Ind. Code § 4-22-2-32
(b) In the review, the attorney general shall determine whether the rule adopted by the agency complies with the requirements under section 29 of this chapter and (if applicable) IC 13-14-9 . The attorney general shall consider the following:
(3) The extent to which the effects of the adopted rule differ from the effects that would have occurred if the published rule or rules had been adopted instead.
In the review, the attorney general shall consider whether the adopted rule may constitute the taking of property without just compensation to an owner.
(c) Except as provided in subsections (d) and (h), the attorney general shall disapprove a rule under this section only if it:
(4) violates another law.
Otherwise, the attorney general shall approve the rule without making a specific finding of fact concerning the subjects.
(d) If an agency submits a rule to the attorney general without complying with section 20(a)(2) of this chapter, the attorney general may:
(f) If the attorney general determines in the course of the review conducted under subsection (b) that a rule may constitute a taking of property, the attorney general shall advise the following:
(2) The agency head.
Advice given under this subsection shall be regarded as confidential attorney-client communication.
(g) The attorney general has forty-five (45) days from the date that an agency:
(2) resubmits a rule under subsection (e);
to approve or disapprove the rule. If the attorney general neither approves nor disapproves the rule, the rule is deemed approved, and the agency may submit it to the governor for approval under section 33 of this chapter without the approval of the attorney general.
(h) For rules adopted under IC 13-14-9 , the attorney general:
(2) may disapprove a rule under this section only if the rule:
As added by P.L.31-1985, SEC.21. Amended by P.L.36-1989, SEC.1; P.L.34-1993, SEC.4; P.L.12-1993, SEC.3; P.L.1-1996, SEC.31; P.L.1-2006, SEC.72; P.L.249-2023, SEC.32.