5 CCR 1001-9
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT REGULATION NUMBER 7 CONTROL OF OZONE VIA OZONE PRECURSORS AND CONTROL OF HYDROCARBONS VIA OIL AND GAS EMISSIONS (EMISSIONS OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS AND NITROGEN OXIDES)
5 CCR 1001-9 [Editor’s Notes follow the text of the rules at the end of this CCR Document.] _________________________________________________________________________ I. Applicability I.A.
I.B.1.b.(ii) (State Only) February 1, 2009, if they are located in an 8-Hour Ozone Control Area and outside of the 1-hour ozone nonattainment or attainment maintenance area; or I.B.1.b.(iii) (State Only) Upon commencement of operation, if located within an ozone nonattainment or attainment maintenance area.
I.B.1.c. This Section I.B.1 does not apply to oil and gas operations subject to Section XII, stationary and portable engines subject to Section XVI, or natural gas actuated pneumatic controllers subject to Section XVIII.
I.B.2. Existing Sources I.B.2.a. Existing sources are (1) those sources for which a complete permit application was submitted prior to October 30, 1989, or (2) those sources, which commenced operation prior to October 30, 1989.
I.B.2.d.(i) (State Only) October 30, 1989, if they are located in what was previously designated as a 1-hour ozone nonattainment or attainment maintenance area;
I.B.2.d.(ii) (State Only) February 1, 2009, if they are located in an 8-hour Ozone Control Area and outside of the Denver 1-hour ozone nonattainment or attainment maintenance area; or I.B.2.d.(iii) (State Only) the date on which the area is first designated as being in nonattainment for ozone, if located within that ozone nonattainment or attainment maintenance area.
I.B.2.e. On and after October 30, 1991, all existing sources shall comply with the requirements of this regulation, and exhibit A shall no longer be applicable. I.B.2.f. On or before October 30, 1990, all existing sources located in what was previously designated as the 1-hour ozone nonattainment or attainment maintenance area shall submit to the Division a report containing the following: I.B.2.f.(i) A list of sources of volatile organic compound emissions located at the stationary source. The list shall include a description, potential emissions, and actual emissions of each source.
I.B.2.f.(ii) Identification of each source subject to a Division Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) determination, and when a request for that determination will be made.
I.B.2.f.(iii) The owner or operator's expected RACT for each source and a description of how compliance will be achieved. If a source is subject to RACT requirements as stated in previous versions of this regulation, the report need only specify how compliance will be achieved for any revised provisions of the regulation.
I.B.2.g. On or before October 30, 1991, all existing sources shall update and submit the report required under Subparagraph b. above. The updated report shall describe in detail all actions taken to comply with the RACT requirements, and when those actions were taken.
I.B.2.h. This Section I.B.2 does not apply to oil and gas operations subject to Section XII, or stationary and portable engines subject to Section XVI. I.C. Once a source subject to this regulation exceeds an applicable threshold limit, the requirements of this regulation are irrevocably effective unless the source obtains a federally enforceable permit limiting emissions to levels below the threshold limit by restricting production capacity or hours of operation.
I.D. The owner or operator of a source not required to obtain a permit by provisions of law other than this section may apply for and shall be required to accept a permit as a condition of avoiding RACT requirements. Such permits shall contain only those conditions necessary to ensure the enforcement of the production capacity or hours of operation. I.E. Materials incorporated by reference in this regulation are available for public inspection during regular business hours at the Commission's Office at 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South, Denver, Colorado. The regulation incorporates the materials as they exist at the date of the promulgation of this regulation and does not include later amendments to or editions of the incorporated materials.
II. General Provisions II.A. Definitions II.A.1. “8-Hour Ozone Control Area” means the Counties of Adams, Arapahoe, Boulder (includes part of Rocky Mountain National Park), Douglas, and Jefferson; the Cities and Counties of Denver and Broomfield; and the following portions of the Counties of Larimer and Weld:
II.A.2. “Denver 1-Hour Ozone Attainment/Maintenance Area” means the Counties of Jefferson and Douglas, the Cities and Counties of Denver and Broomfield, Boulder County (excluding Rocky Mountain National Park), Adams County west of Kiowa Creek, and Arapahoe County west of Kiowa Creek.
II.A.3. "Capture System" means the equipment used to contain, capture, or transport a pollutant to a control device.
II.A.4. "Capture System Efficiency (vapor gathering system efficiency)" means the percent by weight of VOC emitted by an operation subject to this regulation, which is captured by the capture system and sent to the control device; i.e., (mass flow of VOC captured)/(mass flow of VOC emitted by the operation) x 100%.
II.A.5. "Carbon Adsorption System" means a device containing adsorbent material, an inlet and outlet for exhaust gases and a system to regenerate the saturated adsorbent. II.A.6. "Condenser" means any heat transfer device used to liquify vapors by removing their latent heats of vaporization. Such devices include, but are not limited to, shell and tube, coil, surface, or contact condensers.
II.A.7. "Control Device" means a carbon adsorber, refrigeration system, condenser, flare, firebox or other device, which will reduce the concentration of VOC in a gas stream by adsorption, combustion, condensation, or other means of removal. II.A.8. "Control Device Efficiency" means the percent removal by weight of VOC by a control device; i.e., (mass flow of VOC into control device - mass flow of VOC out of control device)/(mass flow of VOC into control device) x 100%.
II.A.9. "Gasoline" means a petroleum distillate having a Reid vapor pressure between 208 and l040 torr (4-20 psi), which is used as fuel for internal combustion engines. II.A.10. "Highly Volatile Organic Compound" is defined as a Volatile Organic Compound or mixture of such compounds with a true vapor pressure in excess of 570 torr (11 Psia) at 20 C.
II.A.11. "Organic Material" means a chemical compound of carbon, excluding carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonic acid, metallic carbides or carbonates, and ammonium carbonate.
II.A.12. (State Only) “Ozone Nonattainment Area” means any area designated as not in attainment with the ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard as determined by the Environmental Protection Agency.
II.A.13. "Petroleum Refinery" means any facility engaged in producing gasoline, aromatics, kerosene, distillate fuel oils, residual fuel oils, lubricants, asphalt, or other products through distillation of petroleum or through redistillation, cracking, rearrangement or reforming of unfinished petroleum derivatives.
II.A.14. "Reid Vapor Pressure" means the absolute vapor pressure of volatile crude oil and volatile nonviscous petroleum liquids except liquified petroleum gases as determined by the American Society for Testing and Materials, Part 17, 1973, D-323-72 (Reapproved 1977).
II.A.15. "True Vapor Pressure" means the equilibrium partial pressure exerted by petroleum (or other) liquid. This may be determined by the methods described in American Petroleum Institute Bulletin 2517, "Evaporation Loss from Floating Roof Tanks," 1962. II.A.16. "Vapor Recovery System" means a system that prevents release to the atmosphere of organic compounds emitted during the operation of any transfer, storage, or processing equipment.
II.A.17. "Volatile Organic Compound (VOC)" means any compound of carbon, excluding carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonic acid, metallic carbides or carbonates, and ammonium carbonate, which participates in atmospheric photochemical reactions, except those listed in Section II.B. as having negligible photochemical reactivity. VOC may be measured by a reference method, an equivalent method, an alternative method, or by procedures specified under 40 CFR Part 60. A reference method, an equivalent method, or an alternative method, however, may also measure nonreactive organic compounds. In such cases, an owner or operator may exclude the compounds listed in Section II.B. when determining compliance with a standard if the amount of such compounds is accurately quantified, and such exclusion is approved by the Division. As a precondition to excluding such compounds as VOC, or at any time thereafter, the Division may require an owner or operator to provide monitoring or testing methods and results demonstrating, to the satisfaction of the Division, the amount of negligible-reactive compounds in the source's emissions.
II.B. Exemptions Emissions of the organic compounds listed as having negligible photochemical reactivity in the common provisions definition of Negligibly Reactive Volatile Organic Compound are exempt from the provisions of this regulation.
II.C. General Emission Limitation II.C.1. Existing Sources (State Only: Located in any Ozone Nonattainment Area or Attainment Maintenance Area)
II.C.1.a.(iv) Such sources with potential emissions of 100 tons per year or more but with actual emissions of less than 50 tons per year, on a rolling 12-month total, may avoid RACT and permit requirements if the following requirements are met:
II.C.1.a.(iv)(A) The owner or operator shall submit revised Air Pollutant Emission Notices (APENs) by April 1 of each year, which demonstrate that the 50 tons per year threshold has not been exceeded.
II.C.1.a.(iv)(B) The owner or operator shall maintain records on site which include monthly VOC use and monthly VOC emissions. The records shall include calculation of total emissions for each rolling 12-month period. The records shall be made available to the Division for inspection upon request.
II.C.1.a.(v) (State Only) Existing sources that are modified – undergo any physical change, or changed in the method of operation of a stationary source which increase VOC or NOx emissions – on or after March 30, 2008, shall utilize RACT control technologies pursuant to Regulation Number 7 and Regulation Number 3, Part B, Section III.D.2. upon recommencing operation.
II.C.1.b. Provided however, that no existing source of VOC emissions employing emission controls on or within the six-month period preceding the effective date of this regulation may reduce its level of control of VOC emissions below that level of control actually achieved, even though such source may otherwise be subject to less stringent control requirements, except that no existing source shall be required to control emissions to an extent greater than that level of control which RACT would achieve.
II.C.1.c. (State Only) Existing sources with potential emissions equal to or greater than 100 tons per year of volatile organic compound emissions shall submit a permit modification application that includes a revised APEN (or APENs) and a RACT analysis, to the Division, as follows:
II.C.1.c.(i) (State Only) By October 30, 1991 if located in what was previously designated as the Denver 1-hour ozone nonattainment or attainment maintenance area; or II.C.1.c.(ii) (State Only) By April 30, 2009 or within one year after the date on which the area is first designated as being in nonattainment for ozone, whichever comes later, if they are located in the 8-hour Ozone Control Area and outside of the Denver 1-hour ozone nonattainment or attainment maintenance area.
II.C.1.d. (State Only) Existing sources shall utilize RACT pursuant to Regulation Number 7 and Regulation Number 3, Part B, Section III.D.2.,by whichever date comes later:
II.C.1.d.(i) (State Only) October 30, 1991, if they are located in what was previously designated as the Denver 1-hour ozone nonattainment or attainment maintenance area;
II.C.1.d.(ii) (State Only) November 21, 2011, if they are located in the 8-hour Ozone Control Area, and outside of the Denver 1-hour ozone nonattainment or attainment maintenance area;
IIC.1.d.(iii) (State Only) Three years after the date on which the area is first designated as being in nonattainment for ozone; or II.C. 1.d.(iv) (State Only) Two years after Division determination of case-by- case RACT pursuant to this Section II.C.1. The Division shall be deemed to have approved the RACT analysis for purposes of this Section II.C.1.d.(iv) if it does not object after eighteen months from having received a complete permit application.
II.C.2. New Sources All new sources shall utilize controls representing RACT, pursuant to Regulation Number 7 and Regulation Number 3, Part B, Section III.D., upon commencement of operation. II.D. Alternative Control Plans and Test Methods II.D.1. Sources subject to specific requirements of this regulation shall submit for approval as a revision to the State Implementation Plan:
II.D.2. No alternative submitted pursuant to this Section II.D is effective until the alternative is approved as a revision to the State Implementation Plan. II.E. REPEALED II.F. Provisions for Specific Processes II.F.1. The Gates Rubber Company Provision - REPEALED
III. General Requirements for Storage and Transfer of Volatile Organic Compounds III.A. Maintenance and Operation of Storage Tanks and Related Equipment All storage tank gauging devices, anti-rotation devices, accesses, seals, hatches, roof drainage systems, support structures, and pressure relief valves shall be maintained and operated to prevent detectable vapor loss except when opened, actuated, or used for necessary and proper activities (e.g. maintenance). Such opening, actuation, or use shall be limited so as to minimize vapor loss.
III.B. Transfer (excluding Petroleum Liquids)
III.C. Beer production and associated beer container storage and transfer operations involving volatile organic compounds with a true vapor pressure of less than 1.5 PSIA actual conditions are exempt from the provisions of Section III.B, above.
IV. Storage of Highly Volatile Organic Compounds IV.A. Highly volatile organic compounds shall be stored: IV.A.1. In a pressure tank which is at all times capable of maintaining working pressures sufficient to prevent vapor loss to the ambient air; or IV.A.2. With methods and/or equipment approved by the Division in writing pursuant to the request of the person owning or operating the storage facility. IV.B. Vapor loss shall be determined visually, by presence of frost or condensation at the point of leakage, or using a portable hydrocarbon analyzer. When an analyzer is used, vapor loss means a VOC concentration exceeding 10,000 ppm and testing and monitoring procedures shall be conducted as in Section VIII.C.3.
V. Disposal of Volatile Organic Compounds V.A. No person shall dispose of volatile organic compounds by evaporation or spillage unless RACT is utilized.
V.B. No owner or operator of a bulk gasoline terminal, bulk gasoline plant, or gasoline dispensing facility as defined in Section VI.C.2., VI.C.3. and XV.A.3., shall permit gasoline to be intentionally spilled, discarded in sewers, stored in open containers, or disposed of in any other manner that would result in evaporation.
VI. Storage and Transfer of Petroleum Liquid VI.A. General Requirements VI.A.1. No person shall build, install, or permit the building or installation of any rotating pump or compressor handling any type of petroleum liquid unless said pump or compressor is equipped with mechanical seals or other equipment of equal efficiency. If reciprocating- type pumps and compressors are used, they shall be equipped with packing glands properly installed, in good working order, and properly maintained so that no detectable emissions occur from the drain recovery systems.
VI.A.2.g. "Petroleum Liquid" means crude oil, condensate and any finished or intermediate product manufactured or extracted in a petroleum refinery. VI.A.2.h. "Shoe Seal" means a primary seal employing a metallic band (called a shoe) which is held against the vertical inner-wall of the tank, concentric with the perimeter of the floating roof.
VI.A.2.i. "Vapor Balance System" means a combination of pipes or hoses that create a closed system between the vapor spaces of an unloading tank and a receiving tank such that vapors displaced from the receiving tank are transferred to the tank being unloaded.
VI.A.2.j. "Vapor-Mounted Seal" means a primary seal mounted so there is an annular vapor space underneath the seal. The annular vapor space is bounded by the bottom of the primary seal, the liquid surface, the floating roof, and the tank wall (thus excluding shoe seals).
VI.A.2.k. "Waxy, Heavy Pour Crude Oil" means a crude oil with a pour point of 10°C (50°F) or higher as determined by the American Society for Testing and Materials Standard D97-66, "Test for Pour Point of Petroleum Oils." VI.B. Storage of Petroleum Liquid VI.B.1. Exemptions VI.B.1.a. Tanks or other containers used to store the following liquids are exempt from the provisions of Subparagraphs VI.B.2., and 3. below: VI.B.1.a.(i) Diesel Fuels 1-D, 2-D, and 4-D as defined in ASTM D975-78. VI.B.1.a.(ii) Fuel Oils #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5, as defined in ASTM D396-78. VI.B.1.a.(iii) Gas Turbine Fuels 1-GT through 4-GT as defined in ASTM D2880-78.
VI.B.1.b. The following underground storage facilities are exempt from Subpart VI.B.2. below:
VI.B.1.b.(i) Underground tanks if the annual sum total of the volume of liquid removed from the tank plus the sum of the volume of liquid added to it does not exceed twice the operational volume of the tank (i.e., a maximum of one turnover per year is allowed).
VI.B.1.b.(ii) Subsurface caverns or porous rock reservoirs. VI.B.1.b.(iii) Horizontal underground tanks storing JP-4 Jet Fuel. VI.B.2. Storage of petroleum liquid in tanks greater than 151,412 liters (40,000 gallons) VI.B.2.a. Storage of petroleum liquid in fixed-roof tanks. VI.B.2.a.(i) The owner or operator of a fixed-roof tank used for storage of petroleum liquids which have a true vapor pressure greater than 33.6 torr (0.65 psia) at 20°C (or, alternatively, a Reid vapor pressure greater than
20°C, and which are stored in any tank or other container of more than 151,412 liters (40,000 gallons) shall ensure that the tank at all times meets the following conditions:
VI.B.2.a.(i)(A) The tank has been equipped with a pontoon-type, or double-deck type, floating roof or an internal floating cover which rests on the surface of the liquid contents and which is equipped with a closure seal or seals to close the space between the edge of the floating roof (or cover) and tank walls; or VI.B.2.a.(i)(B) The tank has been equipped with a vapor gathering system capable of collecting the petroleum liquid vapors discharged, together with a vapor recovery or disposal system capable of processing such vapors so as to prevent their emission into the atmosphere.
VI.B.2.a.(i)(C) Control devices shall meet the applicable requirements, including recordkeeping, of Subsections IX.A.3.a,b,c, and e, and IX. A.8.a and b.
VI.B.2.a.(i)(D) The applicable EPA reference methods 1 through 4, and 25, of 40 CFR Part 60 shall be used to determine the efficiency of control devices.
VI.B.2.a.(i)(E) The owner or operator shall maintain records for at least two years of the type, average monthly storage temperature, and true vapor pressure of all petroleum liquids stored in tanks not equipped with an internal floating roof or cover or other control pursuant to Regulation Number 7, Sections VI.B.2.a.(i)(A) or (B) or 7.II.D.
VI.B.2.a.(ii) No owner or operator of a fixed-roof tank equipped with an internal floating roof or cover shall permit the use of such tank unless: VI.B.2.a.(ii)(A) The tank is maintained such that there are no visible holes, tears, or other openings in the seal or any seal fabric or materials; and VI.B.2.a.(ii)(B) All openings, except stub drains, are equipped with covers, lids, or seals such that:
VI.B.2.a.(ii)(B)(1) The cover, lid, or seal is in the closed position at all times except when in actual use;
VI.B.2.a.(ii)(B)(2) Automatic bleeder vents are closed at all times except when the roof is floated off or landed on the roof leg supports;
VI.B.2.a.(ii)(B)(3) and Rim vents, if provided, are set to open when the roof is being floated off the roof leg supports or at the manufacturer's recommended setting.
VI.B.2.a.(iii) The operator of a fixed-roof tank equipped with an internal floating roof shall:
VI.B.2.a.(iii)(A) Perform a routine inspection through the tank roof hatches at least once every six months;
VI.B.2.a.(iii)(A)(1) During the routine inspection, the operator shall measure for detectable vapor loss inside the hatch. Detectable vapor loss means a VOC concentration exceeding 10,000 ppm, using a portable hydrocarbon analyzer.
VI.B.2.a.(iii)(B) Perform a complete inspection of the cover and seal whenever the tank is out of service, whenever the routine inspection required in subclause (A) above reveals detectable vapor loss, and at least once every ten years, and shall notify the Division in writing before such an inspection.
VI.B.2.a.(iii)(C) Ensure during inspections that there are no visible holes, tears, or other openings in the seal or any seal fabric or materials; that the cover is floating uniformly on or above the liquid surface; that there are no visible defects in the surface of the cover or liquid accumulated on the cover; and that the seal is uniformly in place around the circumference of the cover between the cover and the tank wall. If these items are not met, the owner or operator shall repair the items or empty and remove the storage vessel from service within 45 days. If a failure that is detected during inspections required in this paragraph cannot be repaired within 45 days and if the vessel cannot be emptied within 45 days, a 30-day extension may be requested from the Division in writing. Such a request must document that alternative storage capacity is unavailable and specify a schedule of actions the owner or operator will take that will assure that the items will be repaired or the vessel will be emptied as soon as possible;
VI.B.2.a.(iii)(D) Maintain records for at least two years of the results of all inspections.
VI.B.2.b. Above ground storage tanks used for the storage of petroleum liquid shall have all external surfaces coated with a material which has a reflectivity for solar radiation of 0.7 or more. Methods A or B of ASTM E424 shall be used to determine reflectivity. Alternatively, any untinted white paint may be used which is specified by the manufacturer for such use.
This provision shall not apply to written symbols or logograms applied to the external surface of the container for purposes of identification provided such symbols do not cover more than 20% of the exposed top and side surface area of the container or more than 18.6 square meters (200 square feet), whichever is less.
VI.B.2.c. Seals on External Floating Roof Tanks VI.B.2.c.(i) General Provisions VI.B.2.c.(i)(A) Applicability This section applies to all petroleum liquid storage vessels equipped with external floating roofs, having capacities greater than 150,000 liters (40,000 gallons) that are located in ozone nonattainment areas.
VI.B.2.c.(i)(B) Exemptions VI.B.2.c.(i)(B)(1) Total Exemption The following categories of EFR tanks are exempt from the requirement of Subparagraph VI.B.2.c., except for the applicable recordkeeping requirements of Subparagraph VI.B.2.c (ii)(C). VI.B.2.c.(i)(B)(1)(a) EFR tanks which store any material whose true vapor pressure as stored never exceeds 67 torr (1.3 psia).
VI.B.2.c.(i)(B)(1)(b) Tanks less than 1,600,000 liters (10,000 barrels) which are used to store crude oil and condensate prior to custody transfer.
VI.B.2.c.(i)(B)(2) Limited Exemptions The following are exempt from both secondary seal and secondary seal inspection requirements but shall meet the equipment/procedure provisions in Subclause (ii)(A), the semi- annual inspection provisions of Subclause (ii)(B), and the record keeping provisions of Subclause (ii)(C).
VI.B.2.c.(i)(B)(2)(a) Those tanks storing petroleum liquid between 67 and 207 torr (1.3 to 4.0 psia) maximum true vapor pressure (as stored) which are of welded construction and which have one of the following primary seals:
VI.B.2.c.(i)(B)(2)(a)(I) metallic shoe seal VI.B.2.c.(i)(B)(2)(a)(II) liquid mounted, resilient seal VI.B.2.c.(i)(B)(2)(a)(III) liquid mounted, liquid filled seal VI.B.2.c.(i)(B)(2)(b) Any tank storing waxy, heavy-pour crude oil.
VI.B.2.c.(ii) General Requirements VI.B.2.c.(ii)(A) An operator of an EFR tank storing petroleum liquids with true vapor pressure (as stored) above 67 torr (1.3 psia) shall equip the tank as follows and observe the following procedures: VI.B.2.c.(ii)(A)(1) Equipment VI.B.2.c.(ii)(A)(1)(a) Drains: roof drains which are designed to empty directly into the stored product shall be provided with slotted-membrane fabric covers or equivalent covers which cover at least 90 percent of the area of the opening.
VI.B.2.c.(ii)(A)(1)(b) Openings: except for automatic bleeder vents, rim space vents, and leg sleeves, all openings shall be equipped with:
VI.B.2.c.(ii)(A)(1)(b)(I) Projections into the tank which remain below the liquid surface at all times; and VI.B.2.c.(ii)(A)(1)(b)(II) Covers, seals, or lids.
VI.B.2.c.(ii)(A)(2) Procedures VI.B.2.c.(ii)(A)(2)(a) Covers, seals and lids shall be kept closed except when the openings are in actual use.
VI.B.2.c.(ii)(A)(2)(b) Automatic bleeder vents shall be kept closed at all times except when the roof is floated off or landed on roof leg supports.
VI.B.2.c.(ii)(A)(2)(c) Rim vents shall be set to open at the manufacturer's recommended setting or, alternatively, only when the roof is being floated off the leg supports. VI.B.2.c.(ii)(B) Inspections The operator of an EFR tank subject to this Subparagraph (VI.B.2.c.) shall:
VI.B.2.c.(ii)(B)(1) Perform routine inspections at least once every six months in order to ensure compliance with Part (2) below. The inspections shall include a visual inspection of the secondary seal gap if equipped with a secondary seal.
VI.B.2.c.(ii)(B)(2) Ensure that all seal closure devices meet the following requirements:
VI.B.2.c.(ii)(B)(2)(a) There are no visible holes, tears, or other openings in the seal(s) or seal fabric; and VI.B.2.c.(ii)(B)(2)(b) The seal(s) are intact and uniformly in place around the circumference of the floating roof and the tank wall.
VI.B.2.c.(ii)(C) Records VI.B.2.c.(ii)(C)(1) Operators shall:
VI.B.2.c.(ii)(C)(1)(a) Maintain records of the average monthly storage temperature, the Reid vapor pressure of the liquid and the type of liquid stored for all EFR tanks lacking secondary seals and receiving petroleum liquids with a true vapor pressure of 1.0 psi (7.0kPa) or greater; and VI.B.2.c.(ii)(C)(1)(b) Maintain records of the results of the inspections required herein.
VI.B.2.c.(ii)(C)(2) Copies of all records specified by this Subclause (C) shall be retained by the operator for a minimum of two years after the date on which the record was made.
VI.B.2.c.(iii) Secondary Seal Requirements VI.B.2.c.(iii)(A) General No owner or operator of an EFR tank (storing petroleum liquids) not specifically exempted in Subsection VI.B.2.c.(i)(B) above shall store that petroleum liquid unless such vessel is equipped with a continuous secondary seal extending from the rim of the floating roof to the tank wall (i.e., a rim-mounted secondary seal). VI.B.2.c.(iii)(B) Vapor-Mounted Seals For EFR tanks required to have a secondary seal and which have a vapor-mounted primary seal:
VI.B.2.c.(iii)(B)(1) An annual inspection shall be made of the total gap area between the secondary seal and the wall of the tank in accordance with the method in (3)
below.
VI.B.2.c.(iii)(B)(2) This total gap area shall not exceed
VI.B.2.c.(iii)(B)(3) Method to determine gap area:
VI.B.2.c.(iii)(B)(3)(a) Physically measure the length and width of all gaps around the entire circumference of the secondary seal in each place where a 0.32 cm (1/8 in.)
uniform diameter probe passes freely (without forcing or binding against the seal) between the seal and the tank wall; and, VI.B.2.c.(iii)(B)(3)(b) Sum the area of the individual gaps. VI.B.3. Storage of petroleum liquid in tanks of or less than 151,412 liters (40,000 gallons) capacity VI.B.3.a. Tanks or containers used to store liquids with true vapor pressure at 20°C of less than 78 torr (1.5 psia) or greater than 570 torr (11.0 psia) at 20°C are exempt from the provisions of this Paragraph VI.B.3. VI.B.3.b. The owner or operator of storage tanks at a gasoline dispensing facility (service station) or other facility not addressed in Subsections VI. C.2 OR VI.C.3, which receives and stores petroleum liquid, shall not allow the transfer of petroleum liquid from any delivery vessel into any tank unless the tank is equipped with a submerged fill pipe and the vapors displaced from the storage tank during filling are processed by a vapor control system, if the tank: VI.B.3.b.(i) Has a rated manufacturer's capacity of 2,082 liters (550 gallons) or more and was installed after November 7, l973, (except for storage tanks below 550 gallon capacity used exclusively for agricultural use; however, these must have a submerged fill pipe), or VI.B.3.b.(ii) Has a rated manufacturer's capacity of 7,571 liters (2,000 gallons) or more and was installed before November 7, 1973. VI.B.3.b.(iii) A vapor balance system shall be deemed "approved" if its design and operation are in accordance with the applicable provisions of Appendices A and B.
VI.B.3.c. Tanks equipped with a submerged fill pipe shall meet the specifications of Appendix B.
VI.B.3.d. The vapor control system shall include one or more of the following: VI.B.3.d.(i) A vapor-tight line from the storage tank to delivery vessel (i.e. an approved control system).
VI.B.3.d.(ii) A refrigerator-condensation system or equivalent designed to recover at least 90 percent by weight of the organic compounds in the displaced vapor.
VI.B.3.e. The owner or operator shall ensure that operating procedures are used so that gasoline cannot be transferred into the tank unless the vapor control system is in use.
VI.B.3.f. The vapor balance system shall meet the specifications of Appendix B. VI.B.3.g. The vapor balance system and the vapor control system shall meet the requirements of Section XV.
VI.B.3.h. Control devices shall meet the applicable requirements, including recordkeeping, of Subsections IX.A.3.a,b,c, and e, and IX.A.8.a and b. VI.B.3.i. The applicable EPA reference methods 1 through 4, and 25, of 40 CFR Part 60 shall be used to determine the efficiency of control devices. VI.C. Transfer of Petroleum Liquid VI.C.1. Exemptions Transfer operations involving petroleum liquid with true vapor pressures at 20°C of less than 78 torr (1.5 psia) or greater than 570 torr (11.0 psia) shall be exempt from the provisions of this Subsection C.
VI.C.2. Loading Facilities Classified as Terminals VI.C.2.a. A terminal is defined as a petroleum liquid storage and distribution facility that has an average daily throughput of more than 76,000 liters of gasoline (20,000 gallons), which is loaded directly into transport vehicles. A rolling, 30-day average of throughput shall be used to determine the applicability of this Subsection VI.C.2.
VI.C.2.b.(ii) Install a vapor collection and disposal system which gathers vapor transferred from vehicles being loaded. The system shall include devices to prevent the release of vapor from vapor recovery hoses not in use.
VI.C.2.b.(iii) Use operating procedures to ensure that petroleum liquid cannot be transferred unless the vapor collection equipment is in use. VI.C.2.b.(iv) Provide for the prevention of overfilling of transport vehicles with loading pump shut-offs, set stop meters, or comparable equipment. VI.C.2.b.(v) Operate all recovery and disposal equipment at a back pressure less than the pressure relief valve setting of transport vehicles. VI.C.2.b.(vi) Prevent the release of petroleum liquid on the ground from transport vehicles. Provision shall be made to remove any undelivered petroleum liquid with closed drainage devices.
VI.C.2.b.(vii) Maintain and operate final recovery and disposal equipment or devices in the vapor control system (i.e., control devices) so as to emit no more than 80 milligrams of volatile organic compounds per liter of gasoline being loaded. Such disposal devices shall be approved by the Division.
VI.C.2.b.(viii) Prevent loading of petroleum liquid into transport vehicles which do not have valid leak-tight certification as required in Section VI.D. No truck shall be loaded unless a valid certification sticker is displayed, or a certification letter is carried in the truck.
VI.C.2.b.(ix) Follow all control procedures to prevent leaks as specified in Section XV.
VI.C.2.c. Control devices shall meet the applicable requirements, including recordkeeping of Subsections IX.A.3.a,b,c, and e, and IX.A.8.a and b. VI.C.2.d. The applicable methods of 40 CFR 60. 503, or EPA reference methods 1 through 4, 25A, and 25B of 40 CFR Part 60 shall be used to determine the efficiency of control devices.
VI.C.2.e. The method set forth in Appendix A of EPA-450/2-77-026, "Control of Hydrocarbons from Tank Truck Gasoline Loading Terminals" shall be used to test emission points other than control devices.
VI.C.3. Loading Facilities Classified as Bulk Plants VI.C.3.a. A bulk plant is defined as a petroleum liquid storage and distribution facility that has an average daily throughput of 76,000 liters of gasoline (20,000 gallons) or less, which is loaded directly into transport trucks. (As used herein, "bulk plant" does not include service stations nor separate operations within petroleum liquid distribution facilities which pump only into fuel tanks fueling motor vehicles. Both such operations are regulated by Paragraph VI.B.3. of this Regulation). A rolling 30-day average of throughput shall be used to determine the applicability of this regulation.
