1. (1) As used in this section, the term:

   1. (a) "County agency," for the exclusive purposes of this section, means a board of county commissioners or other legislative and governing body of a county, however styled, including that of a consolidated or metropolitan government, a clerk of the circuit court, a separate or ex officio clerk of the county court, a sheriff, a property appraiser, a tax collector, a supervisor of elections, or any other officer in whom any portion of the fiscal duties of the above are under law separately placed. Each county agency is a local governmental entity for purposes of subparagraph (3)(a)4.

      ¹(b) "Financial audit" means an examination of financial statements in order to express an opinion on the fairness with which they present financial position, results of operations, and changes in financial position in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles and an examination to determine whether operations are properly conducted in accordance with legal and regulatory requirements. Financial audits must be conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and governmental auditing standards as adopted by the Board of Accountancy.

   2. (c) "Governmental entity" means a state agency, a county agency, or any other entity, however styled, that independently exercises any type of state or local governmental function.
   3. (d) "Local governmental entity" means a county agency, municipality, or special district as defined in s. 189.403, but does not include any housing authority established under chapter 421.
   4. (e) "Management letter" means a statement of the auditor's comments and recommendations.

   5. (f) "Performance audit" means an examination of a program, activity, or function of a governmental entity, conducted in accordance with applicable government auditing standards or auditing and evaluation standards of other appropriate authoritative bodies. The term includes an examination of issues related to:

      1. Economy, efficiency, or effectiveness of the program.

      2. Structure or design of the program to accomplish its goals and objectives.

      3. Adequacy of the program to meet the needs identified by the Legislature or governing body.

      4. Alternative methods of providing program services or products.

      5. Goals, objectives, and performance measures used by the agency to monitor and report program accomplishments.

      6. The accuracy or adequacy of public documents, reports, or requests prepared under the program by state agencies.

      7. Compliance of the program with appropriate policies, rules, or laws.

      8. Any other issues related to governmental entities as directed by the Legislative Auditing Committee.

   6. (g) "Political subdivision" means a separate agency or unit of local government created or established by law and includes, but is not limited to, the following and the officers thereof: authority, board, branch, bureau, city, commission, consolidated government, county, department, district, institution, metropolitan government, municipality, office, officer, public corporation, town, or village.
   7. (h) "State agency" means a separate agency or unit of state government created or established by law and includes, but is not limited to, the following and the officers thereof: authority, board, branch, bureau, commission, department, division, institution, office, officer, or public corporation, as the case may be, except any such agency or unit other than the Florida Public Service Commission within the legislative branch of state government.
2. (2) The Auditor General shall make financial audits and performance audits of public records and perform related duties as prescribed by law or concurrent resolution of the Legislature. The Auditor General shall perform his or her duties independently but under the general policies established by the Legislative Auditing Committee.

3. (3) (a)1. The Auditor General shall annually make financial audits of the accounts and records of all state agencies, as defined in this section, of all district school boards, and of all district boards of trustees of community colleges. This section does not limit the Auditor General's discretionary authority to conduct performance audits of these governmental entities as authorized in subparagraph 2. A district school board may select an independent auditor to perform a financial audit as defined in paragraph (1)(b) notwithstanding the notification provisions of this section. In addition, a district school board may employ an internal auditor to perform ongoing financial verification of the financial records of a school district who must report directly to the district school board or its designee.

   2. The Auditor General may at any time make financial audits and performance audits of the accounts and records of all governmental entities created pursuant to law. The audits referred to in this subparagraph must be made whenever determined by the Auditor General, whenever directed by the Legislative Auditing Committee, or whenever otherwise required by law or concurrent resolution. A district school board, expressway authority, or bridge authority may require that the annual financial audit of its accounts and records be completed within 12 months after the end of its fiscal year. If the Auditor General is unable to meet that requirement, the Auditor General shall notify the school board, the expressway authority, or the bridge authority pursuant to subparagraph 4.

   3. The Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability within the Office of the Auditor General shall maintain a schedule of performance audits of state programs. In conducting a performance audit of a state program, the Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability, when appropriate, shall identify and comment upon alternatives for accomplishing the goals of the program being audited. Such alternatives may include funding techniques and, if appropriate, must describe how other states or governmental units accomplish similar goals.

