Mo. Code Regs. Ann. tit. 10, § 60-4.022
PURPOSE: The rule establishes sampling and monitoring requirements for public water systems. The rule also establishes a maximum contaminant level (MCL) for E. coli and uses E. coli and total coliforms to initiate a “find and fix” approach to address fecal contamination that could enter into the distribution system. It requires public water systems to perform assessments to identify sanitary defects and subsequently take corrective action to correct them. The rule sets monitoring and treatment technique requirements for seasonal systems. The rule is based on the requirements in the federal Revised Total Coliform Rule found in subpart Y of 40 CFR part 141.
(1) General Requirements and Applicability.
(2) Analytical methods and laboratory certification.
(A) Analytical methodology.
for analysis, regardless of analytical method used, is one hundred milliliter (100 mL).
ence or absence of total coliforms and E. coli; a determination of density is not required.
initiation of test medium incubation may not exceed thirty (30) hours. Systems are encouraged but not required to hold samples below ten degrees (10°) Celsius during transit.
sured as free, combined, or total chlorine) is to be analyzed, sufficient sodium thiosulfate (Na2S2O3) must be added to the sample bottle before sterilization to neutralize any residual chlorine in the water sample. Dechlorination procedures are addressed in Section 9060A.2 of Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (20th and 21st editions).
must be conducted in accordance with one (1) of the analytical methods or alternative methods incorporated by reference in 10 CSR 60- 5.010(3).
(3) General monitoring requirements for all public water systems.
(A) Sample siting plans.
ple siting plan that identifies sampling sites and a sample collection schedule that are representative of water throughout the distribution system. These plans are subject to department review and revision. Systems must collect total coliform samples according to the written sample siting plan. Monitoring required by sections (4)–(8) of this rule may take place at a customer’s premise, dedicated sampling station, or other designated compliance sampling location. Routine and repeat sample sites and any sampling points necessary to meet the requirements of 10 CSR 60- 4.025 must be reflected in the sampling plan.
for total coliforms is based on the population served by the system as defined in the chart in section (7) of this rule except that systems using surface water or ground water under the direct influence of surface water or systems practicing iron removal or lime softening must collect at least five (5) samples per month. Unless the department approves or specifies in writing of a lesser frequency based on population and system type as defined in sections (4)–(7) of this rule, systems must monitor each calendar month that the system provides water to the public and determine compliance with the MCL in subsection (10)(A) of this rule for each month in which it is required to monitor. Systems must collect samples at regular time intervals throughout the month, except that systems that use only ground water and serve four thousand nine hundred (4,900) or fewer people may collect all required samples on a single day if they are taken from different sites.
mum number of required samples even if the system has had an E. coli maximum contaminant level (MCL) violation or has exceeded the coliform treatment technique triggers in subsection (9)(A) of this rule.
ance monitoring than is required by this rule to investigate potential problems in the distribution system and use monitoring as a tool to assist in uncovering problems. A system may take more than the minimum number of required routine samples and must include the results in calculating whether the coliform treatment technique trigger in subparagraphs (9)(A)1.A.–B. of this rule has been exceeded only if the samples are taken in accordance with the existing sample siting plan and are representative of water throughout the distribution system.
toring locations in the sample siting plan. Unless the provisions of subparagraphs (3)(A)5.A. or B. of this rule are met, the system must collect at least one (1) repeat sample from the sampling tap where the original total coliform-positive sample was taken, and at least one (1) repeat sample at a tap within five (5) service connections upstream and at least one (1) repeat sample at a tap within five (5) service connections downstream of the original sampling site. If a total coliformpositive sample is at the end of the distribution system, or one (1) service connection away from the end of the distribution system, the system must still take all required repeat samples. However, the department may allow an alternative sampling location instead of the requirement to collect at least one (1) repeat sample upstream or downstream of the original sampling site. Except as provided for in subparagraph (3)(A)5.B. of this rule, systems required to conduct triggered source water monitoring under 10 CSR 60–4.025(3)(A) must take ground water source sample(s) in addition to repeat samples required under this rule.