VI.C.3.c.(iii) Assure that transport trucks and loading facilities conform to the applicable provisions of C.2. and C.4. of this Section VI. VI.C.3.d. The owner or operator of a bulk plant which serves only storage tanks exempted from the provisions of Subparagraph VI.B.3.b. by reason of their small size or location in an attainment area shall load outbound transport trucks using equipment that provides for top loading of the petroleum liquid into the vehicle tank compartments through an extended fill tube which reaches within 15.24 cm (6 in.) of the bottom of the tank compartment.
VI.C.3.e. The owner or operator of a bulk plant subject to this subsection shall ensure that petroleum liquid cannot be transferred unless the vapor collection equipment is in use.
VI.C.3.f. The owner or operator of a bulk plant subject to this subsection shall follow all procedures to prevent leaks as specified in Section XV. VI.C.4. Transport Vehicles VI.C.4.a. Rail cars shall be loaded only at facilities which allow for the following: VI.C.4.a.(i) A submerged fill pipe which reaches within 15.24 cm (6 in.) of the bottom of the tank.
VI.C.4.a.(ii) Vapor collection and/or disposal equipment designated and operated to recover vapors displaced during the loading of the rail car. VI.C.4.a.(iii) A vapor-tight seal around the tank car hatch and the loading equipment.
VI.C.4.b. The owner or operator of petroleum transport trucks which serve locations required to be equipped with vapor recovery equipment shall load only at facilities capable of disposing of collected vapors. The owner or operator shall assure that such vehicles possess the proper equipment and that work practices are followed so that:
VI.C.4.b.(i) Dry-break loading and unloading nozzles are used and are compatible with those required at loading facilities.
VI.C.4.b.(ii) Vapor recovery hoses are connected at all times during unloading or loading of petroleum distillate.
VI.C.4.b.(iii) Transport trailers and vehicle tanks are operated and maintained to prevent detectable hydrocarbon vapor loss during loading, transport and delivery.
VI.C.4.b.(iv) Compartment dome lids are closed and locked during transfers of petroleum liquid. Such lids may be opened for the purpose of certifying the accuracy of a delivery only prior to and after such delivery. VI.C.4.b.(v) Hoses, couplings, and valves are maintained to prevent dripping, leaking, or other liquid or vapor loss during loading or unloading. VI.D. Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Gasoline Transport Trucks VI.D.1. General Provisions VI.D.1.a. Applicability This subsection is applicable to all gasoline transport trucks equipped for gasoline vapor collection which receive or dispense gasoline at terminals, bulk plants, or gasoline dispensing facilities located in the nonattainment areas. VI.D.1.b. Definitions For the purpose of this subsection, the following definitions apply: VI.D.1.b.(i) "Gasoline Transport Truck" means a tank truck or tank trailer equipped with a storage tank and used for the transport of gasoline from sources of supply to stationary storage tanks of gasoline dispensing facilities (e.g., service stations), bulk gasoline plants, or gasoline terminals.
VI.D.1.b.(ii) "Vapor Collection System" means a vapor transport system which uses direct displacement by the gasoline being transferred to force vapors from the vessel being loaded into a vessel being unloaded or into a vapor control system or vapor holding tank.
VI.D.1.b.(iii) "Vapor Control System" means a system that is designed to control the release of volatile organic compounds displaced from a vessel during transfer of gasoline.
VI.D.2. Provisions for Specific Processes VI.D.2.a. No terminal operator, when monitoring the gasoline loading operation and no owner or operator of a gasoline transport truck shall allow a gasoline transport truck subject to this Subsection VI.D. to be filled with a VOC with Reid Vapor Pressure of 4.0 or greater unless the gasoline tank truck: VI.D.2.a.(i) Is tested annually according to the test procedure referenced in Appendix E. Testing shall be completed prior to the onset of the summer ozone season (test October through April). In addition, the visual inspection detailed in Appendix E, Part B, shall be performed at least once every six months. Trucks which have not been previously certified (new gasoline transport trucks) may be tested May through September as set forth in VI.D.4.d.(iv).
a gauge pressure of 33.6 torr (18 inches of H2O), then evacuated to a gauge pressure of minus 11.2 torr (minus 6 inches of H2O), during the testing required in Subparagraph a.(i), above (i.e., the sum of the absolute pressure change determined by the pressure test plus the absolute pressure change determined by the vacuum test shall not exceed 3 inches of water); and VI.D.2.a.(ii)(A) Sustains a leak rate of no more than 5.6 torr (3 inches H2O) in five minutes when the internal vapor valves are tested according to procedures in Part E., Appendix E.
VI.D.2.a.(ii)(b) Passes a retest within twenty (20) days if it does not meet the criteria of a.(ii) and (iii) above.
VI.D.2.a.(ii)(C) At all times carries an unexpired certification sticker (pursuant to Subparagraphs D.4.c. and d.).
VI.D.2.b. Monitoring VI.D.2.b.(i) The Division may, at any time, monitor a gasoline tank truck vapor collection system, or vapor control system, by the method referenced in Subparagraph D.3.c to confirm continued compliance with Subparagraph 2.a. above.
VI.D.2.b.(ii) Within fifteen (15) days after an exceedance is detected a tank shall pass:
VI.D.2.b.(ii)(A) A pressure/vacuum test per Appendix E; or VI.D.2.b.(ii)(B) A test with combustible gas detector using procedures referenced in Subparagraph 3.c such that no leak over 60% of the propane lower explosive limit (LEL) exists.
VI.D.3. Testing and Monitoring VI.D.3.a. The owner or operator of a gasoline transport truck shall at their own expense, demonstrate compliance with Paragraph 2, by methods of Appendix E. All tests shall be made by, or under the direction of, a person qualified by training and/or experience in the field of air pollution testing or gasoline transport truck maintenance.
VI.D.4. Recordkeeping and Reporting VI.D.4.a. The owner or operator of a gasoline transport truck subject to this Subsection D. shall maintain records of all certification testing and repairs. The records shall identify the gasoline transport truck, the date of the test or repairs and, if applicable, the type of repair and the date of retest. The written record shall include entries of any pre-test repairs, adjustments, or modifications. These shall also include the part name, number, and vendor name of any part removed and of any part installed. The records shall be maintained in legible, readily available form for at least two (2) years after the date the testing or repair was completed and shall be made available to the Division for inspection upon request.
VI.D.4.b.(iv) At the top of each report page shall be the company name and the date and location of the test results recorded on that page; and VI.D.4.b.(v) Name and title of the person conducting the test. VI.D.4.c. The owner or operator of a gasoline transport truck subject to this regulation must annually certify to the Division that the gasoline transport truck has been tested by an applicable method referenced in Paragraph 3. The application for certification shall include:
VI.D.4.c.(i) The name and address of the company and the name and telephone number of responsible company representative over whose signature the certification is submitted; and, VI.D.4.c.(ii) A copy of the information recorded to comply with Subparagraph 4.b. above.
VI.D.4.d. Certification VI.D.4.d.(i) Except as stated in Paragraphs (ii), (iii), and (iv) below, upon receipt of an application for certification that meets the above requirements, the Division shall issue a sticker and a letter of certification to be valid for 380 days after the most recent, successfully completed pressure/vacuum test, except that the expiration date shall not fall within the months of May through September. The certification shall be valid for less than 380 days if necessary to remain within the allowable test period of October through April.
VI.D.4.d.(ii) Owners or operators of gasoline transport trucks with certificates that expire May 1, 1990 (1991) through July 31, 1990 (1991) shall renew their certificates in March or April, 1990 (1991).
VI.D.4.d.(iii) Owners or operators of gasoline transport trucks with certificates that expire August 1, 1990 (1991) through September 30, 1990 (1991) shall renew their certificates in October or November 1990 (1991). Certificates which expire August 1, 1990 (1991) through September 30, 1990 (1991) shall be valid until November 30, 1990 (1991). VI.D.4.d.(iv) Owners or operators of previously uncertified trucks (new gasoline transport trucks) subject to this subsection may obtain initial certification May 1 through September 30, if necessary. Certification for such trucks certified May 1 through July 31 shall be valid for 270 days. Certification for such trucks certified August 1 through September 30 shall be valid for 430 days. All expiration dates for such certificates shall fall within the allowable testing period of October through April. VI.D.4.d.(v) This certification shall be revoked if monitoring detects an exceedance which is not corrected within fifteen (15) days of initial detection, or if the exceedence is judged so severe as to warrant immediate revocation (i.e., no seal is maintained during transfer). VI.D.4.e. The certification letter shall be kept with the tank or at the transport company office at all times and shall be shown to Division personnel upon their request. Copies of all records and reports required by the provisions of this Subsection D. shall be made available to the Division upon oral or written request. The tank shall at all times prominently display a valid sticker when containing gasoline in the ozone nonattainment area.
VII. Crude Oil VII.A. General Exemptions VII.A.1. Storage tanks of 151,412 liters (40,000 gallons) or less used to store crude oil are exempt from the provisions of this section.
VIII. Petroleum Processing and Refining VIII.A. Wastewater (Oil/Water) Separators VIII.A.1. Definitions VIII.A.1.a. "Forebays" mean the primary sections of a wastewater separator. VIII.A.1.b. "Wastewater (oil/water) separator" means any device or piece of equipment which utilizes the difference in density between oil and water to remove oil and associated chemicals from water, or any device, such as a flocculation tank, clarifier, etc., which removes petroleum derived compounds from wastewater.
VIII.A.2.a.(iii)(B) The applicable EPA reference methods 1 through 4, and 25, of 40 CFR Part 60 shall be used to determine the efficiency of control devices.
VIII.A.2.b. Equip all openings in covers, separators, and forebays with lids or seals such that the lids or seals are in the closed position at all times except when in actual use. Access for gauging and sampling shall be minimized. VIII.B. Emissions from Petroleum Refineries VIII.B.1. Definitions VIII.B.1.a. "Firebox" means the chamber or compartment of a boiler or furnace in which materials are burned but does not mean the combustion chamber of an incinerator.
VIII.B.1.b. "Turnaround" means the procedure of shutting a refinery unit down after a run to do necessary maintenance and repair work and then putting the unit back on stream.
VIII.B.2. Process unit turnarounds The owner or operator of a petroleum refinery shall develop and submit to the Division for approval a detailed procedure for minimization of volatile organic compound emissions during process unit turnaround. As a minimum, the procedure shall provide for: VIII.B.2.a. Depressurization venting of the process unit or vessel to a vapor recovery system, or to a flare or firebox which assures at least 90% combustion efficiency;
VIII.B.3. Venting of blowdown systems and safety pressure relief valves All blowdown systems, process equipment vents, and pressure relief valves shall be vented to a vapor recovery system, or to a flare or firebox which assures at least 90% combustion efficiency.
VIII.B.4. Vacuum-Producing Systems VIII.B.4.a. The owner or operator of any vacuum-producing system at a petroleum refinery shall not permit the emission of any noncondensible volatile organic compounds from the condensers, hot wells or accumulators of the system. This emission limit shall be achieved by:
VIII.B.5. All sampling, testing, and measuring ports, hatches, and access openings shall be kept in a closed sealed position except during actual sampling or access. VIII.B.6. Control devices shall meet the applicable requirements, including recordkeeping, of Subsections IX.A.3.a, b, c, and e, and IX.A.8.a and b.
VIII.B.7. The applicable EPA reference methods 1 through 4, and 25, of 40 CFR Part 60, shall be used to determine the efficiency of control devices.
VIII.C. Petroleum Refinery Equipment Leaks VIII.C.1. Definitions For the purpose of this subsection, the following definitions apply: VIII.C.1.a. "Accessible Component" means a component which can be reached, if necessary, by safe and proper use of portable ladders such as are acceptable to OSHA, as well as by built-in ladders and walkways. "Accessible" also includes components which can be reached by the safe use of an extension on the monitoring probe.
VIII.C.1.g. "Water Draw" means a routinely used valve or system employing a valve which allows non-VOC material (usually water) to be separated from VOC. VIII.C.2. Provisions for Specific Processes VIII.C.2.a. The owner or operator of a petroleum refinery complex subject to this regulation shall:
VIII.C.2.a.(i) Develop a monitoring program consistent with the provisions in Paragraph 3.
VIII.C.2.a.(ii) Conduct a monitoring program consistent with the provisions in Subparagraph 4.a.
VIII.C.2.a.(iii) Record all leaking components which have a voc concentration exceeding 10,000 ppm when tested according to Paragraph 3., and place an identifying tag on each component consistent with the provisions in clause 4.a (iii).
VIII.C.2.a.(iv) Repair and retest leaking components, as defined in clause (iii) above, as soon as possible, but no later than fifteen (15) days after the leak is found, excepting those specified in (v) and (vi) below. VIII.C.2.a.(v) Identify all leaking components (as defined in clause (iii) above), which cannot be repaired until the unit is shut down for turnaround, and repair and retest as in clause (iv) when the unit is back on stream. VIII.C.2.a.(vi) When a component leak cannot be fixed within fifteen (15) working days solely because parts are not available, the following shall be noted in an "awaiting parts log:"
VIII.C.2.a.(vi)(A) component identification and tag number VIII.C.2.a.(vi)(B) date part was ordered VIII.C.2.a.(vi)(C) date part was received VIII.C.2.a.(vi)(D) date repair was made VIII.C.2.b. Except for safety pressure relief valves, no owner or operator of a petroleum refinery shall install or operate a valve at the end of a pipe or line containing volatile organic compounds unless the pipe or line is sealed with a second valve, a blind flange, a plug, or a cap. The sealing device may be removed only when a sample is being taken or when the valve is otherwise in use.
VIII.C.2.c. The Division, at its discretion, may require early unit turnaround based on the number and severity of tagged leaks awaiting turnaround provided: VIII.C.2.c.(i) The requirement does not exceed reasonable available control technology due to cost per ton of emissions reduction achieved by the early turnaround or other reasonable analysis.
VIII.C.2.c.(ii) The Division provides the owner or operator of a petroleum refinery with written notification at least 180 days before requiring an early turnaround. The owner or operator will have 30 days from the date of the Division's notification to contest the requirement by submitting a demonstration that the requirement is beyond reasonable available control technology. If no demonstration is made, it will be assumed the requirement is reasonable. If a demonstration is submitted by the owner or operator, the Division will either approve the demonstration or disapprove the demonstration with a justification regarding the disapproval within 30 days of the date the demonstration is submitted to the Division.
VIII.C.2.c.(iii) The requirement is not contested by the owner or operator. Should the requirement be contested, the requirement for early unit turnaround will be delayed until 180 days after the demonstration discussed in item (ii) above is disapproved by the Division. VIII.C.2.d. Piping valves and pressure relief valves in gaseous VOC service shall be marked in some manner that will be readily obvious to both refinery personnel performing monitoring and the Division, to identify them as components which are monitored quarterly.
VIII.C.3. Testing and Monitoring Procedures Testing and calibration procedures to determine compliance with this regulation shall be consistent with EPA reference method 21 of 40 CFR Part 60. The reference compound may be methane or hexane. A leak is defined as a reading of 10,000 ppmv of the reference compound.
VIII.C.4. Monitoring, Recordkeeping, Reporting VIII.C.4.a. Monitoring VIII.C.4.a.(i) The owner or operator of a petroleum refinery subject to this regulation shall conduct a monitoring program consistent with the following provisions:
VIII.C.4.a.(i)(A)(6) Components in heavy liquid VOC service are exempt from requirements of this subclause (A).
VIII.C.4.a.(i)(B) Monitor quarterly by the method referenced in Paragraph 3., above, all:
VIII.C.4.a.(i)(B)(1) Compressor seals; and VIII.C.4.a.(i)(B)(2) Piping valves in gaseous service; and VIII.C.4.a.(i)(B)(3) Pressure relief valves in gaseous service.
VIII.C.4.a.(i)(C) Monitor at least weekly by visual methods all pump seals.
VIII.C.4.a.(i)(D) Monitor within 24 hours with a VOC detector and make record of any component from which VOC liquids are observed leaking.
VIII.C.4.a.(i)(E) Components in heavy liquid VOC service shall be monitored by the method referenced in Paragraph 3. above within five days if evidence of a potential leak is found by visual, audible, olfactory, or any other detectable method.
VIII.C.4.a.(ii) Inaccessible valves and flanges shall be monitored annually or, as a minimum, at unit shutdown using the procedures of VIII.C.2.a (v). Pressure relief devices which are connected to an operating flare header or vapor recovery device, storage tank valves, and valves that are not externally regulated are exempt from the monitoring requirements in Paragraph (i) of this section.
VIII.C.4.a.(iii) The owner or operator of a petroleum refinery, upon the detection of a leaking component as defined in clause 2.a (iii), shall affix a weatherproof and readily visible tag, bearing an identification number and the date the leak is located, to the leaking component. This tag shall remain in place until the leaking component is repaired. In addition, the owner or operator shall log the leak (including those leaks immediately repaired), per the requirements of Regulation Number 7, Section VIII.C.4.b.(i)-(iii).
VIII.C.4.b. Recordkeeping VIII.C.4.b.(i) The owner or operator of a petroleum refinery shall maintain a leaking components monitoring log which shall contain at a minimum, the following data:
VIII.C.4.b.(i)(A) The name of the process unit where the component is located.
VIII.C.4.b.(i)(B) The type of component (e.g., valve, seal). VIII.C.4.b.(i)(C) The tag number of the component.
VIII.C.4.b.(i)(D) The date on which a leaking component is discovered. VIII.C.4.b.(i)(E) The date on which a leaking component is repaired. VIII.C.4.b.(i)(F) The date and instrument reading found during the recheck procedure subsequent to repairing a leaking component. VIII.C.4.b.(i)(G) A record of the calibration of the monitoring instrument. VIII.C.4.b.(i)(H) Those leaks that cannot be repaired until turnaround. VIII.C.4.b.(i)(I) The total number of components checked and the total number of components found leaking.
VIII.C.4.b.(i)(J) The total number of components subject to Section VIII.C.2.a (v) which upon retest were still leaking as defined in Paragraph 3 above.
VIII.C.4.b.(ii) Copies of the monitoring log shall be retained by the owner or operator for a minimum of two (2) years after the date on which the record was made or report prepared.
VIII.C.4.b.(iii) Copies of the monitoring log shall be made available to the Division upon oral or written request.
VIII.C.4.c. Reporting The owner or operator of a petroleum refinery, upon the completion of each yearly and/or quarterly monitoring procedure, shall:
VIII.C.4.c.(i) Submit a report to the Division by the 15th day of February, May, August, and November that lists all leaking components that were located during the previous three (3) calendar months (quarter), but not repaired within fifteen (15) working days, all leaking components awaiting unit turnaround, the total number of components inspected, and the total number of components found leaking.
VIII.C.4.c.(ii) Submit a signed statement with the report attesting to the fact that, with the exception to those leaking components listed in clause 4.b.(i)(H), all monitoring and repairs were performed as stipulated in the monitoring program.
IX. Surface Coating Operations IX.A. General Provisions IX.A.1. Definitions IX.A.1.a. "Coating" means a protective, functional or decorative film applied in a thin layer to a surface. This term often applies to paints such as lacquers or enamels, but is also used to refer to films applied to paper, plastics, or foils. IX.A.1.b. "Coating Applicator" means an apparatus used to apply a surface coating.
IX.A.1.i. "Single Coat" means a single film of coating applied directly to the metal substrate, omitting the primer application.
IX.A.1.j. "Surface Coating" means a liquid, liquifiable, or mastic composition which is converted to a solid (or semi-solid) protective, decorative, or adherent film or deposit after application as a thin layer or by impregnation. In a machine which has both coating and printing units, all units shall be considered as performing a printing operation. Such a machine is subject to the standards governing graphic arts, and thus is not covered by coating standards. IX.A.1.k. "Surface Coating Oven" means a chamber within which heat is used to bake, cure, polymerize, and/or dry a surface coating.
IX.A.1.l. "Topcoat" means the final film of coating applied in a multiple-coat operation. IX.A.2. Abbreviations IX.A.2.a. Kg/lc shall be the abbreviation for: kilograms of solvent VOC per liter of coating (minus water and "exempt" solvents, as defined in Section II.B.). IX.A.2.b. Lb/gc shall be the abbreviation for: (avoirdupois) pounds of solvent VOC per gallon of coating (minus water and "exempt" solvents, as defined in Section II.B.).
IX.A.3. Test Methods and Procedures IX.A.3.a. The owner or operator of any VOC source required to comply with this section shall, at their own expense, demonstrate compliance using EPA reference method 24 of 40 CFR Part 60 for surface coatings, and reference method 25 and reference methods l through 4 for add-on controls. IX.A.3.b. The test protocol should be in accordance with the requirements of the Air Pollution Control Division Compliance Test Manual and shall be submitted to the Division for review and approval at least thirty (30) days prior to testing. No test shall be conducted without prior approval from the Division. IX.A.3.c. The Division may use independent tests to verify test data submitted by the source operator or owner. The test methods shall be those listed in subclause a above and the Division test results shall take precedence. IX.A.3.d. The Division may accept, instead of the testing required in this subsection, a certification by the manufacturer of the composition of the coatings if supported by actual batch formulation records. The owner or operator of the VOC source required to comply with this section shall obtain certification from the coating manufacturer(s) that the test method(s) used for determination of VOC content meet the requirements specified in Subsection IX.A.3.a. The owner or operator shall have this certification readily available to Division personnel, in order to allow the results to be used in the daily compliance calculations specified in Subsection IX.A.10.
IX.A.5.d.(ii) Credit shall not be received for downtime, however, credit is allowed for enforceable production limits.
IX.A.5.d.(iii) Crossline averaging shall be used only across lines in the same control technique guidance group.
IX.A.5.d.(iv) The emission trading policy shall be met on a daily weighted average.
IX.A.5.d.(v) Sources subject to best available control technology (BACT) and lowest achievable emission rate (LAER) requirements shall not use cross line averaging.
IX.A.5.d.(vi) VOC emissions shall be expressed as lbs/gallons solids to determine reduction over baseline (lb VOC/lb solids for graphic arts). IX.A.5.d.(vii) Organisol and plastisol coatings shall not be used to bubble emissions from vinyl surface or automobile topcoating operations. IX.A.5.d.(viii) Before crossline averaging may be used, the control methodology shall be approved as a revision to the State Implementation Plan.
IX.A.5.e. The design, operation and efficiency of any capture system used in conjunction with any emission control system shall be certified in writing by the source owner or operator and approved by the Division. Unless the capture system meets the requirements for a total enclosure as specified in the New Source Performance Standard for the Magnetic Tape Manufacturing Industry, 53FR38892, October 3, 1988, or unless Division approved material balance techniques are used to adequately determine overall VOC capture and destruction/recovery efficiency, the efficiency of the capture system shall be determined by test methods approved as a revision to the State Implementation Plan. Testing for capture efficiency shall be performed on a case-by-case basis as required by the Division. The requirements of Subsections IX.A.3.e and IX.A.8.b. shall apply to the capture and control device system. When capture and control device efficiency must be independently determined, the overall VOC emission reduction rate equals the (percent capture efficiency X percent control device efficiency)/100.
IX.A.5.f. Sources which use add-on controls, crossline averaging, or an approved alternative control strategy instead of low solvent technology to meet the applicable emission limit shall meet the equivalent VOC emission limit, on the basis of solids applied (lb VOC/gal solids applied, or lb VOC/lb solids applied, for graphic arts sources). Appendix F sets forth the procedure for converting emission limits and lists equivalent limits for various coating operations. IX.A.5.g. Owners or operators of sources which use a carbon adsorption system shall provide for the proper disposal or reuse of all VOC recovered. IX.A.6. Exemptions IX.A.6.a. The requirements of this Section IX do not apply to sources used exclusively for chemical or physical analysis or determination of product quality and commercial acceptance, provided;
IX.A.6.a.(i) the operation of the source is not an integral part of the production process; and IX.A.6.a.(ii) the emissions from the source do not exceed 363 kilograms (800 lbs.) in any calendar month; and IX.A.6.a.(iii) the exemption is approved in writing by the Division. IX.A.6.b. The requirements of Sections IX.C, D,E,F,G,H,I,L and M are not applicable to sources whose actual emissions, including fugitive emissions, before add-on controls, are less than 6.8 kilograms (15 lbs.) per day and less than 1.4 kilograms (3 lbs.) per hour. Emissions from all sources within the same control technique guidance group shall be totaled to determine actual emissions. IX.A.7. Fugitive emission control IX.A.7.a. Control techniques and work practices shall be implemented at all times to reduce VOC emissions from fugitive sources. Control techniques and work practices include, but are not limited to:
IX.A.7.a.(i) tight-fitting covers for open tanks;
IX.A.7.a.(ii) covered containers for solvent wiping cloths; IX.A.7.a.(iii) proper disposal of dirty cleanup solvent. IX.A.7.b. Emissions of organic material released during clean-up operations, disposal, and other fugitive emissions shall be included when determining total emissions, unless the source owner or operator documents that the VOCs are collected and disposed of in a manner that prevents evaporation to the atmosphere.
IX.A.8. Recordkeeping, Reporting, and Monitoring IX.A.8.a. If add-on control equipment is used, continuous monitors of the following parameters shall be installed, calibrated, and operated at all times that the associated control equipment is operating:
IX.A.8.b.(i) For the capture system: fan power use, duct flow, duct pressure. IX.A.8.b.(ii) For carbon adsorbers: bed temperature, bed vacuum pressure, pressure at the vacuum pump, accumulated time of operation, concentration of VOC in the outlet gas, solvent recovery. IX.A.8.b.(iii) For refrigeration systems: compressor discharge and suction pressures, condenser fluid temperature, solvent recovery. IX.A.8.b.(iv) For incinerator systems: exhaust gas temperature, temperature rise across a catalytic incinerator bed, flame temperature, accumulated time of incinerator.
IX.A.8.c. Recordkeeping procedures shall follow the guidance in "Recordkeeping Guidance Document for Surface Coating Operations and the Graphic Arts Industry," July 1989, EPA 340/1-88-003.
IX.A.9. Required and Prohibited Acts IX.A.9.a. No owner or operator of a source of VOCs subject to this section shall operate, cause, allow or permit the operation of the source, unless: IX.A.9.a.(1) For each category of surface coating as specified in Sections IX.B. through IX.M, the owner or operator of a surface coating line or facility subject to that section does not cause, allow or permit the discharge into the atmosphere of any VOCs in excess of the specified emission limit, calculated as delivered to the coating applicator or as applied to the substrate, whichever is greater.
IX.A.10. Compliance Calculation Procedures IX.A.10.a. Compliance with this section shall be determined on a daily basis. Sources may request a revision to the State Implementation Plan for longer times for compliance determination.
IX.A.11. The requirements of Subsections IX.A.1 through IX.A.10 of this regulation apply to each category of surface coating as specified in Sections IX.B through IX.M. The requirements of IX.A. 7 through 10 apply to the category of IX.N.
IX.A.12. The Division shall approve utilization of alternative compliance methods to the following sources pursuant to this Section IX.
IX.A.12.a.(iv) The emission trading policy set forth in Regulation Number 3, V, Part A, shall be met on a daily weighted average.
IX.A.12.a.(v) Sources subject to Best Available Control Technology (BACT), and Lowest Achievable Emission Rate (LAER) shall not use cross line averaging.
IX.A.12.a.(vi) To determine reduction over baseline, VOC emissions shall be expressed according to Regulation Number 7, Section IX.(A).(5).(f), as lbs/gallons solids.
IX.A.12.a.(vii) Monthly records shall be kept at the source to verify ongoing compliance with these conditions. The recordkeeping format shall be approved by the Division.
IX.A.12.a.(viii) An annual report demonstrating ongoing compliance with this regulation and all permit terms shall be filed with the Division. The report format shall be approved by the Division and specifically described in the permit.
IX.A.12.a.(ix) The Division shall issue a permit with Federally enforceable terms and conditions to Lexmark limiting Lexmark's alternative compliance method emissions to those allowable under Subpart L or J as appropriate, of this Regulation Number 7.
IX.A.12.a.(x) Commercial and Product quality control laboratory equipment are exempt from APEN filing and construction permit requirements under Regulation Number 3, Part A. II. D. 1(i), and Regulation Number 3, Part B, III.D.1.a; and from construction permit requirements under Regulation Number 3, Part B, III.D.1(i). Qualifying sources shall be exempt from Regulation Number 7, Section IX. A. 6.
IX.A.12.a.(xi) Nothing in the alternative compliance method is intended to relax any emissions limitation of this Regulation Number 7.
IX.B. Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Assembly Plants IX.B.1. Definitions IX.B.1.a. "Application Area” means the area where the surface coating is applied by spraying, dipping or flow coating.
IX.B.2. Applicability This subsection applies to all assembly and subassembly lines in an automobile or light- duty truck assembly facility, including those for frames, small parts, wheels, and main body parts. This subsection applies only to the manufacture of new vehicles. IX.B.3. Emission Limitations . Kg/lc Lb/gc _______________________________________ ____ ____ Prime application, flashoff area, and oven 0.23 1.9 Topcoat application area, flashoff area, and oven 0.34 2.8 Final repair application, flashoff area and oven 0.58 4.8 IX.B.4. Coatings other than primer, surfacer (guidecoat), topcoat and final repair shall be considered under the miscellaneous metal parts Subsection IX.L. IX.B.5. For topcoat application, if a complying coating is not used to meet the emission limit of Subsection IX.B.3, then:
IX.C.1.e. "Interior Body Spray” means a coating sprayed onto the interior surface of the can body to provide a protective film between the can and its contents. IX.C.1.f. "Overvarnish” means a coating applied directly over ink to reduce the coefficient of friction, provide gloss, protect against abrasion, enhance product quality, and protect against corrosion.
IX.C.1.g. "Three-Piece Can Side Seam Spray” means a coating sprayed onto the interior and/or exterior of a can body seam on a three-piece can to protect the exposed metal.
IX.C.1.h. "Two-Piece Can Exterior End Coat” means a coating applied to the exterior of the bottom end of a two-piece can.
IX.C.2. Applicability This subsection applies to coating applicator(s), and oven(s) of sheet can or end coating lines involved in sheet basecoat (exterior and interior) and over varnish, two-and three- piece can interior body spray, two-piece can exterior end (spray or roll coat), three-piece can side-seam spray, and end sealing compound operations. IX.C.3. Emission Limitations Can Coating Kg/lc Lb/gc ____________________________________________ ______ ____ Sheet base coat (exterior and interior) and overvarnish two-piece can exterior 0.34 2.8 (base coat and overvarnish)
Two and three-piece can interior body spray, two-piece can exterior end (spray or 0.51 4.2 roll coat)
Three-piece can side-seam spray 0.66 5.5 End sealing compound 0.44 3.7 Any additional coats 0.51 4.2 IX.D. Coil Coating Operations IX.D.1. Definitions IX.D.1.a. “Coil Coating” means any surface coating applied by spray, roller, or other means onto one or both surfaces of flat metal sheets or strips that come in rolls or coils.
