29 C.F.R. § 1910.269
(a) General—(1) Application.
(i) This section covers the operation and maintenance of electric power generation, control, transformation, transmission, and distribution lines and equipment. These provisions apply to:
(B) Other installations at an electric power generating station, as follows:
(1) Fuel and ash handling and processing installations, such as coal conveyors,
(2) Water and steam installations, such as penstocks, pipelines, and tanks, providing a source of energy for electric generators, and
(3) Chlorine and hydrogen systems;
(E) Line-clearance tree trimming performed for the purpose of clearing space around electric power generation, transmission, or distribution lines or equipment and on behalf of an organization that operates, or that controls the operating procedures for, those lines or equipment, as follows:
(1) Entire § 1910.269, except paragraph (r)(1) of this section, applies to line-clearance tree trimming covered by the introductory text to paragraph (a)(1)(i)(E) of the section when performed by qualified employees (those who are knowledgeable in the construction and operation of the electric power generation, transmission, or distribution equipment involved, along with the associated hazards).
(2) Paragraphs (a)(2), (a)(3), (b), (c), (g), (k), (p), and (r) of this section apply to line-clearance tree trimming covered by the introductory text to paragraph (a)(1)(i)(E) of this section when performed by line-clearance tree trimmers who are not qualified employees.
(ii) Notwithstanding paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section, § 1910.269 of this part does not apply:
(2) Training.
(i) All employees performing work covered by this section shall be trained as follows:
(ii) Each qualified employee shall also be trained and competent in:
(iii) Each line-clearance tree trimmer who is not a qualified employee shall also be trained and competent in:
(v) An employee shall receive additional training (or retraining) under any of the following conditions:
(3) Information transfer.
(i) Before work begins, the host employer shall inform contract employers of:
(ii) Contract employers shall comply with the following requirements:
(4) Existing characteristics and conditions. Existing characteristics and conditions of electric lines and equipment that are related to the safety of the work to be performed shall be determined before work on or near the lines or equipment is started. Such characteristics and conditions include, but are not limited to:
(b) Medical services and first aid. The employer shall provide medical services and first aid as required in § 1910.151. In addition to the requirements of § 1910.151, the following requirements also apply:
(1) First-aid training. When employees are performing work on, or associated with, exposed lines or equipment energized at 50 volts or more, persons with first-aid training shall be available as follows:
(c) Job briefing—(1) Before each job.
(3) Number of briefings.
(4) Extent of briefing.
(ii) A more extensive discussion shall be conducted:
(2) General.
(ii) The employer's energy control program under paragraph (d)(2) of this section shall meet the following requirements:
(B) If an energy isolating device is capable of being locked out, the employer's program shall use lockout, unless the employer can demonstrate that the use of a tagout system will provide full employee protection as follows:
(1) When a tagout device is used on an energy isolating device which is capable of being locked out, the tagout device shall be attached at the same location that the lockout device would have been attached, and the employer shall demonstrate that the tagout program will provide a level of safety equivalent to that obtained by the use of a lockout program.
(2) In demonstrating that a level of safety is achieved in the tagout program equivalent to the level of safety obtained by the use of a lockout program, the employer shall demonstrate full compliance with all tagout-related provisions of this standard together with such additional elements as are necessary to provide the equivalent safety available from the use of a lockout device. Additional means to be considered as part of the demonstration of full employee protection shall include the implementation of additional safety measures such as the removal of an isolating circuit element, blocking of a controlling switch, opening of an extra disconnecting device, or the removal of a valve handle to reduce the likelihood of inadvertent energizing.
(iv) The procedure shall clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, responsibility, authorization, rules, and techniques to be applied to the control of hazardous energy, and the measures to enforce compliance including, but not limited to, the following:
(v) The employer shall conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the provisions of paragraph (d) of this section are being followed.
(vi) The employer shall provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of energy controls are acquired by employees. The training shall include the following:
(vii) When tagout systems are used, employees shall also be trained in the following limitations of tags:
(viii) Retraining shall be provided by the employer as follows:
(3) Protective materials and hardware.
(ii) Lockout devices and tagout devices shall be singularly identified; shall be the only devices used for controlling energy; may not be used for other purposes; and shall meet the following requirements:
(A) Lockout devices and tagout devices shall be capable of withstanding the environment to which they are exposed for the maximum period of time that exposure is expected.
(1) Tagout devices shall be constructed and printed so that exposure to weather conditions or wet and damp locations will not cause the tag to deteriorate or the message on the tag to become illegible.
(2) Tagout devices shall be so constructed as not to deteriorate when used in corrosive environments.
(6) Lockout/tagout application. The established procedures for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) shall include the following elements and actions, and these procedures shall be performed in the following sequence:
(iv) Lockout or tagout devices shall be affixed to each energy isolating device by authorized employees.
(B) Tagout devices shall be affixed in such a manner as will clearly indicate that the operation or movement of energy isolating devices from the “safe” or “off” position is prohibited.
(1) Where tagout devices are used with energy isolating devices designed with the capability of being locked out, the tag attachment shall be fastened at the same point at which the lock would have been attached.
(2) Where a tag cannot be affixed directly to the energy isolating device, the tag shall be located as close as safely possible to the device, in a position that will be immediately obvious to anyone attempting to operate the device.
(7) Release from lockout/tagout. Before lockout or tagout devices are removed and energy is restored to the machine or equipment, procedures shall be followed and actions taken by the authorized employees to ensure the following:
(iv) Each lockout or tagout device shall be removed from each energy isolating device by the authorized employee who applied the lockout or tagout device. However, if that employee is not available to remove it, the device may be removed under the direction of the employer, provided that specific procedures and training for such removal have been developed, documented, and incorporated into the employer's energy control program. The employer shall demonstrate that the specific procedure provides a degree of safety equivalent to that provided by the removal of the device by the authorized employee who applied it. The specific procedure shall include at least the following elements:
(8) Additional requirements.
(i) If the lockout or tagout devices must be temporarily removed from energy isolating devices and the machine or equipment must be energized to test or position the machine, equipment, or component thereof, the following sequence of actions shall be followed:
(ii) When servicing or maintenance is performed by a crew, craft, department, or other group, they shall use a procedure which affords the employees a level of protection equivalent to that provided by the implementation of a personal lockout or tagout device. Group lockout or tagout devices shall be used in accordance with the procedures required by paragraphs (d)(2)(iii) and (d)(2)(iv) of this section including, but not limited to, the following specific requirements:
(v) If energy isolating devices are installed in a central location and are under the exclusive control of a system operator, the following requirements apply:
(e) Enclosed spaces. This paragraph covers enclosed spaces that may be entered by employees. It does not apply to vented vaults if the employer makes a determination that the ventilation system is operating to protect employees before they enter the space. This paragraph applies to routine entry into enclosed spaces in lieu of the permit-space entry requirements contained in paragraphs (d) through (k) of § 1910.146. If, after the employer takes the precautions given in paragraphs (e) and (t) of this section, the hazards remaining in the enclosed space endanger the life of an entrant or could interfere with an entrant's escape from the space, then entry into the enclosed space shall meet the permit-space entry requirements of paragraphs (d) through (k) of § 1910.146.
(2) Fall protection.
(iii) Body belts and positioning straps for work-positioning equipment shall meet the following requirements:
(A) Hardware for body belts and positioning straps shall meet the following requirements:
(1) Hardware shall be made of drop-forged steel, pressed steel, formed steel, or equivalent material.
(2) Hardware shall have a corrosion-resistant finish.
(3) Hardware surfaces shall be smooth and free of sharp edges.
(G) Positioning straps shall be capable of withstanding the following tests:
(1) A dielectric test of 819.7 volts, AC, per centimeter (25,000 volts per foot) for 3 minutes without visible deterioration;
(2) A leakage test of 98.4 volts, AC, per centimeter (3,000 volts per foot) with a leakage current of no more than 1 mA;
(3) Tension tests of 20 kilonewtons (4,500 pounds-force) for sections free of buckle holes and of 15 kilonewtons (3,500 pounds-force) for sections with buckle holes;
(4) A buckle-tear test with a load of 4.4 kilonewtons (1,000 pounds-force); and
(5) A flammability test in accordance with Table R-2.
| Test method | Criteria for passing the test |
|---|---|
| Vertically suspend a 500-mm (19.7-inch) length of strapping supporting a 100-kg (220.5-lb) weightUse a butane or propane burner with a 76-mm (3-inch) flame. | Any flames on the positioning strap shall self extinguish.The positioning strap shall continue to support the 100-kg (220.5-lb) mass. |
| Direct the flame to an edge of the strapping at a distance of 25 mm (1 inch) | |
| Remove the flame after 5 seconds | |
| Wait for any flames on the positioning strap to stop burning |
(K) Snaphooks shall be of the locking type meeting the following requirements:
(1) The locking mechanism shall first be released, or a destructive force shall be placed on the keeper, before the keeper will open.
(2) A force in the range of 6.7 N (1.5 lbf) to 17.8 N (4 lbf) shall be required to release the locking mechanism.
(3) With the locking mechanism released and with a force applied on the keeper against the face of the nose, the keeper may not begin to open with a force of 11.2 N (2.5 lbf) or less and shall begin to open with a maximum force of 17.8 N (4 lbf).