itoring locations to the department that the system believes to be representative of a pathway for contamination of the distribution system. A system may elect to specify either alternative fixed locations or criteria for selecting repeat sampling sites on a situational basis in a standard operating procedure (SOP) in its sample siting plan. The system must design its SOP to focus the repeat samples at locations that best verify and determine the extent of potential contamination of the distribution system area based on specific situations. The department may modify the SOP or require alternative monitoring locations as needed.
thousand (1,000) or fewer people may propose repeat sampling locations to the department that differentiate potential source water and distribution system contamination (e.g., by sampling at entry points to the distribution system). A ground water system with a single well required to conduct triggered source water monitoring may, with written department approval, take one (1) of its repeat samples at the monitoring location required for triggered source water monitoring under 10 CSR 60-4.025(3)(A) if the system demonstrates to the department’s satisfaction that the sample siting plan remains representative of water quality in the distribution system. If approved by the department, the system may use that sample result to meet the monitoring requirements in both 10 CSR 60-4.025(3)(A) and this section.
monitoring location required for triggered source water monitoring is E. coli-positive, the system has violated the E. coli MCL and must also comply with 10 CSR 60- 4.025(3)(A)3. If a system takes more than one (1) repeat sample at the monitoring location required for triggered source water monitoring, the system may reduce the number of additional source water samples required under 10 CSR 60-4.025(3)(A)3. by the number of repeat samples taken at that location that were not E. coli-positive.
(1) repeat sample at the monitoring location required for triggered source water monitoring under 10 CSR 60-4.025(3)(A) and more than one (1) repeat sample is E. coli-positive, the system has violated the E. coli MCL and must also comply with 10 CSR 60- 4.025(4)(A)1.
the monitoring location required for triggered source water monitoring are E. coli-negative and a repeat sample taken at a monitoring location other than the one required for triggered source water monitoring is E. coli-positive, the system has violated the E. coli MCL, but is not required to comply with 10 CSR 60-4.025(3)(A)3.
and approve, as appropriate, repeat sampling proposed by systems under subparagraphs (3)(A)5.A.–B. of this rule. The system must demonstrate that the sample siting plan remains representative of the water quality in the distribution system. The department may determine that monitoring at the entry point to the distribution system (especially for undisinfected ground water systems) is effective to differentiate between potential source water and distribution system problems.
(C) Invalidation of total coliform samples. A total coliform-positive sample invalidated under this subsection (3)(C) does not count toward meeting the minimum monitoring requirements of this rule.
coliform-positive sample only if any of the following conditions are met:
improper sample analysis caused the total coliform-positive result;
results of repeat samples collected as required under subsection (8)(A) of this rule, determines that the total coliform-positive sample resulted from a domestic or other non-distribution system plumbing problem. The department cannot invalidate a sample on the basis of repeat sample results unless all repeat sample(s) collected at the same tap as the original total coliform-positive sample are also total coliform-positive, and all repeat samples collected at a location other than the original tap are total coliform-negative (e.g., the department cannot invalidate a total coliform-positive sample on the basis of repeat samples if all the repeat samples are total coliform-negative, or if the system has only one (1) service connection).
grounds to believe that a total coliform-positive result is due to a circumstance or condition that does not reflect water quality in the distribution system. In this case, the system must still collect all repeat samples required under subsection (8)(A) of this rule, and use them to determine whether a coliform treatment technique trigger in section (9) of this rule has been exceeded. To invalidate a total coliform-positive sample under this subsection, the decision and supporting rationale must be documented in writing, and approved and signed by the supervisor of the department official who recommended the decision. The department must make this document available to EPA and the public. The written documentation must state the specific cause of the total coliform-positive sample and what action the system has taken, or will take, to correct this problem. The department may not invalidate a total coliform-positive sample 10 CSR 60-4
solely on the grounds that all repeat samples are total coliform-negative.