Coil Coating Kg/lc Lb/gc _______________________________________________ _____ _____ Any coat (primer, intermediate coat, topcoat, single coat) 0.31 2.6 IX.E. Fabric Coating Operations IX.E.1. Definitions IX.E.1.a. “Fabric Coating" means the process of coating or impregnating the full, usable surface of a fabric web or sheet to impart properties that are not initially present such as strength, stability, water or acid repellency, or appearance. "Fabric Coating" excludes those processes normally included under fabric finishing (e.g. dyeing, treating for stain and wrinkle resistance, etc.). IX.E.2. Applicability This subsection applies to fabric coating lines which includes, but is not limited to, coaters and drying ovens.
IX.F.2. Applicability This subsection applies to all large appliance coating lines. IX.F.3. Emission Limitations . Kg/lc Lb/gc __________________________________ _____ _____ Large Appliance Coating Line; prime, single or 0.34 2.8 topcoat application area, flashoff area, and oven IX.G. Magnet Wire Coating Operations IX.G.1. Definition IX.G.1.a. "Magnet Wire Coating" means those operations which apply a coating of electrically insulating varnish or enamel (or similar substance) to wire which is known as "magnet wire.” Magnet wire is usually copper or aluminum, and is used for electric motors, generators, transformers, magnets, and related products. IX.G.2. Applicability This subsection applies to, but is not limited to, coaters and drying ovens of magnet wire coating operations.
IX.G.3. Emission Limitations . Kg/lc Lb/gc ________________________________________ _____ _____ Magnetic wire coating operation 0.20 1.7 IX.H. Metal Furniture Coating Operations IX.H.1. Definitions IX.H.1.a. "Metal Furniture" means furnishings commonly considered furniture, for domestic, business, and/or institutional use, which have one or more essential, major components made of metal. "Metal furniture" includes, but is not limited to, tables, chairs, wastebaskets, beds, desks, lockers, shelving, cabinets, room dividers, clothing racks, chests of drawers, and sofas. IX.H.1.b. "Metal Furniture Coating" means applying a "surface coating" to "metal furniture" as defined above. It excludes coating of non-metal components. IX.H.2. Applicability This subsection applies to all metal furniture coating lines. IX.H.3. Emission Limitations . Kg/lc Lb/gc ______________________________ ____ ____ Metal Furniture Coating Line: All coats (including prime, single, and topcoat) 0.36 3.0 IX.I. Paper Coating Operations IX.I.1. Definition "Paper Coating" means impregnating or applying a uniform layer of "surface coating" to paper. It includes, but is not limited to, the production of: coated, glazed, decorated, and varnished paper; carbon and pressure-sensitive copy papers; paper adhesive-labels and tapes; blue-print; photographic and copier paper. It also includes coating of metal foil such as gift wrap and packaging. Paper coating does not include impregnation using a batch dipping process.
IX.I.2. Applicability This subsection applies to paper coating lines, which includes, but is not limited to, coaters and drying ovens.
IX.I.3. Emission Limitations . Kg/lc Lb/gc __________________________ ____ ____ Paper Coating Line 0.35 2.9 IX.J. Plastic-Film Coating Operations IX.J.1. Definition IX.J.1.a. "Plastic-Film Coating" means applying a uniform layer of "surface coating" to a flexible web or sheet of thin plastic substance, excluding all rubbers and vinyls* (polyvinyl chloride) except for the following two categories of vinyl products: (1) vinyl tapes and (2) vinyls coated with an adhesive or pressure- sensitive coating. It includes, but is not limited to: plastic typewriter ribbons, photographic film, adhesive tapes, and magnetic recording tapes. (*see Subsection K.)
IX.J.2. Applicability This subsection applies to, but is not limited to, coaters and drying ovens of plastic-film coating lines.
IX.J.3. Emission Limitations . Kg/lc Lb/gc ___________________________ _____ _____ Plastic-Film Coating Line 0.35 2.9 IX.K. Vinyl Coating Operations IX.K.1. Definition "Vinyl Coating” means applying a uniform layer, decorative or protective topcoat to a vinyl (polyvinyl chloride) coated fabric or vinyl sheet. It includes printing of same. Excluded are*: (1) the coating of same with adhesive or pressure-sensitive coatings and (2) vinyl tapes. (*see Subsection J).
IX.K.2. Application This subsection applies to vinyl coating lines which includes, but is not limited to, coaters and drying ovens.
IX.K.3. Emission Limitations . Kg/lc Lb/gc ____________________________________ _____ ____ Vinyl Coating Line 0.45 3.8 IX.L. Manufactured Metal Parts and Metal Products IX.L.1. General Provisions IX.L.1.a. Applicability This subsection applies to the application area(s), flashoff area(s), oven(s), and drying areas including (but not limited to) air and forced air drier(s) used in the surface coating of the metal parts and products listed below. This section applies to prime coat, top coat, and single coat operations. This section is applicable to surface coating of manufactured metal parts and metal products which include: IX.L.1.a.(i) Large farm machinery (harvesting, fertilizing, and planting machines, tractors, combines, etc.);
IX.L.1.a.(iv) Commercial machinery (office equipment, computers and auxiliary equipment, typewriters, calculators, vending machines, etc.); IX.L.1.a.(v) Industrial machinery (pumps, compressors, conveyor components, fans, blowers, transformers, etc.);
IX.L.1.a.(vi) Fabricated metal products (metal covered doors, frames, etc.); IX.L.1.a.(vii) Furniture hardware made of metal for use with non-metal furniture; and IX.L.1.a.(viii) Any other industrial category which coats metal parts or products under the standard industrial classification code of major group 33 (primary metal industries), major group 34 (fabricated metal products), major group 35 (non-electric machinery), major group 36 (electrical machinery), major group 37 (transportation equipment), major group 38 (miscellaneous instruments), and major group 39 (miscellaneous manufacturing industries), according to the "Standard Industrial Classification Manual" Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget.
IX.L.1.b. Exemptions IX.L.1.b.(i) This Subsection L is not applicable to the surface coating of the following metal parts and products inasmuch as these are previously covered in Subsections IX.B., C., D., F, G, and H., respectively: IX.L.1.b.(i)(A) Automobiles and light-duty trucks IX.L.1.b.(i)(B) Metal cans IX.L.1.b.(i)(C) Flat metal sheets and strips in the form of rolls or coils IX.L.1.b.(i)(D) Large appliances IX.L.1.b.(i)(E) Magnet wire for use in electrical machinery IX.L.1.b.(i)(F) Metal furniture IX.L.1.b.(ii) This Subsection L is not applicable to the following special purpose coatings:
IX.L.1.b.(ii)(A) Division-approved exemptions for high performance coatings on a case-by-case basis.
IX.L.1.b.(ii)(B) Full exterior repainting of automobiles and light-duty trucks if fewer than 18 vehicles are painted per day.
IX.L.1.c. Definitions For the purpose of this subsection, the following definitions apply: IX.L.1.c.(i) "Air Dried Coating” means coatings which are dried by the use of air or forced warm air at temperatures up to 90oC (194°F); IX.L.1.c.(ii) "Clear Coat” means a coating, which lacks color and opacity or a coating which is transparent;
IX.L.1.c.(iii) "Coating Application System” means all operations and equipment which apply, convey, and dry a surface coating, including, but not limited to, spray booths, flow coaters, flashoff areas, air dryers and ovens;
IX.L.1.c.(iv) "Extreme Environmental Conditions” means exposure to any of the following: temperatures consistently above 95°C, detergents, abrasive and scouring agents, solvents, and corrosive environments; IX.L.1.c.(v) "Extreme Performance Coatings” means coatings designed for extreme environmental conditions.
IX.L.2. Provisions for Specific Processes IX.L.2.a. No owner or operator of a facility or operation engaging in the surface coating of manufactured metal parts or metal products may operate a coating application system subject to this regulation that emits VOC in excess of: IX.L.2.a.(i) Clear coatings:
IX.L.2.a.(iii) Air-Dried Coatings
IX.L.2.a.(iv) Other coatings and systems:
coatings and coating application systems.
IX.L.2.b. If more than one emission limitation in Subparagraph 2.a. applies to a specific coating, then the least stringent emission limitation shall be applied. IX.L.2.c. Pioneer Metal Finishing, Inc., a surface coating operation, is authorized pursuant to Regulation Number 3, Part A, Section V and Regulation Number 7, Section II.D.1.a to use up to twenty (20) tons of certified emission reduction credits of volatile organic compounds (VOC) as an alternative compliance method to satisfy the surface coating emission limitations of Regulation Number 7 in accordance with and upon demonstration of the conditions set forth below: IX.L.2.c.(i) Certified emission reduction credits for VOCs (methanol) to be used in this transaction were formerly owned by the Coors Brewing Company, registered and issued in Emissions Reduction Credit Permit 91AR120R on July 25, 1994;
IX.L.2.c.(ii) Those emission reduction credits were originally obtained by Coors from Verticel, a company that produced honeycomb packaging material and was located within five miles of the PMF facility; IX.L.2.c.(iii) The use of these VOC emission reduction credits identified above shall be used to satisfy VOC limitations of certain specified surface coatings in excess of Control Technique Guidance as specified in Regulation Number 7, Section IX.L.2.a and Section IX.A.6.b, and applicable to the Pioneer Metal finishing operations;
IX.L.2.c.(iv) Such emission reduction credits identified above will be used by PMF to achieve compliance with Regulation Number 7 to compensate for ozone precursor emission of VOCs from non-compliant coatings which meet the emission trading requirements of Regulation Number 3. In order to satisfy the photochemical reactivity equivalency requirement of VOC trades, the methanol VOC ERCs will be reduced on a ratio of 1.1:1 for VOCs of toluene, ethylbezene, xylene and ketones emitted from non- compliant coatings. All other VOCs involved in this transaction are considered to be of the same degree of photochemical reactivity; IX.L.2.c.(v) The requirement in Regulation Number 3, Part A, Section V.F.2 shall not apply to this transaction;
IX.L.2.c.(vi) This transaction is only valid within the Denver/Boulder nonattainment area as described at 40 CFR 81, Subchapter C-Air Programs, Subpart C-Section 107 Attainment Status Designations, Section 81.306;
IX.L.2.c.(vii) This transaction shall be calculated upon a pound for pound basis and averaged over a maximum 24-hour period.
IX.L.2.c.(viii) This transaction shall be effective upon approval by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as a revision to the Colorado State Implementation Plan and after issuance of a State Construction Permit incorporating, but not limited to, the conditions and requirements of the Section;
IX.L.2.c.(ix) This transaction may not be used to satisfy any current or future requirements of NSPS, BACT, LAER, or MACT requirements of HAPs which may apply to PMF, except that this transaction may be used to satisfy control technique guidance or RACT requirements contained in Regulation Number 7 which are applicable to PMF;
IX.L.2.c.(x) This transaction shall not interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further progress in the Colorado State Implementation Plan or any other applicable requirements of the Clean Air Act;
IX.L.2.c.(xi) This transaction shall be registered and enforced through a State Construction Permit issued to Pioneer Metal Finishing, Inc. containing, but not limited to the conditions and limitations set forth in this Section; IX.L.2.c.(xii) Such state Construction Permit issued to Pioneer Metal Finishing, Inc. shall specify, among other, things the necessary monitory, recordkeeping and reporting requirements to insure that the emission reduction credits are applied in accordance with the conditions and requirements of this Section;
IX.L.2.c.(xiii) The state Construction Permit shall allow a daily maximum limitation of 160 lbs. of VOC emissions from non-compliant surface coatings and an annual limitation of 40,000 lbs. of non-compliant VOC emissions. The annual limitation shall be calculated on a 12-month rolling total calculated on the first day of each month using the previous 12 months.
IX.L.2.c.(xiv) The state Construction Permit shall limit the VOC-HAP emissions to less than ten (10) per year of any one HAP or twenty-five (25) tons per year of any combination of HAP emissions; and IX.L.2.c.(xv) PMF will maintain records of daily and monthly totals of non- compliant surface coatings used in its operation and report such usages on an annual basis to the Division or as otherwise requested. IX.M. Flat Wood Paneling Coating.
IX.M.1. Definitions IX.M.1.a. "Class II Hardboard Paneling Finish" means finishes which meet the specifications of Voluntary Product Standard PS-59-73 as approved by the American National Standards Institute.
IX.M.1.f. "Printed Interior Panels" means panels whose grain or natural surface is obscured by fillers and basecoats upon which a simulated grain or decorative pattern is printed.
IX.M.1.g. "Thin Particleboard" is a manufactured board 1/4 inch or less in thickness made of individual wood particles which have been coated with a binder and formed into flat sheets by pressure.
IX.M.1.h. "Tileboard" means paneling that has a colored waterproof surface coating.
IX.M.2. Applicability This subsection applies to all flat wood manufacturing and surface finishing facilities that manufacture printed interior panels made of hardwood plywood and thin particle board; natural finish hardwood plywood panels, or hardboard paneling with Class II finishes. This subsection does not apply to the manufacture of exterior siding, tileboard, or particleboard used as a furniture component.
IX.M.3. Emission Limitations IX.M.3.a. 2.9 kg per 100 square meters of coated finished product (6.0 lb/1,000 sq.
IX.N. Manufacture of Pneumatic Rubber Tires IX.N.1. Definitions IX.N.1.a. "Bead Dipping" means the dipping of an assembled tire bead into a solvent-based cement.
IX.N.2. Applicability This section applies to VOC emissions from the following operations in all pneumatic rubber tire facilities: undertread cementing, tread end cementing, bead dipping, and green tire spraying.
IX.N.3. Provisions for Specific Processes IX.N.3.a. The owner or operator of an undertread cementing, tread end cementing, or bead dipping operation subject to this regulation shall: IX.N.3.a.(i) Install and operate a capture system, designed to achieve maximum reasonable capture, up to 85 percent by weight of VOC emitted, from all undertread cementing, tread end cementing and bead dipping operations. Maximum reasonable capture shall be consistent with the following documents:
IX.N.3.a.(ii) Install and operate a control device that meets the requirements of one of the following:
IX.N.3.a.(ii)(A) A carbon adsorption system designed and operated in a manner such that there is at least a 95.0 percent removal of VOC by weight from the gases ducted to the control device; or, IX.N.3.a.(ii)(B) An incineration system that oxidizes at least 90.0 percent of the nonmethane volatile organic compounds (VOC measured as total combustible carbon) which enter the incinerator to carbon dioxide and water.
IX.N.4. The owner or operator of a green tire spraying operation subject to this regulation must implement one of the following means of reducing volatile organic compound emissions: IX.N.4.a. Substitute water-based sprays for the normal solvent-based mold release compound; or, IX.N.4.a.(i) Install a capture system designed and operated in a manner that will capture and transfer at least 90.0 percent of the VOC emitted by the green tire spraying operation to a control device; and, IX.N.4.a.(ii) In addition to Part (i), install and operate a control device that meets the requirements of one of the following:
IX.N.7. The applicable EPA reference methods l through 4, and 25, of 40 CFR Part 60, shall be used to determine the efficiency of control devices.
X. Use of Solvents for Degreasing and Cleaning X.A. General Provisions X.A.1. Applicability The provisions of this section apply to cold cleaners, non-conveyorized vapor degreasers, and conveyorized degreasers. Open top vapor degreasers are a subset of non-conveyorized vapor degreasers. The owner or operator of a unit subject to this section shall ensure that no such unit is used unless the requirements of this section are satisfied.
X.A.2.d. "Freeboard Ratio” means the ratio of the freeboard to the width of the solvent surface.
X.A.2.e. "Non-Conveyorized Vapor Degreaser” means an apparatus, which uses non- aqueous solvent vapors within some type of container to degrease or otherwise clean solid objects in a batch-loaded process. It excludes continuously loaded conveyorized degreasers.
X.A.2.f. "Solvent Metal Cleaning" means the process of cleaning soils from metal surfaces by cold cleaning, conveyorized degreasing, or non-conveyorized vapor degreasing.
X.A.3. Transfer of waste solvent and used solvent In any disposal or transfer of waste or used solvent, at least 80 percent by weight of the solvent/waste liquid shall be retained (i.e., no more than 20 percent of the liquid solvent/solute mixture shall evaporate or otherwise be lost during transfers). X.A.4. Storage of waste solvent and used solvent Waste or used solvent shall be stored in closed containers unless otherwise required by law.
X.A.5. Any control device shall meet the applicable requirements of Subsections IX.A.3.a, b, c, e and IX.A.8.a. and b.
X.B. Control of Solvent Cold-Cleaners X.B.1. Control Equipment X.B.1.a. Covers X.B.1.a.(i) All cold-cleaners shall have a properly fitting cover. X.B.1.a.(ii) Covers shall be designed to be easily operable with one hand under any of the following conditions:
X.B.1.b.(ii)(B) An enclosed, external drainage facility that captures the drained solvent liquid from the cleaned parts.
X.B.1.c. A permanent, clearly visible sign shall be mounted on or next to the cold-cleaner. The sign shall list the operating requirements.
X.B.1.d. Solvent spray apparatus shall not have a splashing, fine atomizing, or shower type action but rather should produce a solid, cohesive stream. Solvent spray shall be used at a pressure that does not cause excessive splashing. For solvents with a true vapor pressure above 32 torr (0.62 psia) at 38°C (100°F), or, for solvents heated above 50°C (120°F), one of the following techniques shall be used:
X.B.1.d.(i) A freeboard ratio greater than or equal to 0.7. X.B.1.d.(ii) A water or a non-volatile liquid cover. The cover liquid shall not be soluble in the solvent and shall not be more dense than the solvent and the depth of the cover liquid shall be sufficient to prevent the escape of solvent vapors.
X.B.2. Operating requirements X.B.2.a. The cold-cleaner cover shall be closed whenever parts are not being handled within the cleaner confines.
X.C. Control of Non-Conveyorized Vapor Degreasers X.C.1. Control Equipment X.C.1.a. The non-conveyorized vapor degreaser shall have a cover which shall be designed and operated so that it can be easily opened and closed through the use of mechanical assists such as spring loading, counterweights, etc.; opening and closing the cover shall not disturb the vapor zone. X.C.1.b. Safety Switches The following two types of switches shall be installed on vapor degreasers: X.C.1.b.(i) Condenser flow switch and thermostat - (shuts off sump heat if the condenser coolant is either not circulating or is too warm); and X.C.1.b.(ii) Spray safety switch - (shuts off spray pump if the vapor level drops more than four (4) inches).
X.C.1.c.(ii)(D) A carbon adsorption system with ventilation greater than or equal to 15 cubic meters each minute per square meter (50 cfm/ft ) of air/vapor area (when the cover(s) is [are] open), exhausting less than 25 parts per million (by volume) of solvent averaged over one complete adsorption cycle.
X.C.1.d. A permanent, clearly visible sign shall be mounted on or next to the degreaser. The sign shall list the operating requirements. X.C.2. Operating Requirements X.C.2.a. Keep cover closed at all times except when processing work loads into or out of the degreaser.
X.C.2.b. The following operations shall be performed to minimize solvent carry- out:
X.C.2.b.(i) Rack parts to allow full drainage.
X.C.2.b.(ii) Move parts as slowly as is practicable in and out of the degreaser. A maximum of one foot every five seconds by hand or a maximum of 5.5 cm/sec. (10.8ft/min) for a mechanically operated system.
X.C.2.b.(iii) Allow the workload to clean in the vapor zone at least 30 seconds or until condensation ceases.
X.C.2.b.(iv) Tip out any pools of solvent that remain on the cleaned parts before removal from the vapor zone.
X.C.2.b.(v) Allow parts to dry within the degreaser at least 15 seconds and/or until visually dry.
X.C.2.c. Solvents shall not be used to clean porous or absorbent materials; for example, cloth, leather, wood, rope, etc.
X.C.2.d. Work loads shall not occupy more than half of the degreaser's open top area.
X.C.2.e. Spraying shall not be done above the vapor level. X.C.2.f. Solvent leaks shall be repaired immediately, or the degreaser shall be shut down. X.C.2.g. Exhaust ventilation shall not exceed twenty (20) cubic meters per minute per square meter (65.6 cfm per sq. ft.) of degreaser open area, unless greater exhaust rates are necessary to meet Occupational and Safety Health Act requirements. Ventilation fans shall not be used near the degreaser opening, unless necessary to meet Occupational and Safety Health Act requirements. X.C.2.h. The water separator shall function so that no visible water is present in the solvent exiting the separator.
X.D. Control of Conveyorized Degreasers X.D.1. Control Equipment X.D.1.a. Control Device For all conveyorized degreasers with a solvent surface area greater than two (2) square meters (21.5 square feet), the degreasing shall be controlled by at least one of the following:
X.D.1.c.(i)(A) A spray safety switch shall shut off the spray pump and/or the conveyor if the vapor level drops more than four (4) inches.
X.D.1.c.(i)(B) A vapor level control thermostat shall shut off sump heat when the vapor level rises too high.
X.D.1.c.(ii) All conveyorized degreasers shall have a condenser thermostat and flow-detector switch (or equivalent) which shuts off sump heat if coolant is too warm or is not circulating.
X.D.1.d. Minimized Openings: Degreaser entrance and exit openings shall silhouette work loads so that the average clearance between parts (or parts-and the edge of the degreaser opening) is either:
X.D.1.d.(i) less than 10 centimeters (4 inches) or;
X.D.1.d.(ii) less than 10 percent of the width of the opening X.D.1.e. Covers shall be provided to close off all the entrance(s) and exit(s) when the conveyor is not in use.
X.D.1.f. A permanent, clearly visible sign shall be mounted on or next to the degreaser. The sign shall list the operating requirements.
X.D.2. Operating Requirements X.D.2.a. Exhaust ventilation shall not exceed 20 m 3 /minute per square meter of degreaser opening (65.6 cf/m per square foot), unless necessary to meet OSHA requirements. Work place fans shall not be located near, nor directed at degreaser openings, unless necessary to meet OSHA requirements. Exhaust flow shall be measured by EPA reference methods 1 and 2 of 40 CFR Part 60. X.D.2.b. Carry-out emissions shall be minimized by:
XI. Use of Cutback Asphalt XI.A. Definitions XI.A.1. “Asphalt or Asphalt Cement” The dark-brown to black cementatious material (solid, semi- solid, or liquid in consistency) of which the main constituents are bitumens which occur naturally or as a residue of petroleum refining.
XI.C. Recordkeeping During the months of March through September, the person responsible for the use or storage of any cutback asphalt as permitted in Subparagraph 3.a. and b. and Paragraph 2. shall keep records of same, including type and amount of solvent(s) used.
XII. Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Oil and Gas Operations XII.A. Applicability XII.A.1. Except as provided in Section XII.A.2. through 5., this Section applies to oil and gas exploration and production operations, natural gas compressor stations and natural gas drip stations:
XII.A.2. Oil refineries are not subject to this Section XII. XII.A.3. Natural gas-processing plants and qualifying natural gas compressor stations located in an ozone nonattainment or attainment maintenance area are subject to Section XII.G. XII.A.4. Glycol natural gas dehydrators located at an oil and gas exploration and production operation, natural gas compressor station, drip station or gas processing plant in an ozone nonattainment or attainment maintenance area are only subject to Sections XII.B. and XII.H.
XII.A.5. The requirements of this section XII.A shall not apply to any owner or operator in any calendar year in which the APENs for all of the atmospheric condensate storage tanks associated with the affected operations owned or operated by such person reflect a total of less than 30 tons-per-year of actual uncontrolled emissions of VOCs in the 8-Hour Ozone Control Area. Such requirements shall, however, apply to such owner or operator in any subsequent calendar year in which the APENs for atmospheric condensate storage tanks associated with such affected operations reflect a total of 30 tons per year or more of actual uncontrolled emissions of VOCs in the 8-Hour Ozone Control Area. XII.B. Definitions Specific to Section XII XII.B.1. “Affected Operations” means oil and gas exploration and production operations, natural gas compressor stations and natural gas drip stations to which this Section XII applies. XII.B.2. “Air Pollution Control Equipment” , as used in this Section XII, means a combustion device or vapor recovery unit. Air pollution control equipment also means alternative emissions control equipment, pollution prevention devices and processes that comply with the requirements of Section XII.D.2.b. that are approved by the Division. XII.B.3. “Atmospheric Storage Tanks or Atmospheric Condensate Storage Tanks” means a type of condensate storage tank that vents, or is designed to vent, to the atmosphere. XII.B.4. “Auto-Igniter” means a device which will automatically attempt to relight the pilot flame in the combustion chamber of a control device in order to combust volatile organic compound emissions.
XII.B.5. “Calendar Week” shall mean a week beginning with Sunday and ending with Saturday. XII.B.6. “Condensate Storage Tank” shall mean any tank or series of tanks that store condensate and are either manifolded together or are located at the same well pad. XII.B.7. “Downtime” shall mean the period of time when a well is producing and the air pollution control equipment is not in operation.
XII.B.8. “Existing” shall mean any atmospheric condensate storage tank that began operation before February 1, 2009, and has not since been modified. XII.B.9. “Glycol Natural Gas Dehydrator” means any device in which a liquid glycol (including, ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, or triethylene glycol) absorbent directly contacts a natural gas stream and absorbs water.
XII.B.10. “Modified or Modification” shall mean any physical change or change in operation of a stationary source that results in an increase in actual uncontrolled volatile organic compound emissions from the previous calendar year that occurs on or after February 1, 2009. For atmospheric condensate storage tanks, a physical change or change in operation includes but is not limited to drilling new wells and recompleting, refracturing or otherwise stimulating existing wells.
XII.B.11. “New” shall mean any atmospheric condensate storage tank that began operation on or after February 1, 2009.
XII.B.12. “Stabilized” when used to refer to stored condensate, means that the condensate has reached substantial equilibrium with the atmosphere and that any emissions that occur are those commonly referred to within the industry as “working and breathing losses”.
XII.B.13. (State Only) “Surveillance System” means monitoring pilot flame presence or temperature in a combustion device either by visual observation or with an electronic device to record times and duration of periods where a pilot flame is not detected at least once per day.
XII.B.14. “System-Wide” when used to refer to emissions and emission reductions in Section XII.D., shall mean collective emissions and emission reductions from all atmospheric condensate storage tanks under common ownership within the 8-hour Ozone Control Area or other specific Ozone Nonattainment or Attainment Maintenance Area for which uncontrolled actual volatile organic compound emissions are equal to or greater than two tons per year.
XII.C. General Provisions to Section XII XII.C.1. General Requirements for Air Pollution Control Equipment – Prevention of Leakage XII.C.1.a. All air pollution control equipment used to demonstrate compliance with this Section XII. shall be operated and maintained consistent with manufacturer specifications and good engineering and maintenance practices. The owner or operator shall keep manufacturer specifications on file. In addition, all such air pollution control equipment shall be adequately designed and sized to achieve the control efficiency rates required by this Section XII and to handle reasonably foreseeable fluctuations in emissions of volatile organic compounds. Fluctuations in emissions that occur when the separator dumps into the tank are reasonably foreseeable.
XII.C.1.e.(ii) (State Only) For all existing condensate storage tanks controlled by a combustion device in order to comply with the emissions control requirements of Sections XII.D.2., auto-igniters shall be installed and operational beginning May 1, 2009 for condensate storage tanks with actual uncontrolled emissions of greater than or equal to 50 tons per year, and beginning May 1, 2010 for all other existing condensate storage tanks controlled by a combustion device, or within 180 days from first having installed the combustion device, whichever date comes later. XII.C.1.f. (State Only) If a combustion device is used to control emissions of volatile organic compounds, surveillance systems shall be employed and operational as follows:
XII.C.1.F.(i) (State Only) Beginning May 1, 2010, for all existing condensate storage tanks with uncontrolled actual emissions of 100 tons per year or more based on data from the previous twelve consecutive months. XII.C.1.F.(ii) (State Only) For all new and modified condensate storage tanks controlled by a combustion device for the first 90 days surveillance systems shall be employed and operational beginning 180 days from the date of first production after the tank was newly installed, or after the well was newly drilled, re-completed, re-fractured or otherwise stimulated, if uncontrolled actual emissions projected for the first twelve months based on data from the first 90 days of operation from the condensate storage tank are 100 tons or more of uncontrolled VOCs.
XII.C.2. The emission estimates and emission reductions required by this Section XII.D. shall be demonstrated using one of the following emission factors: XII.C.2.a. In the 8-Hour Ozone Control Area XII.C.2.a.(i) For atmospheric condensate storage tanks at oil and gas exploration and production operations, a default emission factor of 13.7 pounds of volatile organic compounds per barrel of condensate shall be used unless a more specific emission factor has been established pursuant to Section XII.C.2.a.(ii)(B). The Division may require a more specific emission factor that complies with Section XII.C.2.a.(ii)(B). XII.C.2.a.(ii) For atmospheric condensate storage tanks at natural gas compressor stations and natural gas drip stations, a specific emission factor established pursuant to this Section XII.c.2.a.(ii) shall be used. A specific emission factor developed pursuant to Section XII.C.2.a.(ii)(B) may also be used for atmospheric storage tanks at oil and gas exploration and production operations and, once established, or required by the Division, shall be used for such operations.
XII.C.2.b. (State Only) For any other Ozone Nonattainment Area or Attainment/Maintenance Areas XII.C.2.b.(i) (State Only) For atmospheric condensate storage tanks at oil and gas exploration and production operations, the source shall use a default basin-specific uncontrolled volatile organic compound emission factor established by the Division unless a source-specific emission factor has been established pursuant to Section XII.C.2.b.(iii). If the Division has established no default emission factor, if the Division has reason to believe that the default emission factor is no longer representative, or if it deems it otherwise necessary, the Division may require use of an alternative emission factor that complies with Section XII.C.2.b.(iii).
XII.C.2.b.(ii) (State Only) For atmospheric condensate storage tanks at natural gas compressor stations and natural gas drip stations, the source shall use a source-specific volatile organic compound emission factor established pursuant to Section XII.C.2.b.(iii). If the Division has reason to believe that the source-specific emission factor is no longer representative, or if it deems it otherwise necessary, the Division may require use of an alternative emission factor that complies with Section XII.C.2.b.(iii).
XII.C.2.b.(iii) (State Only) Establishment of or Updating Approved Emission Factors XII.C.2.b.(iii)(A) (State Only) The Division may require the source to develop and/or use a more recent default basin-specific or source-specific volatile organic compound emission factor pursuant to Section XII.C.2.b., if such emission factor would be more reliable or accurate.
