D.C. Mun. Regs. tit. 21, § 521
521.1 This section applies only to the portion of a major regulated project that consists entirely of bridge, roadway, streetscape, or railway work:
(a) In the existing Public Right of Way (PROW); or
(a) In the existing PROW and in the public space associated with the PROW.
521.2 A project in the existing PROW may comply with a requirement in this chapter to retain a Stormwater Retention Volume (SWRv) by:
(a) Retaining fifty percent (50%) of the SWRv on site and using off-site retention for the remaining volume;
(b) Achieving the SWRv; or
(c) Retaining on site the SWRv to the Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP), after proving that each opportunity for installing retention capacity has been exhausted in compliance with the MEP process for existing PROW detailed in the Department's Stormwater Management Guidebook (SWMG).
521.3 A project in the existing PROW shall:
(a) Prioritize, to the MEP, the management of stormwater from the roadway, including stormwater draining from roadway beyond the area of land-disturbing activity; and
(b) Not be required to install a Best Management Practice (BMP) or landcover:
(1) That provides retention capacity greater than that required to achieve the SWRv that is calculated for the area of land-disturbing activity; or
(2) That is outside the area of land-disturbing activity.
521.4 An existing PROW project on an Anacostia Waterfront Development Zone (AWDZ) site may comply with a requirement in this chapter to achieve a Water Quality Treatment Volume (WQTv) by:
(a) Achieving the WQTv; or
(b) Achieving the WQTv to the MEP, after proving that each opportunity for installing retention and treatment capacity has been exhausted in compliance with the MEP process for existing PROW detailed in the SWMG.
521.5 A project in the existing PROW that elects to comply with the SWMG's MEP process for maximizing retention or treatment shall provide the following information demonstrating technical infeasibility or environmental harm:
(a) Detailed explanation of each opportunity for on-site installation of a BMP that was considered and rejected, and the reasons for each rejection, including each opportunity that could be created by reducing roadway width in order to create an expanded area for retention of the SWRv or treatment of the WQTv between the curb line and private property; and
(b) Evidence of site conditions limiting each opportunity for a BMP, including, as applicable:
(1) Data on soil and groundwater contamination;
(2) Data from percolation testing;
(3) Documentation of the presence of utilities requiring impermeable protection or a setback;
(4) Documentation of structural requirements that would not be satisfied by a BMP;
(5) Evidence of the applicability of a statute, regulation, court order, pre-existing covenant, or other restriction having the force of law; and
(6) Evidence of a District-approved use for the safe and effective transport of goods or people
521.6 A major regulated project in the existing PROW may achieve on-site retention by retaining more than the 1.2 inch SWRv for an area of the site or for an area that drains to the site, subject to the following conditions:
(a) Unless an SDA drains into the CSS or the Department approves an application for relief from extraordinarily difficult site conditions, at least fifty percent (50%) of the 1.2 inch SWRv from the SDA shall be:
(1) Retained; or
SOURCE: Final Rulemaking published at 35 DCR 21 (January 1, 1988); as amended by Final Rulemaking published at 60 DCR 10640 (July 19, 2013); as amended by Final Rulemaking published at 67 DCR 818 (January
31, 2020).