Subd. 1. In general.

An installation of cable communications facilities under sections 238.22 to 238.27 must conform to reasonable conditions necessary to protect the safety, functioning, and aesthetic appearance of the premises, and the convenience and well-being of the property owner and residents.

Subd. 2. Owner approval.

A property owner may require from a cable communications company before installation or modification of cable communications facilities, diagrams showing plans for the placement and securing of the facilities. A property owner may approve or disapprove installation plans. Approval of plans may not be unreasonably withheld.

Subd. 3. Installation; bond.

The facilities must be installed in an expeditious and workmanlike manner, must comply with applicable codes, and must be installed parallel to utility lines when economically feasible. A property owner may require a cable communications company to post a bond or equivalent security in an amount not exceeding the estimated cost of installation of the cable communications facilities on the premises. Any bond filed by a cable communications company with a municipality which would provide coverage to the property owner as provided under this subdivision shall be considered to fulfill the requirements of this subdivision.

Subd. 4. Indemnify for damage.

A cable communications company shall indemnify a property owner for damage caused by the company in the installation, operation, maintenance, or removal of its facilities.

Subd. 5. Relocation.

A property owner may require a cable communications company, after reasonable written notice, to promptly relocate cable communications facilities on or within the premises of the property owner for the purpose of rehabilitation, redecoration, or necessary maintenance of the premises by the property owner.

Subd. 6. Master antenna television system.

Nothing in sections 238.22 to 238.27 precludes a property owner from entering into an agreement for use of a master antenna television system by a cable communications company or other television communications service.

Subd. 7. Cost allocated.

A cable communications company shall bear the entire cost of the installation, operation, maintenance, and removal of a cable communications facility within the initial franchise service area.

Subd. 8. Compensation for access.

1. (a) A cable communications company shall:

   1. (1) compensate the property owner for the diminution in fair market value of the premises resulting directly from the installation of the nonexclusive cable communications system; and
   2. (2) reimburse the property owner in an amount not to exceed $100 for premises containing less than ten dwelling units, and $200 for other premises, for actual costs incurred by the property owner with respect to the professional review of the plans and drawings regarding installation or modification of the cable communications system, associated contractual materials, and other documentation.
2. (b) With respect to paragraph (a), clause (1), any party appearing in a proceeding as provided under section 238.25 may introduce evidence of damages, if any, and special benefits, if any, to the property occurring by reason of the installation of the cable communications system.

Subd. 9. Not retroactive.

Nothing in sections 238.22 to 238.27 affects the validity of an agreement effective before June 15, 1983 between a property owner, a cable communications company, or any other person providing cable communications services on or within the premises of the property owner.

Subd. 10. Channel capacity.

1. (a) A property owner must provide access by a franchised cable communications company, as required under section 238.23, only if that cable company installs equipment with channel capacity sufficient to provide access to other providers of television programming or cable communications services so that residents or association members have a choice of alternative providers of those services. If the equipment is installed, the cable communications company shall allow alternative providers to use the equipment. If some of the residents or association members choose to subscribe to the services of an alternative provider, the cable company that installed the equipment shall be reimbursed by the other providers for the cost of equipment and installation on the property on a pro rata basis which reflects the number of subscribers of each provider on that property to the total number of subscribers on that property. In determining the pro rata amount of reimbursement by any alternative provider, the cost of equipment and installation shall be reduced to the extent of cumulative depreciation of that equipment at the time the alternative provider begins providing service.
2. (b) If equipment is already installed as of June 15, 1983 with channel capacity sufficient to allow access to alternative providers, the access and pro rata reimbursement provisions of paragraph (a) apply.