XII.C.2.b.(iii)(B) (State Only) For atmospheric condensate storage tanks at oil and gas exploration and production operations, the source may use a source-specific volatile organic compound emission factor for which the Division has no objection, and which is based on collection and analysis of a representative sample of condensate pursuant to a test method approved by the Division. XII.C.2.b(iii)(C) (State Only) For atmospheric storage tanks at natural gas compressor stations and natural gas drip stations, a source may use a volatile organic compound emissions factor that was used for reporting emissions from the source on APENs filed on or before February 28, 2003, or an alternative source-specific volatile organic compound emission factor established pursuant to Section XII.C.2.b.
XII.C.2.b.(iii)(D) (State Only) A default basin-specific volatile organic compound emissions factor shall be one for which the Division has no objection, and which is based on collection and analysis of a representative sample of condensate or an alternative method, pursuant to a test method approved by the Division, except as otherwise provided in XII.C.2.b.(i).
XII.C.2.b.(iii)(E) (State Only) A source-specific volatile organic compound emissions factor shall be one for which the Division has no objection, and which is based on collection and analysis of a representative sample of condensate pursuant to a test method approved by the Division.
XII.D. Emission Controls The owners and operators of affected operations shall employ air pollution control equipment to reduce emissions of volatile organic compounds from atmospheric condensate storage tanks associated with affected operations by the dates and amounts listed below. Emission reductions shall not be required for each and every unit, but instead shall be based on overall reductions in uncontrolled actual emissions from all the atmospheric storage tanks associated with the affected operations for which the owner or operator filed, or was required to file, an APEN pursuant to Regulation Number 3, due to either having exceeded reporting thresholds or retrofitting with air pollution control equipment in order to comply with system-wide control requirements. XII.D.1. (State Only) New and Modified Condensate Tanks Beginning February 1, 2009, owners or operators of any new or modified atmospheric condensate storage tank at exploration and production sites shall collect and control emissions by routing emissions to and operating air pollution control equipment pursuant to Section XII.D. The air pollution control equipment shall have a control efficiency of at least 95%, and shall control volatile organic compounds during the first 90 calendar days after the date of first production after the tank was newly installed, or after the well was newly drilled, re-completed, re-fractured or otherwise stimulated. The air pollution control equipment and associated monitoring equipment required pursuant to XII.C.1. may be removed after the first 90 calendar days as long as the source can demonstrate compliance with the applicable system-wide standard.
XII.D.2.a.(iv) Emission reductions achieved between January 1 and April 30, 2005 shall be averaged with emission reductions achieved between October 1 and December 31, 2005. For these two time periods, emissions shall be reduced by 30% from uncontrolled actual emissions and shall be calculated as an average of the emission reductions achieved during the seven months covered by the two periods. XII.D.2.a.(v) Emission reductions achieved between January 1 and April 30, 2006 shall be averaged with emission reductions achieved between October 1 and December 31, 2006. Emissions shall be reduced by 38% from uncontrolled actual emissions, calculated as an average of the emission reduction achieved during the seven months covered by the two periods.
XII.D.2.a.(vi) For the period between January 1, 2007 and April 30, 2007, such emissions shall be reduced by 38% from uncontrolled actual emissions , For the period between October 1, 2007, and December 31, 2007, such emissions shall be reduced by 60% from uncontrolled actual emissions, calculated for each period as an average of the emission reduction achieved during the months covered by each period.
XII.D.2.a.(vii) Beginning with the year 2008, and each year thereafter, emission reductions achieved between January 1 and April 30 shall be averaged with emission reductions achieved between October 1 and December 31. Emissions shall be reduced by 70% from uncontrolled actual emissions, calculated as an average of the emission reduction achieved during the seven months covered by the two periods with the exception of XII.D.2.a.(viii) - XII.D.2.a.(x).
XII.D.2.a.(viii) For the calendar weeks that include May 1, 2009 through April 30, 2010, such emissions shall be reduced by 81% from uncontrolled actual emissions on a calendar weekly basis from May 1 through September 30 and 70% from uncontrolled actual emissions on a calendar monthly basis during October 1 through April 30. XII.D.2.a.(ix) For the calendar weeks that include May 1, 2010 through April 30, 2011, such emissions shall be reduced by 85% from uncontrolled actual emissions on a calendar weekly basis in the May 1 through September 30 and 70% from uncontrolled actual emissions on a calendar monthly basis during October 1 through April 30. XII.D.2.a.(x) Beginning May 1, 2011, and each year thereafter, such emissions shall be reduced by 90% from uncontrolled actual emissions on a calendar weekly basis in the May 1 through September 30 and 70% from uncontrolled actual emissions on a calendar monthly basis during October 1 through April 30.
XII.D.2.b. Alternative emissions control equipment and pollution prevention devices and processes installed and implemented after June 1, 2004, shall qualify as air pollution control equipment, and may be used in lieu of, or in combination with, combustion devices and/or vapor recovery units to achieve the emission reductions required by this Section XII.D.2.a., if the following conditions are met: XII.D.2.b.(i) The owner or operator obtains a construction permit authorizing such use of the alternative emissions control equipment or pollution prevention device or process. The proposal for such equipment, device or process shall comply with all regulatory provisions for construction permit applications and shall include the following:
XII.D.2.b.(i)(A) A description of the equipment, device or process; XII.D.2.b.(i)(b) A description of where, when and how the equipment, device or process will be used;
XII.D.2.b.(i)(C) The claimed control efficiency and supporting documentation adequate to demonstrate such control efficiency; XII.D.2.b.(i)(D) An adequate method for measuring actual control efficiency; and XII.D.2.b.(i)(E) Description of the records and reports that will be generated to adequately track emission reductions and implementation and operation of the equipment, device or process, and a description of how such matters will be reflected in the spreadsheet and annual report required by Sections XII.F.4 and XII.F.5.
XII.D.2.b.(ii) Public notice of the application is provided pursuant to Regulation Number 3, Part B, Section III.C.4.
XII.D.2.b.(iii) EPA approves the proposal. The Division shall transmit a copy of the permit application and any other materials provided by the applicant, all public comments, all Division responses and the Division’s permit to EPA Region 8. If EPA fails to approve or disapprove the proposal within 45 days of receipt of these materials, EPA shall be deemed to have approved the proposal.
XII.E. Monitoring The owner or operator of any condensate storage tank that is being controlled pursuant to this Section XII shall inspect or monitor the Air Pollution Control Equipment at least weekly to ensure that it is operating properly.
XII.E.4. The owner or operator of all tanks subject to Section XII.D. shall document the time and date of each inspection, the person conducting the inspection, a notation that each of the checks required under this Section XII.E. were completed, description of any problems observed during the inspection, description and date of any corrective actions taken, and name of individual performing corrective actions. Further, all tanks subject to Section XII.D. shall comply with the following:
XII.E.4.d. For all atmospheric condensate storage tanks, the owner or operator shall check for and document on a weekly basis that the thief hatch is closed and latched.
XII.E.5. (State Only) For atmospheric condensate storage tanks equipped with an surveillance system or other Division-approved monitoring system, the owner or operator shall check weekly that the system is functioning properly and that necessary information is being collected. Any loss of data or failure to collect required data may be treated by the Division as if the data were not collected. XII.F. Recordkeeping and Reporting The owner or operator of any atmospheric condensate storage tank subject to control pursuant to Section XII.D.2. shall maintain records and submit reports to the Division as required: XII.F.1. The AIRS number assigned by the Division shall be marked on all condensate storage tanks required to file an APEN.
XII.F.2. If air pollution control equipment is required to comply with Section XII.D.2. visible signage shall be located with the control equipment identifying the AIRS number for each atmospheric condensate storage tank that is being controlled by that equipment. XII.F.3. Recordkeeping for Tanks Subject to the System-Wide Control Strategy under Section XII.D.2.
XII.F.3.a(ii) List the emission factor used for each atmospheric condensate storage tank. The emission factors shall comply with Section XII.C.2. XII.F.3.a(iii) List the location and control efficiency value for each unit of air pollution control equipment. Each atmospheric condensate storage tank being controlled shall be identified by name and an AIRS number. XII.F.3.a(iv) List the production volume for each tank, expressed as a weekly and monthly average based on the most recent measurement available. The weekly and monthly average shall be calculated by averaging the most recent measurement of such production, which may be the amount shown on the receipt from the refinery purchaser for delivery of condensate from such tank, over the time such delivered condensate was collected. The weekly and monthly average from the most recent measurement will be used to estimate weekly and monthly volumes of controlled and uncontrolled actual emissions for all weeks and months following the measurement until the next measurement is taken. XII.F.3.a(v) Show the calendar weekly and calendar monthly-uncontrolled actual emissions and the calendar weekly and calendar monthly controlled actual emissions for each atmospheric condensate storage tank.
XII.F.3.a(vi) Show the total system-wide calendar weekly and calendar monthly-uncontrolled actual emissions and the total system-wide calendar weekly and calendar monthly controlled actual emissions. XII.F.3.a(vii) Show the total system-wide calendar weekly and calendar monthly percentage reduction of emissions.
XII.F.3.a(viii) Note any downtime of air pollution control equipment, and shall account for such downtime in the weekly control efficiency value and emission reduction totals. The notations shall include the date, time and duration of any scheduled downtime. For any unscheduled downtime, the spreadsheet shall record the date and time the downtime was discovered and the date and time the air pollution control equipment was last observed to be operating.
XII.F.3.a(ix) Be maintained in a manner approved by the Division and shall include any other information requested by the Division that is reasonably necessary to determine compliance with this Section XII. XII.F.3.a(x) Be updated on a calendar weekly and calendar monthly basis and shall be promptly provided by e-mail or fax to the Division upon its request. The U.S. mail may also be used if acceptable to the Division. XII.F.3.b. Failure to properly install, operate, and maintain air pollution control equipment at the locations indicated in the spreadsheet shall be a violation of this regulation.
XII.F.3.c. A copy of each calendar weekly and calendar monthly spreadsheet shall be retained for five years. A spreadsheet may apply to more than one week if there are no changes in any of the required data and the spreadsheet clearly identifies the weeks it covers. The spreadsheet may be retained electronically. However, the Division may treat any loss of data or failure to maintain the Division-approved spreadsheet, as if the data were not collected. XII.F.3.d. Each owner or operator shall maintain records of the inspections required pursuant to Section XII.E. These records shall include the time and date of the inspection, the person conducting the inspection, a notation that each of the checks required under Section XII.C. and XII.E. were completed and a description of any problems observed during the inspection, and a description and date of any corrective actions taken.
XII.F.3.e. (State Only) Each owner or operator shall maintain records of required surveillance system or other monitoring data and shall make these records available promptly upon Division request.
XII.F.3.f. (State Only) Each owner or operator shall maintain records on when an atmospheric condensate storage tank is newly installed, or when a well is newly drilled, re-completed, re-fractured or otherwise stimulated. Records shall be maintained per well associated with each tank and the date of first production associated with these activities.
XII.F.4. Reporting for Tanks Subject to the System-Wide Control Strategy under Section XII.D.2.a.
XII.F.4.d. The April 30 report shall show the calendar monthly-uncontrolled actual emissions and the controlled actual emissions for each atmospheric condensate storage tank for January 1 through April 30, May 1 through September 30 and October 1 through December 31 of the previous year. The November 30 report shall show such calendar weekly information for the weeks including May 1st through September 30th only.
XII.F.4.e. The April 30 report shall show the calendar monthly total system-wide uncontrolled actual emissions and the total system-wide controlled actual emissions for January 1 through April 30, May 1 through September 30 and October 1 through December 31 of the previous year. The November 30 report shall show such calendar weekly information for the weeks including May 1st through September 30th only.
XII.F.4.f. The April 30 report shall show the calendar monthly total system-wide percentage reduction of emissions for May 1 through September 30 of the previous year, and for the combined periods of January 1 through April 30 and October 1 through December 31 of the previous year. The November 30 report shall show such calendar weekly information for the weeks including May 1 through September 30 period only.
XII.F.4.g. The report shall note any downtime of air pollution control equipment, and shall account for such downtime in the weekly control efficiency value and emission reduction totals. The notations shall include the date, time and duration of any scheduled downtime. For any unscheduled downtime, the date and time the downtime was discovered and the last date the air pollution control equipment was observed to be operating should be recorded in the report. XII.F.4.h. The report shall state whether the required emission reductions were achieved on a weekly basis during the preceding ozone season (calendar weeks including May 1 through September 30) for the November 30 report, and whether the required emission reductions were achieved on a calendar monthly basis during the preceding year for the April 30 report. If the required emission reductions were not achieved, the report shall state why not, and shall identify steps being taken to ensure subsequent compliance.
XII.F.4.i. The report shall include any other information requested by the Division that is reasonably necessary to determine compliance with this Section XII. XII.F.4.j. A copy of each semi-annual report shall be retained for five years. XII.F.4.k. In addition to submitting the semi-annual reports, on or before the 30th of each month commencing in June 2007, the owner or operator of any condensate storage tank that is required to control volatile organic compound emissions pursuant to Sections XII.A. and XII.D. shall notify the Division of any instances where the air pollution control equipment was not properly functioning during the previous month. The report shall include the time and date that the equipment was not properly operating, the time and date that the equipment was last observed operating properly, and the date and time that the problem was corrected. The report shall also include the specific nature of the problem, the specific steps taken to correct the problem, the AIRS number of each of the condensate tanks being controlled by the equipment or if no AIRS number has been assigned the site name, and the estimated production from those tanks during the period of non-operation.
XII.F.4.l. Commencing in 2007, on or before April 30 of each year, the owner or operator shall submit a list identifying by name and AIRS number or if no AIRS number has been assigned the site name, each condensate storage tank that is being controlled to meet the requirements set forth in this Section XII.D.2. On the 30th of each month during ozone season (May through September) and on November 30 and February 28, the owner or operator shall submit a list identifying any condensate storage tank whose control status has changed since submission of the previous list.
XII.F.4.m. (State Only) Semi-annual report submittals shall be signed by a responsible official who shall also sign the Division-approved compliance certification form for atmospheric condensate storage tanks. The compliance certification shall include both a certification of compliance with all applicable requirements of this Section XII. If any non-compliance is identified, citation, dates and durations of deviations from this Section XII., associated reasoning, and compliance plan and schedule to achieve compliance. Compliance certifications for state only conditions shall be identified separately from compliance certifications required under the State Implementation Plan. XII.F.4.n. (State Only) Each Division-approved self-certification form, and compliance certification submitted pursuant to this Section XII. shall contain a certification by a responsible official of the truth, accuracy and completeness of such form, report or certification stating that, based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the statements and information in the document are true, accurate and complete.
XII.F.5. The record-keeping and reporting required in Sections XII. above shall not apply to the owner or operator of any natural gas compressor station or natural gas drip station that is authorized to operate pursuant to a construction permit or Title V operating permit issued by the Division if the following criteria are met:
XII.G.1. For fugitive VOC emissions from leaking equipment, the leak detection and repair (LDAR) program as provided at 40 C.F.R. Part 60, Subpart KKK ( see Regulation Number 6, Part A, Subpart KKK) shall apply, regardless of the date of construction of the affected facility. XII.G.2. Air pollution control equipment shall be installed and properly operated to reduce emissions of volatile organic compounds from any atmospheric condensate storage tank (or tank battery) used to store condensate that has not been stabilized that has uncontrolled actual emissions of greater than or equal to two tons per year. Such air pollution control equipment shall have a control efficiency of at least 95%. XII.G.3. Existing natural gas processing plants within the 8-hour Ozone Control Area shall comply with the requirements of this Section XII.G. by May 1, 2005. (State Only: Existing natural gas processing plants within any new Ozone Nonattainment or Attainment/Maintenance Area shall comply with this regulation within three years after the nonattainment designation.)
XII.G.4. The provisions of this Section XII.B., and Sections XII.C., and XVI., shall apply upon the commencement of operations to any natural gas processing plant that commences operation in the 8-Hour Ozone Control Area or Ozone Nonattainment (State Only: or Attainment/Maintenance Area) after the effective date of this subsection. XII.G.5. The requirements of this Section XII. shall not apply to the owner or operator of any natural gas compressor station or natural gas drip station located in an Ozone Nonattainment or Attainment/Maintenance Area if:
XII.G.5.d.(i) documents the maintenance of the air pollution control equipment according to manufacturer specifications;
XII.G.5.d.(ii) conducts an annual opacity observation once each year on the air pollution control equipment to verify opacity does not exceed 20% during normal operations;
XII.G.5.d.(iii) maintains records of the monthly stabilized condensate throughput and monthly actual VOC emissions; and XII.G.5.d.(iv) reports compliance with these requirements to the Division annually.
XII.G.6. A natural gas compressor station or natural gas drip station subject to this Section XII.G. at which a glycol natural gas dehydrator and/or natural gas-fired stationary or portable engine is operated shall be subject to Sections XII.H. and/or XVI. XII.H. Emission Reductions from glycol natural gas dehydrators XII.H.1. Beginning May 1, 2005, still vents and vents from any flash separator or flash tank on a glycol natural gas dehydrator located at an oil and gas exploration and production operation, natural gas compressor station, drip station or gas-processing plant in the 8- Hour Ozone Control Area and subject to control requirements pursuant to Section XII.H.3., shall reduce uncontrolled actual emissions of volatile organic compounds by at least 90 percent on a rolling twelve-month basis through the use of a condenser or air pollution control equipment.
XII.H.2. (State Only) Beginning January 30, 2009, still vents and vents from any flash separator or flash tank on a glycol natural gas dehydrator located at an oil and gas exploration and production operation, natural gas compressor station, drip station or gas-processing plant in any Ozone Nonattainment or Attainment/Maintenance Area and subject to control requirements pursuant to Section XII.H.3., shall reduce uncontrolled actual emissions of volatile organic compounds by at least 90 percent on a rolling twelve-month basis through the use of a condenser or air pollution control equipment. XII.H.3. The control requirements above shall apply where: XII.H.3.a. Actual uncontrolled emissions of volatile organic compounds from the glycol natural gas dehydrator are equal to or greater than one ton per year; and XII.H.3.b. The sum of actual uncontrolled emissions of volatile organic compounds from any single glycol natural gas dehydrator or grouping of glycol natural gas dehydrators at a single stationary source is equal to or greater than 15 tons per year. To determine if a grouping of dehydrators meets or exceeds the 15 tons per year threshold, sum the total actual uncontrolled emissions of volatile organic compounds from all individual dehydrators at the stationary source, including those with emissions less than one ton per year.
XII.H.4. For purposes of Section XII.H., emissions from still vents and vents from any flash separator or flash tank on a glycol natural gas dehydrator shall be calculated using a method approved in advance by the EPA and the Division. The Division shall consult with and provide EPA 30 days in which to comment on the test method. EPA shall be deemed to have approved the test method for purposes of this Section XII.H if it does not object during such 30-day period.
XIII. Graphic Arts XIII.A. General Provisions XIII.A.1. Definitions For the purpose of this section, the following definitions apply: XIII.A.1.a. "Flexographic Printing" means the application of words, designs, and pictures to a substrate by means of a roll printing technique in which the pattern to be applied is raised above the printing roll and the image carrier is made of rubber or other elastometric materials.
XIII.A.2. Applicability XIII.A.2.a. This section applies to all packaging rotogravure, publication rotogravure, and flexographic printing facilities whose potential emissions of volatile organic compounds before control (determined at design capacity and 8760 hrs/year, or at maximum production, and accounting for any capacity or production limitations in a federally-enforceable permit) are equal to or more than 90,000 Kg per year (100 tons/year). Potential emissions are to be estimated by extrapolating historical records of actual consumption of solvent and ink. (e.g., the historical use of 20 gallons of ink for 4,000 annual hours would be extrapolated to 43.8 gallons for 8760 hours.)The before-control volatile organic compound emissions calculations shall be the summation of all volatile organic compounds in the inks and solvents (including cleaning liquids) used. XIII.B. Provisions for Specific Processes XIII.B.1. No owner or operator of a facility subject to this section and employing VOC-containing ink shall operate, cause, allow, or permit the operation of the facility unless: XIII.B.1.a. The volatile fraction of ink, as it is applied to the substrate, contains 25.0 percent or less (by volume) of VOC and 75.0 percent or more (by volume) of water; or XIII.B.1.b. The ink (minus water) as it is applied to the substrate, contains 60.0 percent or more (by volume) non-volatile material; or XIII.B.1.c. The owner or operator installs and operates a control device and capture system in accordance with Paragraphs XIII.B.2. and 3; or XIII.B.1.d. A combination of solvent-borne inks and low solvent inks that achieve a 70% (volume) overall reduction of solvent usage (compared to an all solvent borne ink usage) is used; or XIII.B.1.e. Flexographic and packaging rotogravure printing facilities limit emissions to 0.5 pounds of VOC per pound of solids in the ink. The limit includes all solvent added to the ink: solvent in the purchased ink, solvent added to cut the ink to achieve desired press viscosity, and solvent added to ink on the press to maintain viscosity during the press run. (Publication rotogravure facilities shall not use this option); or XIII.B.1.f. Crossline averaging is used. The requirements of Section IX.A.5.d apply. XIII.B.2. A capture system shall be used in conjunction with the emission control system in Subparagraph B.l.c. (above). The design and operation of a capture system shall be consistent with good engineering practice, and in conjunction with control equipment shall be required to provide for an overall reduction in volatile organic compound emissions of at least:
XIII.B.4. The overall reduction in VOC emissions specified in Subsection B.2 above shall be calculated by material balance methods approved by the Division, or by determination of capture and control device efficiencies. The overall VOC emission reduction rate equals the (percent capture efficiency X percent control device efficiency)/100. XIII.C. Testing and Monitoring The owner or operator of a source subject to the requirements of this section is also subject to the requirements of Section IX.A.3., IX.A.7, IX.A.9, and IX.A.10. In Section IX.A.3., EPA reference method 24A shall be the test method used for publication rotogravure inks, while EPA Reference method 24 data is acceptable for all other inks. Test methods as set forth in Appendix A, Part 60, Chapter I, Title 40, of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), in effect July 1, 1993. XIII.D. The owner or operator of a source subject to the requirements of this section is also subject to the requirements of Section IX.A.8. "A Guideline for Graphic Arts Calculations" shall be used for compliance determination.
XIV. Pharmaceutical Synthesis XIV.A. General Provisions XIV.A.1. Applicability This section applies to all sources of volatile organic compounds associated with pharmaceutical manufacturing activities, including, but not limited to, reactors, distillation units, dryers, storage of VOCs, extraction equipment, filters, crystallizers, and centrifuges.
VOCs True Vapor Pressure* at 20° Maximum in torr (and psia) from (minimum) up temperature of Gas to ** (maximum) Stream immediately exiting the condenser 0-26(0-0.5) 35°C (95°F)
26-52(0.5-1.0) 25°C(77°F)
52-78(1.0-1.5) 10°C(50°F)
78-150(1.5-2.9) 0°C(32°F)
150-300(2.9-5.8) -15°C(5°F)
Greater than 300 (Greater than 5.8) -25°C(-13°F)
*The calculation methods for gases containing more than one condensible component are complex. As a simplification, the temperature necessary for control by condensation can be roughly approximated by the weighted average of the temperatures necessary for condensation of each VOC considered separately but at concentrations equal to the total organic concentration. **But not including the maximum value of the range.
XIV.B.4. The owner or operator of a facility subject to this section shall: XIV.B.4.a. Provide a vapor balance system or equivalent control that is at least 90.0 percent effective in reducing emissions from truck or railcar deliveries to storage tanks with capacities greater than 7,570 liters (2,000 gallons) that store VOC with true vapor pressure greater than 210 torr (4.1 psia) at 20°C; and, XIV.B.4.b. Install pressure/vacuum conservation vents set at plus or minus 0.2 kPa on all storage tanks that store VOC with true vapor pressures greater than 10.0 kPa (1.5 psi) at 20°C.
XIV.B.5. The owner or operator of a facility subject to this section shall enclose all centrifuges, rotary vacuum filters, and other filters having an exposed liquid surface, where the liquid contains VOC and exerts a total VOC true vapor pressure of 26 torr (0.5 psia) or more at 20°C.
XIV.B.6. The owner or operator of a synthesized pharmaceutical facility subject to this section shall install covers on all in-process tanks containing a volatile organic compound at any time. These covers shall remain closed unless sampling, maintenance, short- duration production procedures or inspection procedures require access. XIV.B.7. The owner or operator of a facility subject to this section shall repair all leaks from which a liquid, containing VOC, can be observed running or dripping. The repair shall be completed the first time the equipment is off-line for a period of time long enough to complete the repair, except that no leak shall go unrepaired for more than 14 days after initial detection unless the Division issues written approval. XIV.B.8. Each surface condenser shall have at least one temperature indicator with its sensor located in the outlet gas stream.
XIV.C. Testing and Monitoring XIV.C.1. Sources subject to the requirements of this section are also subject to the requirements of Section 7.IX.A.3, IX.A.7., IX.A.8., and IX.A.9.
XV. Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Vapor Collection Systems and Vapor Control Systems Located at Gasoline Terminals, Gasoline Bulk Plants, and Gasoline Dispensing Facilities XV.A. General Provisions XV.A.1. Applicability This section is applicable to all gasoline terminals, gasoline bulk plants and gasoline dispensing facilities (e.g., service stations) which are located in ozone nonattainment areas and which must have a vapor collection and/or a vapor control system pursuant to Section VI. and other applicable rules.
XV.A.3.d. "Vapor Control System” means a system that is designed to control the release of volatile organic compounds displaced from a vessel during transfer of gasoline.
XV.B. Specific Provisions XV.B.1. The operator of a vapor collection or vapor control system at a facility subject to the provisions of this section shall operate the vapor collection system and the gasoline loading equipment in a manner that prevents:
XV.B.2. Repairs and Modifications XV.B.2.a. The operator shall within fifteen (15) days, repair and retest a vapor collection or control system that exceeds the pressure limits (Subparagraph 1.a. of this Subsection B.), excepting that;
XVI. Control of Emissions from Stationary and Portable Engines in the 8-hour Ozone Control Area XVI.A Requirements for new and existing engines.
XVI.B. Air pollution control technology requirements XVI.B.1 For rich burn reciprocating internal combustion engines, a non-selective catalyst reduction and an air fuel controller shall be required. A rich burn reciprocating internal combustion engine is one with a normal exhaust oxygen concentration of less than 2% by volume.
XVI.C The air pollution control technology requirements in this Section XVI shall not apply to: XVI.C.1 Non-road engines, as defined in Regulation Number 3. XVI.C.2 Reciprocating internal combustion engines that the Division has determined will be permanently removed from service or replaced by electric units on or before May 1, 2007. The owner or operator of such an engine shall provide notice to the Division of such intent by May 1, 2005 and shall not operate the engine identified for removal or replacement in the 8-hour Ozone Control Area after May 1, 2007. XVI.C.3 Any emergency power generator exempt from APEN requirements pursuant to Regulation Number 3.
XVII.A.3. “Auto-Igniter” means a device which will automatically attempt to relight the pilot flame in the combustion chamber of a control device in order to combust VOC emissions. XVII.A.4. “Centrifugal Compressor” means any machine used for raising the pressure of natural gas by drawing in low pressure natural gas and discharging significantly higher pressure natural gas by means of mechanical rotating vanes or impellers. Screw, sliding vane, and liquid ring compressors are not centrifugal compressors. XVII.A.5. “Component” means each pump seal, flange, pressure relief device, connector, and valve that contains or contacts a process stream with hydrocarbons, except for components in process streams consisting of glycol, amine, produced water, or methanol.
XVII.A.6. “Connector” means flanged, screwed, or other joined fittings used to connect two pipes or a pipe and a piece of process equipment or that close an opening in a pipe that could be connected to another pipe. Joined fittings welded completely around the circumference of the interface are not considered connectors. XVII.A.7. “Date of First Production” means the date reported to the COGCC as the “date of first production.”
XVII.A.8. “Glycol Natural Gas Dehydrator” means any device in which a liquid glycol (including ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, or triethylene glycol) absorbent directly contacts a natural gas stream and absorbs water.
XVII.A.9. “Intermediate Hydrocarbon Liquid” means any naturally occurring, unrefined petroleum liquid.
XVII.A.10. “Natural Gas Compressor Station” means a facility, located downstream of well production facilities, which contains one or more compressors designed to compress natural gas from well pressure to gathering system pressure prior to the inlet of a natural gas processing plant.
XVII.A.11. “Normal Operation” means all periods of operation, excluding malfunctions as defined in Section I.G. of the Common Provisions regulation. For storage tanks at well production facilities, normal operation includes but is not limited to liquid dumps from the separator.
XVII.A.12. “Open-Ended Valve or Line” means any valve, except safety relief valves, having one side of the valve seat in contact with process fluid and one side open to the atmosphere, either directly or through open piping.
XVII.A.13. “Reciprocating Compressor” means a piece of equipment that increases the pressure of process gas by positive displacement, employing linear movement of the driveshaft.
XVII.A.14. “Stabilized” when used to refer to crude oil, condensate, intermediate hydrocarbon liquids, or produced water means that the vapor pressure of the liquid is sufficiently low to prevent the production of vapor phase upon transferring the liquid to an atmospheric pressure in a storage tank, and that any emissions that occur are limited to those commonly referred to within the industry as working, breathing, and standing losses.
XVII.A.15. “Storage Tank” means any fixed roof storage vessel or series of storage vessels that are manifolded together via liquid line. Storage vessel is as defined in 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart OOOO. Storage tanks may be located at a well production facility or other location.
XVII.A.16. “Visible Emissions” means observations of smoke for any period or periods of duration greater than or equal to one (1) minute in any fifteen (15) minute period during normal operation, pursuant to EPA Method 22. Visible emissions do not include radiant energy or water vapor.
XVII.A.17. “Well Production Facility” means all equipment at a single stationary source directly associated with one or more oil wells or gas wells. This equipment includes, but is not limited to, equipment used for storage, separation, treating, dehydration, artificial lift, combustion, compression, pumping, metering, monitoring, and flowline. XVII.B. (State Only) General Provisions XVII.B.1. General requirements for prevention of emissions and good air pollution control practices for all oil and gas exploration and production operations, well production facilities, natural gas compressor stations, and natural gas processing plants. XVII.B.1.a. All intermediate hydrocarbon liquids collection, storage, processing, and handling operations, regardless of size, shall be designed, operated, and maintained so as to minimize leakage of VOCs and other hydrocarbons to the atmosphere to the extent reasonably practicable.
XVII.B.2.b. If a combustion device is used to control emissions of VOCs and other hydrocarbons, it shall be enclosed, have no visible emissions during normal operation, and be designed so that an observer can, by means of visual observation from the outside of the enclosed combustion device, or by other means approved by the Division, determine whether it is operating properly. XVII.B.2.c. Any of the effective dates for installation of controls on storage tanks, dehydrators, and/or internal combustion engines may be extended at the Division’s discretion for good cause shown.
XVII.B.2.d. Auto-igniters: All combustion devices used to control emissions of hydrocarbons must be equipped with and operate an auto-igniter as follows: XVII.B.2.d.(i) All combustion devices installed on or after May 1, 2014, must be equipped with an operational auto-igniter upon installation of the combustion device.
