Mo. Code Regs. Ann. tit. 10, § 10-2.215
PURPOSE: This rule will reduce volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from solvent cleanup operations. The RSMo 536.016 requirement for necessity evidence is the Kansas City Ozone Maintenance Plan adopted February 3, 1998, and section 182 of the Clean Air Act.
(1) Applicability.
(500) pounds per day. Once a source is determined to exceed the applicability level of this rule, it shall remain subject to this rule even if its actual emissions drop below the applicability level.
(C) The following cleaning operations are not subject to the provisions of this rule:
Nonmanufacturing areas include cafeterias, laboratories, pilot facilities, restrooms, and office buildings;
has been made a best available control technology, reasonably available control technology, or lowest achievable emission rate determination; and
to the Aerospace National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants Standards source category, under 40 CFR 63 subpart GG.
(2) Definitions.
of the vapor amounts that equal the total weight of liquid solvent in the system minus the weight of liquid solvent in the used category.
Ve = Si – So(1 – Xci)(1 – Cei)
Where Ve = Total weight of the evaporative loss of the VOC. (from container, the cleaning operation, the surface being cleaned, and the discard wipes and residue) Si = Liquid VOC input weight So = Total liquid VOC output weight (from the cleaning operation, the surface being cleaned and the discard wipes and residue) Xci = Total weight fraction of the contaminants (in the wipes and liquid residue) Cei = Total weight fraction due to control of VOCs attributed to add on emission control device(s). Note Cei will be zero (0) if not applicable.
(3) General Provisions.
(B) Solvent Emission Reduction. The following provisions shall apply to any stationary source subject to subsection (3)(A) of this rule:
reduction shall be based on the average of the summation of the emissions in 1997 and 1998 or shall be based on total VOC emissions from plant-wide solvent cleanup operations divided by units produced in 1997 and 1998. If the owner/operator demonstrates that 1997 and 1998 are not representative production years, then a demonstration shall be made to the agency that other years are more representative for purposes of comparison or for prorating cleaning solvent usage. The following applicable documentation of actions and associated emission reductions shall be sent to the department for approval by December 1, 2002:
es; and
(3)(B)1. of this rule shall remain in effect until other changes resulting in greater, or equal, VOC emission reductions from the cleaning operations are implemented.
(4) Reporting and Record Keeping. The person responsible for industrial cleaning operations at an affected facility seeking to comply with subsection (3)(A) of this rule shall keep records of information sufficient for the calculation of emissions from each Unit Operation System (UOS) from the use of industrial cleaning solvents. A UOS consists of an industrial cleaning operation around which all organic solvent usage, disposal and fugitive losses may be calculated using a SMBE. As an aid to compliance with this section, records for industrial cleaning UOSs may include one (1) or more of the following:
(A) Engineering drawings or sketches of all UOSs used to define industrial cleaning operations within the facility, including a system boundary, organic solvent input(s), organic solvent output(s), and organic solvent evaporative loss points. These drawings shall include each of the following:
boundary which describe all components of the UOS, including any virgin solvent containers, solvent applicators, used solvent containers, and the surface being cleaned;
ing liquid and/or evaporative solvent flow, accurate with respect to relative mass flow rates in and out of the system boundary; and
pathways within the system boundary;
AUTHORITY: section 643.050, RSMo Supp. 1999.* Original rule filed Aug. 30, 2000, effective May 30, 2001.
*Original authority: 643.050, RSMo 1965, amended 1972, 1992, 1993, 1995. 10 CSR 10-2