coliform sample (unless total coliforms are detected) if the sample produces a turbid culture in the absence of gas production using an analytical method where gas formation is examined (e.g., the Multiple-Tube Fermentation Technique), produces a turbid culture in the absence of an acid reaction in the Presence-Absence (P-A) Coliform Test, or exhibits confluent growth or produces colonies too numerous to count with an analytical method using a membrane filter (e.g., Membrane Filter Technique). If a laboratory invalidates a sample because of such interference, the system must collect another sample from the same location as the original sample within twenty-four (24) hours of being notified of the interference problem and have it analyzed for the presence of total coliforms. The system must continue to re-sample within twenty-four (24) hours and have the samples analyzed until it obtains a valid result. The department may waive the twenty-four (24) hour time limit on a case-by-case basis. Alternatively, the department may implement criteria for waiving the twenty-four (24) hour sampling time limit to use in lieu of case-bycase extensions.
(4) Routine monitoring requirements for noncommunity water systems serving one thousand (1,000) or fewer people using only ground water.
(A) General monitoring requirements.
noncommunity water systems using only ground water (except ground water under the direct influence of surface water, as defined in 10 CSR 60-2.015) and serving one thousand (1,000) or fewer people.
sample taken under the provisions of this section, systems must comply with the repeat monitoring requirements and E. coli analytical requirements in section (8) of this rule.
section and section (8) of this rule for a calendar month has been completed, systems must determine whether any coliform treatment technique triggers specified in section (9) of this rule have been exceeded. If any trigger has been exceeded, systems must complete assessments as required by section (9) of this rule.
bility for remaining on or qualifying for quarterly monitoring under the provisions of paragraphs (4)(F)4. and (4)(G)2., respectively, of this rule for transient noncommunity water systems, the department may elect to not count monitoring violations under paragraph (10)(C)1. of this rule if the missed sample is collected no later than the end of the monitoring period following the monitoring period in which the sample was missed. The system must collect the make-up sample in a different week than the routine sample for that monitoring period and should collect the sample as soon as possible during the monitoring period. The department may not use this provision under subsection (H) of this section. This authority does not affect the provisions of paragraph (10)(C)1. of this rule and 10 CSR 60-7.010(11)(D).
(E) Criteria for annual monitoring. The department may reduce the monitoring frequency for a well-operated ground water system from quarterly routine monitoring to no less than annual monitoring, if the system demonstrates that it meets the criteria for reduced monitoring in paragraphs (4)(E)1.-3. of this rule, except for a system that has been on increased monitoring under the provisions of subsection (4)(F) of this rule. A system on increased monitoring under subsection (4)(F) of this rule must meet the provisions of subsection (4)(G) of this rule to go to quarterly monitoring and must meet the provisions of subsection (4)(H) of this rule to go to annual monitoring.
history for a minimum of twelve (12) months.
shows that the system is free of sanitary defects or has corrected all identified sanitary defects, has a protected water source, and meets approved construction standards.
annual site visit within the last twelve (12) months, and the system has corrected all identified sanitary defects. The system may substitute a Level 2 assessment that meets the criteria in subsection (9)(B) of this rule for the department annual site visit.
(F) Increased Monitoring Requirements for systems on quarterly or annual monitoring. A system on quarterly or annual monitoring that experiences any of the events identified in paragraphs (4)(F)1.–4. of this section must begin monthly monitoring the month following the event. A system on annual monitoring that experiences the event identified in paragraph (4)(F)5. of this rule must begin quarterly monitoring the quarter following the event. The system must continue monthly or quarterly monitoring until the requirements in subsection (4)(G) of this rule for quarterly monitoring or subsection (4)(H) of this rule for annual monitoring are met. A system on monthly monitoring for reasons other than those identified in paragraphs (4)(F)1.–4. of this rule is not considered to be on increased monitoring for the purposes of subsections (4)(G) and (4)(H) of this section.
ment or two (2) Level 1 assessments under the provisions of section (9) in a rolling twelve (12) month period.
lation.
technique violation.