(L) Body belts and positioning straps shall be capable of withstanding a drop test as follows:
(1) The test mass shall be rigidly constructed of steel or equivalent material with a mass of 100 kg (220.5 lbm). For work-positioning equipment used by employees weighing more than 140 kg (310 lbm) fully equipped, the test mass shall be increased proportionately (that is, the test mass must equal the mass of the equipped worker divided by 1.4).
(2) For body belts, the body belt shall be fitted snugly around the test mass and shall be attached to the test-structure anchorage point by means of a wire rope.
(3) For positioning straps, the strap shall be adjusted to its shortest length possible to accommodate the test and connected to the test-structure anchorage point at one end and to the test mass on the other end.
(4) The test mass shall be dropped an unobstructed distance of 1 meter (39.4 inches) from a supporting structure that will sustain minimal deflection during the test.
(5) Body belts shall successfully arrest the fall of the test mass and shall be capable of supporting the mass after the test.
(6) Positioning straps shall successfully arrest the fall of the test mass without breaking, and the arrest force may not exceed 17.8 kilonewtons (4,000 pounds-force). Additionally, snaphooks on positioning straps may not distort to such an extent that the keeper would release.
(iv) The following requirements apply to the care and use of personal fall protection equipment.
(F) Unless the snaphook is a locking type and designed specifically for the following connections, snaphooks on work-positioning equipment may not be engaged:
(1) Directly to webbing, rope, or wire rope;
(2) To each other;
(3) To a D ring to which another snaphook or other connector is attached;
(4) To a horizontal lifeline; or
(5) To any object that is incompatibly shaped or dimensioned in relation to the snaphook such that accidental disengagement could occur should the connected object sufficiently depress the snaphook keeper to allow release of the object.
(2) Special ladders and platforms. Portable ladders used on structures or conductors in conjunction with overhead line work need not meet § 1910.23(c)(4) and (9). Portable ladders and platforms used on structures or conductors in conjunction with overhead line work shall meet the following requirements:
(3) Conductive ladders. Portable metal ladders and other portable conductive ladders may not be used near exposed energized lines or equipment. However, in specialized high-voltage work, conductive ladders shall be used when the employer demonstrates that nonconductive ladders would present a greater hazard to employees than conductive ladders.
(2) Cord- and plug-connected equipment. Cord- and plug-connected equipment not covered by subpart S of this part shall comply with one of the following instead of § 1910.243(a)(5):
(3) Portable and vehicle-mounted generators. Portable and vehicle-mounted generators used to supply cord- and plug-connected equipment covered by paragraph (i)(2) of this section shall meet the following requirements:
(4) Hydraulic and pneumatic tools.
(j) Live-line tools—(1) Design of tools. Live-line tool rods, tubes, and poles shall be designed and constructed to withstand the following minimum tests:
(2) Condition of tools.
(iii) Live-line tools used for primary employee protection shall be removed from service every 2 years, and whenever required under paragraph (j)(2)(ii) of this section, for examination, cleaning, repair, and testing as follows:
(C) The tool shall be tested in accordance with paragraphs (j)(2)(iii)(D) and (j)(2)(iii)(E) of this section under the following conditions:
(1) After the tool has been repaired or refinished; and
(2) After the examination if repair or refinishing is not performed, unless the tool is made of FRP rod or foam-filled FRP tube and the employer can demonstrate that the tool has no defects that could cause it to fail during use.
(E) The voltage applied during the tests shall be as follows:
(1) 246,100 volts per meter (75,000 volts per foot) of length for 1 minute if the tool is made of fiberglass, or
(2) 164,000 volts per meter (50,000 volts per foot) of length for 1 minute if the tool is made of wood, or
(3) Other tests that the employer can demonstrate are equivalent.
(2) Materials storage near energized lines or equipment.
(i) In areas to which access is not restricted to qualified persons only, materials or equipment may not be stored closer to energized lines or exposed energized parts of equipment than the following distances, plus a distance that provides for the maximum sag and side swing of all conductors and for the height and movement of material-handling equipment:
(1) General.
(2) At least two employees.
(i) Except as provided in paragraph (l)(2)(ii) of this section, at least two employees shall be present while any employees perform the following types of work:
(ii) Paragraph (l)(2)(i) of this section does not apply to the following operations:
(3) Minimum approach distances.
(iii) The employer shall ensure that no employee approaches or takes any conductive object closer to exposed energized parts than the employer's established minimum approach distance, unless:
(4) Type of insulation.
(i) When an employee uses rubber insulating gloves as insulation from energized parts (under paragraph (l)(3)(iii)(A) of this section), the employer shall ensure that the employee also uses rubber insulating sleeves. However, an employee need not use rubber insulating sleeves if:
(ii) When an employee uses rubber insulating gloves or rubber insulating gloves and sleeves as insulation from energized parts (under paragraph (l)(3)(iii)(A) of this section), the employer shall ensure that the employee:
(5) Working position.
(6) Making connections. The employer shall ensure that employees make connections as follows:
(8) Protection from flames and electric arcs.
(iv) The employer shall ensure that the outer layer of clothing worn by an employee, except for clothing not required to be arc rated under paragraphs (l)(8)(v)(A) through (l)(8)(v)(E) of this section, is flame resistant under any of the following conditions:
(v) The employer shall ensure that each employee exposed to hazards from electric arcs wears protective clothing and other protective equipment with an arc rating greater than or equal to the heat energy estimated under paragraph (l)(8)(ii) of this section whenever that estimate exceeds 2.0 cal/cm 2. This protective equipment shall cover the employee's entire body, except as follows:
(vi) Dates.
(12) Opening and closing circuits under load.
(ii) The employer shall ensure that devices used by employees to close circuits under load conditions are designed to safely carry the current involved.
| For phase-to-phase system voltages of 50 V to 300 V: 1 | |
| MAD = avoid contact | |
| For phase-to-phase system voltages of 301 V to 5 kV: 1 | |
| MAD = M + D, where | |
| D = 0.02 m | the electrical component of the minimum approach distance. |
| M = 0.31 m for voltages up to 750 V and 0.61 m otherwise | the inadvertent movement factor. |
| For phase-to-phase system voltages of 5.1 kV to 72.5 kV: 1 4 | |
| MAD = M + AD, where | |
| M = 0.61 m | the inadvertent movement factor. |
| A = the applicable value from Table R-5 | the altitude correction factor. |
| D = the value from Table R-4 corresponding to the voltage and exposure or the value of the electrical component of the minimum approach distance calculated using the method provided in appendix B to this section | the electrical component of the minimum approach distance. |
| For phase-to-phase system voltages of more than 72.5 kV, nominal: 2 4 | |
| MAD = 0.3048(C + a)V L-G TA + M | |
| C = 0.01 for phase-to-ground exposures that the employer can demonstrate consist only of air across the approach distance (gap), | |
| 0.01 for phase-to-phase exposures if the employer can demonstrate that no insulated tool spans the gap and that no large conductive object is in the gap, or | |
| 0.011 otherwise | |
| VL-G = phase-to-ground rms voltage, in kV | |
| T = maximum anticipated per-unit transient overvoltage; for phase-to-ground exposures, T equals TL-G, the maximum per-unit transient overvoltage, phase-to-ground, determined by the employer under paragraph (l)(3)(ii) of this section; for phase-to-phase exposures, T equals 1.35TL-G + 0.45 | |
| A = altitude correction factor from Table R-5 | |
| M = 0.31 m, the inadvertent movement factor | |
| a = saturation factor, as follows: |
| Phase-to-Ground Exposures | |||||
| V Peak = T L-G V L-G√2 | 635 kV or less | 635.1 to 915 kV | 915.1 to 1,050 kV | More than 1,050 kV | |
| a | 0 | (V Peak-635)/140,000 | (V Peak-645)/135,000 | (V Peak-675)/125,000 | |
| Phase-to-Phase Exposures 3 | |||||
| V Peak = (1.35T L-G + 0.45)V L-G√2 | 630 kV or less | 630.1 to 848 kV | 848.1 to 1,131 kV | 1,131.1 to 1,485 kV | More than 1,485 kV |
| a | 0 | (V Peak-630)/155,000 | (V Peak-633.6)/152,207 | (V Peak-628)/153,846 | (V Peak-350.5)/203,666 |
| 1 Employers may use the minimum approach distances in Table R-6. If the worksite is at an elevation of more than 900 meters (3,000 feet), see footnote 1 to Table R-6. | |||||
| 2 Employers may use the minimum approach distances in Table R-7, except that the employer may not use the minimum approach distances in Table R-7 for phase-to-phase exposures if an insulated tool spans the gap or if any large conductive object is in the gap. If the worksite is at an elevation of more than 900 meters (3,000 feet), see footnote 1 to Table R-7. Employers may use the minimum approach distances in Table 14 through Table 21 in appendix B to this section, which calculated MAD for various values of T, provided the employer follows the notes to those tables. | |||||
