(a) This section applies to rules and orders that:
- (1) concern telecommunications service or providers of telecommunications service; and
- (2) may be adopted or issued by the commission under the authority of state or federal law.
(b) Rules and orders described in this section:
(1) may be adopted or issued only after notice and hearing, unless:
(A) the commission acts in accordance with IC 8-1-2-113 during a disaster emergency that is declared by the governor and that requires the commission or a provider to take immediate action to:
- (i) prevent injury to the business or interests of the citizens of Indiana; or
- (ii) maintain a provider's financial integrity and ability to provide adequate basic telecommunications service;
- (B) the commission is authorized under IC 8-1-2 to adopt a particular rule or issue a particular order without the necessity of a hearing; or
- (C) after receiving notice of the commission's proposed action, all parties to a proceeding consent to the commission taking action without a hearing; and
(2) must be:
- (A) consistent with this chapter; and
- (B) in the public interest, as determined by the commission under subsection (d).
(c) Rules and orders described in this section must promote one (1) or more of the following:
- (1) Cost minimization for providers to the extent that a provider's quality of service and facilities are not diminished.
- (2) A more accurate evaluation by the commission of a provider's physical or financial conditions or needs as well as a less costly regulatory procedure for either the provider, the provider's customers, or the commission.
- (3) Consumer access to affordable basic telecommunications service.
- (4) Development of depreciation guidelines and procedures that recognize technological obsolescence.
- (5) Increased provider management efficiency beneficial to customers.
- (6) Regulation consistent with a competitive environment.
(d) In determining whether the public interest will be served, as required under subsection (b), the commission shall consider:
- (1) whether technological change, competitive forces, or regulation by other state and federal regulatory bodies render the exercise of jurisdiction by the commission unnecessary or wasteful;
- (2) whether the exercise of commission jurisdiction produces tangible benefits to the customers of providers; and
- (3) whether the exercise of commission jurisdiction inhibits a regulated entity from competing with unregulated providers of functionally similar telecommunications services or equipment.
As added by P.L.92-1985, SEC.1. Amended by P.L.27-2006, SEC.19; P.L.107-2014, SEC.2; P.L.36-2026, SEC.6.