   4. If by July 1 in any fiscal year a district school board or local governmental entity has not been notified that a financial audit for that fiscal year will be performed by the Auditor General pursuant to subparagraph 2., each municipality with either revenues or expenditures of more than $100,000, each special district with either revenues or expenditures of more than $50,000, and each county agency shall, and each district school board may, require that an annual financial audit of its accounts and records be completed, within 12 months after the end of its respective fiscal year, by an independent certified public accountant retained by it and paid from its public funds. An independent certified public accountant who is selected to perform an annual financial audit of a school district must report directly to the district school board or its designee. A management letter must be prepared and included as a part of each financial audit report. Each local government finance commission, board, or council, and each municipal power corporation, created as a separate legal or administrative entity by interlocal agreement under s. 163.01(7), shall provide the Auditor General, within 12 months after the end of its fiscal year, with an annual financial audit report of its accounts and records and a written statement or explanation or rebuttal concerning the auditor's comments, including corrective action to be taken. The county audit shall be one document that includes a separate audit of each county agency. The county audit must include an audit of the deposits into and expenditures from the Public Records Modernization Trust Fund. The Auditor General shall tabulate the results of the audits of the Public Records Modernization Trust Fund and report a summary of the audits to the Legislature annually.

   5. The governing body of a municipality or a special district must establish an auditor selection committee and competitive auditor selection procedures. The governing board may elect to use its own competitive auditor selection procedures or the procedures outlined in subparagraph 6.

   6. The governing body of a noncharter county or district school board that elects to use a certified public accountant other than the Auditor General is responsible for selecting an independent certified public accountant to audit the county agencies of the county or district school board according to the following procedure:

   a. For each noncharter county, an auditor selection committee must be established, consisting of the county officers elected pursuant to s. 1(d), Art. VIII of the State Constitution, and one member of the board of county commissioners or its designee.

   b. The committee shall publicly announce, in a uniform and consistent manner, each occasion when auditing services are required to be purchased. Public notice must include a general description of the audit and must indicate how interested certified public accountants can apply for consideration.

   c. The committee shall encourage firms engaged in the lawful practice of public accounting who desire to provide professional services to submit annually a statement of qualifications and performance data.

   d. Any certified public accountant desiring to provide auditing services must first be qualified pursuant to law. The committee shall make a finding that the firm or individual to be employed is fully qualified to render the required services. Among the factors to be considered in making this finding are the capabilities, adequacy of personnel, past record, and experience of the firm or individual.

   e. The committee shall adopt procedures for the evaluation of professional services, including, but not limited to, capabilities, adequacy of personnel, past record, experience, results of recent external quality control reviews, and such other factors as may be determined by the committee to be applicable to its particular requirements.

   f. The public must not be excluded from the proceedings under this subparagraph.

   g. The committee shall evaluate current statements of qualifications and performance data on file with the committee, together with those that may be submitted by other firms regarding the proposed audit, and shall conduct discussions with, and may require public presentations by, no fewer than three firms regarding their qualifications, approach to the audit, and ability to furnish the required services.

   h. The committee shall select no fewer than three firms deemed to be the most highly qualified to perform the required services after considering such factors as the ability of professional personnel; past performance; willingness to meet time requirements; location; recent, current, and projected workloads of the firms; and the volume of work previously awarded to the firm by the agency, with the object of effecting an equitable distribution of contracts among qualified firms, provided such distribution does not violate the principle of selection of the most highly qualified firms. If fewer than three firms desire to perform the services, the committee shall recommend such firms as it determines to be qualified.

   i. If the governing board receives more than one proposal for the same engagement, the board may rank, in order of preference, the firms to perform the engagement. The firm ranked first may then negotiate a contract with the board giving, among other things, a basis of its fee for that engagement. If the board is unable to negotiate a satisfactory contract with that firm, negotiations with that firm shall be formally terminated, and the board shall then undertake negotiations with the second-ranked firm. Failing accord with the second-ranked firm, negotiations shall then be terminated with that firm and undertaken with the third-ranked firm. Negotiations with the other ranked firms shall be undertaken in the same manner. The board, in negotiating with firms, may reopen formal negotiations with any one of the three top-ranked firms, but it may not negotiate with more than one firm at a time. The board shall also negotiate on the scope and quality of services. In making such determination, the board shall conduct a detailed analysis of the cost of the professional services required in addition to considering their scope and complexity. For contracts over $50,000, the board shall require the firm receiving the award to execute a truth-in-negotiation certificate stating that the rates of compensation and other factual unit costs supporting the compensation are accurate, complete, and current at the time of contracting. Such certificate shall also contain a description and disclosure of any understanding that places a limit on current or future years' audit contract fees, including any arrangements under which fixed limits on fees will not be subject to reconsideration if unexpected accounting or auditing issues are encountered. Such certificate shall also contain a description of any services rendered by the certified public accountant or firm of certified public accountants at rates or terms that are not customary. Any auditing service contract under which such a certificate is required must contain a provision that the original contract price and any additions thereto shall be adjusted to exclude any significant sums by which the board determines the contract price was increased due to inaccurate or incomplete factual unit costs. All such contract adjustments shall be made within 1 year following the end of the contract.

   j. If the board is unable to negotiate a satisfactory contract with any of the selected firms, the committee shall select additional firms, and the board shall continue negotiations in accordance with this subsection until an agreement is reached.

