AUTHORITY TO PROMULGATE RULES AND REGULATIONS The Office of Preparedness, Security, and Fire Safety (OPSFS) is authorized by the provisions of 24- 33.5-1609, C.R.S., to adopt rules and regulations for the continuity of state government operations to provide guidance to state departments and agencies in developing viable and executable contingency plans for continuity of operations. In adopting such rules and regulations the director shall use as general guidelines the plans published by the federal emergency management agency in federal preparedness circulars 65, 66, and 67, and in the rules promulgated thereunder, as amended from time to time. DEFINITIONS “Administrator” means a person who is authorized or delegated the authority to make substantive decisions on behalf of the Executive Director concerning a Department's state government continuity, safety, and security responsibilities.

“Director” means the Director of the Office of Preparedness, Security, and Fire Safety. COG 1 PURPOSE A. These rules and regulations provide for the creation and adoption of the planning guidance necessary for state departments and agencies to use in developing viable and executable contingency plans for the Continuity of State Government Operations (COSGO).

B. Contingency planning facilitates the performance of department/agency essential functions during any emergency or situation that may disrupt normal operations. COG 2 APPLICABILITY AND SCOPE A. The provisions of the COSGO planning guidance adopted pursuant to these rules and regulations are applicable to all state departments and agencies, hereinafter referred to as “agencies.”

B. The COSGO elements outlined herein apply to all state properties, whether owned or leased, and are for use by all agencies throughout the state. COG 3 POLICY A. It is the policy of the State of Colorado to have in place a comprehensive and effective program to ensure continuity of critical State functions under all circumstances.

B. As a baseline of preparedness for the full range of potential emergencies, all agencies shall have in place a viable COSGO plan which ensures the performance of their critical functions during any emergency or situation that may disrupt normal operations.

C. Inherent in this policy is a requirement for all agencies to designate alternate operating facilities as part of their COSGO planning responsibilities.

D. Inherent in this policy is the requirement that all agencies periodically test, train, and exercise their COSGO plans individually and collectively. The OPSFS will arrange for a periodic assessment of an agencies performance while conducting required testing, training, and exercising COG 4 BACKGROUND A. The changing threat environment and recent emergencies, including localized acts of nature, accidents, technological emergencies, and acts of terrorism, have shifted awareness to the need for COSGO capabilities that enable agencies to continue their critical functions across a broad spectrum of emergencies. Also, the potential use of weapons of mass destruction by terrorists has emphasized the need to provide the Governor a capability that ensures continuity of essential government functions across all agencies.

B. COSGO planning is simply a “good business practice” part of the fundamental mission of agencies as responsible and reliable public institutions. For years, COSGO planning had been an individual agency responsibility primarily in response to emergencies within the confines of the organization. The content and structure of COSGO plans, operational standards, and interagency coordination, if any, were left to the discretion of the agency.

C. To provide a focal point to orchestrate this effort, the Legislature has identified the Director as the lead for COSGO. Inherent in that role is the responsibility to formulate guidance for agencies to use in developing viable, executable COSGO plans; facilitate interagency coordination as appropriate; and oversee and assess the status of COSGO capability across all agencies.

D. An agency's essential functions may include those functions, stated or implied, which are required to be performed by statute; involve the legal or financial rights of the government or citizens; or directly support important administrative functions or mission-related activities, such as counter terrorism and survival of critical infrastructures.

COG 5 PLANNING GUIDANCE A. The COSGO planning guidance shall be promulgated by the Director in three parts. Those parts are identified as follows:

1. Part 1 - Continuity of State Government Operations (Base Plan). This provides planning guidance for state agencies for use in developing viable and executable contingency plans for the COSGSO.

2. Part 2 - Acquisition of Alternate Facilities. This provides planning guidance for state agencies for use in acquiring alternate facilities to support their COSGO plans.

3. Part 3 - Training and Exercises Programs. This provides planning guidance for state agencies to use in developing viable and executable test, training, and exercise programs necessary to support the implementation and validation of COSGO plans.

B. The entire planning guidance for the COSGO shall be subject to annual review and revision by the Director.

C. To assist with this review the Director shall establish a State Government, Continuity, Safety, and Security Task Force (SGCSSTF) composed of a minimum of one representative from each of the Executive Branch Departments. Such representative shall be an administrator appointed pursuant to the provisions of COG 6, Paragraph B.

D. The SGCSSTF shall meet on a periodic basis, the frequency of which will be determined by the Director. As required, but not less than once every other year, the SGCSSTF shall meet to consider proposed changes to the COSGO guidance. However, changes should only be recommended for adoption by the SGCSSTF that are consistent with the requirements of 24-33.5-1609 (2), C.R.S. COG 6 IMPLEMENTATION A. The provisions of the COSGO planning guidance shall be implemented based on a phased implementation process, the milestones for which shall be determined by the Director. Agencies will be required to be in full compliance with the provisions of COSGO planning guidance by no later that June 30,2006.

B. Each agency is responsible for appointing an administrator as a program manager and agency point-of-contact for coordinating the agency's state government continuity, safety, and security activities. The appointment of an administrator to coordinate the agency's state government continuity, safety, and security activities, is also required under Rule BSOP 4 (B) of the Rules and Regulations Concerning Building Security and Occupant Protection, adopted by the Director.

C. The COSGO planning guidance shall be considered part of the State Emergency Operations Plan (SEOP) by reference.