Fla. Admin. Code R. 63D-13.0042
(1) These rules apply to youth on probation, CR, and PCP. Possible violations of supervision include the following:
(4) Technical violations involve noncompliance with a youth’s court-ordered sanctions, or terms of conditional release, which may include, but are not limited to, community service, curfew, mental health or substance abuse evaluations and counseling, and school enrollment, attendance, and behavior. Technical violations shall be addressed in accordance with the Graduated Response Matrix, including those incurred simultaneously with a new law violation.
(a) Unless a previously filed Affidavit/Petition for Violation of Probation is pending disposition (for youth on probation or PCP) or a previously submitted administrative transfer request is pending a staffing (for youth on CR), within seven calendar days of becoming aware of a technical violation, the JPO shall utilize the Graduated Response Matrix to determine the appropriate response based on the youth’s risk to reoffend and the severity and frequency of the noncompliance.
1. If the youth meets the LIST 1 noncompliance threshold and has not previously met a LIST 1 or LIST 2 threshold for any other sanction, the JPO shall identify and implement at least one appropriate response from LIST 1.
2. If the youth meets the LIST 1 noncompliance threshold and has previously met a LIST 1 or LIST 2 threshold for any other sanction, the JPO and JPOS shall meet to determine whether a LIST 1 response(s), a LIST 2 response(s), or an Affidavit/Petition for Violation of Probation (for youth on probation or PCP) or an administrative transfer request (for youth on CR) is appropriate. The JPO and JPOS shall consider the volume, frequency, and severity of all noncompliance, as well as the youth’s age, maturity level, and criminogenic needs.
3. If the youth meets the LIST 2 noncompliance threshold and has not previously met a LIST 2 threshold for any other sanction, the JPO shall identify and implement at least one appropriate response from LIST 2.
4. If the youth meets the LIST 2 noncompliance threshold and has previously met a LIST 2 threshold for any other sanction, the JPO and JPOS shall meet to determine whether a LIST 2 response(s) or an Affidavit/Petition for Violation of Probation (for youth on probation or PCP) or an administrative transfer request (for youth on CR) is appropriate. The JPO and JPOS shall consider the volume, frequency, and severity of all noncompliance, as well as the youth’s age, maturity level, and criminogenic needs.
5. If the youth meets the VOP/TRANSFER noncompliance threshold, the JPO shall file an Affidavit/Petition for Violation of Probation (for youth on probation or PCP) or submit an administrative transfer request (for youth on CR). The affidavit or request shall include all technical violations of supervision that were not previously included in any affidavit or request; the affidavit or request shall document how the Graduated Response Matrix was used to address each instance of noncompliance.
(5) For the youth to meet the criteria for absconding, the JPO must have cause to believe that the youth is deliberately avoiding supervision by removing himself or herself from the home or community. A youth reported by family member, law enforcement agency, or foster care agency to have run away is considered an absconder.
(c) The JPO shall notify law enforcement of the absconded youth once an Affidavit for An Order to Take into Custody, and an Affidavit/Petition for Violation of Probation have been filed.
1. The referral indicating the violation of probation shall be entered in JJIS at the time the paperwork is submitted to the court.
2. The placement and alert of abscond status shall be entered in JJIS upon receipt of the signed Order to Take into Custody from the court.
(6) Non-compliance with the court order for youth on CR shall be addressed through the administrative transfer process.
(c) The transfer request paperwork shall include a copy of the following:
1. Commitment order;
2. Signed YES Plan;
3. Reasons for the request; and
4. Recommendation as to the restrictiveness level necessary to ensure protection of the public and to meet the treatment needs of the youth.
Rulemaking Authority 985.438, 985.64, 985.601 FS. Law Implemented 985.435, 985.438, 985.439 FS. History–New 5-4-20, Amended 12-22-24.