Fla. Admin. Code R. 61G20-3.013
(1) Product Approval Revocation or Suspension.
(a) Any product approval shall be revoked or suspended for any of the following reasons:
1. Failure to maintain certification, evaluation reports or testing in good standing with a Commission approved entity which conducted the testing or comparative or rational analysis, or combination thereof on which the product approval is based.
2. Suspension or revocation of the certification, evaluation report or testing report issued by a Commission approved entity on which the approval is based, for just cause.
3. Failure to maintain quality assurance programs for the manufacture of the approved products as required by this document.
4. Failure to correct manufacturing deficiencies required to bring the product within specifications of the originally approved product or alternatively to demonstrate in a manner consistent with this document, that the product’s performance complies with the standards established by the Code.
5. Advertising and sales of the product for uses not consistent with conditions or limitations of its approval.
6. Determination that the product was approved based on misrepresentations in the application for approval.
7. Failure of the manufacturer to cooperate with a Commission ordered investigation.
(2) Revocation or suspension of evaluation entity, certification agency, testing laboratory, validation entity, quality assurance agencies or accreditation body approval.
(a) The Commission shall revoke or suspend the approval of any evaluation entity, certification agency, testing laboratory, quality assurance agency, or validation entity for one or more of the following reasons:
1. Failure to maintain accreditation by a Commission approved accreditation body.
2. Suspension or revocation of accreditation by a Commission approved accreditation body for failure to meet Commission accreditation standards or equivalent pursuant to Rules 61G20-3.008 and 61G20-3.015, F.A.C.
3. Determination by the Commission that any requirement set forward in this document has been violated.
4. Determination that the criteria for independence from any manufacturer set forth in Rule 61G20-3.009, F.A.C., has been violated.
5. Determination that the entity is not independent pursuant to Rule 61G20-3.009, F.A.C., of any competing manufacturer of the manufacturer to whom the entity provided services on which Florida jurisdictions’ product approval is based.
6. An entity has misrepresented its accreditations or other material information on its application for approval.
7. Failure to conduct investigations of products authorized by Rule 61G20-3.014, F.A.C.
Rulemaking Authority 553.842(14) FS. Law Implemented 553.842(14) FS. History–New 5-5-02, Amended 11-22-06, Formerly 9B-72.160, 9N-3.013, Amended 10-18-21.