| 3 Use the equations for phase-to-ground exposures (with V Peak for phase-to-phase exposures) unless the employer can demonstrate that no insulated tool spans the gap and that no large conductive object is in the gap. | |||||
| 4 Until March 31, 2015, employers may use the minimum approach distances in Table 6 through Table 13 in Appendix B to this section. |
| Nominal voltage (kV)phase-to-phase | Phase-to-ground exposure | Phase-to-phase exposure |
|---|---|---|
| D (m) | D (m) | |
| 5.1 to 15.0 | 0.04 | 0.07 |
| 15.1 to 36.0 | 0.16 | 0.28 |
| 36.1 to 46.0 | 0.23 | 0.37 |
| 46.1 to 72.5 | 0.39 | 0.59 |
| Altitude above sea level(m) | A |
|---|---|
| 0 to 900 | 1.00 |
| 901 to 1,200 | 1.02 |
| 1,201 to 1,500 | 1.05 |
| 1,501 to 1,800 | 1.08 |
| 1,801 to 2,100 | 1.11 |
| 2,101 to 2,400 | 1.14 |
| 2,401 to 2,700 | 1.17 |
| 2,701 to 3,000 | 1.20 |
| 3,001 to 3,600 | 1.25 |
| 3,601 to 4,200 | 1.30 |
| 4,201 to 4,800 | 1.35 |
| 4,801 to 5,400 | 1.39 |
| 5,401 to 6,000 | 1.44 |
| Nominal voltage (kV)phase-to-phase | Distance | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase-to-ground exposure | Phase-to-phase exposure | |||
| m | ft | m | ft | |
| 0.050 to 0.300 2 | Avoid Contact | Avoid Contact | ||
| 0.301 to 0.750 2 | 0.33 | 1.09 | 0.33 | 1.09 |
| 0.751 to 5.0 | 0.63 | 2.07 | 0.63 | 2.07 |
| 5.1 to 15.0 | 0.65 | 2.14 | 0.68 | 2.24 |
| 15.1 to 36.0 | 0.77 | 2.53 | 0.89 | 2.92 |
| 36.1 to 46.0 | 0.84 | 2.76 | 0.98 | 3.22 |
| 46.1 to 72.5 | 1.00 | 3.29 | 1.20 | 3.94 |
| 1 Employers may use the minimum approach distances in this table provided the worksite is at an elevation of 900 meters (3,000 feet) or less. If employees will be working at elevations greater than 900 meters (3,000 feet) above mean sea level, the employer shall determine minimum approach distances by multiplying the distances in this table by the correction factor in Table R-5 corresponding to the altitude of the work. | ||||
| 2 For single-phase systems, use voltage-to-ground. |
| Voltage range phase to phase (kV) | Phase-to-ground exposure | Phase-to-phase exposure | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| m | ft | m | ft | |
| 72.6 to 121.0 | 1.13 | 3.71 | 1.42 | 4.66 |
| 121.1 to 145.0 | 1.30 | 4.27 | 1.64 | 5.38 |
| 145.1 to 169.0 | 1.46 | 4.79 | 1.94 | 6.36 |
| 169.1 to 242.0 | 2.01 | 6.59 | 3.08 | 10.10 |
| 242.1 to 362.0 | 3.41 | 11.19 | 5.52 | 18.11 |
| 362.1 to 420.0 | 4.25 | 13.94 | 6.81 | 22.34 |
| 420.1 to 550.0 | 5.07 | 16.63 | 8.24 | 27.03 |
| 550.1 to 800.0 | 6.88 | 22.57 | 11.38 | 37.34 |
| 1 Employers may use the minimum approach distances in this table provided the worksite is at an elevation of 900 meters (3,000 feet) or less. If employees will be working at elevations greater than 900 meters (3,000 feet) above mean sea level, the employer shall determine minimum approach distances by multiplying the distances in this table by the correction factor in Table R-5 corresponding to the altitude of the work. | ||||
| 2 Employers may use the phase-to-phase minimum approach distances in this table provided that no insulated tool spans the gap and no large conductive object is in the gap. | ||||
| 3 The clear live-line tool distance shall equal or exceed the values for the indicated voltage ranges. |
| Maximum anticipated per-unittransient overvoltage | Distance (m)maximum line-to-ground voltage (kV) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 250 | 400 | 500 | 600 | 750 | |
| 1.5 or less | 1.12 | 1.60 | 2.06 | 2.62 | 3.61 |
| 1.6 | 1.17 | 1.69 | 2.24 | 2.86 | 3.98 |
| 1.7 | 1.23 | 1.82 | 2.42 | 3.12 | 4.37 |
| 1.8 | 1.28 | 1.95 | 2.62 | 3.39 | 4.79 |
| 1 The distances specified in this table are for air, bare-hand, and live-line tool conditions. If employees will be working at elevations greater than 900 meters (3,000 feet) above mean sea level, the employer shall determine minimum approach distances by multiplying the distances in this table by the correction factor in Table R-5 corresponding to the altitude of the work. |
| Voltage range(kV) | Type of current(ac or dc) | Assumedmaximum per-unit transientovervoltage |
|---|---|---|
| 72.6 to 420.0 | ac | 3.5 |
| 420.1 to 550.0 | ac | 3.0 |
| 550.1 to 800.0 | ac | 2.5 |
| 250 to 750 | dc | 1.8 |
(2) General.
(iv) If two or more crews will be working on the same lines or equipment, then:
(3) Deenergizing lines and equipment.
(iv) The employer need not use the tags mentioned in paragraphs (m)(3)(ii) and (m)(3)(iii) of this section on a network protector for work on the primary feeder for the network protector's associated network transformer when the employer can demonstrate all of the following conditions:
(x) To release a clearance, the employee in charge shall:
(2) General. For any employee to work transmission and distribution lines or equipment as deenergized, the employer shall ensure that the lines or equipment are deenergized under the provisions of paragraph (m) of this section and shall ensure proper grounding of the lines or equipment as specified in paragraphs (n)(3) through (n)(8) of this section. However, if the employer can demonstrate that installation of a ground is impracticable or that the conditions resulting from the installation of a ground would present greater hazards to employees than working without grounds, the lines and equipment may be treated as deenergized provided that the employer establishes that all of the following conditions apply:
(4) Protective grounding equipment.
(6) Connecting and removing grounds.
(2) General requirements.
(3) Safeguarding of test areas.
(iii) In field testing, or at a temporary test site not guarded by permanent fences and gates, the employer shall ensure the use of one of the following means to prevent employees without authorization from entering:
(4) Grounding practices.
(i) The employer shall establish and implement safe grounding practices for the test facility.
(iii) In high-power testing, the employer shall provide an isolated ground-return conductor system designed to prevent the intentional passage of current, with its attendant voltage rise, from occurring in the ground grid or in the earth. However, the employer need not provide an isolated ground-return conductor if the employer can demonstrate that both of the following conditions exist:
(v) The employer shall ensure that, when any employee enters the test area after equipment is deenergized, a ground is placed on the high-voltage terminal and any other exposed terminals.
(5) Control and measuring circuits.
(6) Safety check.
(ii) The test operator in charge shall conduct these routine safety checks before each series of tests and shall verify at least the following conditions:
(p) Mechanical equipment—(1) General requirements.
(ii) No motor vehicle or earthmoving or compacting equipment having an obstructed view to the rear may be operated on off-highway jobsites where any employee is exposed to the hazards created by the moving vehicle, unless:
(2) Outriggers.
(4) Operations near energized lines or equipment.
(iii) If, during operation of the mechanical equipment, that equipment could become energized, the operation also shall comply with at least one of paragraphs (p)(4)(iii)(A) through (p)(4)(iii)(C) of this section.
(C) Each employee shall be protected from hazards that could arise from mechanical equipment contact with energized lines or equipment. The measures used shall ensure that employees will not be exposed to hazardous differences in electric potential. Unless the employer can demonstrate that the methods in use protect each employee from the hazards that could arise if the mechanical equipment contacts the energized line or equipment, the measures used shall include all of the following techniques:
(1) Using the best available ground to minimize the time the lines or electric equipment remain energized,
(2) Bonding mechanical equipment together to minimize potential differences,
(3) Providing ground mats to extend areas of equipotential, and
(4) Employing insulating protective equipment or barricades to guard against any remaining hazardous electrical potential differences.
(q) Overhead lines and live-line barehand work. This paragraph provides additional requirements for work performed on or near overhead lines and equipment and for live-line barehand work.
(1) General.
(2) Installing and removing overhead lines. The following provisions apply to the installation and removal of overhead conductors or cable (overhead lines).
(ii) For conductors, cables, and pulling and tensioning equipment, the employer shall provide the protective measures required by paragraph (p)(4)(iii) of this section when employees are installing or removing a conductor or cable close enough to energized conductors that any of the following failures could energize the pulling or tensioning equipment or the conductor or cable being installed or removed:
(3) Live-line barehand work. In addition to other applicable provisions contained in this section, the following requirements apply to live-line barehand work:
(ii) Before any employee uses the live-line barehand technique on energized high-voltage conductors or parts, the employer shall ascertain the following information in addition to information about other existing conditions required by paragraph (a)(4) of this section:
(vii) The employer shall provide and ensure that employees use a conductive bucket liner or other conductive device for bonding the insulated aerial device to the energized line or equipment.