Coliform Rule monitoring violations or one (1) Revised Total Coliform Rule monitoring violation and one (1) Level 1 assessment under the provisions of section (9) in a rolling twelve (12) month period for a system on quarterly monitoring.
Coliform Rule monitoring violation for a system on annual monitoring.
(G) Requirements for returning to quarterly monitoring. The department may reduce the monitoring frequency for a system on monthly monitoring triggered under subsection (4)(F) of this section to quarterly monitoring if the system meets the criteria in paragraphs (4)(G)1. and 2. of this rule.
the system must have a completed sanitary survey or a site visit by the department or a voluntary Level 2 assessment by a party approved by the department, be free of sanitary defects, and have a protected water source; and
pliance history for a minimum of twelve (12) months.
(H) Requirements for systems on increased monitoring to qualify for annual monitoring. The department may reduce the monitoring frequency for a system on increased monitoring under subsection (4)(F) of this section if the system meets the criteria in subsection (4)(G) of this section plus the criteria in paragraphs (4)(H)1. and 2. of this section.
and correction of all identified sanitary defects. The system may substitute a voluntary Level 2 assessment by a party approved by the department for the department annual site visit in any given year.
adopt one (1) or more additional enhancements to the water system barriers to contamination in subparagraphs (4)(H)2.A.–E. of this section.
approved by the department.
priate department certification program or regular visits by a circuit rider certified by an appropriate department certification program.
the distribution system and a residual in the distribution system in accordance with criteria specified by the department.
at least a 4-log removal or inactivation of viruses as provided for under 10 CSR 60- 4.025(4)(B)3.
water system barriers as approved by the department.
(I) Seasonal systems.
completion of a department-approved start-up procedure, which may include a requirement for startup sampling prior to serving water to the public.
month that it is in operation unless it meets the criteria in subparagraphs (4)(I)2.A.–C. of this rule to be eligible for monitoring less frequently than monthly, except as provided under subsection (4)(C) of this rule.
frequently than monthly must have an approved sample siting plan that designates the time period for monitoring based on sitespecific considerations (e.g., during periods of highest demand or highest vulnerability to contamination). Seasonal systems must collect compliance samples during this time period.
toring, the system must meet the criteria in subsection (4)(G) of this section.
ing, the system must meet the criteria under subsection (4)(H) of this rule.
sonal system from some or all of the requirements for seasonal systems if the entire distribution system remains pressurized during the entire period that the system is not operating, except that systems that monitor less frequently than monthly must still monitor during the vulnerable period designated by the department.
(J) Additional routine monitoring the month following a total coliform-positive sample. Systems collecting samples on a quarterly or annual frequency must conduct additional routine monitoring the month following one (1) or more total coliform-positive samples (with or without a Level 1 treatment technique trigger). Systems must collect at least three (3) routine samples during the next month, except that the department may waive this requirement if the conditions of paragraphs (4)(J)1.–3. of this rule are met. Systems may either collect samples at regular time intervals throughout the month or may collect all required routine samples on a single day if samples are taken from different sites. Systems must use the results of additional routine samples in coliform treatment technique trigger calculations under subsection (9)(A) of this rule.
requirement to collect three (3) routine samples the next month in which the system provides water to the public if the department, or an agent approved by the department, performs a site visit before the end of the next month in which the system provides water to the public. Although a sanitary survey need not be performed, the site visit must be sufficiently detailed to allow the department to determine whether additional monitoring and/or any corrective action is needed. The department cannot approve an employee of the system to perform this site visit, even if the employee is an agent approved by the department to perform sanitary surveys.
requirement to collect three (3) routine samples the next month in which the system provides water to the public if the department has determined why the sample was total coliform-positive and has established that the system has corrected the problem or will correct the problem before the end of the next month in which the system serves water to the public. In this case, the department must document this decision to waive the following month’s additional monitoring requirement in writing, have it approved and signed by the supervisor of the department official who recommends such a decision, and make this document available to the EPA and public. The written documentation must describe the specific cause of the total coliform-positive sample and what action the system has taken and/or will take to correct this problem.
requirement to collect three (3) additional routine samples the next month in which the system provides water to the public solely on the grounds that all repeat samples are total coliform-negative. If the department determines that the system has corrected the contamination problem before the system takes the set of repeat samples required in section (8) of this rule, and all repeat samples were total coliform-negative, the department may waive the requirement for additional routine monitoring the next month.
