inactivation ratios, between the point of disinfectant application and a point before or at the first customer during peak hourly flow. Under this alternative, the system must calculate the total inactivation ratio by determining (CTcalc/CT99.9) for each sequence and then adding the (CTcalc/CT99.9) values together to determine ((CTcalc/CT99.9)); and
total logs of inactivation by multiplying the value calculated in part (6)(C)2.D.(I) of this rule by three (3.0).
ramines or ozone for primary disinfection must also calculate the logs of inactivation for viruses using a method identified in the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Water document, Alternative Disinfectants and Oxidants Guidance Manual, Volume 99 Issue 14 of EPA 815-R, published April 1999. This document is incorporated by reference without any later amendments or modifications. To obtain a copy, contact the U.S. Government Printing Office at 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20401, toll free (866)512-1800 or by visiting https://bookstore.gpo.gov.
tion profile data in graphic form, as a spreadsheet, or in some other format acceptable to the department for review as part of sanitary surveys conducted by the department.
3. Disinfection benchmarking.
disinfection profile under the provisions of paragraphs (6)(C)1. and 2. of this rule and that decides to make a significant change to its disinfection practice must consult with the department in writing prior to making such change. Significant changes to disinfection practice are:
fection;
used in the treatment plant;
process; and
fied by the department.
disinfection practice must calculate its disinfection benchmark using one (1) of the following procedures:
collected and calculated under paragraph (6)(C)2. of this rule, the system must determine the lowest average monthly Giardia lamblia inactivation in each year of profiling data. The system must determine the average Giardia lamblia inactivation for each calendar month for each year of profiling data by dividing the sum of Giardia lamblia inactivation by the number of values calculated for that month; or
the lowest monthly average value (for systems with one (1) year of profiling data) or average of lowest monthly average values (for systems with more than one (1) year of profiling data) of the monthly logs of Giardia lamblia inactivation in each year of profiling data.
ramines or ozone for primary disinfection must also calculate the disinfection benchmark for viruses using a method approved by the department.
lowing information to the department as part of its consultation process:
change;
Giardia lamblia (and, if necessary, viruses) under paragraph (6)(C)2. of this rule and benchmark as required by subparagraph (6)(C)3.B. of this rule; and
posed change will affect the current levels of disinfection.
AUTHORITY: section 640.100, RSMo 2016.* Original rule filed July 12, 1991, effective Feb. 6, 1992. Amended: Filed Feb. 1, 1996, effective Oct. 30, 1996. Amended: Filed Dec. 15, 1999, effective Sept. 1, 2000. Amended: Filed March 17, 2003, effective Nov. 30, 2003. Amended: Filed Aug. 12, 2015, effective March 30, 2016. Amended: Filed June 13, 2018, effective Feb. 28, 2019. *Original authority: 640.100, RSMo 1939, amended 1978, 1981, 1982, 1988, 1989, 1992, 1993, 1995, 1996, 1998, 1999, 2002, 2006, 2012, 2014.