   7. At the conclusion of the audit field work, the independent certified public accountant shall discuss with the head of each local governmental entity or the chair's designee or with the chair of the district school board or the chair's designee, as appropriate, all of the auditor's comments that will be included in the audit report. If the officer is not available to discuss the auditor's comments, their discussion is presumed when the comments are delivered in writing to his or her office. ²The auditor shall notify each member of the governing body of a local governmental entity for which deteriorating financial conditions exist which may cause a condition described in s. 218.503(1) to occur if actions are not taken to address such conditions.

   8. The officer's written statement of explanation or rebuttal concerning the auditor's comments, including corrective action to be taken, must be filed with the governing body of the local governmental entity or district school board within 30 days after the delivery of the financial audit report.

   9. The Auditor General, in consultation with the Board of Accountancy, shall adopt rules for the form and conduct of all local governmental entity audits. The rules must include, but are not limited to, requirements for the reporting of information necessary to carry out the purposes of the Local Government Financial Emergencies Act as stated in s. 218.501.

   10. Any local governmental entity or district school board financial audit report required under subparagraph 4. and the officer's written statement of explanation or rebuttal concerning the auditor's comments, including corrective action to be taken, must be submitted to the Auditor General within 45 days after delivery of the audit report to the local governmental entity or district school board but no later than 12 months after the end of the fiscal year. If the Auditor General does not receive the financial audit report within the prescribed period, he or she must notify the Legislative Auditing Committee that the governmental entity has not complied with this subparagraph. Following notification of failure to submit the required audit report or items required by rule adopted by the Auditor General, a hearing must be scheduled by rule of the committee. After the hearing, the committee shall determine which local governmental entities will be subjected to further state action. If it finds that one or more local governmental entities should be subjected to further state action, the committee shall:

   a. In the case of a local governmental entity, request the Department of Revenue and the Department of Banking and Finance to withhold any funds payable to such governmental entity until the required financial audit is received by the Auditor General.

   b. In the case of a special district, notify the Department of Community Affairs that the special district has failed to provide the required audits. Upon receipt of notification, the Department of Community Affairs shall proceed pursuant to ss. 189.421 and 189.422.

   11.a. The Auditor General, in consultation with the Board of Accountancy, shall review all audit reports submitted by local governmental entities pursuant to subparagraph 9. The Auditor General shall request any significant items that were omitted in violation of a rule adopted by the Auditor General. The items must be provided within 45 days after the date of the request. If the Auditor General does not receive the requested items, he or she shall notify the Joint Legislative Auditing Committee.

   b. The Auditor General shall notify the Governor and the Joint Legislative Auditing Committee of any audit report reviewed by the Auditor General which contains a statement that the local governmental entity is in a state of financial emergency as provided in s. 218.503. If the Auditor General, in reviewing any audit report, identifies additional information which indicates that the local governmental entity may be in a state of financial emergency as provided in s. 218.503, the Auditor General shall request appropriate clarification from the local governmental entity. The requested clarification must be provided within 45 days after the date of the request. If the Auditor General does not receive the requested clarification, he or she shall notify the Joint Legislative Auditing Committee. If, after obtaining the requested clarification, the Auditor General determines that the local governmental entity is in a state of financial emergency as provided in s. 218.503, he or she shall notify the Governor and the Joint Legislative Auditing Committee.

   12. In conducting a performance audit of any agency, the Auditor General shall use the Agency Strategic Plan of the agency in evaluating the performance of the agency.

4. (b) The Legislative Auditing Committee may authorize and direct the Auditor General to make a financial audit of any municipality or independent agency or authority of any municipality within the state, and the committee shall direct the Auditor General to make such audit whenever petitioned to do so by at least 20 percent of the electors of any municipality. The supervisor of elections of the county in which the municipality is located shall certify whether or not the petition contains the signatures of at least 20 percent of the electors of the municipality. The expenses of such audit shall be paid by the municipality and, in the event the municipality fails to pay the cost of the audit, the Department of Revenue shall, upon certification of the Auditor General, withhold from that portion of the municipal financial assistance trust fund for municipalities which is derived from the cigarette tax imposed under chapter 210, and which is distributable to such municipality, a sum sufficient to pay the cost of the audit and shall deposit that sum into the General Revenue Fund of the state.