XVII.B.2.d.(ii) All combustion devices installed before May 1, 2014, must be equipped with an operational auto-igniter by or before May 1, 2016, or after the next combustion device planned shutdown, whichever comes first.
XVII.B.2.e. Alternative emissions control equipment shall qualify as air pollution control equipment, and may be used in lieu of, or in combination with, combustion devices and vapor recovery units to achieve the emission reductions required by this Section XVII., if the Division approves the equipment, device or process As part of the approval process the Division, at its discretion, may specify a different control efficiency than the control efficiencies required by this Section XVII.
XVII.B.3. Requirements for compressor seals and open-ended valves or lines XVII.B.3.a. Beginning January 1, 2015, each open-ended valve or line at well production facilities and natural gas compressor stations must be equipped with a cap, blind flange, plug, or a second valve that seals the open end at all times except during operations requiring process fluid flow through the open-ended valve or line. Open-ended valves or lines in an emergency shutdown system which are designed to open automatically in the event of a process upset are exempt from the requirement to seal the open end of the valve or line. Alternatively, an open-ended valve or line may be treated as if it is a “component” as defined in Section XVII.A.5., and may be monitored under the provisions of Section XVII.F.
XVII.B.4. Oil refineries are not subject to Section XVII. XVII.B.5. Glycol natural gas dehydrators and internal combustion engines that are subject to an emissions control requirement in a federal maximum achievable control technology (“MACT”) standard under 40 CFR Part 63, a Best Available Control Technology (“BACT”) limit, or a New Source Performance Standard (“NSPS”) under 40 CFR Part 60 are not subject to Section XVII., except for the leak detection and repair requirements in Section XVII.F.
XVII.C. (State Only) Emission reduction from storage tanks at oil and gas exploration and production operations, well production facilities, natural gas compressor stations, and natural gas processing plants.
XVII.C.1.b.(i)(b) A storage tank constructed before May 1, 2014, must be in compliance by May 1, 2015.
XVII.C.1.b.(i)(c) A storage tank not otherwise subject to Sections XVII.C.1.b.(i)(a) or XVII.C.1.b.(i)(b) that increases uncontrolled actual emissions to six (6) tons per year VOC or more on a rolling twelve month basis after May 1, 2014, must be in compliance within sixty (60) days of discovery of the emissions increase.
XVII.C.1.c. Control requirements within ninety (90) days of the date of first production.
XVII.C.1.c.(i) Beginning May 1, 2014, owners or operators of storage tanks at well production facilities must collect and control emissions by routing emissions to operating air pollution control equipment during the first ninety (90) calendar days after the date of first production. The air pollution control equipment must achieve an average hydrocarbon control efficiency of 95%. If a combustion device is used, it must have a design destruction efficiency of at least 98% for hydrocarbons. This control requirement does not apply to storage tanks that are projected to have emissions less than 1.5 tons of VOC during the first ninety (90) days after the date of first production.
XVII.C.1.c.(ii) The air pollution control equipment and any associated monitoring equipment required pursuant to Section XVII.C.1.c.(i) may be removed at any time after the first ninety (90) calendar days as long as the source can demonstrate that uncontrolled actual emissions from the storage tank will be below the threshold in Section XVII.C.1.b. XVII.C.1.d. Beginning May 1, 2014, or the applicable compliance date in Section XVII.C.1.b.(i), whichever comes later, owners or operators of storage tanks subject to Section XVII.C.1. must conduct audio, visual, olfactory (“AVO”) and additional visual inspections of the storage tank and any associated equipment (e.g. separator, air pollution control equipment, or other pressure reducing equipment) at the same frequency as liquids are loaded out from the storage tank. These inspections are not required more frequently than every seven (7) days but must be conducted at least every thirty one (31) days. Monitoring is not required for storage tanks or associated equipment that are unsafe, difficult, or inaccessible to monitor, as defined in Section XVII.C.1.e. The additional visual inspections must include, at a minimum:
XVII.C.1.d.(i) Visual inspection of any thief hatch, pressure relief valve, or other access point to ensure that they are closed and properly sealed; XVII.C.1.d.(ii) Visual inspection or monitoring of the air pollution control equipment to ensure that it is operating, including that the pilot light is lit on combustion devices used as air pollution control equipment; XVII.C.1.d.(iii) If a combustion device is used, visual inspection of the auto- igniter and valves for piping of gas to the pilot light to ensure they are functioning properly;
XVII.C.1.d.(iv) Visual inspection of the air pollution control equipment to ensure that the valves for the piping from the storage tank to the air pollution control equipment are open; and XVII.C.1.d.(v) If a combustion device is used, inspection of the device for the presence or absence of smoke. If smoke is observed, either the equipment must be immediately shut-in to investigate the potential cause for smoke and perform repairs, as necessary, or EPA Method 22 must be conducted to determine whether visible emissions are present for a period of at least one (1) minute in fifteen (15) minutes. XVII.C.1.e. If storage tanks or associated equipment is unsafe, difficult, or inaccessible to monitor, the owner or operator is not required to monitor such equipment until it becomes feasible to do so.
XVII.C.1.e.(i) Difficult to monitor means it cannot be monitored without elevating the monitoring personnel more than two meters above a supported surface or is unable to be reached via a wheeled scissor-lift or hydraulic type scaffold that allows access up to 7.6 meters (25 feet) above the ground.
XVII.C.1.e.(ii) Unsafe to monitor means it cannot be monitored without exposing monitoring personnel to an immediate danger as a consequence of completing the monitoring.
XVII.C.1.e.(iii) Inaccessible to monitor means buried, insulated, or obstructed by equipment or piping that prevents access by monitoring personnel. XVII.C.2. Capture and monitoring requirements for storage tanks that are fitted with air pollution control equipment as required by Sections XII.D. or XVII.C.1. XVII.C.2.a. Owners or operators of storage tanks must route all hydrocarbon emissions to air pollution control equipment, and must operate without venting hydrocarbon emissions from the thief hatch (or other access point to the tank) or pressure relief device during normal operation, unless venting is reasonably required for maintenance, gauging, or safety of personnel and equipment. Compliance must be achieved in accordance with the schedule in Section XVII.C.2.b.(ii).
XVII.C.2.b. Owners or operators of storage tanks subject to the control requirements of Sections XII.D.2., XVII.C.1.a, or XVII.C.1.b. must develop, certify, and implement a documented Storage Tank Emission Management System (“STEM”) plan to identify, evaluate, and employ appropriate control technologies, monitoring practices, operational practices, and/or other strategies designed to meet the requirements set forth in Section XVII.C.2.a. Owners or operators must update the STEM plan as necessary to achieve or maintain compliance. Owners or operators are not required to develop and implement STEM for storage tanks containing only stabilized liquids. The minimum elements of STEM are listed below.
XVII.C.2.b.(i) STEM must include selected control technologies, monitoring practices, operational practices, and/or other strategies; procedures for evaluating ongoing storage tank emission capture performance; and monitoring in accordance with approved instrument monitoring methods following the applicable schedule in Section XVII.C.2.b.(ii) and Inspection Frequency in Table 1.
XVII.C.2.b.(ii) Owners or operators must achieve the requirements of Sections XVII.C.2.a. and XVII.C.2.b. and begin implementing the required approved instrument monitoring method in accordance with the following schedule:
XVII.C.2.b.(ii)(a) A storage tank constructed on or after May 1, 2014, must comply with the requirements of Section XVII.C.2.a. by the date the storage tank commences operation. The storage tank must comply with Section XVII.C.2.b. and implement the approved instrument monitoring method inspections within ninety (90) days of the date that the storage tank commences operation.
XVII.C.2.b.(ii)(b) A storage tank constructed before May 1, 2014, must comply with the requirements of Sections XVII.C.2.a. and XVII.C.2.b. by May 1, 2015. Approved instrument monitoring method inspections must begin within ninety (90) days of the Phase-In Schedule in Table 1, or within thirty (30) days for storage tanks with uncontrolled actual VOC emissions greater than 50 tons per year.
XVII.C.2.b.(ii)(c) A storage tank not otherwise subject to Sections XVII.C.2.b.(ii)(a) or XVII.C.2.b.(ii)(b) that increases uncontrolled actual emissions to six (6) tons per year VOC or more on a rolling twelve month basis after May 1, 2014, must comply with the requirements of Sections XVII.C.2.a. and XVII.C.2.b. and implement the required approved instrument monitoring method inspections within sixty (60) days of discovery of the emissions increase.
XVII.C.2.b.(ii)(d) Following the first approved instrument monitoring method inspection, owners or operators must continue conducting approved instrument monitoring method inspections in accordance with the Inspection Frequency in Table 1. Table 1 – Storage Tank Inspections Threshold: Storage Approved Instrument Phase-In Tank Uncontrolled Monitoring Method Schedule Actual VOC Emissions Inspection Frequency (tpy)
> 6 and < 12 Annually January 1, 2016 > 12 and < 50 Quarterly July 1, 2015 > 50 Monthly January 1, 2015 XVII.C.2.b.(iii) Owners or operators are not required to monitor storage tanks and associated equipment that are unsafe, difficult, or inaccessible to monitor, as defined in Section XVII.C.1.e.
XVII.C.2.b.(iv) STEM must include a certification by the owner or operator that the selected STEM strategy(ies) are designed to minimize emissions from storage tanks and associated equipment at the facility(ies), including thief hatches and pressure relief devices.
XVII.C.3. Recordkeeping: The owner or operator of each storage tank subject to Sections XII.D. or XVII.C. must maintain records of STEM, if applicable, including the plan, any updates, and the certification, and make them available to the Division upon request. In addition, for a period of two (2) years, the owner or operator must maintain records of any required monitoring and make them available to the Division upon request, including:
XVII.C.3.a. The AIRS ID for the storage tank.
XVII.C.3.b. The date and duration of any period where the thief hatch, pressure relief device, or other access point are found to be venting hydrocarbon emissions, except for venting that is reasonably required for maintenance, gauging, or safety of personnel and equipment. XVII.C.3.c. The date and duration of any period where the air pollution control equipment is not operating.
XVII.C.3.d. Where a combustion device is being used, the date and result of any EPA Method 22 test or investigation pursuant to Section XVII.C.1.d.(v).
XVII.C.3.e. The timing of and efforts made to eliminate venting, restore operation of air pollution control equipment, and mitigate visible emissions.
XVII.C.3.f. A list of equipment associated with the storage tank that is designated as unsafe, difficult, or inaccessible to monitor, as described in Section XVII.C.1.e., an explanation stating why the equipment is so designated, and the plan for monitoring such equipment.
XVII.D. (State Only) Emission reductions from glycol natural gas dehydrators XVII.D.1. Beginning May 1, 2008, still vents and vents from any flash separator or flash tank on a glycol natural gas dehydrator located at an oil and gas exploration and production operation, natural gas compressor station, or gas-processing plant subject to control requirements pursuant to Section XVII.D.2., shall reduce uncontrolled actual emissions of volatile organic compounds by at least 90 percent through the use of a condenser or air pollution control equipment.
XVII.D.4.c.(ii) A Designated Outside Activity Area shall mean an outdoor venue or recreation area, such as a playground, permanent sports field, amphitheater, or other similar place of public assembly owned or operated by a local government, which the local government had established as a designated outside activity area by the COGCC; or an outdoor venue or recreation area where ingress to or egress from could be impeded in the event of an emergency condition at an oil and gas location less than three hundred and fifty (350) feet from the venue due to the configuration of the venue and the number of persons known or expected to simultaneously occupy the venue on a regular basis. XVII.E. Control of emissions from new, modified, existing, and relocated natural gas fired reciprocating internal combustion engines.
XVII.E.1. (State Only) The requirements of this Section XVII.E. shall not apply to any engine having actual uncontrolled emissions below permitting thresholds listed in Regulation Number 3, Part B.
XVII.E.2. (State Only) New, Modified and Relocated Natural Gas Fired Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines XVII.E.2.a. Except as provided in Section XVII.E.2.b. below, the owner or operator of any natural gas fired reciprocating internal combustion engine that is either constructed or relocated to the state of Colorado from another state, on or after the date listed in the table below shall operate and maintain each engine according to the manufacturer’s written instructions or procedures to the extent practicable and consistent with technological limitations and good engineering and maintenance practices over the entire life of the engine so that it achieves the emission standards required in Section XVII.E.2.b. Table 2 below. XVII.E.2.b. Actual emissions from natural gas fired reciprocating internal combustion engines shall not exceed the emission performance standards in Table 2 below as expressed in units of grams per horsepower-hour (G/hp-hr) TABLE 2 Maximum Construction or Relocation Emission Standards Engine Hp Date is G/hp-hr NOx CO VOC < 100 Hp Any NA NA NA ≥100 Hp On or after January 1, 2008 2.0 4.0 1.0 and < 500 On or after January 1, 2011 1.0 2.0 0.7 Hp ≥500 Hp On or after July 1, 2007 2.0 4.0 1.0 On or after July 1, 2010 1.0 2.0 0.7 XVII.E.3. Existing Natural Gas Fired Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines XVII.E.3.a. (Regional Haze SIP) Rich Burn Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines XVII.E.3.a.(i) Except as provided in Sections XVII.3.1.(i)(b) and (c) and XVII.E.3.a.(ii), all rich burn reciprocating internal combustion engines with a manufacturer's name plate design rate greater than 500 horsepower, constructed or modified before February 1, 2009 shall install and operate both a non-selective catalytic reduction system and an air fuel controller by July 1, 2010. A rich burn reciprocating internal combustion engine is one with a normal exhaust oxygen concentration of less than 2% by volume.
XVII.E.3.a.(i)(c) The requirements of this Section XVII.E.3.a. shall not apply to any engine having actual uncontrolled emissions below permitting thresholds listed in Regulation Number 3, Part B. XVII.E.3.a.(ii) Any rich burn reciprocating internal combustion engine constructed or modified before February 1, 2009, for which the owner or operator demonstrates to the Division that retrofit technology cannot be installed at a cost of less than $ 5,000 per ton of combined volatile organic compound and nitrogen oxides emission reductions (this value shall be adjusted for future applications according to the current day consumer price index) is exempt complying with Section XVII.E.3.a. Installation costs and the best information available for determining control efficiency shall be considered in determining such costs. In order to qualify for such exemption, the owner or operator must submit an application making such a demonstration, together with all supporting documents, to the Division by August 1,2009.
XVII.E.3.b. (State Only) Lean Burn Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines XVII.E.3.b.(i) Except as provided in Section XVII.E.3.b.(ii), all lean burn reciprocating internal combustion engines with a manufacturer's nameplate design rate greater than 500 horsepower shall install and operate an oxidation catalyst by July 1, 2010. A lean burn reciprocating internal combustion engine is one with a normal exhaust oxygen concentration of 2% by volume, or greater.
XVII.E.3.b.(ii) Any lean burn reciprocating internal combustion engine constructed or modified before February 1, 2009, for which the owner or operator demonstrates to the Division that retrofit technology cannot be installed at a cost of less than $ 5,000 per ton of volatile organic compound emission reduction (this value shall be adjusted for future applications according to the current day consumer price index) is exempt complying with Section XVII.E.3.b.(i). Installation costs and the best information available for determining control efficiency shall be considered in determining such costs. In order to qualify for such exemption, the owner or operator must submit an application making such a demonstration, together with all supporting documents, to the Division by August 1, 2009.
XVII.F. (State Only) Leak detection and repair program for well production facilities and natural gas compressor stations XVII.F.1. The following provisions of Section XVII.F. shall apply in lieu of any directed inspection and maintenance program requirements established pursuant to Regulation Number 3, Part B, Section III.D.2.
XVII.F.3.c. Following the first approved instrument monitoring method inspection, owners or operators must continue conducting approved instrument monitoring method inspections in accordance with the Inspection Frequency in Table 3. XVII.F.3.d. For purposes of Section XVII.F.3., fugitive emissions must be calculated using the emission factors of Table 2-4 of the 1995 EPA Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates (Document EPA-453/R-95-017), or other Division approved method.
Table 3 – Natural Gas Compressor Station Component Inspections Fugitive VOC Emissions (tpy) Inspection Frequency >0 and < 12 Annually > 12 and < 50 Quarterly > 50 Monthly XVII.F.4. Requirements for well production facilities XVII.F.4.a. Owners or operators of well production facilities constructed on or after October 15, 2014, must identify leaks from components using an approved instrument monitoring method no sooner than fifteen (15) days and no later than thirty (30) days after the facility commences operation. This initial test constitutes the first, or only for facilities subject to a one time approved instrument monitoring method inspection, of the periodic approved instrument monitoring method inspections. Thereafter, approved instrument monitoring method and AVO inspections must be conducted in accordance with the Inspection Frequencies in Table 4.
XVII.F.4.b. Owners or operators of well production facilities constructed before October 15, 2014, must identify leaks from components using an approved instrument monitoring method within ninety (90) days of the Phase-In Schedule in Table 4; within thirty (30) days for well production facilities subject to monthly approved instrument monitoring method inspections; or by January 1, 2016, for well production facilities subject to a one time approved instrument monitoring method inspection. Thereafter, approved instrument monitoring method and AVO inspections must be conducted in accordance with the Inspection Frequencies in Table 4.
XVII.F.4.c. The estimated uncontrolled actual VOC emissions from the highest emitting storage tank at the well production facility determines the frequency at which inspections must be performed. If no storage tanks storing oil or condensate are located at the well production facility, owners or operators must rely on the facility emissions (controlled actual VOC emissions from all permanent equipment, including emissions from components determined by utilizing the emission factors defined as less than 10,000 ppmv of Table 2-8 of the 1995 EPA Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates). Table 4 – Well Production Facility Component Inspections Thresholds (per XVII.F.4.c.)
Well production Well production Approved AVO Phase-In facilities without facilities with Instrument Inspection Schedule storage tanks storage tanks Monitoring Frequency
(tpy) (tpy) Method Inspection Frequency > 0 and < 6 > 0 and < 6 One time Monthly January 1, 2016 > 6 and < 12 > 6 and < 12 Annually Monthly January 1, 2016 > 12 and < 20 > 12 and < 50 Quarterly Monthly January 1, 2015 > 20 > 50 Monthly January 1, 2015 XVII.F.5. If a component is unsafe, difficult, or inaccessible to monitor, the owner or operator is not required to monitor the component until it becomes feasible to do so. XVII.F.5.a. Difficult to monitor components are those that cannot be monitored without elevating the monitoring personnel more than two (2) meters above a supported surface or are unable to be reached via a wheeled scissor-lift or hydraulic type scaffold that allows access to components up to 7.6 meters (25 feet) above the ground.
XVII.F.6 Leaks requiring repair: Leaks must be identified utilizing the methods listed in Section XVII.F.6. Only leaks detected pursuant to Section XVII.F.6. require repair under Section XVII.F.7.
XVII.F.6.c. For infra-red camera and AVO monitoring, or other Division approved non-quantitative instrument based monitoring, a leak is any detectable emissions not associated with normal equipment operation, such as pneumatic device actuation and crank case ventilation.
XVII.F.6.d. For other Division approved monitoring devices or methods, leak identification requiring repair will be established as set forth in the Division’s approval.
XVII.F.6.e. For leaks identified using an approved instrument monitoring method or AVO, owners or operators have the option of either repairing the leak in accordance with the repair schedule set forth in Section XVII.F.7. or conducting follow-up monitoring using EPA Method 21 within five (5) working days of the leak detection. If the follow-up EPA Method 21 monitoring shows that the emission is a leak as defined in Section XVII.F.6., the leak must be repaired and remonitored in accordance with Section XVII.F.7.
XVII.F.7. Repair and remonitoring XVII.F.7.a. First attempt to repair a leak must be made no later than five (5) working days after discovery, unless parts are unavailable, the equipment requires shutdown to complete repair, or other good cause exists. If parts are unavailable, they must be ordered promptly and the repair must be made within fifteen (15) working days of receipt of the parts. If shutdown is required, the leak must be repaired during the next scheduled shutdown. If delay is attributable to other good cause, repairs must be completed within fifteen (15) working days after the cause of delay ceases to exist.
XVII.F.8.b. The date and site information for each inspection; XVII.F.8.c. A list of the leaking components and the monitoring method(s) used to determine the presence of the leak;
XVII.F.8.d. The date of first attempt to repair the leak and, if necessary, any additional attempt to repair the leak;
XVII.F.8.e. The date the leak was repaired;
XVII.F.8.f. The delayed repair list, including the basis for placing leaks on the list; XVII.F.8.g. The date the leak was remonitored to verify the effectiveness of the repair, and the results of the remonitoring; and XVII.F.8.h. A list of components that are designated as unsafe, difficult, or inaccessible to monitor, as described in Section XVII.F.5., an explanation stating why the component is so designated, and the plan for monitoring such component(s).
XVII.F.9. Reporting: The owner or operator of each facility subject to the leak detection and repair requirements in Section XVII.F. must submit a single annual report on or before May 31st of each year that includes, at a minimum, the following information regarding leak detection and repair activities at their subject facilities conducted the previous calendar year:
XVII.F.9.c. The total number of leaks identified, broken out by component type; XVII.F.9.d. The total number of leaks repaired;
XVII.F.9.e. The number of leaks on the delayed repair list as of December 31st; and XVII.F.9.f. Each report shall be accompanied by a certification by a responsible official that, based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the statements and information in the document are true, accurate, and complete. XVII.G. (State Only) Control of emissions from well production facilities Well Operation and Maintenance: On or after August 1, 2014, gas coming off a separator, produced during normal operation from any newly constructed, hydraulically fractured, or recompleted oil and gas well, must either be routed to a gas gathering line or controlled from the date of first production by air pollution control equipment that achieves an average hydrocarbon control efficiency of 95%. If a combustion device is used, it must have a design destruction efficiency of at least 98% for hydrocarbons. XVII.H. (State Only) Venting during downhole well maintenance and liquids unloading events XVII.H.1. Beginning May 1, 2014, owners or operators must use best management practices to minimize hydrocarbon emissions and the need for well venting associated with downhole well maintenance and liquids unloading, unless venting is necessary for safety.
XVII.H.1.a. During liquids unloading events, any means of creating differential pressure must first be used to attempt to unload the liquids from the well without venting. If these methods are not successful in unloading the liquids from the well, the well may be vented to the atmosphere to create the necessary differential pressure to bring the liquids to the surface. XVII.H.1.b. The owner or operator must be present on-site during any planned well maintenance or liquids unloading event and must ensure that any venting to the atmosphere is limited to the maximum extent practicable. XVII.H.1.c. Records of the cause, date, time, and duration of venting events under Section XVII.H. must be kept for two (2) years and made available to the Division upon request.
XVIII. (State Only) Natural Gas-Actuated Pneumatic Controllers Associated with Oil and Gas Operations XVIII.A. Applicability This section applies to pneumatic controllers that are actuated by natural gas, and located at, or upstream of natural gas processing plants (upstream activities include: oil and gas exploration and production operations and natural gas compressor stations).
XVIII.B. Definitions XVIII.B.1. “Affected Operations” shall mean pneumatic controllers that are actuated by natural gas, and located at, or upstream of natural gas processing plants (upstream activities include: oil and gas exploration and production operations and natural gas compressor stations).
XVIII.B.4. “Low-Bleed Pneumatic controller” shall mean a pneumatic controller that is designed to have a constant bleed rate that emits less than or equal to 6 scfh of natural gas to the atmosphere.
XVIII.B.5. “Natural Gas Processing Plant” shall mean any processing site engaged in the extraction of natural gas liquids from field gas, fractionation of mixed natural gas liquids to natural gas products, or both.
XVIII.B.6. “No-Bleed Pneumatic Controller” shall mean any pneumatic controller that is not using hydrocarbon gas as the valve’s actuating gas.
XVIII.B.7. “Pneumatic Controller” shall mean an instrument that is actuated using pressurized gas and used to control or monitor process parameters such as liquid level, gas level, pressure, valve position, liquid flow, gas flow and temperature. XVIII.C. Emission Reduction Requirements The owners and operators of affected operations shall reduce emissions of volatile organic compounds from pneumatic controllers associated with affected operations as follows: XVIII.C.1. In the 8-Hour Ozone Control Area:
XVIII.C.1.c.(i) For high-bleed pneumatic controllers in service prior to February 1, 2009, the owner/operator shall submit justification for high-bleed pneumatic controllers to remain in service due to safety and /or process purposes by March 1, 2009. The Division shall be deemed to have approved the justification if it does not object to the owner/operator within 30-days upon receipt.
XVIII.C.1.c.(ii) For high-bleed pneumatic controllers placed in service on or after February 1, 2009, the owner/operator shall submit justification for high- bleed pneumatic controllers to be installed due to safety and /or process purposes prior to installation. The Division shall be deemed to have approved the justification if it does not object to the owner/operator within 30-days upon receipt.
XVIII.C.2. Statewide:
XVIII.C.2.c. All high-bleed pneumatic controllers that must remain in service due to safety and/or process purposes must have Division approval and comply with Sections XVIII.D. and XVIII.E.
XVIII.C.2.c.(i) For high-bleed pneumatic controllers in service prior to May 1, 2014, the owner/operator shall submit justification for high-bleed pneumatic controllers to remain in service due to safety and/or process purposes by March 1, 2015. The Division shall be deemed to have approved the justification if it does not object to the owner/operator within 30-days upon receipt.
XVIII.C.2.c.(ii) For high-bleed pneumatic controllers placed in service on or after May 1, 2014, the owner/operator shall submit justification for high-bleed pneumatic controllers to be installed due to safety and/or process purposes prior to installation. The Division shall be deemed to have approved the justification if it does not object to the owner/operator within 30-days upon receipt.
XVIII.D. Monitoring This section applies only to high-bleed pneumatic controllers identified in Sections XVIII.C.1.c. and XVIII.C.2.c.
XVIII.E.1. The owner or operator of affected operations shall maintain a log of the total number of high-bleed pneumatic controllers and their associated controller numbers per facility, the total number of high-bleed pneumatic controllers per company and the associated justification that the high-bleed pneumatic controllers must be used pursuant to Sections XVIII.C.1.c. and XVIII.C.2.c. The log shall be updated on a monthly basis. XVIII.E.2. The owner or operator shall maintain a log of enhanced maintenance which shall include, at a minimum, inspection dates, the date of the maintenance activity, high-bleed pneumatic controller number, description of the maintenance performed, results and date of any corrective action taken, and the printed name and signature of the individual performing the maintenance. The log shall be updated on a monthly basis. XVIII.E.3. Records of enhanced maintenance of pneumatic controllers shall be maintained for a minimum of three years and readily made available to the Division upon request.
XIX. Statements of Basis, Specific Statutory Authority and Purpose XIX.A. December 21, 1995 (Section II.B)
Specific Statutory Authority The Colorado Air Pollution Prevention and Control Act provides the authority for the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission to adopt and modify Regulations pertaining to organic solvents and photochemical substances. Section 25-7-109(2)(f) and 25-7-109(2)(g), C.R.S., grant the Commission the authority to promulgate regulations pertaining to Organic solvents and photochemical substances. The Commission's action is taken pursuant to authority granted and procedures set forth in Sections 25-7-105, 25-7-109, and 25-7-110, C.R.S.
Purpose These revisions to Regulations Number 3, 7, and the Common Provisions are intended to clarify substances that are negligibly reactive VOCs, which are reflected in the EPA list of non-photochemically reactive VOCs. By consolidating the list (which consists of the EPA list of non-photochemically VOCs), and adopting the EPA definition by reference, a single list of negligibly reactive VOCs will apply uniformly to all Colorado Air Quality Control Commission Regulations. This revision will also include EPA's recent addition of acetone to the negligibly reactive VOC list. The addition of acetone to the list of negligibly reactive VOC's provides additional flexibility to sources looking for an alternative to more photochemically reactive VOCs. Because the EPA has added acetone to their list of non-photochemically reactive VOCs many industries, which make and supply products to Colorado industries, are planning to substitute acetone for more reactive VOCs. This change in the content of products purchased by industry for use in Colorado would adversely effect industries in Colorado if acetone remains a regulated VOC in Colorado. By adopting acetone as a negligibly reactive VOC industries will be able to take advantage of and benefit from this possible shift in product contents. XIX.B. March 21, 1996 (Sections I.A.1-4; II.D; II.E)
The purpose of the addition of Regulation Number 7, § II.E is to provide sources with a process to obtain approval of an alternative emission control plan, compliance method, test method, or test procedure without waiting for EPA to approve of a site-specific SIP revision. The rule provides that any such alternative must be just as effective as the relevant regulatory provision, and that such effectiveness must be demonstrated using equally effective test methods and procedures. The changes to this section delegate the authority to the Division to approve of such alternatives. Since rulemaking is not required under Paragraph E, the language allowing a source to assert that the relevant regulatory provision does not represent RACT has been omitted from this section. Such a change to the substantive requirements of Regulation Number 7 would require a rule change.
The rule revision proposed by the RAQC provided that alternative emissions control plans and compliance methods must be just as effective as those contained in the rule, but did not describe the test methods to be used to demonstrate such effectiveness. The Division proposed an alternative rule requiring such effectiveness to be demonstrated using test methods and procedures that are just as effective as those set out in the rule, or that have otherwise been approved by EPA. Such criteria for test methods and procedures are necessary in order to obtain EPA approval of this SIP revision. However, even without this language in the rule the Division would have required approved test methods and procedures in order to approve of proposed alternatives. The Division's alternative proposal provides the needed certainty in the most flexible manner possible. Furthermore, the alternative proposed by the Division does not impose any new regulatory requirement. Instead, it merely establishes criteria for allowing persons subject to the regulation to propose, in their discretion, an alternative means of complying with the existing regulatory requirements. Therefore, the alternative proposal submitted by the Division and adopted by the Commission will have no regulatory impact on any person, facility, or activity. The rule revisions provide that no permit may be issued based on the provisions allowing for the creation of de minimis exemptions and the approval of alternative compliance plans without first revising the SIP unless EPA first approves of such regulatory revisions as part of the State Implementation Plan. The purpose of this condition is to address the possible disapproval of these revisions by EPA. In the event these changes are not approved by EPA, the remaining regulatory provisions of Regulation Number 7 will remain in full force and effect, and therefore, the EPA may approve of the maintenance plan and the redesignation request. The revisions to Regulation Number 7 are procedural changes that are not intended to reduce air pollution.
For clarification, the Commission adopted these regulation revisions as follows: REGULATION REVISION OZONE SIP AND MAINTENANCE PLAN Section I.A.1 Exists in Appendix C of the Ozone Maintenance Plan to become a part of that document approved March 21, 1996 Sections I.A.2, 3, 4; Section II.D, II.E Adopted as subsequent regulation revisions to be submitted to the Governor and EPA separately and concurrently as a revision to the Ozone SIP (and Maintenance Plan)
The specific statutory authority to promulgate the rules necessary for redesignation is set out in § § 25-7-105(1)(a)(I) and (2); -106(1)(a); -107 (1) and (2.5); and -301. The authority to adopt such rules includes the authority to adopt exceptions to the rules, and the process for applying for any such exemptions.