(5) Routine monitoring requirements for community water systems serving one thousand (1,000) or fewer people using only ground water.
(A) General Routine Monitoring.
community water systems using only ground water (except ground water under the direct influence of surface water, as defined in 10 CSR 60-2.015) and serving one thousand (1,000) or fewer people.
sample taken under the provisions of this section, systems must comply with the repeat monitoring requirements and E. coli analytical requirements in section (8) of this rule. 10 CSR 60-4
tion (5) and section (8) of this rule for a calendar month has been completed, systems must determine whether any coliform treatment technique triggers specified in section (9) of this rule have been exceeded. If any trigger has been exceeded, systems must complete assessments as required by section (9) of this rule.
(1) sample per month except that systems practicing iron removal or lime softening must collect at least five (5) routine samples per month.
(C) Transition to the Revised Total Coliform Rule.
section (5)(E) of this rule are triggered, or unless otherwise directed by the department, all systems must continue to monitor according to the total coliform monitoring schedules under the Environmental Protection Agency’s Code of Federal Regulations, 40 CFR 141.21, published February 13, 2013. This document is incorporated by reference without any later amendments or modifications. To obtain a copy, contact the U.S. Government Printing Office at 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C., 20401, toll free at (866) 512-1800 or by visiting https://bookstore.gpo.gov.
cial monitoring evaluation during each sanitary survey to review the status of the system, including the distribution system, to determine whether the system is on an appropriate monitoring schedule. After the department has performed the special monitoring evaluation during each sanitary survey, the department may modify the system’s monitoring schedule, as necessary, or it may allow the system to stay on its existing monitoring schedule, consistent with the provisions of this section. The department may not allow systems to begin less frequent monitoring under the special monitoring evaluation unless the system has already met the applicable criteria for less frequent monitoring in this section.
(D) Criteria for reduced monitoring.
itoring frequency from monthly monitoring to no less than quarterly monitoring if the system is in compliance with department-certified operator provisions and demonstrates that it meets the criteria in subparagraphs (5)(D)1.A.–C. of this rule. A system that loses its certified operator must return to monthly monitoring the month following that loss.
history for a minimum of twelve (12) months.
shows the system is free of sanitary defects (or has an approved plan and schedule to correct them and is in compliance with the plan and the schedule), has a protected water source and meets approved construction standards.
of the following criteria:
visit by the department that is equivalent to a Level 2 assessment or an annual Level 2 assessment by a party approved by the department and correction of all identified sanitary defects (or the system has an approved plan and schedule to correct them and is in compliance with the plan and schedule);
tion control, as approved by the department;
disinfection entering the distribution system and a residual in the distribution system in accordance with criteria specified by the department;
tion of maintenance of at least a 4-log removal or inactivation of viruses as provided for under 10 CSR 60-4.025(4)(B)3.; or
to water system barriers as approved by the department.
(E) Return to routine monthly monitoring requirements. Systems on quarterly monitoring that experience any of the events in paragraphs (5)(E)1.-4. of this rule must begin monthly monitoring the month following the event. The system must continue monthly monitoring until it meets the reduced monitoring requirements in subsection (5)(D) of this rule.
ment or two (2) Level 1 assessments in a rolling twelve (12) month period.
lation.
technique violation.
Coliform Rule monitoring violations in a rolling twelve (12) month period.