5. (c) The Auditor General shall at least every 2 years make a performance audit of the local government financial reporting system, which, for the purpose of this chapter, means the reporting provisions of this subsection and subsection (4); s. 27.3455(1) and (2); part VII of chapter 112; s. 163.05; s. 166.241; chapter 189; parts III and V of chapter 218; and s. 925.037(5). The performance audit shall analyze each component of the reporting system separately and analyze the reporting system as a whole. The purpose of such an audit is to determine the accuracy, efficiency, and effectiveness of the reporting system in achieving its goals and objectives and to make recommendations to the local governments, the Governor, and the Legislature as to how the reporting system can be improved and how program costs can be reduced. Such goals and objectives must include, but need not be limited to, the timely, accurate, uniform, and cost-effective accumulation of financial and other information that can be used by the members of the Legislature and other appropriate officials in order to:

   1. Compare and contrast revenue sources and expenditures of local governmental entities;

   2. Assess the fiscal impact of the formation, dissolution, and activity of special districts;

   3. Evaluate the fiscal impact of state mandates on local governmental entities;

   4. Assess financial or economic conditions of local governmental entities; and

   5. Improve communication and coordination among state agencies and local governmental entities.

6. (d) Whenever a local governmental entity requests the Auditor General to conduct an audit of all or part of its operations and the Auditor General under his or her own authority or at the direction of the Legislative Auditing Committee conducts the audit, the expenses of the audit shall be paid for by the local governmental entity.
7. (4) If the Auditor General conducts an audit of a special district which indicates in its findings problems related to debt policy or practice, including failure to meet debt service payments, failure to comply with significant bond covenants, failure to meet bond reserve requirements, and significant erosion of a special district's revenue-producing capacity, a copy of the audit shall be submitted to the Division of Bond Finance of the State Board of Administration for review and comment. Upon receipt of this notification from the Auditor General, the Division of Bond Finance shall prepare a brief report describing the previous debt issued by the special district and submit the report to the Legislative Auditing Committee for their review and consideration.
8. (5) Each audit required or authorized by this section, when practicable, shall be made and completed within not more than 12 months following the end of each fiscal year of the state agency or political subdivision, if an annual audit, or at such lesser time which may be provided by law or concurrent resolution or directed by the Legislative Auditing Committee. When the Auditor General is required by law to make a financial audit of the whole or a portion of a fiscal year of a political subdivision and his or her current workload of audits of state agencies and political subdivisions is so great that it is not practicable within the required time to perform such audit and also to make financial audits of that political subdivision as to any other period not previously audited by him or her, then in his or her discretion the Auditor General may temporarily or indefinitely postpone audits of such other period or any portion thereof unless otherwise directed by the committee.
9. (6) The Legislative Auditing Committee may at any time, without regard to whether the Legislature is then in session or out of session, take under investigation any matter within the scope of an audit either completed or then being conducted by the Auditor General, and in connection with such investigation may exercise the powers of subpoena by law vested in a standing committee of the Legislature.
10. (7) (a) The Auditor General may, when in his or her judgment it is necessary, designate and direct any auditor employed by the Auditor General to audit any accounts or records within the power of the Auditor General to audit. The auditor shall report his or her findings for review by the Auditor General, who shall prepare the audit report.
11. (b) The audit report when final shall be a public record. The audit workpapers and notes are not a public record; however, those workpapers necessary to support the computations in the final audit report may be made available by a majority vote of the Legislative Auditing Committee after a public hearing showing proper cause. The audit workpapers and notes shall be retained by the Auditor General until no longer useful in his or her proper functions, after which time they may be destroyed.

12. (c) The audit report must make special mention of:

    1. Any violation of the laws within the scope of the audit; and

    2. Any illegal or improper expenditure, any improper accounting procedures, all failures to properly record financial transactions, and all other inaccuracies, irregularities, shortages, and defalcations.

