1632 TWO-STEP SOLICITATIONS

1632.1 The contracting officer may use a two (2)-step solicitation process when the contracting officer determines that this method will provide the best value to the District. Notwithstanding the provisions of § 1602, the purpose of this section is to authorize a two (2)-step procurement method. The first step shall be a request for qualifications (RFQ) to enable the contracting officer to determine which prospective contractors are qualified to receive requests for proposals (RFPs) and submit responses to the RFPs, based on financial and professional responsibility criteria established by the contracting officer for pre-qualification of a prospective contractor.

1632.2 The District shall conduct the two (2)-step selection process as follows:

(a) The first step shall consist of a request issued by the Office of Contracting and Procurement (OCP) for qualifications from a firm or combination of firms that has the expertise, ability, and entrepreneurship to:

(i) Assemble the labor and capital necessary for the completion of the procurement;

(ii) Manage all components of the procurement; and

(iii) Complete the procurement in a timely manner while serving the District's stated policy objectives; and

(b) The second step shall include the submission of proposals in response to an RFP issued by OCP to up to five (5) offerors determined to be the most qualified in the first step. The only offerors who may submit proposals in response to the RFP in the second step are those offerors that responded to the RFQ and were determined to be the most qualified by the contracting officer.

1632.3 The contracting officer shall give public notice of the RFQ in accordance with Chapter 13.

1632.4 The contracting officer shall utilize the two (2)-step process set forth in section 1632.2 on forms prescribed by the Director.

1632.5 The first step of the process shall consist of an RFQ inviting interested prospective contractors to respond in writing with a statement of their qualifications to perform the required services, including financial and professional responsibility information. The RFQ shall provide, at a minimum:

(a) A detailed description of the project;

(b) The District's intent of the project;

(c) The selection process, schedule, and criteria to be used by the District in determining which prospective contractors are qualified;

(d) Submission requirements and evaluation criteria that will be used to determine whether each prospective contractor is qualified; and

(e) Unless otherwise provided in accordance with §1632.10, a statement that only

proposals from up to five (5) offerors determined most qualified in the first step pursuant to subparagraphs (c) and (d) of this subsection will be selected to submit proposals in the second step.

1632.6 The contracting officer may conduct oral or written discussions with prospective contractors who submitted responses to the RFQ. If the contracting officer conducts discussions, he or she shall conduct such discussions with all prospective contractors who submitted responses to the RFQ.

1632.7 The contracting officer may provide the information submitted by all prospective contractors in response to the RFQ to an evaluation panel who may recommend to the contracting officer, based upon the panel's analysis of the information according to the criteria set forth in the RFQ, whether or not the prospective contractor is among the up to five (5) most qualified to proceed to the second step.

1632.8 The contracting officer shall determine the financial and professional responsibility of each prospective contractor that responds to the RFQ and whether the prospective contractor is among the up to five (5) most qualified to proceed to the second step.

1632.9 The second step of the selection process shall follow the competitive sealed proposal procedures consistent with the requirements of this chapter, except as follows:

(a) The contracting officer shall issue an RFP only to up to five (5) of the top-ranked offerors who have been determined most qualified in the first step;

(b) The contracting officer shall ensure that an independent cost/benefit analysis of each proposal is completed; and

(c) The RFP shall not be advertised in newspapers or publicly posted.

1632.10 The maximum number of offerors that may be selected to receive an RFP shall not exceed five (5) unless the contracting officer determines, prior to the RFQ, that a number greater than five (5) is in the District's best interest and is consistent with the objectives of that particular solicitation.

1632.11 The contracting officer, in the contracting officer's discretion, may pay a stipend solely from federal funds for design and construction procurements that are funded, or partially funded, with funds provided by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, to one (1) or more unsuccessful offerors that have submitted responsive proposals complying with the conditions of the RFP. The stipends may be used to compensate an unsuccessful offeror for a portion of their proposal development costs, the use of information contained in their proposal, and to encourage competition. The contracting officer shall determine the number and amount of the stipend(s), if any. If an unsuccessful offeror accepts a stipend, the District shall be authorized to retain the right to use ideas and information from the design documents and technical drawings in its proposal.

SOURCE: Notice of Final Rulemaking published at 56 DCR 9555 (December 25, 2009).