(ix) Aerial lifts used for live-line barehand work shall have dual controls (lower and upper) as follows:
(xiii) The employer shall ensure that employees perform a boom-current test before starting work each day, each time during the day when they encounter a higher voltage, and when changed conditions indicate a need for an additional test.
(4) Towers and structures. The following requirements apply to work performed on towers or other structures that support overhead lines.
(r) Line-clearance tree trimming. This paragraph provides additional requirements for line-clearance tree trimming and for equipment used in this type of work.
(1) Electrical hazards. This paragraph does not apply to qualified employees.
(ii) There shall be a second line-clearance tree trimmer within normal (that is, unassisted) voice communication under any of the following conditions:
(2) Brush chippers.
(3) Sprayers and related equipment.
(4) Stump cutters.
(5) Gasoline-engine power saws. Gasoline-engine power saw operations shall meet the requirements of § 1910.266(e) and the following:
(6) Backpack power units for use in pruning and clearing.
(7) Rope.
(s) Communication facilities—(1) Microwave transmission.
(t) Underground electrical installations. This paragraph provides additional requirements for work on underground electrical installations.
(2) Lowering equipment into manholes.
(3) Attendants for manholes and vaults.
(7) Protection against faults.
(u) Substations. This paragraph provides additional requirements for substations and for work performed in them.
(4) Guarding of rooms and other spaces containing electric supply equipment.
(i) Rooms and other spaces in which electric supply lines or equipment are installed shall meet the requirements of paragraphs (u)(4)(ii) through (u)(4)(v) of this section under the following conditions:
(C) If live parts operating at more than 600 volts to ground are within the room or other space, unless:
(1) The live parts are enclosed within grounded, metal-enclosed equipment whose only openings are designed so that foreign objects inserted in these openings will be deflected from energized parts, or
(2) The live parts are installed at a height, above ground and any other working surface, that provides protection at the voltage on the live parts corresponding to the protection provided by a 2.4-meter (8-foot) height at 50 volts.
(5) Guarding of energized parts.
(6) Substation entry.
(v) Power generation. This paragraph provides additional requirements and related work practices for power generating plants.
(1) Interlocks and other safety devices.
(4) Guarding of rooms and other spaces containing electric supply equipment.
(i) Rooms and other spaces in which electric supply lines or equipment are installed shall meet the requirements of paragraphs (v)(4)(ii) through (v)(4)(v) of this section under the following conditions:
(C) If live parts operating at more than 600 volts to ground are within the room or other space, unless:
(1) The live parts are enclosed within grounded, metal-enclosed equipment whose only openings are designed so that foreign objects inserted in these openings will be deflected from energized parts, or
(2) The live parts are installed at a height, above ground and any other working surface, that provides protection at the voltage on the live parts corresponding to the protection provided by a 2.4-meter (8-foot) height at 50 volts.
(5) Guarding of energized parts.
(6) Water or steam spaces. The following requirements apply to work in water and steam spaces associated with boilers:
(7) Chemical cleaning of boilers and pressure vessels. The following requirements apply to chemical cleaning of boilers and pressure vessels:
(i) Areas where chemical cleaning is in progress shall be cordoned off to restrict access during cleaning. If flammable liquids, gases, or vapors or combustible materials will be used or might be produced during the cleaning process, the following requirements also apply:
(8) Chlorine systems.
(9) Boilers.
(10) Turbine generators.
(11) Coal and ash handling.
(xi) Remotely and automatically controlled conveyors, and conveyors that have operating stations which are not manned or which are beyond voice and visual contact from drive areas, loading areas, transfer points, and other locations on the conveyor path not guarded by location, position, or guards shall be furnished with emergency stop buttons, pull cords, limit switches, or similar emergency stop devices. However, if the employer can demonstrate that the design, function, and operation of the conveyor do not expose an employee to hazards, an emergency stop device is not required.
(w) Special conditions—(1) Capacitors. The following additional requirements apply to work on capacitors and on lines connected to capacitors.
(3) Series streetlighting.
(5) Protection against drowning.
(6) Employee protection in public work areas.
(x) Definitions.
Affected employee. An employee whose job requires him or her to operate or use a machine or equipment on which servicing or maintenance is being performed under lockout or tagout, or whose job requires him or her to work in an area in which such servicing or maintenance is being performed.
Attendant. An employee assigned to remain immediately outside the entrance to an enclosed or other space to render assistance as needed to employees inside the space.
Authorized employee. An employee who locks out or tags out machines or equipment in order to perform servicing or maintenance on that machine or equipment. An affected employee becomes an authorized employee when that employee's duties include performing servicing or maintenance covered under this section.
Automatic circuit recloser. A self-controlled device for automatically interrupting and reclosing an alternating-current circuit, with a predetermined sequence of opening and reclosing followed by resetting, hold closed, or lockout.
Barricade. A physical obstruction such as tapes, cones, or A-frame type wood or metal structures that provides a warning about, and limits access to, a hazardous area.
Barrier. A physical obstruction that prevents contact with energized lines or equipment or prevents unauthorized access to a work area.
Bond. The electrical interconnection of conductive parts designed to maintain a common electric potential.
Bus. A conductor or a group of conductors that serve as a common connection for two or more circuits.
Bushing. An insulating structure that includes a through conductor or that provides a passageway for such a conductor, and that, when mounted on a barrier, insulates the conductor from the barrier for the purpose of conducting current from one side of the barrier to the other.
Cable. A conductor with insulation, or a stranded conductor with or without insulation and other coverings (single-conductor cable), or a combination of conductors insulated from one another (multiple-conductor cable).
Cable sheath. A conductive protective covering applied to cables.
Circuit. A conductor or system of conductors through which an electric current is intended to flow.
Clearance (between objects). The clear distance between two objects measured surface to surface.
Clearance (for work). Authorization to perform specified work or permission to enter a restricted area.
Communication lines. (See Lines; (1) Communication lines.)
Conductor. A material, usually in the form of a wire, cable, or bus bar, used for carrying an electric current.
Contract employer. An employer, other than a host employer, that performs work covered by this section under contract.
Covered conductor. A conductor covered with a dielectric having no rated insulating strength or having a rated insulating strength less than the voltage of the circuit in which the conductor is used.
Current-carrying part. A conducting part intended to be connected in an electric circuit to a source of voltage. Non-current-carrying parts are those not intended to be so connected.
Deenergized. Free from any electrical connection to a source of potential difference and from electric charge; not having a potential that is different from the potential of the earth.
Designated employee (designated person). An employee (or person) who is assigned by the employer to perform specific duties under the terms of this section and who has sufficient knowledge of the construction and operation of the equipment, and the hazards involved, to perform his or her duties safely.
Electric line truck. A truck used to transport personnel, tools, and material for electric supply line work.
Electric supply equipment. Equipment that produces, modifies, regulates, controls, or safeguards a supply of electric energy.
Electric supply lines. (See Lines; (2) Electric supply lines.)
Electric utility. An organization responsible for the installation, operation, or maintenance of an electric supply system.
Enclosed space. A working space, such as a manhole, vault, tunnel, or shaft, that has a limited means of egress or entry, that is designed for periodic employee entry under normal operating conditions, and that, under normal conditions, does not contain a hazardous atmosphere, but may contain a hazardous atmosphere under abnormal conditions.
Energized (alive, live). Electrically connected to a source of potential difference, or electrically charged so as to have a potential significantly different from that of earth in the vicinity.
Energy isolating device. A physical device that prevents the transmission or release of energy, including, but not limited to, the following: a manually operated electric circuit breaker, a disconnect switch, a manually operated switch, a slide gate, a slip blind, a line valve, blocks, and any similar device with a visible indication of the position of the device. (Push buttons, selector switches, and other control-circuit-type devices are not energy isolating devices.)
Energy source. Any electrical, mechanical, hydraulic, pneumatic, chemical, nuclear, thermal, or other energy source that could cause injury to employees.
Entry (as used in paragraph (e) of this section). The action by which a person passes through an opening into an enclosed space. Entry includes ensuing work activities in that space and is considered to have occurred as soon as any part of the entrant's body breaks the plane of an opening into the space.
Equipment (electric). A general term including material, fittings, devices, appliances, fixtures, apparatus, and the like used as part of or in connection with an electrical installation.
Exposed, Exposed to contact (as applied to energized parts). Not isolated or guarded.
Fall restraint system. A fall protection system that prevents the user from falling any distance.
First-aid training. Training in the initial care, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (which includes chest compressions, rescue breathing, and, as appropriate, other heart and lung resuscitation techniques), performed by a person who is not a medical practitioner, of a sick or injured person until definitive medical treatment can be administered.
Ground. A conducting connection, whether planned or unplanned, between an electric circuit or equipment and the earth, or to some conducting body that serves in place of the earth.
Grounded. Connected to earth or to some conducting body that serves in place of the earth.
Guarded. Covered, fenced, enclosed, or otherwise protected, by means of suitable covers or casings, barrier rails or screens, mats, or platforms, designed to minimize the possibility, under normal conditions, of dangerous approach or inadvertent contact by persons or objects.
Hazardous atmosphere. An atmosphere that may expose employees to the risk of death, incapacitation, impairment of ability to self-rescue (that is, escape unaided from an enclosed space), injury, or acute illness from one or more of the following causes:
(5) Any other atmospheric condition that is immediately dangerous to life or health.