XIX.C. November 21, 1996 (Section XII)
Regulation Number 8 and 3 list the federal Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs). In the June 8, 1996 Federal Register the EPA removed Caprolactam (CAS 105-60-2) from the federal list of Hazardous Air Pollutants. The conforming changes in Regulation Number 3 Appendices B, C and D have been made to keep the list of federal HAPs in Regulation Number 3 consistent with the federal list. The list of HAPs in Regulation Number 8 has been removed and a reference to the list in Regulation Number 3 has been added. Specific Statutory Authority The Colorado Air Pollution Prevention and Control Act provides the authority for the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission to adopt and modify Regulations pertaining to organic solvents and photochemical substances. Section 25-7-109(2)(f) and 25-7-109(2)(g), C.R.S., grant the Commission the authority to promulgate regulations pertaining to organic solvents and photochemical substances. Sections 25-7- 105(1)(I)(b) and 25-7-109(2)(h) provide authority to adopt emission control regulations and emission control regulations relating to HAPs respectively. The Commission's action is taken pursuant to authority granted and procedures set forth in Sections 25-7-105, 25-7-109, and 25-7-110, C.R.S. Purpose These revisions to Regulations Number 3, 7, 8 and the Common Provisions are intended to update the state lists of NRVOCs, the Ozone SIP, and HAPs for consistency with the federal lists. XIX.D. October 15, 1998 (Section II.F)
Basis Regulation Number 3 contains a certification and trading of emission reduction credits section (Section V), which sets forth the definitions and process for obtaining emission credits and using those credits. This section was amended to permit the use of emission reduction credits (ERC) to satisfy reasonably available control technology (RACT) requirements. The criteria for approval of ERC transactions specifies that they must involve like pollutants (for volatile organic compounds, the same degree of toxicity and photochemical reactivity), must be within the same nonattainment area, may not be used to satisfy Federal technology control requirements and may not be inconsistent with standards or regulations or to circumvent new source performance standards, best available control technology, lowest available emission rate technology controls or NESHAPs.
Regulation Number 7 sets forth CTG and RACT emission limitations, equipment requirements and work practices intended to control emission of volatile organic compounds (VOC) from new and existing stationary sources. The control measures specified in Regulation Number 7 are designed to reduce the ambient concentrations of ozone in ozone nonattainment areas and to maintain adequate air quality in other areas.
Specific Statutory Authority The provisions of C.R.S. § § 25-7-105 and 25-7-109 to 110 provide the specific statutory authority for the amendments to this regulation adopted by the Commission. The Commission has also adopted in compliance with C.R.S. § 24-4-103(4), this Statement of Basis, Specific Statutory Authority and Purpose. Purpose The purpose of this amendment to Regulation Number 7 is to establish a source specific rule for Gates to allow the use of emission reduction credits to satisfy the RACT requirements for VOC emissions pursuant to Regulation Number 7 for surface coatings operations not specifically listed in Section IX of Regulation Number 7. Regulation Number 3 provides specific authorization to use emission reduction credit transactions as an alternative compliance method to satisfy CTG and RACT requirements. Specifically, the VOC certified emissions reduction credits to be used in this emission credit transaction in an amount up to 12 tons per year are from Coors Brewing Company pursuant to their emissions reduction credit Permit. The emission reduction credits will be used to satisfy the general requirements that all sources apply RACT. These emission reduction credits will be used by Gates so that Gates can use solvent-based surface coatings which contain VOCs periodically in lieu of the water-based coatings normally used on its 10 Cord coating line (S033, S034, and S035). these credits will allow Gates to meet RACT requirements without applying control technology to the 10 Cord line, other than the currently installed catalytic incinerator on the emissions from the drying oven from the fourth dip, which reduces those emissions by at least 90%.
The relevant portion of Regulation Number 3, which applies to the Gates credit transaction is Section V.F., entitled "Criteria for Approval of all Transactions.” The first requirement is that the transaction involve like pollutants. In the present case, the emission credit transaction involves the exchange of VOC pollutants. Coors credits for methanol will be exchanged for m-pyrol. Exhaust from the catalytic incinerator, which contains unconverted toluene and xylene, is routed to the curing ovens of the other zones of the 10 Cord line, including the first zone. The Division has previously found that, excluding the emissions from the non-compliant coatings addressed in this rule, the 10 Cord line has met RACT standards. The use of the non-compliant coatings adds no HAPs to the Gates emissions. Other non- criteria reportable pollutants are present at well below APEN de minimis quantities under scenario 2, which is applicable to the 10 Cord line. Regulation Number 3 further requires that toxic or VOC pollutants involve the same degree of toxicity and photochemical reactivity or else a greater reduction may be required. Since these pollutants are both toxics and VOCs (except that m-pyrol is not a toxic), both have been addressed.
All of these compounds are commonly used in the surface coating industry with appropriate safeguards during their use. With respect to toxicity of the Gates compounds, m-pyrol is not listed as a toxic compound on either the federal or state lists. Methanol, the VOC in the Coors credit, is a Bin C HAP. Because the m-pyrol in the non-compliant coatings is not a HAP, the Gates VOCs have equal or lower toxicity than those being purchased from Coors. Therefore, HAP emissions will be reduced in the airshed. The photochemical reactivities of VOCs are important because of their impact on the ozone formation process in an airshed. The Air Pollution Control Division relied upon the work of Dr. William P.L. Carter, Professor at the University of California, whose article entitled "Development of Ozone Reactivity Scales for Volatile Organic Compounds" describes relative photochemical reactivity scales and comparisons. Dr. Carter notes that there are a number of ways to quantify VOC reactivities, but the most relevant measure of VOC effects on ozone is the actual change in ozone formation in an airshed. This results from changing the emissions of the VOC in that airshed which depends not only on how rapidly the VOC reacts and the nature of its atmospheric reaction mechanism, but also the nature of the airshed where it is emitted, including the effects of other pollutants which are present.
Dr. Carter further states that the VOC effect on ozone in the atmosphere can only be estimated using computer airshed models. The effect of changing the emissions of a given VOC on ozone formation in a particular episode will, in general, depend on the magnitude of the emissions change and on whether the VOC is being added to, subtracted from, or replacing a portion of the base case emissions.
Dr. Carter's derived relative reactivity scale includes reactive organic gases whose indices for maximum incremental reactivity (MIR) range from 0.004 to 6.5. The MIR values were updated in 1997. The VOCs and their respective MIR involved with this exchange are as follows: Methanol0.16 m-Pyrol0.57 The pending emission credits of VOCs being used in the proposed emissions credit transaction are for methanol. The VOCs emitted from uncontrolled use of solvent-based coatings at Gates are from m-pyrol. Regulation Number 3 provides that if the VOCs are not of the same photochemical reactivity, a greater offset may be required. The Commission required that, based on a past ERC trade for Pioneer Metal Finishing, that methanol credits in a 1.1:1 offset ratio be exchanged for toluene and xylenes. Here, however, the Commission finds that m-pyrol and methanol have similar photochemical reactivities, so no offset will be required.
The second requirement states that the transaction must not result in an increased concentration, at the point of maximum impact of hazardous air pollutants. This provision was derived from the EPA Emissions Trading Policy Statement and referred to NESHAP requirements involved in bubble transactions. If this provision is interpreted to apply generally to a facility which is limited by an existing permit to some level of VOC emissions on a twenty-four hour basis, any additional VOCs allowed pursuant to an emission transaction would by its application increase the concentration of VOCs at the maximum point of impact. Since it appears to have been intended to limit NESHAP offsets in bubble transactions, and no NESHAPs are applicable in the Gates transaction, and recognizing the earlier action of the Commission in approving the use of ERC transactions to satisfy CTG requirements and in approving a previous ERC transaction for Pioneer Metal Finishing, the Commission determined that this requirement should not apply to this transaction.
The next requirement states that no transaction may be approved which is inconsistent with any standard established by the Federal Act, the state Air Quality Control Act or the regulations promulgated under either, or to circumvent NSPS requirements or BACT or LAER, although the Commission may approve a transaction using a certified emission reduction credit in lieu of a specified CTG method or RACT. The emissions involved in this transaction at Gates are not subject to NSPS, BACT, or LAER. Regulation Number 7 applies only RACT to the Gates operations involved. Regulation Number 3 clearly permits the use of emission reduction credits to satisfy RACT.
The emission must involve sources which are located within the same nonattainment area. In the present case, both Gates, whose operations are located at 900 S. Broadway, Denver, Colorado, who is proposing to use the credits, and the source of the credits, Verticel, whose operations were located at 4607 South Windermere Street, Englewood, Colorado, are located in the Denver nonattainment area, less than five miles apart.
The next requirement prohibits the use of emission reduction credits to meet applicable technology-based requirements for new sources, such as NSPS, BACT, or LAER. As stated above, the Gates operations involved in this transaction are not subject to NSPS, BACT, or LAER or any other technology-based requirement except for RACT requirements for which an ERC transaction may be used to satisfy such requirements.
The next requirement states that VOC trades will be considered equal in ambient effect where the trade is a pound for pound trade in the same control strategy demonstration area. It appears that this requirement, which was taken from the EPA Emissions Trading Policy Statement, made the assumption that the "pound for pound" trend would have an equal impact on the ambient environment, with respect to ozone. Since there was no independent photochemical reactivity equivalency requirement in the 1986 Policy Statement, this requirement appears to be redundant with the requirement for insuring the same degree of photochemical reactivity among traded pollutants. For VOC trades involving surface coating, the requirements state that emissions must be calculated on a solids-applied basis and must specify the maximum time period over which the emissions may be averaged, not to exceed 24 hours. The proposed emissions credit transaction is based on a 24-hour period. With respect to the solids-applied basis calculation, this transaction will be calculated on the basis of the pounds of VOCs from uncontrolled solvent-based coatings. The emissions credit transaction will require a SIP revision. The source specific rule for Gates will be forwarded to EPA for approval. The state emission permit for Gates pursuant to the emissions credit transaction will be state effective (but not federally effective) until the SIP revision is approved by EPA. Gates proposed the following VOC emissions limitation in its state permit taking into consideration the pounds per year VOC emissions allowed by this emissions credit transaction:
Gates proposes to calculate the annual total VOC limitation on a rolling 12-month basis. Gates further proposes to keep monthly totals of non-compliant surface coatings used and to calculate daily usage based on monthly usage divided by the number of days non-compliant surface coatings were used. Records of usages and calculations will be kept and produced at the Division's request. This source-specific rule has a negligible or no effect upon the other provisions of the ozone SIP. It is contemplated that a State construction permit will be issued to Gates upon final approval by the Commission. Should the approval come after the issuance of Gates' Title V operating permit, the terms of the construction permit will be added to the operating permit. XIX.E January 11, 2001 (Sections III.C, IX.L.2.c (1), and X.D.2 through XI.A.3.) Readoption of Changes to Regulation Number 7 that were not printed in the Regulation or the Colorado Code of Regulations.
Background This Statement of Basis, Specific Statutory Authority and Purpose complies with the requirements of the Administrative Procedures Act, C.R.S. (1988), Sections 24-4-103(4) and (12.5) for adopted or modified regulations.
Basis During a review of the version of Regulation Number 7 adopted by the Air Quality Control Commission and the version of Regulation Number 7 published in the Colorado Code of Regulations, several significant discrepancies have been identified. This rule making will clarify the Commission's intent to adopt the following revisions to Regulation Number 7:
Authority Sections 25-7-109, C.R.S. (1997) authorize the Commission to adopt emission control regulations. Purpose Re-adoption of the proposed rule will eliminate the discrepancies between the Commission's adopted provisions within Regulation Number 7 and those contained within the Colorado Code of Regulations. Adoption of the amendments will benefit the regulated community by providing sources with consistent information.
XIX.F. November 20, 2003 (Sections I.A.2 through I.A.4, II.D and II.E). The Commission repealed the provisions establishing a procedure for granting exemptions for de minimis sources, and the procedure for approving alternative compliance plans without source- specific SIP revisions. The Commission had adopted the repealed provisions in March 1996, but had delayed the effective date pending EPA approval through the SIP revision process. Earlier this year, EPA informed the Commission of its intent to disapprove the provisions unless they were withdrawn. Thus, the provisions that are the subject of this rulemaking action never took effect. The Commission hereby repeals such provisions in order to avoid disapproval of the earlier SIP submittal, and to remove extraneous provisions from Regulation Number 7. Such repeal is required in order to comply with federal requirements, and is not otherwise more stringent than the requirements of the federal act.
Section XII.A.6 provides an exemption for owners and operators with less than 30 tpy of flash emissions subject to APEN reporting requirements. Regulation Number 7 previously included more general exemptions for emissions from condensate operations, but such pre-existing exemptions should have been repealed as part of this revision to Regulation Number 7. To the extent any pre-existing exemption for condensate operations remains, such pre-existing exemption shall not be construed to supercede the requirements of Section XII. The rule also requires annual reports describing how E&P sources will achieve the requisite emission reductions. Such reports are necessary so that the Division can determine whether or not the emission reductions are being achieved.
Section XII.B of Regulation Number 7 is required to ensure that existing and new natural gas processing plants employ air pollution control technology to control emissions from leaking equipment, and atmospheric condensate storage tanks (and tank batteries). The Commission is specifically requiring a leak detection and repair (LDAR) program for all gas plants, according to the provisions of 40 C.F.R. Part 60, Subpart KKK, regardless of the date of construction of the affected facility. This is necessary to ensure these large facilities are well controlled and VOC emissions minimized.
Section XII. C. pertains to control of VOC emissions from natural gas dehydration operations. The Commission determined that, in order to meet the requirements of the SIP, emissions must be reduced from all dehydration operations located in the 8-hour Ozone Control Area if such operations produce emissions above the minimum threshold specified in the rule. Further the Commission decided that flexibility should be allowed in how emissions are reduced, so several options are listed from which a source owner or operator may choose. If other equally effective measures or control devices are available, the Division may, on a case-by-case basis, approve the use of such alternatives.
Similarly, Section XVI establishes controls for reciprocating internal combustion engines. Both "lean" and "rich" burn engines are addressed and though the Commission has specified the default control technology to be applied to each engine type, the Division is allowed to approve alternative technology if a demonstration can be made that the alternative is at least as effective as the listed device in reducing VOC emissions. Parties to the rulemaking hearing provided evidence that suitable, cost-effective control equipment may not be available for some existing engines. The rule adopted by the Commission includes an exemption for lean burn engines if the owner demonstrates that such emissions controls would cost $5,000 or more per ton of VOC removed. In calculating such costs, the Division shall use an appropriate amortization period and current discount rate. The Commission directs the Division to further investigate the question of whether controls are available and suitable for lean burn engines, and to recommend any revisions necessary for the regulation applicable to such engines. New engines locating in the control area must comply with the requirements effective June 1, 2004, but existing engines have until May 1, 2005 to come into compliance. Since the rule provides an exemption for existing engines that cannot be controlled for less than $5,000 per ton, the rule must make the distinction between new and existing engines so that engines will not be moved into the area during prior to May 2005 and subsequently apply for such an exemption.
The Commission recognizes that, at this point in time, the controls required by the rule amendments constitute Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT), at a minimum, and in some cases, the controls mandated by this regulation may, in fact, constitute Best Available Control Technology (BACT). This means that this regulation shall not be used: (a) to preclude a source from asserting that one of the controls mandated herein constitutes BACT or Lowest Achievable Emissions Rate (LAER) for a new source or major modification, (b) require the Division or Commission to mandate different control technologies as BACT, or (c) preclude the Division or Commission from requiring additional or more stringent air pollution control technologies as necessary or appropriate to comply with applicable BACT or LAER requirements for new sources and major modifications.
By its terms, the New Source Performance Standard (NSPS) applicable to leaking equipment at onshore natural gas processing plants (40 C.F.R. Part 60, Subpart KKK) applies to “affected facilities” and “process units” at such facilities as those terms are defined in the standard. In general, plants that were constructed prior to January 20, 1984 are exempt from the standard, unless subsequently modified or reconstructed, or newly constructed after that date. Since process units at a single gas plant can be distinct, certain gas plants may contain equipment that is not presently subject to the NSPS because of its date of construction. The control requirement in Section XII.B would extend leak detection and repair program requirements to such equipment. The statutory authority for the revisions to regulation Number 7 is set out in Sections 25-7- 105(1)(a) and (1)(b); 25-7-106(1)(c), (5) and (6); and 25-7-109(1)(a) and (2), C.R.S. The March 2004 revisions to Regulation Number 7 are based on reasonably available, validated, reviewed, and sound scientific methodologies. All validated, reviewed and sound scientific methodologies and information made available by interested parties has been considered. Evidence in the record supports the finding that the rule shall result in a demonstrable reduction in air pollution. The Commission chose the most cost-effective mix of control strategies available to comply with the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Where possible, the regulations provide the regulated community with flexibility to achieve the necessary reductions. The Commission chose the regulatory alternative that will maximize the air quality benefits in the most cost-effective manner. XIX.H (December 2004, SECTIONS I.A., II.A, XII and XVI) The December 2004 revisions were adopted to respond to U.S. EPA comments on the Ozone Action Plan the Commission adopted in March 2004. EPA required the rule revision in order to make the control measures incorporated into the State Implementation Plan practically enforceable as required by the federal Clean Air Act. The Federal Act requires all of the regulatory provisions adopted in this rulemaking action, and none of the provisions are more stringent than the requirements of the federal act.
The revised rule includes a process for obtaining emission reduction credit for pollution prevention measures. In order to qualify for emission reduction credit a pollution prevention measures must, among other things, be included in a permit even if it does not involve the construction of an air pollution source and would not otherwise trigger a requirement for a permit. The revisions to the regulation do not, however, create a requirement for sources to obtain a permit for pollution prevention measures for which the source will not take emissions reduction credit.
The Commission has the statutory authority to adopt the revisions pursuant to Sections 25-7- 105(1)(a) and (1)(b); 25-7-106(1)(c), (5) and (6); and 25-7-109(1)(a) and (2), C.R.S. The control measures necessary to achieve the 8-hour ozone standard were adopted in March 2004. The December 2004 rule changes do not impose new emission control requirements or emission reduction requirements on industry. Instead, the December 2004 rule revisions are intended to make the previously adopted requirements more enforceable, and to make sure that the requisite emission reductions occur during the ozone season when they are needed. Thus, the December 2004 are administrative in nature in that they are intended to assist with the administration and enforcement of the previously adopted controls. The Commission recognizes that the December 2004 rule amendments impose additional recordkeeping and reporting requirements, and therefore costs, on the regulated community. The changes, however, are not intended to achieve further reduction in emissions of volatile organic compounds beyond the reduction requirements adopted in March 2004. They are instead intended to make the March 2004 revisions fully enforceable and acceptable to EPA. Since the December 2004 rule changes are administrative in nature, the requirements of Section 25-7-110.8 C.R.S. do not apply. XIX.I. December 17, 2006 (Section XII)
This Statement of Basis, Specific Statutory Authority and Purpose complies with the requirements of the Colorado Administrative Procedure Act Sections 24-4-103(4), C.R.S. for new and revised regulations.
Basis Regulation Number 7, Section XII imposes emission control requirements on oil and gas condensate tanks located in Adams, Arapahoe, Boulder, Douglas and Jefferson Counties, the Cities and Counties of Broomfield and Denver and parts of Larimer and Weld Counties (“8-Hour Ozone Control Area” ). The condensate tank requirements, along with other requirements applicable to oil and gas operations and natural gas fired reciprocating internal combustion engines, were initially promulgated in March 2004, and later revised in December 2004, in connection with an Early Action Compact Ozone Action Plan (“EAC”) entered into between the State of Colorado and the United States Environmental Protection Agency. The purpose of the EAC is to prevent exceedances of the 8-Hour Ozone Standard and avoid a nonattainment designation for the area. Pursuant to the EAC, Colorado committed to limiting Volatile Organic Compound (“VOC”) emissions from condensate tanks located in the 8-Hour Ozone Control Area to 91.3 tons per day (“TPD”) as of May 1, 2007 and 100.9 TPD as of May 1, 2012. Because of unanticipated growth of condensate tank emissions since 2004, the control requirements for condensate tanks adopted during the 2004 rulemaking are insufficient to meet these daily emission numbers. The current revisions require a greater level of control of condensate tank emissions in the 8-Hour Ozone Control Area in order to meet the commitments set forth in the EAC and to prevent future exceedances of the 8-Hour Ozone Standard. These revisions are based on reasonably available, validated, reviewed and sound scientific methodologies. All validated, reviewed and sound scientific methodologies made available by interested parties have been considered. Evidence in the record supports the finding that the rule shall result in a demonstrable reduction in air pollution, and will reduce the risk to human health or the environment or otherwise provide benefits justifying the costs. Among the options considered, the regulatory option chosen will maximize the air quality benefits in the most cost-effective manner. Specific Statutory Authority The specific statutory authority for these revisions is set forth in Section, 25-7-105(1)(a), C.R.S., which gives the Air Quality Control Commission authority to promulgate rules and regulations necessary for the proper implementation of a comprehensive state implementation plan that will assure attainment of national ambient air quality standards. Additional authority for these revisions is set forth in Sections, 25- 7-106 and 25-7-109, which allow the Commission to promulgate emission control regulations and recordkeeping requirements applicable to air pollution sources. Specifically, Section 25-7-106(1)(c) authorizes the Commission to adopt emission control regulations that are applicable to specified areas within the state. Section 25-7-109(1)(a) authorizes the Commission to adopt emission control regulations. Section 25-7-109(3)(b) authorizes the Commission to adopt emission control regulations for the storage and transfer of petroleum products and any other volatile organic compounds. Purpose The Revisions to Section XII were adopted in order to meet the commitments with respect to condensate tank emissions set forth in the Early Action Compact Ozone Action Plan entered into between the State of Colorado and U.S. EPA, prevent exceedances of the 8-Hour Ozone Standard, and simplify recordkeeping and reporting requirements.
To accomplish these goals the revised regulation raises the system-wide control requirements for the ozone season from the current 47.5% to 75% commencing in 2007 and 78% in 2012. While the rule establishes a higher percentage reduction in 2012 the Commission recognizes that given the uncertainty of emissions growth over the next 6 years, this reduction requirement may be too high and may need to be revisited as the 2012 deadline approaches. For the non-ozone season the required reduction has been raised from 38% to 60% commencing October 2007, and 70% commencing January 1, 2008. Determination of compliance during the ozone season under the revisions will be on a weekly basis instead of a daily basis, in recognition of the fact that condensate production is not typically measured on a daily basis. Under the previous version of the Rule, production could be tracked on something greater than a daily basis and the total divided by the number of days to obtain a daily number. As such, the prior rule did not truly give a daily average and thus the move to a weekly average is of little substance. Apart from this change, calculation of emissions for compliance purposes will remain the same as under the previous version of the rule.
In addition to raising the system-wide reduction requirements, the current rule adds significant new monitoring, record-keeping and reporting requirements, and a “backstop” threshold requirement to have emission controls on all condensate storage tanks with uncontrolled actual emissions of 20 tpy or more of VOC flash emission, as a state-only requirement within the EAC area pursuant to Section XVII.C.1. of Regulation Number 7. Owners and operators will continue to keep a spreadsheet that tracks emission reductions and submit an Annual Report as required under the previous version of the rule. Owners and operators are now also required to submit a semi-annual report on November 30 of each year detailing their emissions during the preceding ozone season. Additional record keeping has been added so as to require that a weekly checklist be maintained detailing inspections of control devices. This checklist will assist operators in the inspection and maintenance practice and provide a record that proper inspections have been done. If the inspections show a problem with the control device, the owner or operator will be required to notify the Division of problems on a monthly basis. This requirement will allow the Division to track problems on a more timely basis and ensure compliance with the rule. Finally, a provision has been added to require owners or operators to submit a list of all their controlled tanks on April 30 of each year and notify the Division monthly during ozone season if the control status of any tank changes. XIX.J. December 17, 2006 (Sections I.A.1.b. and XVII)
Basis The Air Quality Control Commission has adopted these state-only provisions as a means of reducing air emissions from oil and gas operations throughout Colorado. Due to the large growth in oil and gas production in a number of regions of the state emissions from oil and gas operations have rapidly increased over the past few years and are expected to increase further in the foreseeable future. These revisions are a proactive measure designed to eliminate air emissions that could threaten attainment of ambient air quality standards and adversely affect visibility in Class I Areas. These revisions are based on reasonably available, validated, reviewed and sound scientific methodologies. All validated, reviewed and sound scientific methodologies made available by interested parties have been considered. Evidence in the record supports the finding that the rule shall result in a demonstrable reduction in air pollution, and will reduce the risk to human health or the environment or otherwise provide benefits justifying the costs. Among the options considered, the regulatory option chosen will maximize the air quality benefits in the most cost-effective manner.
Specific Statutory Authority The specific statutory authority for these revisions is set forth in Sections 25-7-106 and 25-7-109 of the Colorado Air Pollution Prevention and Control Act (“Act”), which allow the Commission to promulgate emission control regulations and recordkeeping requirements applicable to air pollution sources. Additional authority is set forth in Section 25-7-105.1, which allows the Commission to adopt state-only standards. Specifically, Section 25-7-106(1)(c) authorizes the Commission to adopt emission control regulations that are applicable to the entire state. Section 25-7-109(1)(a) authorizes the Commission to adopt emission control regulations. Section 25-7-109(3)(b) authorizes the Commission to adopt emission control regulations for the storage and transfer of petroleum products and any other volatile organic compounds.
Purpose The Revisions to Section XVII were adopted in order to reduce air emissions from oil and gas operations and natural gas fired reciprocating internal combustion engines in Colorado. These revisions constitute a forward-looking approach to deal with a rapidly growing source of air emissions, and are designed to reduce the possibility of future problems with respect to the attainment of National Ambient Air Quality Standards and state and federal Class I Area visibility goals. Since the requirements are not mandated under federal law and are not currently necessary to meet National Ambient Air Quality Standards they are being adopted as a state-only requirement in accordance with the Act and as provided for under the Federal Clean Air Act.
These revisions establish emission control requirements for condensate storage tanks, glycol dehydrators and natural gas fired reciprocating internal combustion engines in Colorado. These provisions require that condensate tank and dehydrator controls meet a 95% percent control efficiency. As in the EAC Area, this requirement does not contemplate stack testing in order to verify the control efficiency. The insertion of the word average allows operators some downtime without a violation occurring so long as the downtime does not result in an average control efficiency of less than 95% considering the actual engineered control efficiency. For the purposes of XVII.C.4.b. observed operation of flare auto-igniters can include telemetric monitoring systems, physical on-site function tests or auditory confirmation of the auto-igniter function.
The requirements applicable to glycol dehydrators mirror the requirements applicable in the 8-Hour Ozone Control Area set forth in Section XII, and should be interpreted consistently with those provisions notwithstanding the addition of clarifying language. For example, language has been added clarifying that grouping of dehydrators is limited to dehydrators at a single site. Similarly, the word “production” has been added to the definition of condensate tank to clarify that the requirements, as within the EAC, do not apply to produced water tanks.
Determination of whether a condensate tank’s emissions are at or above the threshold is based on the emissions from the tank during the preceding twelve-month period. If a tank has been in service for less than twelve months, applicability shall be based on uncontrolled actual emissions over the service period of the tank multiplied out to twelve months. Accordingly, if a tank has been in service for three months, applicability of the control requirements will be based on the uncontrolled actual emissions from the tank for those three months multiplied by four. If emissions from a controlled tank decrease, operators may remove the controls when emissions from the previous twelve-month period falls below the applicable threshold. Operators will remain responsible, however, for controlling a tank if a subsequent emission increase results in emissions being over the applicable threshold during the preceding twelve months. For tanks serving newly drilled, recompleted or restimulated wells (including refrac’d wells) the owner or operator will have 90 days to determine anticipated production and, if necessary install a control device. In determining anticipated production the owner or operator may use an appropriate decline factor to determine expected emissions over the first 12 months after the new drilling, recompletion or re- stimulation. If the owner or operator determines that emissions will be below the 20 tpy threshold following the new drilling, recompletion or restimulation, the owner or operator shall notify the Division of this determination.
Certain differences with the requirements applicable to the 8-Hour Ozone Control Area have been included in order to provide greater flexibility to operators in other areas of the state and in light of the fact that the regulation represents a proactive attempt to avoid future impacts from oil and gas emissions. Specifically, the standards for obtaining approval of an alternative pollution control device have been relaxed to promote innovative control strategies. Additionally, a provision has been added to allow an extension of the control requirement deadlines at the Division’s discretion for good cause shown. This provision allows the Division to extend a deadline where shortages of control equipment, and crews may prevent an operator from meeting the deadlines, particularly in areas where access is limited by the weather or other issues. With respect to Section VII.B.1.c. of the General Provisions, the Commission has determined that as a general rule during normal operations no emissions should be visible from the air pollution control equipment. Normal operations include reasonably foreseeable fluctuations in emissions from the condensate tank, including the fluctuations that occur during a separator dump. However, a transient (lasting less than 10 seconds) “puff” of smoke when the main burner ignites or shuts down would not be considered a violation of the “no visible emission” standard. Finally, a provision has been included that exempts units subject to the rule if such units are also subject to a control standard under the MACT, BACT or NSPS Programs. This exception is of most importance for new and newly relocated engines that may become subject to a currently pending NSPS Standard under Subpart JJJJ. The engine provisions only apply to engines that are constructed or relocated into Colorado after the applicability date and do not impose requirements on units that are currently located in the state. The Commission recognizes that the adopted emission control requirements represent a first step in addressing rapidly growing emissions from oil and gas operations throughout the state. Accordingly the Commission directs the Division to provide an annual update on emission growth trends, environmental impacts, modeling and monitoring efforts, the adequacy of emission controls to protect the NAAQS and the health impacts of emissions from the oil and gas sector. XIX.K. December 12, 2008 (Title, Sections I, II, VI – XIII, XVII, XVIII, and Appendices A-F) This Statement of Basis, Specific Statutory Authority and Purpose complies with the requirements of the Colorado Administrative Procedure Act Sections 24-4-103(4), C.R.S. for new and revised regulations.
Basis The Air Quality Control Commission has adopted revisions throughout Regulation Number 7 to address ozone formation in the 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area (NAA), including the 9-county Denver Metropolitan Area and North Front Range (DMA/NFR) NAA. Specifically, the Commission has adopted revisions to reduce an ozone precursor, volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions, and thus reduce ozone formation. These revisions are necessary to ensure attainment with the current 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) set at 0.08 parts per million (ppm), and to achieve additional ozone reductions in light of both the new ozone NAAQS set at 0.075 ppm and the Governor’s July 27, 2007 directive to proactively and pragmatically reduce ozone levels. As of November 20, 2007, the EPA’s deferral of a nonattainment designation for the area in question expired, signifying that the area is now considered nonattainment, or in violation of the 1997 8-hour Ozone NAAQS of 0.08 ppm for ground level ozone. The DMA/NFR includes all of Adams, Arapahoe, Boulder, Broomfield, Denver, Douglas, and Jefferson Counties as well as portions of Larimer and Weld Counties. This area is now known as the DMA/NFR NAA.
Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act, Colorado must prepare and submit a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) to the EPA no later than June 30, 2009 that demonstrates attainment of the 8- Hour Ozone NAAQS no later than 2010. The Commission has adopted an Attainment Plan that satisfies this requirement. The Attainment Plan demonstrates attainment with no additional control measures. Photochemical grid dispersion modeling indicates that without further emission controls, Colorado will attain the 8-hour standard by 2010. The dispersion modeling reflects that Colorado would attain the standard by a narrow margin. Photochemical dispersion modeling analysis is the primary tool used to assess present and future air quality trends, and is required for EPA to approve the state attainment demonstration in the SIP.
In addition, pursuant to EPA guidance, if modeling results indicate that the highest ozone levels will fall between 0.082 and 0.087 ppm, Colorado must conduct a “weight of evidence” analysis and other supplemental analyses in order to corroborate the modeling results. Colorado’s model results are within this range, and thus the state has conducted this analysis. The analysis supports the conclusion that Colorado will attain the standard by 2010.
The Commission is also adopting State-only revisions to Regulation Number 7 to further address ozone formation in the DMA/NFR NAA. Specifically, the Commission has adopted revisions to reduce an ozone precursor, volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions, and thus reduce ozone formation. These revisions help Colorado make progress toward eventual compliance with the new ozone NAAQS set at 0.075 ppm as well as the Governor’s directive to proactively and pragmatically reduce ozone levels. Statutory Authority The statutory authority for these revisions is set forth in the Colorado Air Pollution Prevention and Control Act (“Act”), C.R.S. §25-7-101, et seq., specifically, C.R.S. §25-7-105(12) (authorizing rules necessary to implement the provisions of the emission notice and construction permit programs and the minimum elements of the operating permit program), 109(1)(a), (2) and (3) (authorizing rules requiring effective practical air pollution controls for significant sources and categories of sources, including rules pertaining to nitrogen oxides and hydrocarbons, photochemical substances, as well as rules pertaining to the storage and transfer of petroleum products and any other VOCs), and § 25-7-301 (authorizing the development of a program for the attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS). Purpose These revisions to Regulation Number 7 are part of an overall ozone reduction strategy. The Commission intends that this overall ozone reduction strategy accomplishes six objectives: A) reduce VOC and nitrogen oxides’ (NOx) emissions from oil and gas operations in the Ozone NAA and across the state, B) revise the control requirements for condensate tanks by a refined system-wide control strategy in the Ozone NAA, C) expand VOC RACT requirements for listed source categories for 100 tpy sources such that all Ozone NAAs are subject to Regulation Number 7’s RACT requirements, D) clarify how the RACT requirements in Regulations 3 and 7 interact in the Ozone NAA, E) improve the Division’s inventory of condensate emissions and other relevant sources in the NAA; and F) make typographical, grammatical and formatting changes for greater clarity and readability. In support of objectives A-D and F above, the Commission adopts these revisions to Regulation Number 7 to revise condensate tank regulations, set pneumatic controller regulations, expand RACT applicability and make associated corrections (Regulation Number 7, Sections I, II, VI – XIII, XVII, XVIII, and Appendices A-F).
In the course of this proceeding, the Division and certain parties supported a compromise proposal regarding the control of condensate tanks. The Commission finds this proposal to be appropriate with certain changes noted herein. The Commission is requiring an increase from 75% to 81% control on a system-wide basis in 2009; to 85% control on a system-wide basis in 2010; and to 90% control on a system-wide basis in 2011 in the 8-Hour Ozone NAA. The Commission is adopting new VOC controls for pneumatic controllers in the 8-Hour Ozone NAA in Regulation Number 7, Section XVIII. These system-wide control percentages achieve significant ozone precursor reductions in 2009, 2010 and 2011, with emphasis on significant VOC emissions reductions in 2010, during the monitoring period for the attainment demonstration. These revisions will help to ensure that the non-attainment area realizes the necessary reductions during the 2010 attainment year. Further, these revisions are an important step in putting the State on a path towards attaining the 2008 8-Hour ozone standard. A number of parties including the Regional Air Quality Council and the North Front Range Metropolitan Planning Organization supported this proposal to secure VOC reductions from this source at these levels and according to this schedule. The system-wide approach has been approved by the Commission in the past, as well as by EPA in revisions to the State Implementation Plan. The Commission decided to defer decision making on the implementation of a 95% system-wide level of control, given concerns regarding the notable incremental cost associated with control to the equivalent of 2 tpy tanks as well as concerns regarding the flexibility intended to be afforded by a system-wide approach. Tank operators also expressed concern about the loss of incentive to over-control their systems to meet the standard, and the difficulty for small operators to control at the 95% system-wide level at this time. The proposed control percentages continue to afford flexibility in operations to condensate tank operators, while ensuring attainment of the standard by 2010. Therefore, the Commission is deferring further control for future modeling, air quality analysis, and/or administrative review, whether to control this source in the future at the 95% system-wide control level or through some other approach for purposes of the 2008 8-Hour standard.
The provisions of the compromise proposal, including the commensurate emissions reductions, support the State Implementation Plan’s ability to assure attainment and maintenance of the 1997 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS. Inclusion of these provisions enhances the Weight of Evidence demonstration supporting attainment by 2010 pursuant to this State Implementation Plan. The Commission recognizes parties subject to the compromise Regulation Number 7 provisions for condensate tank system-wide emissions reductions concur that these provisions are appropriate for inclusion in the State Implementation Plan. Further the Commission intends to expand the applicability of RACT requirements to existing, new and modified sources in Ozone NAAs outside of the historic one-hour Ozone NAA or attainment/maintenance area (Regulation Number 7, Sections I and II). The Commission further intends to clarify how the control technology requirements of Regulation Number 7 interact with Regulation 3, Part B, Section II.D.2. Finally, the Commission intends to make grammatical, typographical, formatting revisions, and other editing revisions throughout Regulation Number 7.
Condensate Tank Emissions Control Condensate storage tank control requirements in Regulation Number 7, Section XII are revised by reorganizing the rule, adding/revising definitions, adding monitoring requirements, revising recordkeeping and reporting requirements, and setting additional control requirements for tanks. The current requirements are reorganized by specifying applicability, definitions, general provisions, emissions controls, monitoring, and recordkeeping and reporting sections. The terms new, existing, modified/modification, auto-igniter, and surveillance system were defined. Tanks serving newly drilled, recompleted or stimulated wells are required to employ air pollution control equipment during the first 90 days of production. After the first 90 calendar days, the control device may be removed. This requirement is designed to address the fact that production, and thus emissions, is at their greatest during the period immediately after drilling, recompletion or stimulation, and the fact that the actual production/emission level is not known prior to drilling, recompletion or stimulation. By requiring controls on all tanks serving newly drilled, recompleted or stimulated wells, the proposed rule significantly reduces emissions during the initial period, while allowing owners and operators to remove control devices afterward, as part of the overall system-wide control regime. All tanks over 2 tpy must participate in the overall system-wide program. Furthermore, since Regulation Number 7’s system-wide program is essentially RACT for condensate tanks in the NAA, new and modified 2 tpy or greater condensate tanks (affected by Regulation 3 RACT) may also move their control devices after the first 90 days when participating in the overall system-wide control regime, as long as the overall system-wide requirements are being met. Such flexibility is provided as to avoid two regulatory programs: one for tanks that might never be allowed to move their control devices under Regulation 3 RACT and one for tanks that would be allowed the flexibility under a system-wide program. Finally, it is the intent of this rule that sources may use their 2 tpy or greater “modified” tanks emissions (i.e., during those tanks’ first 90 days of production) in the source’s overall system wide calculation. After 90 days, sources must include – whether controlled or otherwise - the 2 tpy or greater “modified” tanks in the overall system-wide calculation. In the case of modified tanks that fall below 2 tpy, it is not the intent of the commission for sources to include these less than 2 tpy tanks in any system-wide calculation. However, sources may use the less than 2 tpy controlled tanks, if necessary to demonstrate system-wide compliance. The Commission is requiring the installation and operation of auto-igniters for each combustion device. In many cases, condensate tanks are remotely located and unmanned. Auto-igniters will provide greater assurance that the control devices are functioning, under these circumstances. Auto-igniters may be relied on to identify when the pilot is not lit and attempt to relight it, and ensure control operation. The Commission is also requiring surveillance on batteries with uncontrolled emissions greater than 100 tpy. Operators must use surveillance to document the duration of time when the pilot is not lit, and to discover if repairs are necessary to ensure proper control operation. The Commission is targeting this size of battery in order to strike a balance between the need to more carefully monitor performance among the largest batteries, the cost associated with surveillance and the division’s capacity to manage the information. The Commission acknowledges that three well operators, Encana, Anadarko and Noble Energy, have agreed to participate with the Division in a pilot program regarding the implementation of electronic surveillance systems.
With regard to recordkeeping and reporting requirements, operators will still record estimated emissions each week (as part of the current Regulation Number 7 requirements) and will report this information to the Division semi-annually. In addition, the Division has revised these requirements so that sources now must keep monthly records throughout the year and provide any of those records within 5 business days of a division request. Further, operators may only use a Division-approved spreadsheet to submit emissions records. Further, a responsible official must now certify the accuracy of the data in the semi- annual reports. This level of recordkeeping and reporting will allow the Division greater capacity to verify compliance and additional availability to work with sources (especially smaller operators). The Commission intends that record-keeping and reporting requirements for surveillance apply only to tanks with uncontrolled emissions greater than 100 tpy.
Controls on 2 Tons Per Year Tanks and Lower The Commission intends that substantial emissions reductions be achieved from condensate storage tanks and that industry retain the flexibility to decide which tanks to control in order to achieve those reductions. The rule has been revised to subject any condensate storage tank to this rule in the Applicability Section, but stipulates in the Emission Control Section that in order to determine the appropriate system-wide emissions reductions, only two ton per year tanks be considered. In doing this, the Commission intends that tanks that emit actual uncontrolled volatile organic compound emissions of two tons per year or more be considered in determining compliance with the system-wide emissions reductions for the specific ozone non-attainment or attainment maintenance area, and that industry have the flexibility to control smaller tanks in those specific ozone non-attainment or attainment maintenance areas if needed in order to meet the applicable system-wide emissions reductions. For example, if a company owns 20 tanks that emit actual uncontrolled volatile organic compound emissions of two tons per year in a specific ozone non-attainment area, and 15 tanks that emit less than two tons per year, the company would determine its required emission reductions of the production through the 20 two tpy tanks, but be able to control any of the 15 additional less than 2 tpy tanks in order to comply with the system-wide emissions reduction or maintain the desired over control as buffer. However, all tanks controlled in order to comply with the system-wide emissions reduction standard must have filed an APEN and obtained a valid permit in order to be considered as part of the compliance demonstration. Calendar Weekly and Calendar Monthly Records and Reports The Commission intends that records and associated reports demonstrating compliance with the weekly emission reduction requirement shall start with the calendar week containing May 1st and end with the calendar week containing September 30th, or other specified dates in the rule. A calendar week begins midnight Sunday morning and ends the following Saturday evening at midnight. Thus, where May 1st falls on any day other than Sunday, the calendar week of May 1st begins on midnight of the preceding Sunday morning. Similarly, the weekly emission reduction requirement applies to the full calendar week that includes September 30th. So, if September 30th falls somewhere in the middle of a calendar week, the emissions reduction requirement applies to that calendar week in full, beginning midnight Sunday morning and ending the following Saturday evening at midnight. Consequently, calendar monthly records and associated reports demonstrating compliance with the monthly emission reduction requirement shall apply to midnight the morning of day 1 through midnight the evening of the last day of each specific calendar month. The Commission intentionally broadened the definition of surveillance to provide that: 1) electronic surveillance is not specifically required, and other means to gather information from remote locations is allowed; and 2) data only had to be gathered on an daily basis. The Commission intends that currently required surveillance need only monitor combustion device flame presence or temperature once every day, in order to balance the need to gather adequate data on combustion device operation with the amount of data to be gathered, handled and processed. The Commission believes this is a fair approach considering that only the largest atmospheric condensate storage tanks (those with actual uncontrolled volatile organic compound emissions equal to or greater than 100 tons per year) are subject to this surveillance requirement.
Finally, the Commission intends that the monitoring be completed to ensure compliance, and has determined that failing to monitor as required, losing monitoring data, and failing to maintain monitoring data should be treated similarly to recordkeeping requirements. Thus, these actions “may be treated by the Division as if the data were not collected.”
The Commission intends that system-wide emissions control requirements apply to each specific ozone non-attainment or attainment maintenance area and not collectively to all ozone non-attainment or attainment maintenance areas state-wide. This means that the system-wide emissions control requirements apply specifically to the Ozone Control Area (a.k.a. the Denver Metropolitan Area/North Front Range Ozone Control Area), separately from any future designated ozone non-attainment area. Each new ozone non-attainment area designated in the future shall be subject to the system-wide control requirements by themselves. This is needed to ensure that necessary controls are achieved and maintained in each ozone non-attainment or attainment maintenance area, and that these controls are not removed and offset by system-wide controls in some other ozone non-attainment area. Pneumatics Emissions Control This revision establishes new VOC controls for pneumatic controllers in the 8-hour Ozone NAA in Regulation Number 7, Section XVIII. Pneumatic controllers are widely used in the oil and gas industry to control or monitor process parameters such as liquid level, gas level, pressure, valve position, liquid flow, gas flow and temperature. Pneumatic controllers of interest are instruments that are actuated using natural gas pressure (of which some natural gas may be bled to the atmosphere from the pneumatic controller and some may be vented from the associated valve). Natural gas-actuated pressure relief devices are not intended to be covered by this rule. There are high-bleed controllers designed to emit more than six standard cubic feet of gas per hour (scfh) to the atmosphere, and low-bleed controllers that emit six scfh or less. Historically, high-bleed controllers have been used. A 2003 EPA study reported that emissions from pneumatic controllers are collectively one of the largest sources of methane emissions in the natural gas industry. Estimated annual nationwide methane emissions are approximately 31 billion cubic feet (Bcf) from the production sector, 16 Bcf from the processing sector, and 14 Bcf from the transmission sector. As stated above, by definition, high-bleed pneumatic controllers emit more than six scfh of natural gas to the atmosphere. The highest bleed rate listed in one source, a table published by the EPA, is 42 cubic feet per hour (cfh). The average bleed rate for high-bleed pneumatic controllers in the NAA is 21 cfh. Natural gas is primarily composed of methane, but also contains other compounds including VOCs and hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). VOC emissions from pneumatic controllers within the NAA were 24.8 tons per day (tpd) for the 2006 baseline and have been projected to be 31.1 tpd for the 2010 baseline. These emissions represent 14.0 and 15.1 percent of the total VOC emissions from oil and gas sources in the NAA in 2006 and 2010, respectively. Therefore, emission reductions related to this source category have the potential to be significant. These rules require that most high-bleed controllers must be replaced with the equivalent of low-bleed or better pneumatic controllers by May 1, 2009. There is an exception that allows high-bleed controllers that the Division agrees are necessary for safety purposes. Operators must inspect and maintain in-use high- bleed controllers on a monthly basis. Operators must also keep logs of the number of in-use high-bleed controllers, as well as the reasoning that high-bleed controller remains in place, and the inspection and maintenance of the in-use high-bleed controllers. These revisions further require operators to physically tag the in-use high-bleed controllers to enable the Division to track compliance. The oil and gas industry has already begun replacing high-bleed controllers with low-bleed controllers, understanding the financial gain of minimizing the bleed rate of pneumatic controllers. RICE Controls Reciprocating internal combustion engine (RICE) requirements of Regulation Number 7, Section XVI applies in what was the early action compact area (now the Ozone NAA). These revisions extend the RICE requirements’ applicability to a state-wide basis. Expand and Clarify RACT Requirements Regulation Number 7 is revised to expand its application to all subject sources in any Ozone NAA and Attainment/Maintenance Areas. This previously applied to the one-hour attainment/maintenance area nonattainment area. Accordingly, this regulation will apply to some sources that were previously outside of its geographic scope. It is intended that existing sources become subject to previously adopted Control Technique Guidelines (CTGS) or general RACT requirements, and are given time to comply to implement the general RACT requirements. Specifically, existing sources that have not been modified are allowed three years from the date of ozone non-attainment designation to implement general RACT requirements. All new or modified sources become subject to these general RACT requirements upon commencing operation after the new ozone non-attainment designation date. This revision is considered a measured approach to ensuring the consistent use of best practices across the NAA as well as reductions in ozone precursors considered necessary to attaining the 8-hour ozone standard. This revision expands Regulation Number 7’s applicability to any Ozone NAA or attainment/maintenance area. This is done intentionally to apply Regulation Number 7 requirements to current as well as any future Ozone NAA or attainment maintenance areas in Colorado. Additionally, this revision clarifies how the Regulation 3 RACT requirements interact with Regulation Number 7. This revision specifies that pursuant to Regulation Number 7, Section II.C. all existing sources that emit 100 tons per year of VOC emissions and that are located in the 8-hour Ozone NAA become subject to RACT.
Further, Regulation Number 7 is currently unclear on whether or not existing sources that are modified become subject to new source requirements. This revision clarifies that existing sources that are modified are subject to the Regulation Number 3, Part B, Section II.D. requirements and are considered to be a new source for the purposes of Regulation Number 7.
This revision also clarifies that the both case-by-case and general RACT requirements of Regulation Number 7, Section II.C. only apply to existing, new and modified sources. For sources at which all air pollution generating activities at that source are already subject to RACT or BACT, the RACT analysis would show that all activities are already subject to RACT or BACT. For any other air pollution generating activities not covered by RACT or BACT, the source would only have to complete a RACT analysis specific to those activities.
Typographical, Grammatical, Formatting and Other Changes The commission changed the title of Regulation Number 7 to include NOx. An outline of the sections is provided to better understand the contents of Regulation Number 7. Outdated sections are removed (i.e. Section II.F.1. specific to Gates Rubber Company, which is now out of business). Section XII, specific to condensate tanks in the Ozone NAA is reorganized for clarity. One appendix (new Appendix A) is added to provide maps of Ozone NAAs and chronologies of attainment designations, of which certain requirements key off. Finally, sections and appendices are renumbered and formatted as necessary. Section 110.5 and 110.8 Analysis Some of these revisions are not intended to be incorporated into Colorado’s SIP. To the extent these revisions could be construed to exceed the requirements of federal law, the Commission provides the following additional statement, consistent with C.R.S. § 25-7-110.5(5)(a):
Further, pursuant to C.R.S. §25-7-110.8(1), the Commission makes the determination that:
XIX.L. January 8, 2011 Outline and Sections I. and XVII. This Statement of Basis, Specific Statutory Authority and Purpose complies with the requirements of the Colorado Administrative Procedures Act, Section 24-4-103, C.R.S., and the Colorado Air Pollution Prevention and Control Act, Sections 25-7-110 and 25-7-110.5, C.R.S (the Act). Specific Statutory Authority The Colorado Air Quality Control Commission (Commission) promulgates this regulation pursuant to the authority granted in Sections 25-7-105(1)(c), C.R.S. (authority to adopt a prevention of significant deterioration program); 25-7-109(1)(a) (authority to require the use of air pollution controls); 25-7- 109(2)(a) (authority to adopt emission control regulations pertaining to visible pollutants); and 25-7- 114.4(1) (authority to adopt rules for the administration of permits). Basis and Purpose The Commission intends that the current Regulation Number 7, Section XVII.E.3.a. identifying technology-based control requirements for existing rich burn reciprocating internal combustion engines (RICE), or rich burn RICE that were constructed or modified prior to February 1, 2009, become a NOx emission control measure that is included as part of the Regional Haze SIP and become federally enforceable upon EPA approval.
The technology-based control requirements of Section XVII.E.3.a. reduce NOx. This proposal only changes the enforceability of these currently state-only requirements such that they become federally enforceable. This proposal does not change emission control, monitoring, recordkeeping or reporting requirements.
The Commission also intends that the following provisions, added in Section XVII.E.3.a.(i)(a) through (c), will continue to be effective under the Regional Haze SIP. Specifically, these provisions require good air pollution control practices and allow for exemptions from the requirements for existing rich burn RICE. The exemptions apply to any existing rich burn RICE either with uncontrolled actual emissions below permitting thresholds or that is subject to a New Source Performance Standard (NSPS), National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), or Best Available Control Technology (BACT) limit.
Existing lean burn RICE requirements are not incorporated into the Regional Haze SIP, as the associated controls do not reduce NOx or SO2.
Colorado has determined that it is reasonable and appropriate to make these RICE requirements federally enforceable in this first planning period, as part of the state’s strategy for addressing reasonable progress towards achieving natural visibility conditions in federal Class I areas. XIX.M. December 20, 2012 (Sections II, XII, and XVII)
This Statement of Basis, Specific Statutory Authority and Purpose complies with the requirements of the Colorado Administrative Procedure Act Sections 24-4-103(4), Colorado Revised Statutes (C.R.S.) for new and revised regulations.
Basis Regulation Number 7 is designed to implement substantive regulatory programs authorized under the Colorado Air Pollution Prevention and Control Act (Act) including provisions of the State Implementation Plan (SIP) addressed in C.R.S. Section 25-7-105(1)(a), emission control regulations addressed in C.R.S. Section 25-7-105(1)(b) and authorization of the development of a program for the attainment and maintenance of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) in C.R.S. Section 25-7-301, as well as other authorized programs under the Act. The current revisions have been promulgated in order to facilitate this goal. The revisions were made to address the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s ("EPA") partial disapproval of Colorado’s ozone SIP. On August 5, 2011, EPA published the "Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; State of Colorado; Attainment Demonstration for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard, and Approval of Related Revisions" (76 Fed. Reg. 47443, August 5, 2011). EPA partially approved and partially disapproved revisions to Colorado’s SIP adopted by the Air Quality Control Commission (Commission) in December 2008 and submitted to the EPA in June 2009. Statutory Authority The statutory authority for these revisions is set forth in the Colorado Air Pollution Prevention and Control Act, C.R.S. Section 25-7-101, et seq., specifically, C.R.S. Section 25-7-105(12) (authorizing rules necessary to implement the provisions of the emission notice and construction permit programs and the minimum elements of the operating permit program), 109(1)(a), (2) and (3) (authorizing rules requiring effective practical air pollution controls for significant sources and categories of sources, including rules pertaining to nitrogen oxides and hydrocarbons, photochemical substances, as well as rules pertaining to the storage and transfer of petroleum products and any other VOCs), and Section 25-7-301 (authorizing the development of a program for the attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS). Purpose The Commission revised Regulation Number 7 to address the EPA’s partial disapproval of Colorado’s Ozone State Implementation Plan ("SIP’). On August 5, 2011, the EPA issued a final action on Colorado’s June 2009, Ozone SIP submittal, both approving Colorado’s attainment demonstration for the 1997 8- Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) and disapproving specific revisions to Regulation Number 7. 76 Fed. Reg. 47443, August 5, 2011. Specifically, the EPA disapproved both the repeal of Regulation Number 7, Section II.D. and all revisions to Section XII. as adopted by the Commission in December 2008. As a basis for its action, the EPA stated that Colorado demonstrated attainment with the 1997 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS, however Colorado did not adequately provide an anti- backsliding demonstration for the revisions to Regulation Number 7 that were adopted by the AQCC in December 2008, and submitted to the EPA in June 2009.
The Commission intends that these 2012 revisions include both SIP and state-only revisions that address EPA’s partial disapproval of SIP provisions in Sections II.D and XII, and make related state-only revisions to Section XVII. for consistency.
The Commission does not intend that these 2012 revisions add or strengthen emissions control measures of Section II.D., XII. or XVII. at this time. All SIP revisions are intended to specifically address those provisions that EPA included as part of its basis for disapproving revisions to Regulation Number 7. While the EPA indicated general approval of the concept of the June 2009 SIP submittal, the EPA took exception to some of the details in the SIP revisions, characterized as "deficiencies," that formed the basis of EPA’s disapproval during the SIP review process. EPA’s objections to the 2009 SIP revisions and the Commission’s responses are summarized as follows:
Items 1-9 above are all SIP revisions.
In addition, the Commission is also revising the state-only Section XVII.D. for consistency with the 2012 SIP revisions. The Commission does not intend that this state-only revision change the applicability of the control requirements for glycol natural gas dehydrators. Finally, the Commission made typographical, grammatical, and formatting revisions, as necessary. XIX.N. February 23, 2014 (Sections II., XVII., and XVIII.) This Statement of Basis, Specific Statutory Authority, and Purpose complies with the requirements of the Colorado Administrative Procedure Act Sections 24-4-103(4), the Colorado Air Pollution Prevention and Control Act, C.R.S. §§ 25-7-110 and 25-7-110.5., and the Air Quality Control Commission’s (“Commission”) Procedural Rules.
Basis On October 18, 2012, the Commission partially adopted federal Standards of Performance for Crude Oil and Natural Gas Production, Transmission, and Distribution found in 40 C.F.R. Part 60, Subpart OOOO (“NSPS OOOO”) into Regulation Number 6, Part A. During the partial adoption of NSPS OOOO, the Commission requested the Air Pollution Control Division (“Division”) to consider full adoption at a later date and directed the Division to identify additional oil and gas control measures that complement and expand upon NSPS OOOO. This rulemaking is the result and further addresses the volatile organic compound (“VOC”), an ozone precursor, and other hydrocarbon emissions, such as methane, from the oil and gas sector.
The Commission supports the EPA’s development of NSPS OOOO and believes that additional hydrocarbon control measures are warranted in Colorado for several reasons. First, the Denver Metropolitan Area/North Front Range is in nonattainment with EPA’s current 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (“NAAQS”); it is likely that EPA will lower the ozone NAAQS in the near future, potentially expanding Colorado’s nonattainment area; and Division air monitors and other sampling indicate elevated levels of oil and gas related air emissions in oil and gas development areas. Second, Colorado has seen substantial growth of oil and gas development in recent years, which is a significant source of VOC emissions, and expects that growth to continue in the foreseeable future. In particular, oil and gas storage tanks contribute significantly to the VOC emissions from oil and gas development. Further, oil and gas operations also emit methane, a negligibly reactive ozone precursor and potent greenhouse gas. Third, oil and gas operators have had difficulty meeting the current 95% control requirements in Regulation Number 7 established for condensate tanks in 2004 and 2006 due to “flash” emissions. Fourth, improved technologies and business practices, many already utilized by Colorado oil and gas operators, can reduce emissions of hydrocarbons such as VOCs and methane in a cost-effective manner. These technologies and practices include, without limitation, auto-igniters, low- or no-bleed pneumatic controllers, stabilized liquids or reduced tank pressures, flares achieving at least 98% destruction efficiency, and leak detection and repair (including the use of infrared (“IR”) cameras). For these reasons and more, the Commission believes additional control measures beyond the current requirements in Regulation Number 7 and NSPS OOOO are appropriate. Colorado’s considerable experience with the regulation of oil and gas sources involves both SIP and state-only requirements. During the rulemaking process, various parties provided extensive evidence concerning whether the proposed revisions, in particular the STEM and LDAR requirements, should apply either statewide or only in the ozone nonattainment area. Based upon careful consideration of all the evidence provided during the rulemaking, the Commission determined it was appropriate to apply the proposed requirements statewide. Further, in addition to the extensive evidence concerning the benefits of statewide hydrocarbon emission reductions, the Commission believes that the tiered and phased nature of many of the requirements properly focuses on emissions. Under this tiered approach, lower emitting sources such as marginal, stripper, and coal bed methane wells will appropriately be subject to less rigorous and costly requirements. In addition, evidence in the rulemaking record and testimony of industry members supports the conclusion that the rules can be effectively implemented. Accordingly, the Commission concludes that the proposed rules are technologically feasible and cost-effective. Moreover, because these revisions apply on a state-wide, state-only basis, and are not a part of Colorado’s SIP, the Commission, the Division, and stakeholders have the opportunity to further assess the implementation and effectiveness of these requirements, to better inform future actions.
Statutory Authority The Colorado Air Pollution Prevention and Control Act, C.R.S. §§ 25-7-101, et seq., (“Act”), C.R.S. § 25- 7-105(1) directs the Commission to promulgate such rules and regulations as are consistent with the legislative declaration set forth in Section 25-7-102 and are necessary for the proper implementation and administration of Article 7. The Act broadly defines air pollutant and provides the Commission broad authority to regulate air pollutants. Section 25-7-106 provides the Commission maximum flexibility in developing an effective air quality program and promulgating such combination of regulations as may be necessary or desirable to carry out that program. Section 25-7-106 also authorizes the Commission to promulgate emission control regulations applicable to the entire state, specified areas or zones, or a specified class of pollution. Sections 109(1)(a), (2), and (3) of the Act authorize the Commission to promulgate regulations requiring effective and practical air pollution controls for significant sources and categories of sources, emission control regulations pertaining to nitrogen oxides and hydrocarbons, and emissions control regulations pertaining to the storage and transfer of petroleum products and other VOCs. Section 25-7-109(2)(c), in particular, provides broad authority to regulate hydrocarbons. Purpose The following section sets forth the Commission’s purpose in adopting the revisions to Regulation Number 7, and includes the technological and scientific rational for the adoption of the revisions. The Commission adopts revisions to Regulation Number 7 to address hydrocarbon emissions from oil and0 gas facilities, including well production facilities and natural gas compressor stations. The Commission expands existing oil and gas control requirements and establishes additional monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements. For example, the revisions increase control requirements and improve capture efficiency requirements for oil and gas storage tanks. The Commission also seeks to minimize fugitive emissions from leaking components at natural gas compressor stations and well production facilities. Further, the Commission intends to minimize emissions at new and modified oil and gas wells and wells undergoing maintenance and during liquids unloading events. The Commission also expands control requirements for pneumatic devices and glycol natural gas dehydrators. The Commission believes that this combination of revisions is appropriate to complement the full adoption of NSPS OOOO, and to further reduce emissions produced by the oil and gas industry. Among other things, these revisions:
Visible Emissions Regulation Number 7, Sections XII. and XVII. have historically contained a prohibition on visible emissions from combustion devices, such as flares. The Commission is not proposing to relax this requirement. To address comments from diverse stakeholders, the Commission is clarifying how Division inspectors and the regulated community are to determine compliance with the prohibition on visible emissions. The Commission has qualified that visible emissions are emissions of smoke that are observed for a period in duration of greater than or equal to one (1) minute during a fifteen (15) minute time period, pursuant to EPA Method 22. The Commission expects that both Division inspectors and the regulated community will, if any smoke is observed, determine whether the emissions are considered visible emissions for purposes of Regulation Number 7. The regulated community may, alternatively, immediately shut-in the equipment to investigate the cause for smoke and perform repairs. While the presence of visible emissions constitutes a violation of the rules, the Commission recognizes that there may be instances where visible emissions occur notwithstanding the owner or operator’s best efforts, such as when an upset or malfunction occurs. Accordingly, the Division should consider the owner or operator’s efforts and whether the visible emissions resulted from factors outside the owner or operator’s control in determining how to best enforce this requirement. Definitions (Section XVII.A.)
