Fla. Admin. Code R. 62-780.700
(2) Prior to performing any pilot study, within the time frames specified in Table A or the CAD the PRSR shall submit to the Department for review an electronic or paper copy of a Pilot Study Work Plan to determine the need for any applicable Department permits or authorizations (for example, underground injection control, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System, or air emissions), and to ensure that human health and the environment are adequately protected. The Department shall:
(3) The Remedial Action Plan shall:
(d) Explain the rationale for the active remediation methods selected, which shall include at a minimum:
1. Results from any pilot studies or bench tests; and,
2. Results of an evaluation of remedial alternatives (including source removal), and a discussion of why other remedial alternatives considered were rejected, based on the following criteria:
a. Long-term and short-term human health and environmental effects,
b. Implementability, which may include ease of construction, site access, and necessity for permits,
c. Operation and maintenance requirements,
d. Reliability,
e. Feasibility,
f. Estimated time required to achieve cleanup; and,
g. Cost-effectiveness of installation, operation, and maintenance, when compared to other site remediation alternatives;
(f) Summarize the design, construction details, and operational details of the equipment to be used during active remediation, including, if applicable:
1. The disposition of any effluent,
2. The expected concentrations of contaminants in the effluent,
3. The method of air emissions treatment and the expected quantities in pounds per day of any contaminants discharged into air as a result of all the on-site active remediation systems. A separate air permit will not be required if the total air emissions from all the on-site remediation equipment system(s) do not exceed 5.5 lbs/day for any single Hazardous Air Pollutant (HAP) or 13.7 pounds per day for total HAPs. For on-site remediation equipment system(s) located at a facility that is a Title V source pursuant to chapter 62-213, F.A.C., a separate permit pursuant to that chapter may be required,
4. The rates of application and concentrations of any in situ chemical or biological enhancement technologies implemented; and,
5. The schedule for maintenance and monitoring of the remediation system.
(g) If groundwater contamination is present:
1. For remedial systems that include groundwater recovery, include a list of contaminants to be monitored in the recovery well(s) and in the effluent from the treatment system (based on the type of treatment employed and disposition of the effluent), the designation of recovery well(s) to be sampled, and a proposal for their sampling frequency. Contaminants that do not exceed the background concentrations or the applicable CTLs in samples from the recovery wells for two consecutive sampling events with a sampling frequency not less than quarterly may be excluded from subsequent monitoring events,
2. Include a list of contaminants to be monitored, the designation of a representative number of monitoring wells and, if applicable, surface water bodies to be sampled, and a proposal for their sampling frequency adequate to monitor the cleanup progress during active remediation, and the description of the methodology proposed to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the remediation system. The designated wells shall include at least one well located at the downgradient edge of the plume and one well in the area of maximum groundwater contamination or directly adjacent to it if the area of highest groundwater contamination is inaccessible (for example, under a structure). For cleanups expected to last greater than two years, wells shall be sampled quarterly for the first year and semiannually thereafter. For cleanups expected to last less than two years, wells shall be sampled quarterly. For all cleanups, an alternative sampling frequency can be approved based upon site-specific conditions. A reporting frequency should be established that is sufficient to evaluate the progress of the cleanup and a single report can be used to summarize multiple sampling events, as approved based upon site-specific conditions,
3. Include a list of contaminants to be monitored and the designation of a representative number of currently and previously contaminated monitoring wells that shall be sampled once a year during active remediation in order to redefine the plume and fully evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the remediation system; and,
4. Include the designation of a representative number of monitoring wells, piezometers, and, if applicable, staff gauge locations to collect water-level data each time groundwater samples are collected; and,
(4) Other requirements to be included in the Remedial Action Plan, if applicable, include the following:
(7) The Department shall:
(b) Notify the PRSR in writing, stating:
1. The reason(s) why the Remedial Action Plan does not contain information adequate to support the conclusion that the active remediation objectives will comply with all applicable requirements of rule 62-780.700, F.A.C., or
2. The reason(s) why the proposal, plan, or recommendation included in the Remedial Action Plan is not supported by the applicable criteria.