High-power tests. Tests in which the employer uses fault currents, load currents, magnetizing currents, and line-dropping currents to test equipment, either at the equipment's rated voltage or at lower voltages.
High-voltage tests. Tests in which the employer uses voltages of approximately 1,000 volts as a practical minimum and in which the voltage source has sufficient energy to cause injury.
High wind. A wind of such velocity that one or more of the following hazards would be present:
(3) The wind would expose an employee to other hazards not controlled by the standard involved.
Host employer. An employer that operates, or that controls the operating procedures for, an electric power generation, transmission, or distribution installation on which a contract employer is performing work covered by this section.
Immediately dangerous to life or health (IDLH). Any condition that poses an immediate or delayed threat to life or that would cause irreversible adverse health effects or that would interfere with an individual's ability to escape unaided from a permit space.
Insulated. Separated from other conducting surfaces by a dielectric (including air space) offering a high resistance to the passage of current.
Insulation (cable). Material relied upon to insulate the conductor from other conductors or conducting parts or from ground.
Isolated. Not readily accessible to persons unless special means for access are used.
Line-clearance tree trimmer. An employee who, through related training or on-the-job experience or both, is familiar with the special techniques and hazards involved in line-clearance tree trimming.
Line-clearance tree trimming. The pruning, trimming, repairing, maintaining, removing, or clearing of trees, or the cutting of brush, that is within the following distance of electric supply lines and equipment:
(2) For voltages to ground of more than 50 kilovolts—3.05 meters (10 feet) plus 0.10 meters (4 inches) for every 10 kilovolts over 50 kilovolts.
Lines—(1) Communication lines. The conductors and their supporting or containing structures which are used for public or private signal or communication service, and which operate at potentials not exceeding 400 volts to ground or 750 volts between any two points of the circuit, and the transmitted power of which does not exceed 150 watts. If the lines are operating at less than 150 volts, no limit is placed on the transmitted power of the system. Under certain conditions, communication cables may include communication circuits exceeding these limitations where such circuits are also used to supply power solely to communication equipment.
(2) Electric supply lines. Conductors used to transmit electric energy and their necessary supporting or containing structures. Signal lines of more than 400 volts are always supply lines within this section, and those of less than 400 volts are considered as supply lines, if so run and operated throughout.
Manhole. A subsurface enclosure that personnel may enter and that is used for installing, operating, and maintaining submersible equipment or cable.
Minimum approach distance. The closest distance an employee may approach an energized or a grounded object.
Personal fall arrest system. A system used to arrest an employee in a fall from a working level.
Qualified employee (qualified person). An employee (person) knowledgeable in the construction and operation of the electric power generation, transmission, and distribution equipment involved, along with the associated hazards.
Statistical sparkover voltage. A transient overvoltage level that produces a 97.72-percent probability of sparkover (that is, two standard deviations above the voltage at which there is a 50-percent probability of sparkover).
Statistical withstand voltage. A transient overvoltage level that produces a 0.14-percent probability of sparkover (that is, three standard deviations below the voltage at which there is a 50-percent probability of sparkover).
Switch. A device for opening and closing or for changing the connection of a circuit. In this section, a switch is manually operable, unless otherwise stated.
System operator. A qualified person designated to operate the system or its parts.
Vault. An enclosure, above or below ground, that personnel may enter and that is used for installing, operating, or maintaining equipment or cable.
Vented vault. A vault that has provision for air changes using exhaust-flue stacks and low-level air intakes operating on pressure and temperature differentials that provide for airflow that precludes a hazardous atmosphere from developing.
Voltage. The effective (root mean square, or rms) potential difference between any two conductors or between a conductor and ground. This section expresses voltages in nominal values, unless otherwise indicated. The nominal voltage of a system or circuit is the value assigned to a system or circuit of a given voltage class for the purpose of convenient designation. The operating voltage of the system may vary above or below this value.
Work-positioning equipment. A body belt or body harness system rigged to allow an employee to be supported on an elevated vertical surface, such as a utility pole or tower leg, and work with both hands free while leaning.
Appendix A to § 1910.269—Flow Charts This appendix presents information, in the form of flow charts, that illustrates the scope and application of § 1910.269. This appendix addresses the interface between § 1910.269 and Subpart S of this Part (Electrical), between § 1910.269 and § 1910.146 (Permit-required confined spaces), and between § 1910.269 and § 1910.147 (The control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout)). These flow charts provide guidance for employers trying to implement the requirements of § 1910.269 in combination with other General Industry Standards contained in Part 1910. Employers should always consult the relevant standards, in conjunction with this appendix, to ensure compliance with all applicable requirements.

Appendix A-2 to § 1910.269—Application of § 1910.269 and Subpart S of this Part to Electrical Safety-Related Work Practices 1

| Compliance with Subpart S will comply with these paragraphs of § 1910.269 1 | Paragraphs that apply regardless of compliance with Subpart S 2 |
|---|---|
| (d), electric-shock hazards only | (a)(2), (a)(3) and (a)(4). |
| (h)(3) | (b) |
| (i)(2) and (i)(3) | (c) |
| (k) | (d), for other than electric-shock hazards. |
| (l)(1) through (l)(5), (l)(7), and (l)(10) through (l)(12) | (e) |
| (m) | (f) |
| (p)(4) | (g) |
| (s)(2) | (h)(1) and (h)(2). |
| (u)(1) and (u)(3) through (u)(5) | (i)(4) |
| (v)(3) through (v)(5) | (j) |
| (w)(1) and (w)(7) | (l)(6), (l)(8) and (l)(9). |
| (n) | |
| (o) | |
| (p)(1) through (p)(3). | |
| (q) | |
| (r) | |
| (s)(1) | |
| (t) | |
| (u)(2) and (u)(6) | |
| (v)(1), (v)(2), and (v)(6) through (v)(12). | |
| (w)(2) through (w)(6), (w)(8), and (w)(9). | |
| 1 If the electrical installation meets the requirements of §§ 1910.302 through 1910.308 of this part, then the electrical installation and any associated electrical safety-related work practices conforming to §§ 1910.332 through 1910.335 of this part are considered to comply with these provisions of § 1910.269 of this part. | |
| 2 These provisions include electrical safety and other requirements that must be met regardless of compliance with subpart S of this part. |



Appendix B to § 1910.269—Working on Exposed Energized Parts I. Introduction Electric utilities design electric power generation, transmission, and distribution installations to meet National Electrical Safety Code (NESC), ANSI C2, requirements. Electric utilities also design transmission and distribution lines to limit line outages as required by system reliability criteria 1 and to withstand the maximum overvoltages impressed on the system. Conditions such as switching surges, faults, and lightning can cause overvoltages. Electric utilities generally select insulator design and lengths and the clearances to structural parts so as to prevent outages from contaminated line insulation and during storms. Line insulator lengths and structural clearances have, over the years, come closer to the minimum approach distances used by workers. As minimum approach distances and structural clearances converge, it is increasingly important that system designers and system operating and maintenance personnel understand the concepts underlying minimum approach distances. 1 Federal, State, and local regulatory bodies and electric utilities set reliability requirements that limit the number and duration of system outages. The information in this appendix will assist employers in complying with the minimum approach-distance requirements contained in § 1910.269(l)(3) and (q)(3). Employers must use the technical criteria and methodology presented in this appendix in establishing minimum approach distances in accordance with § 1910.269(l)(3)(i) and Table R-3 and Table R-8. This appendix provides essential background information and technical criteria for the calculation of the required minimum approach distances for live-line work on electric power generation, transmission, and distribution installations. Unless an employer is using the maximum transient overvoltages specified in Table R-9 for voltages over 72.5 kilovolts, the employer must use persons knowledgeable in the techniques discussed in this appendix, and competent in the field of electric transmission and distribution system design, to determine the maximum transient overvoltage. II. General A. Definitions. The following definitions from § 1910.269(x) relate to work on or near electric power generation, transmission, and distribution lines and equipment and the electrical hazards they present. Exposed. . . . Not isolated or guarded. Guarded. Covered, fenced, enclosed, or otherwise protected, by means of suitable covers or casings, barrier rails or screens, mats, or platforms, designed to minimize the possibility, under normal conditions, of dangerous approach or inadvertent contact by persons or objects. Note to the definition of “guarded”: Wires that are insulated, but not otherwise protected, are not guarded. Insulated. Separated from other conducting surfaces by a dielectric (including air space) offering a high resistance to the passage of current. Note to the definition of “insulated”: When any object is said to be insulated, it is understood to be insulated for the conditions to which it normally is subjected. Otherwise, it is, for the purpose of this section, uninsulated. Isolated. Not readily accessible to persons unless special means for access are used. Statistical sparkover voltage. A transient overvoltage level that produces a 97.72-percent probability of sparkover (that is, two standard deviations above the voltage at which there is a 50-percent probability of sparkover). Statistical withstand voltage. A transient overvoltage level that produces a 0.14-percent probability of sparkover (that is, three standard deviations below the voltage at which there is a 50-percent probability of sparkover). B. Installations energized at 50 to 300 volts. The hazards posed by installations energized at 50 to 300 volts are the same as those found in many other workplaces. That is not to say that there is no hazard, but the complexity of electrical protection required does not compare to that required for high-voltage systems. The employee must avoid contact with the exposed parts, and the protective equipment used (such as rubber insulating gloves) must provide insulation for the voltages involved. C. Exposed energized parts over 300 volts AC. Paragraph (l)(3)(i) of § 1910.269 requires the employer to establish minimum approach distances no less than the distances computed by Table R-3 for ac systems so that employees can work safely without risk of sparkover. 