The Commission has revised or added definitions for several terms. Further explanation for a few of these terms is set forth below.
“Approved instrument monitoring method” (“AIMM”) means the methods and technologies utilized for monitoring storage tanks and components at well production facilities and natural gas compressor stations. The instrument being used for AIMM inspections must be capable of measuring hydrocarbon compounds at the applicable leak definition concentration specified in the revisions, and calibrated as appropriate. See EPA Method 21 at 6.0. In addition, while the definition lists EPA Method 21 and IR cameras, the Commission does not intend to limit industry to only EPA Method 21 and IR cameras as the Division may approve the use of additional monitoring devices and methods. “Component” excludes compressor seals and open-ended valves and lines, which are defined separately, because they are designed to leak and are better addressed with equipment specific work practices, also included separately. Based on concerns that the requirements for small reciprocating compressors at well production facilities may not be cost-effective, the adopted work practices for reciprocating compressors are limited to reciprocating compressors located at natural gas compressor stations. Nevertheless, there is an issue as to whether compressors at well production facilities are a significant source of emissions. The Commission, therefore, directs the Division to investigate whether reciprocating compressors at well production facilities are a significant source of emissions, and if so, whether there may be appropriate, cost-effective work practices to reduce fugitive emissions from reciprocating compressors at well production facilities. The Commission further directs the Division to brief the Commission on this investigation in March, 2015.
“Date of first production” is meant to coincide with the date reported to the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission’s (“COGCC”) as the “date of first production,” as currently used in COGCC Form 5A. The Commission intends for oil and gas sources to use only one date for compliance with both COGCC and Commission requirements.
“Natural gas compressor stations” are subject to leak detection and repair requirements. This definition is meant to exclude compressors at well production facilities and gas processing plants. This definition is also meant to exclude natural gas compressor stations that are downstream of the natural gas processing plant at this time.
“Normal operation” is considered to include all operation, including maintenance and other activities, as long as the operation does not meet the definition of “malfunction” as set forth in the Common Provision regulations.
“Storage tank,” means a single storage tank or a storage tank battery if the storage tanks are manifolded together. In recent years, it has become more common for multiple storage tank batteries, sometimes containing different hydrocarbon liquids, to be manifolded at the emissions line and routed to a common control device. To further clarify the concept of manifolded within the definition of “storage tank,” the Commission revises the definition of storage tank to specify that a storage tank battery must be manifolded by liquid line, and not just by gas or emission line. This revision is in keeping with the rationale that a single tank could have been used to capture liquids in place of multiple small storage tanks in a battery. The Commission’s definition, and Colorado’s approach to emissions reporting and permitting for storage tanks, differs from EPA’s definition of “storage vessel” and the description of an affected storage vessel facility in NSPS OOOO because EPA considers each individual tank, even those in a battery manifolded by liquid line, to be a storage vessel for comparison against the applicability threshold. The Commission intends to maintain this distinction and, therefore, deletes the previously used definition of “atmospheric condensate storage tank” and creates a new definition of “storage tank” which expands upon the definition of storage vessel in NSPS OOOO to include storage vessels manifolded together by liquid line.
“Well production facilities” are also subject to leak detection and repair requirements and storage tank maintenance requirements. This definition is meant to include all of the emission points, as well as any other equipment and associated piping and components, owned, operated, or leased by the producer located at the same stationary source (a defined term specific to permitting). The “owned, operated, or leased” qualifier in the definition is not meant to reduce the stringency of LDAR requirements in situations where there are multiple owners or operators of the well production facility. This definition is meant to exclude natural gas compressor stations from “well production facility” and avoid overlapping LDAR requirements. This definition is also meant to exclude natural gas storage wells. Good Air Pollution Control Practices (Section XVII.B.)
The Commission intends that all oil and gas operations, including those below control thresholds or even below Regulation Number 3 APEN and permitting thresholds, adhere to good general air pollution control practices. Examples of what the Commission considers to be a good air pollution control practice include, but are not limited to:
Therefore, the Commission intends that the malfunction affirmative defense in the Common Provisions regulation continue to be available to owners or operators, provided that the owners or operators demonstrate that the elements of the malfunction defense have been met. The Commission intends that the burden remain on the owner or operator to demonstrate that an emission should not be considered venting as provided in Section XVII.C.2. The Commission further recognizes that meeting the no venting requirement may be challenging in some cases, and accordingly has adopted additional provisions requiring owners and operators to develop a STEM plan to help ensure compliance, as discussed more fully below. In some cases, development and implementation of the STEM plan may be an iterative process involving ongoing improvements before continuous compliance with the no venting standard is achieved. With this in the mind, the Division should consider the efforts of owners and operators in developing and implementing their STEM plan as part of the Division’s assessment about how best to enforce the no venting requirement.
In contrast with venting, leaking as used in Section XVII.F. more specifically relates to unintended emissions from components at well production facilities and natural gas compressor stations. Identification and repair of leaks in accordance with these revisions benefits the public, the environment, and the oil and gas industry. The Commission has determined that leaks discovered by the owner or operator or the Division inspector pursuant to the detection methods specified in Section XVII.F. shall not be subject to enforcement by the Division under certain circumstances. For example, if a leak is identified and the owner or operator is in the process of timely and properly addressing the leak in accordance with these revisions, the Division should afford the owner or operator the opportunity to fix the leak absent enforcement. However, by this provision, the Commission does not intend to exempt owners or operators from their obligation to operate without venting or to utilize good air pollution control practices at all times. Storage Tanks Controls (Section XVII.C.)
EPA established a six (6) tpy VOC threshold on a controlled actual emissions basis for applying storage vessel controls. In contrast, Colorado uses the sum total emissions from a tank battery, where multiple tanks are manifolded together, on an uncontrolled actual emissions basis for applying reporting, permitting, and control requirements. This means that the EPA’s six (6) tpy threshold on a controlled actual emissions basis applies to individual tanks having the equivalent of one hundred and twenty (120) tpy VOC on an uncontrolled actual basis. Thus, more storage tanks are regulated under Regulation Number 7, Section XVII. than under NSPS OOOO.
The Commission intends that under Regulation Number 7, Section XVII., air pollution control equipment may be removed if: (1) the storage tank (including manifolded tanks) emissions fall below the uncontrolled actual six (6) tpy threshold, on a rolling twelve month basis; and (2) those controls are not required by other applicable requirements. Conversely, if storage tank emissions increase above the uncontrolled actual six (6) tpy threshold on a rolling twelve month basis, air pollution control equipment must be installed within sixty (60) days of discovery of the increase. The Commission does not intend for the storage tank control, or related, requirements to apply to frac tanks that are located at a well production facility for less than 180 consecutive days. Control Efficiency (Section XVII.C.)
The Commission expands the 95% control efficiency requirement to apply to storage tanks containing any hydrocarbon liquids (including condensate, crude oil, produced water, and intermediate hydrocarbon liquids), for consistency with NSPS OOOO. Produced water and crude oil storage tanks, which in years past were thought to have insignificant emissions, can instead be significant sources of emissions. This rule change is also a result, in part, of the removal of the APEN exemption in 2008 for tanks containing crude oil and less than 1% crude. The Commission intends that the air pollution control equipment achieve an average hydrocarbon control efficiency of at least 95%, and if a combustion device is used the device must have a design destruction efficiency of at least 98%, with few exceptions. The Commission recognizes and expects that most flares can control hydrocarbon emissions by 98% or more when properly operated.
Audio, Visual, Olfactory (“AVO”) and Visual Inspections (Section XVII.C.) The Commission intends that owners and operators of subject storage tanks (including storage tanks during the first ninety (90) days of production and storage tanks containing only stabilized liquids) conduct applicable AVO and visual inspections for venting or leaking. Visual inspections are in addition to AVO monitoring and require further inspections of the storage tank and associated equipment, such as thief hatches and air pollution control equipment. These inspections are not required to occur at the same time as loadout. Instead, loadout triggers the requirement for AVO and visual inspection, and indicates the frequency at which inspection is required.
Storage Tank Emission Management System (“STEM”) Plan, Monitoring, and Recordkeeping (Section XVII.C.)
Owners and operators of storage tanks with uncontrolled actual emissions equal to or greater than six (6) tpy must develop, certify, and implement a STEM plan designed to ensure compliance with the “without venting” requirement of Section XVII.C.2., among other requirements. Through STEM, owners and operators must evaluate and employ appropriate control technologies, monitoring, maintenance, and operational practices to avoid venting of emissions from storage tanks. The Commission intends that sources have flexibility to develop STEM plans on an individual basis for each storage tank or for multiple storage tanks. However, upon request, the owner or operator must be able to identify to the Division what STEM plan applies to a storage tank and make that plan available for review. Owners and operators of storage tanks controlled during the first ninety (90) days of production or containing only stabilized liquids are not required to develop and implement a STEM plan. However, owners or operators of such storage tanks must still comply with applicable control, capture, monitoring, and recordkeeping requirements. For purposes of clarification, the STEM plan is intended to include, but is not limited to, the following elements:
An identification of the procedures to be employed to evaluate ongoing capture performance after implementation of the STEM plan;
A procedure to update the STEM plan when capture performance is not adequate, the STEM design is not operating properly, when otherwise desired by the owner or operator, or when required by the Division; and The certification made by the appropriate personnel with actual knowledge of the STEM design for each storage tank.
In addition to AVO and visual inspections for storage tanks, STEM plans must include AIMM inspections on a frequency schedule that is tied to the uncontrolled actual VOC emissions from the storage tank. The Commission intends that the AIMM inspection satisfy any simultaneous AVO and visual inspection requirement.
The STEM plan should be maintained by the owner or operator for the life of the storage tank, while records of applicable monitoring only need to be retained for a period of two years. Upon sale or transfer of ownership of a storage tank, the relevant documentation and records should be transferred with the ownership. Owners and operators are encouraged to reevaluate any existing STEM plan for the storage tank upon purchase or acquisition of the storage tank.
Unsafe, Difficult, or Inaccessible to Monitor (Sections XVII.C. and XVII.F.) The Commission does not intend to require owners or operators to conduct either AVO or AIMM inspections of unsafe, difficult, or inaccessible components or storage tanks and associated equipment. The Commission acknowledges that, in limited circumstances, unsafe to monitor may include unsafe weather or travel conditions. However, in those limited circumstances, the Commission expects the owner or operator to resume monitoring once the weather or travel conditions cease to be unsafe. Importantly, the Commission does not intend to allow owners or operators to delay required monitoring for the entire winter season.
Glycol Natural Gas Dehydrators (Section XVII.D.)
The Commission expanded the state-wide control requirements for glycol natural gas dehydrators. This revision requires that all existing glycol natural gas dehydrators with uncontrolled actual VOC emissions of six (6) tpy or greater be controlled with air pollution control equipment achieving at least a 95% reduction. This revision also requires that existing glycol natural gas dehydrators with uncontrolled actual VOC emissions of two (2) tpy or greater be controlled if the dehydrator is located within 1,320 feet of a building unit or designated outside activity area. The definitions for building unit and designated outside activity area are taken from COGCC regulations. The Commission does not intend to apply this proximity requirement to the glycol natural gas dehydrator owner or operator’s buildings, where public access to the building is also restricted. Further, because glycol natural gas dehydrators are different and unique sources, a similar proximity requirement for storage tanks is not appropriate at this time as storage tanks are more appropriately addressed based on emission thresholds. This revision also requires that all new glycol natural gas dehydrators with uncontrolled actual VOC emissions of two (2) tpy or greater be controlled with air pollution control equipment achieving at least 95% reduction. If a combustion device is used, it must have a design destruction efficiency of at least 98%, with few exceptions. The Commission recognizes and expects that most flares can control hydrocarbon emissions by 98% or more when properly operated.
Leak Detection and Repair Requirements (Section XVII.F.) The Commission believes the detection and timely repair of leaks is important in the efforts to reduce hydrocarbon emissions. The use of appropriate inspection instruments and methods, such as IR cameras, enhances the detection and reduction of emissions. The leak detection and repair program more broadly targets leaks from components at natural gas compressor stations and well production facilities, even if such facilities do not include storage tanks. In contrast, STEM targets venting from storage tanks. The use of an AIMM as it relates to leak detection and repair frequency is generally intended to complement the STEM monitoring schedule. The Commission has created a phased schedule and tiered approach for leak detection and repair that is based on emissions, recognizing that smaller operators and facilities may have lower emissions and may need additional time to comply. Owners or operators have flexibility in how to meet the leak detection and repair requirements, including utilizing their own equipment and personnel or hiring a third party contractor. Owners or operators also have flexibility in timing the AVO and AIMM inspections to coordinate overlapping AVO and AIMM inspections, as well as inspections of facilities in the same area or on the same inspection frequency. The Commission intends that the AIMM inspection satisfy any simultaneous AVO inspection requirement. However, the Commission expects that owners and operators will also utilize this flexibility to ensure that inspections are appropriately spaced on the frequency schedule (e.g. quarterly inspections will occur every three months but not, for example, on March 31 and April 1). The Commission distinguished between new and existing well production facilities by utilizing an October 1, 2014, commenced construction date and created an inspection phase-in schedule for existing facilities. The Commission also distinguished the emissions thresholds for determining inspection frequencies for well production facilities with storage tanks and well production facilities without storage tanks. For well production facilities with storage tanks, the threshold determining inspection frequency is based on the uncontrolled actual VOC emissions from the highest emitting storage tank. For well production facilities without storage tanks, the threshold determining inspection frequency is based on “facility emissions.” The Commission has determined that “facility emissions” means the controlled actual VOC emissions from all permanent equipment, including fugitive emissions calculated using the emission factors defined as less than 10,000 ppmv of Table 2-8 of the 1995 EPA Protocol for Equipment Leak Emission Estimates. The Commission has defined a leak requiring repair in a manner that is dependent on the monitoring methodology. Leak detection methodologies have varied abilities to identify emission quantity and chemical makeup. EPA Method 21, for example, detects and quantifies hydrocarbon emission concentration, but does not speciate hydrocarbons (e.g., methane from other hydrocarbons) or identify the emission rate. Similarly, while IR cameras are becoming much more prevalent as a more affordable, time-saving, and user-friendly tool, they also do not speciate hydrocarbons or quantify the emission concentration. The Commission provides owners and operators flexibility in selecting a leak detection methodology.
If EPA Method 21 is utilized, the Commission set the threshold at which component leaks must be repaired at 2,000 parts per million (“ppm”) hydrocarbons for existing natural gas compressor stations and 500 ppm for new (constructed after May 1, 2014) natural gas compressor stations and new and existing well production facilities. Where IR camera or AVO monitoring is utilized, a leak is any detectable emission not associated with normal equipment operation (e.g. the acceptable level of leaks from a component designed to leak). These values were determined based in part on a review of current federal or state leak detection and repair requirements for natural gas processing plants, refineries, and other oil and gas sources. Leak detection values have decreased over time, in recognition of improved technologies and business practices. NSPS OOOO identifies leaks at natural gas processing plants at 500 ppm. Prior to NSPS OOOO, leaks were identified in other New Source Performance Standards (NSPS KKK and NSPS VVa) at 10,000 ppm. In addition, California, Wyoming, and Pennsylvania have varying leak detection and repair requirements and approaches to defining a leak. Some California air quality districts generally define a minor leak as between 1,000 and 10,000 ppm. Wyoming does not have a numerical limit. Pennsylvania essentially defines a leak at a well pad as anything with detectable emissions utilizing Method 21, as more than 2.5% methane or 500 ppm VOC, or no visible leaks using an IR camera. Upon consideration of all of the evidence presented, the Commission chose to define component leak at the foregoing thresholds.
The Commission expects that leaks that are not located specifically at a component will be addressed and repaired, in accordance with the general requirements to minimize emissions and employ good air pollution control practices. Further, the Commission finds that the repair deadlines set forth in Section XVII.F.7. provide flexibility for operational differences, including the potential range of leaks and degrees of repair difficulty that may be encountered.
The Commission anticipates that many operators will choose to utilize IR cameras, in light of their relative ease of use and increased reliance by both by industry and regulators within Colorado and across the country.
The Commission expects that owners and operators will remonitor leaks requiring repair with either the approved instrument monitoring method the owner or operator used to identify the leak or any method approved for remonitoring of leaks under EPA Method 21. The Commission expects that in most instances the leak detection and repair requirements of this regulation will apply in lieu of leak detection and repair requirements in permits existing as of the promulgation date of the revisions. The Commission recognizes that leak detection and repair requirements in a few state permits may be federally enforceable, and this state-only regulation cannot supersede federal requirements. The Commission expects the Division and owners and operators to work cooperatively on the efficient implementation of leak detection and repair requirements, in those rare instances where there may be duplicative or competing requirements. During the rulemaking, several parties requested more stringent requirements for all oil and gas operations located within 1,320 feet of a building unit or designated outside activity area. Residents living within close proximity to oil and gas operations, particularly those living within 1,320 feet of oil and gas operations, may understandably have heightened concerns regarding potential impacts of emissions from such facilities. It is the Commission’s understanding that some oil and gas owners and operators implement practices beyond what is currently required under state law in order to minimize emissions and otherwise be good neighbors, including conducting increased site inspections. The Commission supports such practices.
Also during the rulemaking, various parties provided extensive evidence concerning the frequency of instrument monitoring method inspections, the timing of leak repair, and the costs and benefits associated with more or less frequent monitoring and repair. The Commission recognizes that additional information would benefit the Commission, Division, industry, and other stakeholders and therefore encourages the Division to work with energy companies, to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of various kinds of instrument based monitoring methods and program designs at a range of types, sizes, and frequencies at well production facilities and natural gas compressor stations. The Commission also encourages the Division to work with industry and other stakeholders to evaluate emissions from and potential control strategies for downstream natural gas compressor stations and intermittent pneumatic controllers.
Lastly, several parties to the rulemaking requested greater transparency and public access to air quality information associated with oil and gas development. In particular, a coalition of local community organizations requested that owner and operators’ annual reports as required by these rules be posted on the Division’s website. The Commission believes these reports will provide important information when reviewing the efficacy of the inspection and maintenance program, as well as valuable information to interested citizens, particularly those who live in close proximity to oil and gas facilities. Therefore, the Commission requests that the Division make this information available in the most efficient means possible, which may include posting on the Division’s website individual reports and/or a compilation summary. In addition, the Commission requests an annual briefing on these regulations. Such briefing will assist the Commission and interested stakeholders to understand the data and implementation issues relating to this new program, as well as other initiatives covered in this rulemaking. The Commission believes that this information would also be valuable to all parties. Well Maintenance and Liquids Unloading (Section XVII.H.) Over time, liquids build up inside a well and reduce flow out of the well. These liquids can slow and even block gas flow in wet gas wells and are removed during a well blowdown, also called liquids unloading. As a result of recent information, EPA has significantly increased their emission factor for liquids unloading. The uncontrolled emission factor is based upon fluid equilibrium calculations used to estimate the amount of gas needed to blow down a column of fluids blocking a well and Natural Gas STAR partner data on the amount of additional venting after a blowdown. Similar to the issues with well maintenance and well completion emissions, considerable uncertainty for liquid unloading emissions arises from the limited data sources used and the applicability of Natural Gas STAR program activities to calculate industry baseline emissions. This is especially important as liquid unloading emissions are estimated to comprise 33% of the uncontrolled methane emissions from the natural gas industry in the latest greenhouse gas inventory. EPA’s Natural Gas STAR program advocates the use of a plunger lift system to reduce the need for liquids unloading, and indicates that such systems may pay for themselves in about one year. The Commission has determined that the use of technologies and practices to minimize venting, including plunger lift systems, are available and economically feasible, and encourages their use in Colorado. Pneumatic Controllers (Section XVIII.)
The Commission recognized in a December 2008, rulemaking that pneumatic devices are a significant source of emissions. In addition, a 2013 University of Texas study concluded that methane emissions from pneumatics are higher than EPA previously estimated. Therefore, expanding the current low-bleed pneumatic device requirements statewide and further reducing emissions is appropriate and cost- effective. However, the Commission does not intend to expand the pneumatic device requirements to intermittent pneumatic controllers at this time. Further, while the use of low-bleed pneumatic controllers will result in a significant reduction of VOC and methane emissions from Colorado oil and gas facilities, no-bleed pneumatic controllers are currently commercially available to further reduce emissions from these sources. However, because these devices can only be used at facilities with adequate electric power, and given the high cost of electrifying a facility, the Commission is only requiring the use of no- bleed pneumatic controllers at facilities that are connected to the electric grid, using electricity to power equipment, and where technically and economically feasible. Additional Considerations In accordance with C.R.S. §§ 25-7-105.1 and 25-7-133(3) the Commission states the rules in Sections XVII. and XVIII. of Regulation Number 7 adopted in this rulemaking are state-only requirements and are not intended as additions or revisions to Colorado’s SIP at this time. In accordance with C.R.S. § 25-7-110.5(5)(b), the Commission determines:
Appendix A Colorado Ozone Nonattainment or Attainment Maintenance Areas I. Chronology of Attainment Status Denver Metropolitan Area Only 1978 Denver 1-hour Ozone Nonattainment Area designation first becomes effective in 7-county Denver Metropolitan Area 10/11/01 Denver 1-hour Ozone Attainment Maintenance Area designation replaces non- attainment designation and becomes effective in 7-county Denver Metropolitan Area 9/2/05 1-hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard is Revoked in Colorado except for the Denver 1-hour Ozone Attainment Maintenance Area.
Denver Metropolitan Area and North Front Range 10/11/01 1-hour attainment maintenance area replaces non-attainment designation for the Denver Metro Area/North Front Range Area 4/15/04 EPA designates the Denver Metro Area/North Front Range region as an 8-hour ozone non-attainment area, designation deferred due to the implementation of the Early Action Compact 11/20/07 Denver 8-hour ozone non-attainment designation becomes effective in 9 county Denver Metropolitan Area II. Maps Denver Metropolitan Area and North Front Range Appendix B Criteria for Control of Vapors from Gasoline Transfer to Storage Tanks I. Drop Tube Specifications. Submerged fill is specifically required. The drop tube must extend to within 15.24 cm (6 in.) of the tank bottom.
II. Vapor Hose Return. Vapor return line and any manifold must be minimum 7.6 cm (3 in.) ID. All tanks must be provided with individual overfill protection. (Liquid must not be allowed in the vent line or vapor recovery line.) Disconnect on liquid line should assure that all liquid in the hose is drained into the storage tank. The requirements for overfill protection as specified may be waived for existing storage tanks when it is demonstrated to the satisfaction of the appropriate local Fire Marshal, and where applicable, the State Oil Inspection Office that the installation of overfill protection devices on existing tanks is physically not possible.
III. Size of Vapor Line Connections. For separate vapor lines, nominal three inch (7.6 cm) or larger connections must be utilized at the storage tank and truck. However, short lengths of 2-inch (5.1
IV. Type of Liquid Fill Connection. Vapor tight caps are required for the liquid fill connection for all systems. A positive closure utilizing a gasket is necessary to prevent vapors from being emitted at ground level. Cam-lock closures meet this requirement. Dry break closures are preferred.
V. Tank Truck Inspection. Tank trucks are specifically required to be vapor-tight and to have valid leak-tight certification. The visual inspection procedure must be conducted at least once every six months to ensure properly operating manifolding and relief valves, using the test procedure of Appendix D.B.
VI. Dry Break on Underground Tank Vapor Riser. Dry-break closures are required to assure transfer of displaced vapors to the truck and to prevent ground-level, gasoline-vapor emissions caused by failure to connect the vapor return line to the underground tanks (closure on riser to mate with opening on hose). These devices keep the tank sealed until the hose is connected to the underground tank. Concentric couplers without dry-breaks are required to have a dry-break on the vapor line connection to the coupler itself, rather than on the rise pipe from the storage tank. The liquid fill riser should be provided with a gap having a positive closure (threaded or latched).
VII. Equipment Ensuring Vapor-Hose Connection During Gasoline Deliveries. An equipment system aboard the tank truck shall insure (barring deliberate tampering) that a vapor return hose is connected from the truck's vapor return line to the tank receiving gasoline. VIII. Vent Line Restriction Devices. Vent line restriction devices are required. They both improve recovery efficiency and, as an integral part of any system, assure that the vapor return line is connected during transfer. If the liquid fill line were attached to the underground tank and the vapor return line were disconnected, then dry break closures would seal the vapor return path to the truck, forcing all vapors out the vent line. In such instances, a restriction device on this vent line greatly reduces fill rate, warning the operator that the vapor line is not connected. Both of the following devices must be used.
IX. Fire and Safety Regulations. All new or modified installations must comply in their entirety with all code requirements including NFPA, Pamphlet 30 (fiberglass is preferred for new manifold lines). For any questions concerning compliance, please contact State Oil Inspection or your local Fire Marshal.
X. State Oil Inspection. Requirements of the State Oil Inspection office make accurate measurements of the liquid in the underground tank necessary. Vapor-tight gauging devices will be required in all systems designed such that a pressure other than atmospheric will be held or maintained in the storage tank. The volume of liquid in the tanks maintained at atmospheric pressure may be determined with a stick through the submerged drop tube or through a separate submerged gauging tube extending to within 15.24 cm (6 in.) of the tank bottom. Appendix C Criteria for Control of Vapors From Gasoline Transfer at Bulk Plants (Vapor Balance System)
I. Storage Tank Requirements:
II. Loading Rack Requirements:
III. Tank Truck* Requirements:
* The term "tank truck" is meant to include all trucks with tanks used for the transport of gasoline, such as tank wagons, account trucks and transport trucks.
Appendix D Minimum Cooling Capacities for Refrigerated Freeboard Chillers on Vapor Degreasers The specifications in this Appendix apply only to vapor degreasers that have both condenser coils and refrigerated freeboard chillers. (The coolant in the condenser coils is normally water.) The amount of refrigeration capacity is expressed in Calories/Hour per meter of perimeter. This perimeter is measured at the air/vapor interface.
For refrigerated chillers operated below 0°C., the following requirements apply: DEGREASER WIDTH *CALORIES/HR BTU/HR METER OF FOOT OF PERIMETER PERIMETER Less than 1.1 meters (3.5 ft.) 165 200
Greater than 3.0 meters (10 ft.) 500 600 * Kilocalories (1 Kilocalorie = 4184.0 joules)
For refrigerated chillers operating above 0°C., there shall be at least 415 Calories/Hr. - meter of perimeter (500 BTU/Hr-ft.), regardless of size.
Definition:
"Air/Vapor Interface" - means the surface defined by the top of the solvent vapor layer within the confines of a vapor degreaser.
Appendix E Test Procedures for Annual Pressure/Vacuum Testing of Gasoline Transport Tanks A. Testing The delivery tank, mounted on either the truck or trailer, is pressurized isolated from the pressure source, and the pressure drop recorded to determine the rate of pressure change. A vacuum test is to be conducted in a similar manner. The Division shall provide forms which designate all required information to be recorded by the testing agency.
B. Visual Inspection The entire tank, including domes, dome vents, cargo tank, piping, hose connections, hoses and delivery elbows, shall be inspected for wear, damage, or misadjustment that could be a potential leak source. Inspect all rubber fittings except those in piping which are not accessible. Any part found to be defective shall be adjusted, repaired, or replaced as necessary. (Safety note: it is strongly recommended that testing be done outside, unless tank is first degassed (e.g., steamcleaned). No "hot work" or spark-producing procedures should be undertaken without first degassing).
C. Equipment Requirements
D. Vacuum and Pressure Tests of Tanks
E. Leak Check of Vapor Return Valve
Appendix F Emission Limit Conversion Procedure The following procedure shall be used to convert emission limits expressed as lb VOC/gallon coating less water and exempt solvents to limits expressed as lb VOC/gallon solids. This example uses the emission limit of 3.7 lb VOC/gallon coating.
Assume VOC density of the “Presumptive” RACT coating is 7.36 pounds per gallon because this same value was used to determine the "Presumptive" recommended RACT emission limits from volume solids data.
(3.7) LB VOC / GAL COATING LESS WATER x l GAL VOC x 100 / 7.36 LB VOC = (50) V0L% VOC 100 - (50) V0L% VOC = (50) V0L% SOLIDS (3.7) LB VOC / GAL COATING LESS H2O x 100 GAL COATING / (50) GAL SOLIDS = (7.4) LB VOC / GAL SOLIDS See "A Guideline For Surface Coating Calculations" EPA - 340/1-86-0l6 for additional examples. The following table lists equivalent mass VOC/volume solids emission limits for various coating operations.
Industrial Finishing Categories Lb VOC per Lb VOC per Kg VOC per Gallon Coating Gallon of Liter of less water Solids Solids Can Industry Sheet Basecoat (Exterior and Interior) and 2.8 4.5 0.55 over-varnish; two-piece can exterior (base-coat and over-varnish)
Two- and three-piece can interior body spray, 4.2 9.8 1.19 two-piece can exterior end spray or roll coat Three-piece can side-seam spray 5.5 21.7 2.61 End sealing compound 3.7 7.4 0.88 Any additional coats 4.2 9.8 1.19 Coil Coating Any coat 2.6 4.0 0.48 Fabric Coating Fabric coating line 2.9 4.8 0.58 Vinyl coating line 3.8 7.9 0.93 Paper Coating Coating line 2.9 4.8 0.58 Automotive and Light-Duty Truck Assembly Plant Primer (electrodeposition) application, flashoff 1.9 2.6 0.31 area and oven Topcoat application, flashoff area and oven 2.8 4.5 0.55 Final repair application, flashoff area and oven 4.8 13.8 1.67 Metal Furniture Coating line 3.0 5.1 0.61 Magnet Wire Wire coating operation 1.7 2.2 0.26 Large Appliances Prime, single, or topcoat application area, 2.8 4.5 0.55 flashoff area and oven Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products Air-dried items 3.5 6.7 0.80 Clear-coated items 4.3 10.3 1.25 Extreme performance coatings 3.5 6.7 0.80 Other coatings and systems 3.0 5.1 0.61 Plastic Film Coating Plastic film coating line 2.9 4.8 0.58 _________________________________________________________________________ Editor’s Notes History Entire rule eff. 01/30/2009.
Parts I.A.1, XVII, XIX.L eff. 02/14/2011 Parts II.D, XII.D – XII.H, XVII.D, XIX.M eff. 02/15/2013. Parts II.B, VI.B.2.a.(i)(E), IX.A.12.a.(x), XVII – XVIII, XIX.B, XIX.N eff. 04/14/2014.