(1) or more total coliform-positive samples (with or without a Level 1 treatment technique trigger). Systems must collect at least three (3) routine samples during the next month, except that the department may waive this requirement if the conditions of paragraphs (5)(F)1., 2., or 3. of this rule are met. Systems may either collect samples at regular time intervals throughout the month or may collect all required routine samples on a single day if samples are taken from different sites. Systems must use the results of additional routine samples in coliform treatment technique trigger calculations.
requirement to collect three (3) routine samples the next month in which the system provides water to the public if the department, or an agent approved by the department, performs a site visit before the end of the next month in which the system provides water to the public. Although a sanitary survey need not be performed, the site visit must be sufficiently detailed to allow the department to determine whether additional monitoring or any corrective action, or both, is needed. The department cannot approve an employee of the system to perform this site visit, even if the employee is an agent approved by the department to perform sanitary surveys.
requirement to collect three (3) routine samples the next month in which the system provides water to the public if the department has determined why the sample was total coliform-positive and has established that the system has corrected the problem or will correct the problem before the end of the next month in which the system serves water to the public. In this case, the department must document this decision to waive the following month’s additional monitoring requirement in writing, have it approved and signed by the supervisor of the department official who recommends such a decision, and make this document available to the U.S. EPA and the public. The written documentation must describe the specific cause of the total coliform-positive sample and what action the system has taken and/or will take to correct this problem.
requirement to collect three (3) additional routine samples the next month in which the system provides water to the public solely on the grounds that all repeat samples are total coliform-negative. If the department determines that the system has corrected the contamination problem before the system takes the set of repeat samples required in section (8) of this rule, and all repeat samples were total coliform-negative, the department may waive the requirement for additional routine monitoring the next month. (6) Routine monitoring requirements for surface water and ground water under the direct influence of surface water public water systems serving one thousand (1,000) or fewer people.
(A) General Routine Monitoring.
water and ground water under the direct influence of surface water systems serving one thousand (1,000) or fewer people.
sample taken under the provisions of this section (6), systems must comply with the repeat monitoring requirements and E. coli analytical requirements in section (8) of this rule.
section (6) and section (8) of this rule for a calendar month has been completed, systems must determine whether any coliform treatment technique triggers specified in section (9) have been exceeded. If any trigger has been exceeded, systems must complete assessments as required by section (9) of this rule.
4. Seasonal systems.
strate completion of a department-approved start-up procedure, which may include a requirement for start-up sampling prior to serving water to the public.
seasonal system from some or all of the requirements for seasonal systems if the entire distribution system remains pressurized during the entire period that the system is not operating.
(7) Routine monitoring requirements for public water systems serving more than one thousand (1,000) people.
(A) General Routine Monitoring.
public water systems serving more than one thousand (1,000) people.
sample taken under the provisions of this section, systems must comply with the repeat monitoring requirements and E. coli analytical requirements in section (8) of this rule.
section and section (8) of this rule for a calendar month has been completed, systems must determine whether any coliform treatment technique triggers specified in section (9) of this rule have been exceeded. If any trigger has been exceeded, systems must complete assessments as required by section (9) of this rule.
4. Seasonal systems.
strate completion of a department-approved start-up procedure, which may include a requirement for start-up sampling prior to serving water to the public.
seasonal system from some or all of the requirements for seasonal systems if the entire distribution system remains pressurized during the entire period that the system is not operating.
(8) Repeat monitoring and E. coli requirements.
(A) Repeat monitoring.
(24) hour limit on a case-by-case basis if the system has a logistical problem in collecting the repeat samples within twenty-four (24) hours that is beyond its control. Alternatively, the department may implement criteria for the system to use in lieu of case-by-case extensions. In the case of an extension, the department must specify how much time the system has to collect the repeat samples. The department cannot waive the requirement for a system to collect repeat samples in paragraphs (8)(A)1.-3. of this rule.
samples on the same day, except that the department may allow a system with a single service connection to collect the required set of repeat samples over a three (3) day period or to collect a larger volume repeat sample(s) in one (1) or more sample containers of any size, as long as the total volume collected is at least three hundred milliliters (300 mL). Systems with more than one (1) service connection, but fewer service connections than the required number of repeat samples, shall collect repeat samples as directed by the department.