2 2 Sparkover is a disruptive electric discharge in which an electric arc forms and electric current passes through air. Unless the employee is using electrical protective equipment, air is the insulating medium between the employee and energized parts. The distance between the employee and an energized part must be sufficient for the air to withstand the maximum transient overvoltage that can reach the worksite under the working conditions and practices the employee is using. This distance is the minimum air insulation distance, and it is equal to the electrical component of the minimum approach distance. Normal system design may provide or include a means (such as lightning arrestors) to control maximum anticipated transient overvoltages, or the employer may use temporary devices (portable protective gaps) or measures (such as preventing automatic circuit breaker reclosing) to achieve the same result. Paragraph (l)(3)(ii) of § 1910.269 requires the employer to determine the maximum anticipated per-unit transient overvoltage, phase-to-ground, through an engineering analysis or assume a maximum anticipated per-unit transient overvoltage, phase-to-ground, in accordance with Table R-9, which specifies the following maximums for ac systems: 72.6 to 420.0 kilovolts—3.5 per unit 420.1 to 550.0 kilovolts—3.0 per unit 550.1 to 800.0 kilovolts—2.5 per unit See paragraph IV.A.2, later in this appendix, for additional discussion of maximum transient overvoltages. D. Types of exposures. Employees working on or near energized electric power generation, transmission, and distribution systems face two kinds of exposures: Phase-to-ground and phase-to-phase. The exposure is phase-to-ground: (1) With respect to an energized part, when the employee is at ground potential or (2) with respect to ground, when an employee is at the potential of the energized part during live-line barehand work. The exposure is phase-to-phase, with respect to an energized part, when an employee is at the potential of another energized part (at a different potential) during live-line barehand work. III. Determination of Minimum Approach Distances for AC Voltages Greater Than 300 Volts A. Voltages of 301 to 5,000 volts. Test data generally forms the basis of minimum air insulation distances. The lowest voltage for which sufficient test data exists is 5,000 volts, and these data indicate that the minimum air insulation distance at that voltage is 20 millimeters (1 inch). Because the minimum air insulation distance increases with increasing voltage, and, conversely, decreases with decreasing voltage, an assumed minimum air insulation distance of 20 millimeters will protect against sparkover at voltages of 301 to 5,000 volts. Thus, 20 millimeters is the electrical component of the minimum approach distance for these voltages. B. Voltages of 5.1 to 72.5 kilovolts. For voltages from 5.1 to 72.5 kilovolts, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration bases the methodology for calculating the electrical component of the minimum approach distance on Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) Standard 4-1995, Standard Techniques for High-Voltage Testing. Table 1 lists the critical sparkover distances from that standard as listed in IEEE Std 516-2009, IEEE Guide for Maintenance Methods on Energized Power Lines. Table 1—Sparkover Distance for Rod-to-Rod Gap 60 Hz Rod-to-Rod sparkover(kV peak) Gap spacing from IEEE Std 4-1995(cm) 25 2 36 3 46 4 53 5 60 6 70 8 79 10 86 12 95 14 104 16 112 18 120 20 143 25 167 30 192 35 218 40 243 45 270 50 322 60 Source: IEEE Std 516-2009. To use this table to determine the electrical component of the minimum approach distance, the employer must determine the peak phase-to-ground transient overvoltage and select a gap from the table that corresponds to that voltage as a withstand voltage rather than a critical sparkover voltage. To calculate the electrical component of the minimum approach distance for voltages between 5 and 72.5 kilovolts, use the following procedure: 1. Divide the phase-to-phase voltage by the square root of 3 to convert it to a phase-to-ground voltage. 2. Multiply the phase-to-ground voltage by the square root of 2 to convert the rms value of the voltage to the peak phase-to-ground voltage. 3. Multiply the peak phase-to-ground voltage by the maximum per-unit transient overvoltage, which, for this voltage range, is 3.0, as discussed later in this appendix. This is the maximum phase-to-ground transient overvoltage, which corresponds to the withstand voltage for the relevant exposure. 3 3 The withstand voltage is the voltage at which sparkover is not likely to occur across a specified distance. It is the voltage taken at the 3σ point below the sparkover voltage, assuming that the sparkover curve follows a normal distribution. 4. Divide the maximum phase-to-ground transient overvoltage by 0.85 to determine the corresponding critical sparkover voltage. (The critical sparkover voltage is 3 standard deviations (or 15 percent) greater than the withstand voltage.) 5. Determine the electrical component of the minimum approach distance from Table 1 through interpolation. Table 2 illustrates how to derive the electrical component of the minimum approach distance for voltages from 5.1 to 72.5 kilovolts, before the application of any altitude correction factor, as explained later. Table 2—Calculating the Electrical Component of MAD 751 V to 72.5 kV Step Maximum system phase-to-phase voltage (kV) 15 36 46 72.5 1. Divide by √3 8.7 20.8 26.6 41.9 2. Multiply by √2 12.2 29.4 37.6 59.2 3. Multiply by 3.0 36.7 88.2 112.7 177.6 4. Divide by 0.85 43.2 103.7 132.6 208.9 5. Interpolate from Table 1 3 + (7.2/10)*1 14 + (8.7/9)*2 20 + (12.6/23)*5 35 + (16.9/26)*5 Electrical component of MAD (cm) 3.72 15.93 22.74 38.25 C. Voltages of 72.6 to 800 kilovolts. For voltages of 72.6 kilovolts to 800 kilovolts, this section bases the electrical component of minimum approach distances, before the application of any altitude correction factor, on the following formula: Equation 1—For Voltages of 72.6 kV to 800 kV D = 0.3048(C + a) VL-GT Where: D = Electrical component of the minimum approach distance in air in meters; C = a correction factor associated with the variation of gap sparkover with voltage; a = A factor relating to the saturation of air at system voltages of 345 kilovolts or higher; 4 4 Test data demonstrates that the saturation factor is greater than 0 at peak voltages of about 630 kilovolts. Systems operating at 345 kilovolts (or maximum system voltages of 362 kilovolts) can have peak maximum transient overvoltages exceeding 630 kilovolts. Table R-3 sets equations for calculating a based on peak voltage. VL-G = Maximum system line-to-ground rms voltage in kilovolts—it should be the “actual” maximum, or the normal highest voltage for the range (for example, 10 percent above the nominal voltage); and T = Maximum transient overvoltage factor in per unit. In Equation 1, C is 0.01: (1) For phase-to-ground exposures that the employer can demonstrate consist only of air across the approach distance (gap) and (2) for phase-to-phase exposures if the employer can demonstrate that no insulated tool spans the gap and that no large conductive object is in the gap. Otherwise, C is 0.011. In Equation 1, the term a varies depending on whether the employee's exposure is phase-to-ground or phase-to-phase and on whether objects are in the gap. The employer must use the equations in Table 3 to calculate a. Sparkover test data with insulation spanning the gap form the basis for the equations for phase-to-ground exposures, and sparkover test data with only air in the gap form the basis for the equations for phase-to-phase exposures. The phase-to-ground equations result in slightly higher values of a, and, consequently, produce larger minimum approach distances, than the phase-to-phase equations for the same value of VPeak. Table 3—Equations for Calculating the Surge Factor, a Phase-to-ground exposures V Peak = T L-G V L-G √2 635 kV or less 635.1 to 915 kV 915.1 to 1,050 kV a 0 (V Peak- 635)/140,000 (V Peak-645)/135,000 V Peak = T L-G V L-G√2 More than 1,050 kV a (V Peak-675)/125,000 Phase-to-phase exposures 1 V Peak = (1.35T L-G + 0.45)V L-G√2 630 kV or less 630.1 to 848 kV 848.1 to 1,131 kV a 0 (V Peak-630)/155,000 (V Peak-633.6)/152,207 V Peak = (1.35T L-G + 0.45)VL-G√2 1,131.1 to 1,485 kV More than 1,485 kV a (V Peak-628)/153,846 (V Peak-350.5)/203,666 1 Use the equations for phase-to-ground exposures (with V Peak for phase-to-phase exposures) unless the employer can demonstrate that no insulated tool spans the gap and that no large conductive object is in the gap. In Equation 1, T is the maximum transient overvoltage factor in per unit. As noted earlier, § 1910.269(l)(3)(ii) requires the employer to determine the maximum anticipated per-unit transient overvoltage, phase-to-ground, through an engineering analysis or assume a maximum anticipated per-unit transient overvoltage, phase-to-ground, in accordance with Table R-9. For phase-to-ground exposures, the employer uses this value, called TL-G, as T in Equation 1. IEEE Std 516-2009 provides the following formula to calculate the phase-to-phase maximum transient overvoltage, TL-L, from TL-G: TL-L = 1.35TL-G + 0.45 For phase-to-phase exposures, the employer uses this value as T in Equation 1. D. Provisions for inadvertent movement. The minimum approach distance must include an “adder” to compensate for the inadvertent movement of the worker relative to an energized part or the movement of the part relative to the worker. This “adder” must account for this possible inadvertent movement and provide the worker with a comfortable and safe zone in which to work. Employers must add the distance for inadvertent movement (called the “ergonomic component of the minimum approach distance”) to the electrical component to determine the total safe minimum approach distances used in live-line work. