Mo. Code Regs. Ann. tit. 10, § 10-6.140
PURPOSE: This rule implements provisions of federal regulations which restrict credit in the calculation of emission limitations for reduced pollutant concentrations due to the use of dispersion techniques.
PUBLISHER’S NOTE: The secretary of state has determined that the publication of the entire text of the material which is incorporated by reference as a portion of this rule would be unduly cumbersome or expensive. This material as incorporated by reference in this rule shall be maintained by the agency at its headquarters and shall be made available to the public for inspection and copying at no more than the actual cost of reproduction. This note applies only to the reference material. The entire text of the rule is printed here.
(1) Applicability.
(C) Exemptions. The provisions of section (3) of this rule do not apply to emission limitation credits from—
before December 31, 1970, except where pollutants are being emitted from the stacks by source operations which were constructed, reconstructed, or on which major modifications were carried out after December 31, 1970; or
31, 1970, except where these dispersion techniques are being applied to source operations which were constructed, reconstructed, or on which major modifications were carried out after December 31, 1970.
(2) Definitions.
(A) Commence—For the purposes of major stationary source construction or major modification, the owner or operator has all necessary preconstruction approvals or permits and—
actual on-site construction of the source, to be completed within a reasonable time; or
obligations, which cannot be canceled or modified without substantial loss to the owner or operator, to undertake a program of actual construction of the source to be completed within a reasonable time.
(B) Dispersion technique—
pollutant in the ambient air by—
engineering practice stack height;
to atmospheric conditions or ambient concentrations of that pollutant; or
source process parameters, exhaust gas parameters, stack parameters, or combining exhaust gases from several existing stacks into one (1) stack; or other selective handling of exhaust gas streams so as to increase the exhaust gas plume rise; and
2. This definition does not include:
pollution control system, for the purpose of returning the gas to the temperature at which it was originally discharged from the installation generating the gas stream;
B. The merging of exhaust gas streams where—
that the installation was originally designed and constructed with the merged gas streams;
in operation at the installation that includes the installation of emissions control equipment and is accompanied by a net reduction in the allowable emissions of a pollutant. This exclusion from the definition of dispersion technique shall apply only to the emission limitation for the pollutant affected by a change in operation; or
change in operation at the installation that included the installation of emissions control equipment or was carried out for sound economic or engineering reasons. Where there was an increase in the emission limitation or in the event that no emission limitation was in existence prior to the merging, the director shall presume that merging was significantly motivated by an intent to gain emissions credit for greater dispersion. Without a demonstration by the source owner or operator that merging was not significantly motivated by that intent, the director shall deny credit for the effects of merging in calculating the allowable emissions for the source;
prescribed burning programs;
open burning; or
which increase final exhaust gas plume rise where the resulting allowable emissions of sulfur dioxide from the installation do not exceed five thousand (5,000) tons per year.
(D) Excessive concentration—
pollutant concentrations from stack height exceeding that defined in paragraph (2)(E)2. of this rule, an excessive concentration is a maximum ground-level concentration due to emissions from a stack due in whole or part to downwash, wakes, or eddy effects produced by nearby structures or nearby terrain features which are at least forty percent (40%) in excess of the maximum concentration experienced in the absence of the downwash, wakes, or eddy effects, and that contributes to a total concentration due to emissions from all installations that is greater than an ambient air quality standard. For installations subject to the prevention of significant deterioration program as set forth in 10 CSR 10-6.060(8), an excessive concentration means a maximum ground-level concentration due to emissions from a stack due to the same conditions as mentioned previously and is greater than a prevention of significant deterioration increment. The allowable emission rate to be used in making demonstrations under this definition shall be prescribed by the new source performance regulation as referenced by 10 CSR 10-6.070 for the source category unless the owner or operator demonstrates that this emission rate is infeasible. Where demonstrations are approved by the director, an alternative emission rate shall be established in consultation with the source owner or operator;
increases in stack heights up to the heights established under paragraph (2)(E)2. of this rule, an excessive concentration is either—
or part to downwash, wakes, or eddy effects as provided in paragraph (2)(D)1. of this rule, except that the emission rate used shall be the applicable emission limitation (or, in the absence of this limit, the actual emission rate); or
stack, as determined by the director; and
for a stack height determined under paragraph (2)(E)2. of this rule where the director requires the use of a field study of fluid model to verify good engineering practice stack height, for installations seeking stack height credit after November 9, 1984, based on the aerodynamic influence of cooling towers, and for installations seeking stack height credit after December 31, 1970, based on the aerodynamic influence of structures not represented adequately by the equations in paragraph (2)(E)2. of this rule, a maximum groundlevel concentration due in whole or part to downwash, wakes, or eddy effects that is at least forty percent (40%) in excess of the maximum concentration experienced in the absence of downwash, wakes, or eddy effects.