al set of repeat samples in the manner specified in paragraphs (8)(A)1.-3. of this rule if one (1) or more repeat samples in the current set of repeat samples is total coliform-positive. The system must collect the additional set of repeat samples within twenty-four (24) hours of being notified of the positive result, unless the department extends the limit as provided in paragraph (8)(A)1. of this rule. The system must continue to collect additional sets of repeat samples until either total coliforms are not detected in one (1) complete set of repeat samples or the system determines that a coliform treatment technique trigger specified in subsection (9)(A) of this rule has been exceeded as a result of a repeat sample being total coliform-positive and notifies the department. If a trigger identified in section (9) of this rule is exceeded as a result of a routine sample being total coliform-positive, systems are required to conduct only one (1) round of repeat monitoring for each total coliform-positive routine sample.
ple and before it learns the results of the analysis of that sample, if it collects another routine sample(s) from within five (5) adjacent service connections of the initial sample, and the initial sample, after analysis, is found to contain total coliforms, then the system may count the subsequent sample(s) as a repeat sample instead of as a routine sample.
ples taken under sections (4)-(8) of this rule not invalidated by the department must be used to determine whether a coliform treatment technique trigger specified in section (9) of this rule has been exceeded.
(B) Escherichia coli (E. coli) testing.
coliform-positive, the system must analyze that total coliform-positive culture medium to determine if E. coli are present. If E. coli are present, the system must notify the department by the end of the day when the system is notified of the test result, unless the system is notified of the result after the department office is closed and the department does not have either an after-hours phone line or an alternative notification procedure, in which case the system must notify the department before the end of the next business day.
allow a system, on a case-by-case basis, to forgo E. coli testing on a total coliform-positive sample if that system assumes that the total coliform-positive sample is E. coli-positive. Accordingly, the system must notify the department as specified in paragraph (8)(B)1. of this rule and the provisions of the Environmental Protection Agency’s Code of Federal Regulations, 40 CFR 141.63(c), published February 13, 2013. This document is incorporated by reference without any later amendments or modifications. To obtain a copy, contact the U.S. Government Printing Office at 732 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, D.C., 20401, toll free at (866) 512-1800 or by visiting https://bookstore.gpo.gov.
(9) Coliform treatment technique triggers and assessment requirements for protection against potential fecal contamination.
(A) Treatment technique triggers. Systems must conduct assessments in accordance with subsection (9)(B) of this rule after exceeding treatment technique triggers in paragraphs (9)(A)1. and (9)(A)2. of this rule.
1. Level 1 treatment technique triggers.
more samples per month, the system exceeds five percent (5.0%) total coliform-positive samples for the month.
(2) or more total coliform-positive samples in the same month.
required repeat sample after any single total coliform-positive sample.
2. Level 2 treatment technique triggers.
specified in section (10) of this rule.
in paragraph (9)(A)1. of this rule, within a rolling twelve (12) month period, unless the department has determined a likely reason that the samples that caused the first Level 1 treatment technique trigger were total coliform-positive and has established that the system has corrected the problem.
monitoring, a Level 1 trigger in two (2) consecutive years.
(B) Requirements for assessments.
2 assessments are conducted in order to identify the possible presence of sanitary defects and defects in distribution system coliform monitoring practices. Level 2 assessments 10 CSR 60-4
must be conducted by parties approved by the department.
tems must ensure that the person performing the assessment evaluates minimum elements that include review and identification of inadequacies in sample sites; sampling protocol; sample processing; atypical events that could affect distributed water quality or indicate that distributed water quality was impaired; changes in distribution system maintenance and operation that could affect distributed water quality (including water storage); source and treatment considerations that bear on distributed water quality, where appropriate (e.g., small ground water systems); and existing water quality monitoring data. The system must conduct the assessment consistent with any department directives that tailor specific assessment elements with respect to the size and type of the system and the size, type, and characteristics of the distribution system.
conduct a Level 1 assessment consistent with department requirements if the system exceeds one (1) of the treatment technique triggers in paragraph (9)(A)1. of this rule. The Level 1 assessment must be conducted consistent with any department directives that tailor specific assessment elements with respect to the size and type of the system and the size, type, and characteristics of the distribution system.
