Fla. Stat. § 216.221
(b) In developing a plan of action to prevent deficits in accordance with subsection (7), the Governor and Chief Justice shall, to the extent possible, preserve legislative policy and intent, and, absent any specific direction to the contrary in the General Appropriations Act, the Governor and Chief Justice shall comply with the following guidelines for reductions in the approved operating budgets of the executive branch and the judicial branch:
1. Entire statewide programs previously established by the Legislature should not be eliminated.
2. Education budgets should not be reduced more than provided for in s. 215.16(2).
3. The use of nonrecurring funds to solve recurring deficits should be minimized.
4. Newly created programs that are not fully implemented and programs with critical audits should receive first consideration for reductions.
5. No agencies or branches of government receiving appropriations should be exempt from reductions.
6. When reductions in positions are required, the focus should be initially on vacant positions.
7. Any reductions applied to all agencies and branches should be uniformly applied.
8. Reductions that would cause substantial losses of federal funds should be minimized.
9. To the greatest extent possible, across-the-board, prorated reductions should be considered.
10. Reductions to statewide programs should occur only after review of programs that provide only local benefits.
11. Reductions in administrative and support functions should be considered before reductions in direct-support services.
12. Maximum reductions should be considered in budgets for expenses including travel and in budgets for equipment replacement, outside consultants, and contracts.
13. Reductions in salaries for elected state officials should be considered.
14. Reductions that adversely affect the public health, safety, and welfare should be minimized.
15. The Budget Stabilization Fund should not be reduced to a level that would impair the financial stability of this state.
16. Reductions in programs that are traditionally funded by the private sector and that may be assumed by private enterprise should be considered.
17. Reductions in programs that are duplicated among state agencies or branches of government should be considered.
History.--s. 31, ch. 69-106; s. 14, ch. 71-354; s. 18, ch. 83-49; s. 21, ch. 91-109; s. 64, ch. 92-142; s. 1170, ch. 95-147; s. 13, ch. 98-73.