Minn. Stat. § 103G.2242
Subd. 1. Rules.
Subd. 2. Evaluation.
Questions concerning the public value, location, size, or type of a wetland shall be submitted to and determined by a technical evaluation panel after an on-site inspection. The technical evaluation panel shall be composed of a technical professional employee of the board, a technical professional employee of the local soil and water conservation district or districts, and a technical professional with expertise in water resources management appointed by the local government unit. The panel shall use the "United States Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual" (January 1987), "Wetlands of the United States" (United States Fish and Wildlife Service Circular 39, 1971 edition), and "Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States" (1979 edition). The panel shall provide the wetland determination to the local government unit that must approve a replacement plan under this section, and may recommend approval or denial of the plan. The authority must consider and include the decision of the technical evaluation panel in their approval or denial of a plan.
Subd. 3. Replacement completion.
Replacement of wetland values must be completed prior to or concurrent with the actual draining or filling of a wetland, or an irrevocable bank letter of credit or other security acceptable to the local government unit must be given to the local government unit to guarantee the successful completion of the replacement.
Subd. 4. Decision.
Upon receiving and considering all required data, the local government unit reviewing replacement plan applications, banking plan applications, and exemption or no-loss determination requests must act on all replacement plan applications, banking plan applications, and exemption or no-loss determination requests in compliance with section 15.99.
Subd. 5. Processing fee.
The local government unit may charge processing fees in amounts not greater than are necessary to cover the reasonable costs of implementing the rules adopted under subdivision 1.
Subd. 6. Notice of application.
(c) For the purpose of this subdivision, "application" includes a revised application for replacement plan approval and an application for a revision to an approved replacement plan if:
Subd. 7. Notice of decision.
Within ten days of the approval or denial of a replacement plan under this section, a summary of the approval or denial must be mailed to members of the technical evaluation panel, the applicant, individual members of the public who request a copy, the managers of the watershed district, if one exists, and the commissioner of natural resources.
Subd. 8. Public comment period.
Except for activities impacting less than 10,000 square feet of wetland, before approval or denial of a replacement plan under this section, comments may be made by the public to the local government unit for a period of 30 days.
Subd. 9. Appeal.
Appeal of a replacement plan, exemption, or no-loss decision may be obtained by mailing a petition and payment of a filing fee of $200, which shall be retained by the board to defray administrative costs, to the board within 15 days after the postmarked date of the mailing specified in subdivision 7. If appeal is not sought within 15 days, the decision becomes final. The local government unit may require the petitioner to post a letter of credit, cashier's check, or cash in an amount not to exceed $500. If the petition for hearing is accepted, the amount posted must be returned to the petitioner. Appeal may be made by the wetland owner, by any of those to whom notice is required to be mailed under subdivision 7, or by 100 residents of the county in which a majority of the wetland is located. Within 30 days after receiving a petition, the board shall decide whether to grant the petition and hear the appeal. The board shall grant the petition unless the board finds that the appeal is meritless, trivial, or brought solely for the purposes of delay; that the petitioner has not exhausted all local administrative remedies; or that the petitioner has not posted a letter of credit, cashier's check, or cash if required by the local government unit. In determining whether to grant the appeal, the board shall also consider the size of the wetland, other factors in controversy, any patterns of similar acts by the local government unit or petitioner, and the consequences of the delay resulting from the appeal. All appeals must be heard by the committee for dispute resolution of the board, and a decision made within 60 days of the appeal. The decision must be served by mail on the parties to the appeal, and is not subject to the provisions of chapter 14. A decision whether to grant a petition for appeal and a decision on the merits of an appeal must be considered the decision of an agency in a contested case for purposes of judicial review under sections 14.63 to 14.69.
Subd. 10. Local requirements.
The rules adopted under subdivision 1 shall allow for local government units to use their own notice and public comment procedures so long as the requirements of this section are satisfied.
Subd. 11. Wetland heritage advisory committee.
The governor shall establish a wetland heritage advisory committee consisting of a balanced diversity of interests including agriculture, environmental, and sporting organizations, land development organizations, local government organizations, and other agencies. The committee must consist of nine members including the commissioner of agriculture, or a designee of the commissioner, the commissioner of natural resources, and seven members appointed by the governor. The governor's appointees must include one county commissioner, one representative each from a statewide sporting organization, a statewide conservation organization, an agricultural commodity group, one faculty member of an institution of higher education with expertise in the natural sciences, and one member each from two statewide farm organizations. The committee shall advise the board on the development of rules under this section and, after rule adoption, shall meet at least twice a year to review implementation of the program, to identify strengths and weaknesses, and to recommend changes to the rules and the law to improve the program.
Subd. 12. Replacement credits.
(c) Notwithstanding section 103G.222, subdivision 1, paragraph (i), the following actions are eligible for replacement credit as determined by the local government unit, including enrollment in a statewide wetlands bank:
Subd. 13.
Repealed, 1996 c 462 s 44