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration based the ergonomic component of the minimum approach distance on response time-distance analysis. This technique uses an estimate of the total response time to a hazardous incident and converts that time to the distance traveled. For example, the driver of a car takes a given amount of time to respond to a “stimulus” and stop the vehicle. The elapsed time involved results in the car's traveling some distance before coming to a complete stop. This distance depends on the speed of the car at the time the stimulus appears and the reaction time of the driver. In the case of live-line work, the employee must first perceive that he or she is approaching the danger zone. Then, the worker responds to the danger and must decelerate and stop all motion toward the energized part. During the time it takes to stop, the employee will travel some distance. This is the distance the employer must add to the electrical component of the minimum approach distance to obtain the total safe minimum approach distance. At voltages from 751 volts to 72.5 kilovolts, 5 the electrical component of the minimum approach distance is smaller than the ergonomic component. At 72.5 kilovolts, the electrical component is only a little more than 0.3 meters (1 foot). An ergonomic component of the minimum approach distance must provide for all the worker's unanticipated movements. At these voltages, workers generally use rubber insulating gloves; however, these gloves protect only a worker's hands and arms. Therefore, the energized object must be at a safe approach distance to protect the worker's face. In this case, 0.61 meters (2 feet) is a sufficient and practical ergonomic component of the minimum approach distance. 5 For voltages of 50 to 300 volts, Table R-3 specifies a minimum approach distance of “avoid contact.” The minimum approach distance for this voltage range contains neither an electrical component nor an ergonomic component. For voltages between 72.6 and 800 kilovolts, employees must use different work practices during energized line work. Generally, employees use live-line tools (hot sticks) to perform work on energized equipment. These tools, by design, keep the energized part at a constant distance from the employee and, thus, maintain the appropriate minimum approach distance automatically. The location of the worker and the type of work methods the worker is using also influence the length of the ergonomic component of the minimum approach distance. In this higher voltage range, the employees use work methods that more tightly control their movements than when the workers perform work using rubber insulating gloves. The worker, therefore, is farther from the energized line or equipment and must be more precise in his or her movements just to perform the work. For these reasons, this section adopts an ergonomic component of the minimum approach distance of 0.31 m (1 foot) for voltages between 72.6 and 800 kilovolts. Table 4 summarizes the ergonomic component of the minimum approach distance for various voltage ranges. Table 4—Ergonomic Component of Minimum Approach Distance Voltage range (kV) Distance m ft 0.301 to 0.750 0.31 1.0 0.751 to 72.5 0.61 2.0 72.6 to 800 0.31 1.0 Note: The employer must add this distance to the electrical component of the minimum approach distance to obtain the full minimum approach distance. The ergonomic component of the minimum approach distance accounts for errors in maintaining the minimum approach distance (which might occur, for example, if an employee misjudges the length of a conductive object he or she is holding), and for errors in judging the minimum approach distance. The ergonomic component also accounts for inadvertent movements by the employee, such as slipping. In contrast, the working position selected to properly maintain the minimum approach distance must account for all of an employee's reasonably likely movements and still permit the employee to adhere to the applicable minimum approach distance. (See Figure 1.) Reasonably likely movements include an employee's adjustments to tools, equipment, and working positions and all movements needed to perform the work. For example, the employee should be able to perform all of the following actions without straying into the minimum approach distance: • Adjust his or her hardhat, • maneuver a tool onto an energized part with a reasonable amount of overreaching or underreaching, • reach for and handle tools, material, and equipment passed to him or her, and • adjust tools, and replace components on them, when necessary during the work procedure. The training of qualified employees required under § 1910.269(a)(2), and the job planning and briefing required under § 1910.269(c), must address selection of a proper working position.
E. Miscellaneous correction factors. Changes in the air medium that forms the insulation influences the strength of an air gap. A brief discussion of each factor follows. 1. Dielectric strength of air. The dielectric strength of air in a uniform electric field at standard atmospheric conditions is approximately 3 kilovolts per millimeter. 6 The pressure, temperature, and humidity of the air, the shape, dimensions, and separation of the electrodes, and the characteristics of the applied voltage (wave shape) affect the disruptive gradient. 6 For the purposes of estimating arc length, § 1910.269 generally assumes a more conservative dielectric strength of 10 kilovolts per 25.4 millimeters, consistent with assumptions made in consensus standards such as the National Electrical Safety Code (IEEE C2-2012). The more conservative value accounts for variables such as electrode shape, wave shape, and a certain amount of overvoltage. 2. Atmospheric effect. The empirically determined electrical strength of a given gap is normally applicable at standard atmospheric conditions (20 °C, 101.3 kilopascals, 11 grams/cubic centimeter humidity). An increase in the density (humidity) of the air inhibits sparkover for a given air gap. The combination of temperature and air pressure that results in the lowest gap sparkover voltage is high temperature and low pressure. This combination of conditions is not likely to occur. Low air pressure, generally associated with high humidity, causes increased electrical strength. An average air pressure generally correlates with low humidity. Hot and dry working conditions normally result in reduced electrical strength. The equations for minimum approach distances in Table R-3 assume standard atmospheric conditions. 3. Altitude. The reduced air pressure at high altitudes causes a reduction in the electrical strength of an air gap. An employer must increase the minimum approach distance by about 3 percent per 300 meters (1,000 feet) of increased altitude for altitudes above 900 meters (3,000 feet). Table R-5 specifies the altitude correction factor that the employer must use in calculating minimum approach distances. IV. Determining Minimum Approach Distances A. Factors Affecting Voltage Stress at the Worksite 1. System voltage (nominal). The nominal system voltage range determines the voltage for purposes of calculating minimum approach distances. The employer selects the range in which the nominal system voltage falls, as given in the relevant table, and uses the highest value within that range in per-unit calculations. 2. Transient overvoltages. Operation of switches or circuit breakers, a fault on a line or circuit or on an adjacent circuit, and similar activities may generate transient overvoltages on an electrical system. Each overvoltage has an associated transient voltage wave shape. The wave shape arriving at the site and its magnitude vary considerably. In developing requirements for minimum approach distances, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration considered the most common wave shapes and the magnitude of transient overvoltages found on electric power generation, transmission, and distribution systems. The equations in Table R-3 for minimum approach distances use per-unit maximum transient overvoltages, which are relative to the nominal maximum voltage of the system. For example, a maximum transient overvoltage value of 3.0 per unit indicates that the highest transient overvoltage is 3.0 times the nominal maximum system voltage. 3. Typical magnitude of overvoltages. Table 5 lists the magnitude of typical transient overvoltages. Table 5—Magnitude of Typical Transient Overvoltages Cause Magnitude(per unit) Energized 200-mile line without closing resistors 3.5 Energized 200-mile line with one-step closing resistor 2.1 Energized 200-mile line with multistep resistor 2.5 Reclosing with trapped charge one-step resistor 2.2 Opening surge with single restrike 3.0 Fault initiation unfaulted phase 2.1 Fault initiation adjacent circuit 2.5 Fault clearing 1.7 to 1.9 4. Standard deviation—air-gap withstand. For each air gap length under the same atmospheric conditions, there is a statistical variation in the breakdown voltage. The probability of breakdown against voltage has a normal (Gaussian) distribution. The standard deviation of this distribution varies with the wave shape, gap geometry, and atmospheric conditions. The withstand voltage of the air gap is three standard deviations (3σ) below the critical sparkover voltage. (The critical sparkover voltage is the crest value of the impulse wave that, under specified conditions, causes sparkover 50 percent of the time. An impulse wave of three standard deviations below this value, that is, the withstand voltage, has a probability of sparkover of approximately 1 in 1,000.) 5. Broken Insulators. Tests show reductions in the insulation strength of insulator strings with broken skirts. Broken units may lose up to 70 percent of their withstand capacity. Because an employer cannot determine the insulating capability of a broken unit without testing it, the employer must consider damaged units in an insulator to have no insulating value. Additionally, the presence of a live-line tool alongside an insulator string with broken units may further reduce the overall insulating strength. The number of good units that must be present in a string for it to be “insulated” as defined by § 1910.269(x) depends on the maximum overvoltage possible at the worksite. B. Minimum Approach Distances Based on Known, Maximum-Anticipated Per-Unit Transient Overvoltages 1. Determining the minimum approach distance for AC systems. Under § 1910.269(l)(3)(ii), the employer must determine the maximum anticipated per-unit transient overvoltage, phase-to-ground, through an engineering analysis or must assume a maximum anticipated per-unit transient overvoltage, phase-to-ground, in accordance with Table R-9. When the employer conducts an engineering analysis of the system and determines that the maximum transient overvoltage is lower than specified by Table R-9, the employer must ensure that any conditions assumed in the analysis, for example, that employees block reclosing on a circuit or install portable protective gaps, are present during energized work. To ensure that these conditions are present, the employer may need to institute new live-work procedures reflecting the conditions and limitations set by the engineering analysis. 