(E) Good engineering practice (GEP) stack height—The greater of—
elevation at the base of the stack;
before January 12, 1979, and for which the owner or operator had obtained all applicable permits or approvals required under 40 CFR 51 and 52,
Hg = 2.5H
provided the owner or operator produces evidence that this equation was actually relied on in establishing an emission limitation; and for all other stacks,
Hg = H + 1.5L
Where: Hg = GEP stack height, measured from the ground-level elevation at the base of the stack; H = height of nearby structure(s) measured from the groundlevel elevation at the base of the stack; and L = lesser dimension, height, or projected width of the nearby structure(s). Provided that the director may require the use of a field study or fluid model to verify GEP stack height for the installation; or
approved by the director, which ensures that the emissions from a stack do not result in excessive concentrations of any air pollutant as a result of atmospheric downwash, wakes, or eddy effects created by the source itself, nearby structures, or nearby terrain features.
(F) Major modification—Any physical change or change in the method of operation at an installation or in the attendant air pollution control equipment that would result in a significant net emissions increase of any pollutant. A physical change or a change in the method of operation, unless previously limited by enforceable permit conditions, shall not include:
of an order under sections 2(a) and (b) of the Energy Supply and Environmental Coordination Act of 1974, a prohibition under the Power Plant and Industrial Fuel Use Act of 1978, or by reason of a natural gas curtailment plan pursuant to the Federal Power Act;
January 6, 1975, the source was capable of accommodating the fuel or material, unless the change would be prohibited under any enforceable permit condition which was established after January 6, 1975;
production rate unless the change would be prohibited under any enforceable permit condition which was established after January 6, 1975; or
under section 125 of the Clean Air Act.
(G) Nearby—Nearby, as used in the definition good engineering practice (GEP) stack height in paragraph (2)(E)2. of this rule, is defined for a specific structure or terrain feature—
paragraph (2)(E)2. of this rule, nearby means that distance up to five (5) times the lesser of the height or the width dimension of a structure, but not greater than one-half (1/2) mile; and
demonstrations under paragraph (2)(E)3. of this rule, nearby means not greater than one-half (1/2) mile, except that the portion of a terrain feature may be considered to be nearby which falls within a distance of up to ten (10) times the maximum height of the feature, not to exceed two (2) miles if feature achieves a height one-half (1/2) mile from the stack that is at least forty percent (40%) of the GEP stack height determined by the formula provided in paragraph (2)(E)2. of this rule, or twenty-six meters (26 m), whichever is greater, as measured from the ground-level elevation at the base of the stack. The height of the structure or terrain feature is measured from the ground-level elevation at the base of the stack.
(3) General Provisions.
AUTHORITY: section 643.050, RSMo 2016.* Original rule filed Jan. 6, 1986, effective May 11, 1986. Amended: Filed May 1, 2019, effective Jan. 30, 2020.
*Original authority: 643.050, RSMo 1965, amended 1972, 1992, 2011.