(11) Within the time frames specified in Table A or the CAD, the operation of the active remediation system(s) shall be initiated unless, after the exercise of reasonable diligence, applicable permits required pursuant to subsection 62-780.700(9), F.A.C., have not been obtained. The following shall be obtained or determined during active remediation at the specified frequencies and turnaround times, as applicable, unless otherwise provided in the approved Remedial Action Plan:
(i) Concentrations of recovered vapors from a vacuum extraction system, and post-treatment air emissions if air emissions treatment is provided, weekly for the first month, monthly for the next two months, and quarterly thereafter or at an alternative frequency as proposed in the approved Remedial Action Plan (if applicable air quality standards are not exceeded for two consecutive monthly or quarterly sampling events, the PRSR may submit to the Department for review a proposal for a different sampling frequency; for activated carbon off-gas treatment, additional sampling events may be performed based on the estimated time of breakthrough), as follows:
1. Concentrations of recovered vapors from individual wells shall be determined using an organic vapor analyzer with a flame ionization detector, or other applicable field detection device, in order to optimize the airflow rate and contaminant recovery,
2. Influent and effluent samples shall be collected using appropriate air sampling protocols and shall be analyzed for contaminants using an appropriate analytical method referenced in the approved Remedial Action Plan.
(k) Results of analyses of soil samples taken to verify that the applicable No Further Action criteria of rule 62-780.680, F.A.C., or the applicable Natural Attenuation Monitoring criteria of rule 62-780.690, F.A.C., have been met, based on one of the following:
1. When both field screening and laboratory results using the most sensitive method for the constituents being analyzed for vacuum extraction systems indicate no detectable concentrations of contaminants in the recovered vapors,
2. When the screening for bioventing parameters indicates that the bioventing is complete, or
3. If alternative soil CTLs were established pursuant to rule 62-780.650, F.A.C., when system performance or monitoring using the applicable analytical methods for the appropriate constituents indicate that the alternative soil CTLs have been achieved.
(12) During implementation of the Remedial Action Plan, within the time frames specified in Table A or the CAD the PRSR shall submit to the Department for review an electronic or paper copy of status reports of remedial action. The Remedial Action Status Report shall contain the following, as applicable:
(14) At any time during implementation of the Remedial Action Plan, the PRSR may propose and justify:
(15) The Department shall:
(18) For sites conducting active groundwater remediation, if the site does not meet the No Further Action criteria of subsection 62-780.680(1), F.A.C., or the Natural Attenuation Monitoring criteria of rule 62-780.690, F.A.C., the PRSR may submit to the Department for review an electronic or paper copy of a proposal to discontinue active groundwater remediation, provided the following demonstration and analyses are met:
(b) After a minimum of one year of groundwater treatment, concentrations of contaminants in designated monitoring wells and recovery wells have leveled off. This demonstration shall be based on subsequent monthly sampling results obtained for a minimum of 180 days, unless an alternative frequency has been approved in the Remedial Action Plan or pursuant to subsection 62-780.700(14), F.A.C. “Leveling off” shall mean that the graph of contaminant concentrations versus time generally fits a curve defined by the equation C=Cf+Coe-kt, that the lower limb of the curve is substantially linear, and that the slope of the final portion of the curve approaches zero. Applicable statistical methods shall be applied to demonstrate this conclusion. In the preceding equation, symbols are defined as follows:
1. C: concentration of the applicable contaminant at time t,
2. Cf: coefficient representing final concentration that the curve approaches asymptotically,
3. Co: coefficient representing concentration difference between the final concentration and the concentration at time zero,
4. e: 2.718, the base of natural logarithms,
5. k: coefficient representing the exponential factor that indicates how fast the concentration approaches Cf;
6. t: time in days from some fixed starting point.
(c) An analysis or demonstration has been made of:
1. The technical feasibility of enhancements to the existing remediation system,
2. The technical feasibility of other proven groundwater or soil treatment techniques to further reduce the concentrations of applicable contaminants at the site,
3. The costs and time frames involved to further reduce the concentrations of applicable contaminants employing the alternative method(s) proposed,
4. The effects on the designated or potential use of the water resource if contaminants remain at existing concentrations,
5. The effect on, and any protection that may be required of, surface water resources,
6. The effect on human health, public safety, and the environment if contaminants remain at existing concentrations,
7. The extent and potential for further migration of contaminated groundwater above background concentrations or applicable CTLs; and,
8. Institutional controls or both institutional and engineering controls that may be necessary to ensure protection of the public and the environment from future use of contaminated groundwater.
Rulemaking Authority 376.303, 376.3071, 376.30701, 376.3078(4), 376.81, 403.0877 FS. Law Implemented 376.3071, 376.30701, 376.3078(4), 376.81, 403.0877 FS. History–New 4-17-05, Amended 6-12-13, 2-2-17. Editorial Note: Portions of this rule were copied from rule 62-770.700, Formerly 17-70.010 and Formerly 17-770.700; 62-782.700; and 62-785.700, F.A.C.