1 assessment as soon as practical after any trigger in paragraph (9)(A)1. of this rule. In the completed assessment form, the system must describe sanitary defects detected, corrective actions completed, and a proposed timetable for any corrective actions not already completed. The assessment form may also note that no sanitary defects were identified. The system must submit the completed Level 1 assessment form to the department within thirty (30) days after the system learns that it has exceeded a trigger.
pleted Level 1 assessment and determines that the assessment is not sufficient (including any proposed timetable for any corrective actions not already completed), the department must consult with the system. If the department requires revisions after consultation, the system must submit a revised assessment form to the department on an agreedupon schedule not to exceed thirty (30) days from the date of the consultation.
of the assessment form by the system, the department must determine if the system has identified a likely cause for the Level 1 trigger and, if so, establish that the system has corrected the problem, or has included a schedule acceptable to the department for correcting the problem.
ensure that a Level 2 assessment consistent with department requirements is conducted if the system exceeds one (1) of the treatment technique triggers in paragraph (9)(A)2. of this rule. The Level 2 assessment must be conducted consistent with any department directives that tailor specific assessment elements with respect to the size and type of the system and the size, type, and characteristics of the distribution system. The system must comply with any expedited actions or additional actions required by the department in the case of an E. coli MCL violation.
Level 2 assessment is completed by the department or by a party approved by the department as soon as practical after any trigger in paragraph (9)(A)2. of this rule. The system must submit a completed Level 2 assessment form to the department within thirty (30) days after the system learns that it has exceeded a trigger. The assessment form must describe sanitary defects detected, corrective actions completed, and a proposed timetable for any corrective actions not already completed. The assessment form may also note that no sanitary defects were identified.
assessments if the system has staff or management with the certification or qualifications specified by the department unless otherwise directed by the department.
pleted Level 2 assessment and determines that the assessment is not sufficient (including any proposed timetable for any corrective actions not already completed), the department must consult with the system. If the department requires revisions after consultation, the system must submit a revised assessment form to the department on an agreedupon schedule not to exceed thirty (30) days.
of the assessment form by the system, the department must determine if the system has identified a likely cause for the Level 2 trigger and determine whether the system has corrected the problem, or has included a schedule acceptable to the department for correcting the problem.
(10) Violations.
(MCL) Violation. A system is in violation of the MCL for E. coli when any of the conditions identified in paragraphs (10)(A)1.-4. of this rule occur. For purposes of the public notification requirements in 10 CSR 60- 8.010, violation of the MCL for E. coli may pose an acute risk to health.
repeat sample following a total coliform-positive routine sample.
tive repeat sample following an E. coli-positive routine sample.
repeat samples following an E. coli-positive routine sample.
when any repeat sample tests positive for total coliform.
(B) Treatment technique violation.
occurs when a system exceeds a treatment technique trigger specified in subsection (9)(A) of this rule and then fails to conduct the required assessment or corrective actions within the timeframe specified in subsections (9)(B) and (9)(C) of this rule.
occurs when a seasonal system fails to complete a department-approved start-up procedure prior to serving water to the public.
(C) Monitoring violations.
or additional routine sample in a compliance period is a monitoring violation.
ing a total coliform-positive routine sample is a monitoring violation.
(D) Reporting violations.
or completed assessment form after a system properly conducts monitoring or assessment in a timely manner is a reporting violation.
lowing an E. coli-positive sample as required by paragraph (8)(B)1. of this rule in a timely manner is a reporting violation.
pletion of department-approved start-up procedure by a seasonal system is a reporting violation.
AUTHORITY: section 640.100, RSMo 2016.* Original rule filed Aug. 12, 2015, effective March 30, 2016. Amended: Filed June 13, 2018, effective Feb. 28, 2019. *Original authority: 640.100, RSMo 1939, amended 1978, 1981, 1982, 1988, 1989, 1992, 1993, 1995, 1996, 1998, 1999, 2002, 2006, 2012, 2014.