13. (d) At the conclusion of the audit, the Auditor General or the Auditor General's designated representative shall discuss the audit with the official whose office is subject to audit and submit to that official a list of the Auditor General's adverse findings which may be included in the audit report. If the official is not available for receipt of the list of adverse audit findings, clearly designated as such, then delivery thereof is presumed to be made when it is delivered to his or her office. The official shall submit to the Auditor General or the designated representative, within 30 days after the receipt of the list of findings, his or her written statement of explanation or rebuttal concerning all of the findings, including therein corrective action to be taken to preclude a recurrence of all adverse findings. Whenever necessary, the Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability may request the official to submit his or her written statement of explanation or rebuttal within 15 days after the receipt of the list of findings.
14. (e) Each agency head shall provide to the Legislative Auditing Committee, within 6 months after the published date of an audit report, a written explanation of the status of recommendations contained in the report.
15. (f) No later than 18 months after the release of a performance audit report, the agencies which are the subject of that report shall provide data and other information that describes with specificity what the agencies have done to respond to the recommendations contained in the report. The Auditor General or the Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability may verify the data and information provided by the agencies. If the data and information provided by the agencies are deemed sufficient and accurate, the Auditor General or the Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability shall report to the Joint Legislative Auditing Committee and to the legislative standing committees concerned with the subject areas of the audit. The report shall include a summary of the agencies' responses, the evaluation of those responses, and any recommendations deemed to be appropriate.
16. (8) If the Auditor General discovers any errors, unusual practices, or any other discrepancies in connection with his or her audits of a state agency or state officer, the Auditor General shall, as soon as practicable, notify in writing the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, respectively, who, in turn, shall promptly thereafter forward a copy thereof to the chairs of the respective legislative committees, which in the judgment of the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of ³Representatives. Thereafter, and in no event later than the 10th day of the next succeeding legislative session, the person in charge of the state agency involved, or the state officer involved, as the case may be, shall explain in writing to the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives and to the Legislative Auditing Committee the reasons or justifications for such errors, unusual practices, or discrepancies and the corrective measures, if any, taken by the agency.
17. (9) All agencies, other than state agencies as defined herein, and all district school boards and district boards of trustees of community colleges shall have the power to have a performance audit or financial audit of their accounts and records by an independent certified public accountant retained by them and paid from their public funds.

18. (10) The Auditor General shall provide annually a list of those special districts which are in compliance with this section and a list of those special districts which are not in compliance with this section for the Special District Information Program of the Department of Community Affairs.

    ¹Note.--As amended by s. 1, ch. 96-324. This version is published here as the last expression of legislative will (see Journal of the Senate 1996, pp. 923 and 1570). Paragraph (b) of subsection (1) was also amended by s. 26, ch. 96-318, and that version reads:

19. (b) "Financial audit" means an examination of financial statements in order to express an opinion on the fairness with which they present financial position, results of operations, and changes in financial position in conformity with generally accepted governmental accounting principles and an examination to determine whether operations are properly conducted in accordance with legal and regulatory requirements. Financial audits must be conducted in accordance with governmental auditing standards and generally accepted auditing standards as defined by the Board of Accountancy.

    ²Note.--As amended by s. 1, ch. 97-255. As amended by s. 1, ch. 97-111, this sentence appears before the last sentence of standing text.

    ³Note.--The part of this sentence that followed the word "Representatives" was deleted by s. 26, ch. 96-318.

History.--s. 6, ch. 67-470; s. 6, ch. 69-82; s. 1, ch. 72-6; ss. 1, 2, ch. 73-234; s. 1, ch. 75-122; s. 1, ch. 76-73; s. 1, ch. 77-102; s. 2, ch. 79-183; ss. 1, 3, 6, ch. 79-589; s. 1, ch. 81-167; s. 1, ch. 83-55; s. 1, ch. 83-106; s. 1, ch. 84-241; s. 1, ch. 85-80; s. 14, ch. 86-204; s. 2, ch. 86-217; s. 1, ch. 87-114; s. 4, ch. 89-87; s. 30, ch. 89-169; s. 9, ch. 90-110; s. 19, ch. 90-227; s. 65, ch. 91-45; s. 17, ch. 91-282; s. 2, ch. 91-429; s. 91, ch. 92-142; s. 136, ch. 92-279; s. 55, ch. 92-326; s. 15, ch. 94-249; s. 1309, ch. 95-147; s. 1, ch. 95-214; s. 1, ch. 95-380; s. 12, ch. 95-396; s. 26, ch. 96-318; s. 1, ch. 96-324; s. 21, ch. 97-96; s. 1, ch. 97-111; s. 1, ch. 97-255; s. 26, ch. 97-271.

Note.--Former s. 11.186.