2. Calculation of reduced approach distance values. An employer may take the following steps to reduce minimum approach distances when the maximum transient overvoltage on the system (that is, the maximum transient overvoltage without additional steps to control overvoltages) produces unacceptably large minimum approach distances: Step 1. Determine the maximum voltage (with respect to a given nominal voltage range) for the energized part. Step 2. Determine the technique to use to control the maximum transient overvoltage. (See paragraphs IV.C and IV.D of this appendix.) Determine the maximum transient overvoltage that can exist at the worksite with that form of control in place and with a confidence level of 3σ. This voltage is the withstand voltage for the purpose of calculating the appropriate minimum approach distance. Step 3. Direct employees to implement procedures to ensure that the control technique is in effect during the course of the work. Step 4. Using the new value of transient overvoltage in per unit, calculate the required minimum approach distance from Table R-3. C. Methods of Controlling Possible Transient Overvoltage Stress Found on a System 1. Introduction. There are several means of controlling overvoltages that occur on transmission systems. For example, the employer can modify the operation of circuit breakers or other switching devices to reduce switching transient overvoltages. Alternatively, the employer can hold the overvoltage to an acceptable level by installing surge arresters or portable protective gaps on the system. In addition, the employer can change the transmission system to minimize the effect of switching operations. Section 4.8 of IEEE Std 516-2009 describes various ways of controlling, and thereby reducing, maximum transient overvoltages. 2. Operation of circuit breakers. 7 The maximum transient overvoltage that can reach the worksite is often the result of switching on the line on which employees are working. Disabling automatic reclosing during energized line work, so that the line will not be reenergized after being opened for any reason, limits the maximum switching surge overvoltage to the larger of the opening surge or the greatest possible fault-generated surge, provided that the devices (for example, insertion resistors) are operable and will function to limit the transient overvoltage and that circuit breaker restrikes do not occur. The employer must ensure the proper functioning of insertion resistors and other overvoltage-limiting devices when the employer's engineering analysis assumes their proper operation to limit the overvoltage level. If the employer cannot disable the reclosing feature (because of system operating conditions), other methods of controlling the switching surge level may be necessary. 7 The detailed design of a circuit interrupter, such as the design of the contacts, resistor insertion, and breaker timing control, are beyond the scope of this appendix. The design of the system generally accounts for these features. This appendix only discusses features that can limit the maximum switching transient overvoltage on a system. Transient surges on an adjacent line, particularly for double circuit construction, may cause a significant overvoltage on the line on which employees are working. The employer's engineering analysis must account for coupling to adjacent lines. 3. Surge arresters. The use of modern surge arresters allows a reduction in the basic impulse-insulation levels of much transmission system equipment. The primary function of early arresters was to protect the system insulation from the effects of lightning. Modern arresters not only dissipate lightning-caused transients, but may also control many other system transients caused by switching or faults. The employer may use properly designed arresters to control transient overvoltages along a transmission line and thereby reduce the requisite length of the insulator string and possibly the maximum transient overvoltage on the line. 8 8 Surge arrester application is beyond the scope of this appendix. However, if the employer installs the arrester near the work site, the application would be similar to the protective gaps discussed in paragraph IV.D of this appendix. 4. Switching Restrictions. Another form of overvoltage control involves establishing switching restrictions, whereby the employer prohibits the operation of circuit breakers until certain system conditions are present. The employer restricts switching by using a tagging system, similar to that used for a permit, except that the common term used for this activity is a “hold-off” or “restriction.” These terms indicate that the restriction does not prevent operation, but only modifies the operation during the live-work activity. D. Minimum Approach Distance Based on Control of Maximum Transient Overvoltage at the Worksite When the employer institutes control of maximum transient overvoltage at the worksite by installing portable protective gaps, the employer may calculate the minimum approach distance as follows: Step 1. Select the appropriate withstand voltage for the protective gap based on system requirements and an acceptable probability of gap sparkover. 9 9 The employer should check the withstand voltage to ensure that it results in a probability of gap flashover that is acceptable from a system outage perspective. (In other words, a gap sparkover will produce a system outage. The employer should determine whether such an outage will impact overall system performance to an acceptable degree.) In general, the withstand voltage should be at least 1.25 times the maximum crest operating voltage. Step 2. Determine a gap distance that provides a withstand voltage 10 greater than or equal to the one selected in the first step. 11 10 The manufacturer of the gap provides, based on test data, the critical sparkover voltage for each gap spacing (for example, a critical sparkover voltage of 665 kilovolts for a gap spacing of 1.2 meters). The withstand voltage for the gap is equal to 85 percent of its critical sparkover voltage. 11 Switch steps 1 and 2 if the length of the protective gap is known. Step 3. Use 110 percent of the gap's critical sparkover voltage to determine the phase-to-ground peak voltage at gap sparkover (VPPG Peak). Step 4. Determine the maximum transient overvoltage, phase-to-ground, at the worksite from the following formula:
Step 5. Use this value of T 12 in the equation in Table R-3 to obtain the minimum approach distance. If the worksite is no more than 900 meters (3,000 feet) above sea level, the employer may use this value of T to determine the minimum approach distance from Table 14 through Table 21. 12 IEEE Std 516-2009 states that most employers add 0.2 to the calculated value of T as an additional safety factor. Note: All rounding must be to the next higher value (that is, always round up). Sample protective gap calculations. Problem: Employees are to perform work on a 500-kilovolt transmission line at sea level that is subject to transient overvoltages of 2.4 p.u. The maximum operating voltage of the line is 550 kilovolts. Determine the length of the protective gap that will provide the minimum practical safe approach distance. Also, determine what that minimum approach distance is. Step 1. Calculate the smallest practical maximum transient overvoltage (1.25 times the crest phase-to-ground voltage): 13 13 To eliminate sparkovers due to minor system disturbances, the employer should use a withstand voltage no lower than 1.25 p.u. Note that this is a practical, or operational, consideration only. It may be feasible for the employer to use lower values of withstand voltage.
This value equals the withstand voltage of the protective gap. Step 2. Using test data for a particular protective gap, select a gap that has a critical sparkover voltage greater than or equal to: 561kV ÷ 0.85 = 660kV For example, if a protective gap with a 1.22-m (4.0-foot) spacing tested to a critical sparkover voltage of 665 kilovolts (crest), select this gap spacing. Step 3. The phase-to-ground peak voltage at gap sparkover (VPPG Peak) is 110 percent of the value from the previous step: 665kV × 1.10 = 732kV This value corresponds to the withstand voltage of the electrical component of the minimum approach distance. Step 4. Use this voltage to determine the worksite value of T:
Step 5. Use this value of T in the equation in Table R-3 to obtain the minimum approach distance, or look up the minimum approach distance in Table 14 through Table 21: MAD = 2.29m (7.6 ft). E. Location of Protective Gaps 1. Adjacent structures. The employer may install the protective gap on a structure adjacent to the worksite, as this practice does not significantly reduce the protection afforded by the gap. 2. Terminal stations. Gaps installed at terminal stations of lines or circuits provide a level of protection; however, that level of protection may not extend throughout the length of the line to the worksite. The use of substation terminal gaps raises the possibility that separate surges could enter the line at opposite ends, each with low enough magnitude to pass the terminal gaps without sparkover. When voltage surges occur simultaneously at each end of a line and travel toward each other, the total voltage on the line at the point where they meet is the arithmetic sum of the two surges. A gap installed within 0.8 km (0.5 mile) of the worksite will protect against such intersecting waves. Engineering studies of a particular line or system may indicate that employers can adequately protect employees by installing gaps at even more distant locations. In any event, unless using the default values for T from Table R-9, the employer must determine T at the worksite. 3. Worksite. If the employer installs protective gaps at the worksite, the gap setting establishes the worksite impulse insulation strength. Lightning strikes as far as 6 miles from the worksite can cause a voltage surge greater than the gap withstand voltage, and a gap sparkover can occur. In addition, the gap can sparkover from overvoltages on the line that exceed the withstand voltage of the gap. Consequently, the employer must protect employees from hazards resulting from any sparkover that could occur. F. Disabling automatic reclosing. There are two reasons to disable the automatic-reclosing feature of circuit-interrupting devices while employees are performing live-line work: • To prevent reenergization of a circuit faulted during the work, which could create a hazard or result in more serious injuries or damage than the injuries or damage produced by the original fault; • To prevent any transient overvoltage caused by the switching surge that would result if the circuit were reenergized. However, due to system stability considerations, it may not always be feasible to disable the automatic-reclosing feature. V. Minimum Approach-Distance Tables A. Legacy tables. Employers may use the minimum approach distances in Table 6 through Table 13 until March 31, 2015.
| Voltage range phase to phase (kV) | Phase-to-ground exposure | Phase-to-phase exposure | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| m | ft | m | ft | |
| 0.05 to 1.0 | Avoid Contact | Avoid Contact | ||
| 1.1 to 15.0 | 0.64 | 2.10 | 0.66 | 2.20 |
| 15.1 to 36.0 | 0.72 | 2.30 | 0.77 | 2.60 |
| 36.1 to 46.0 | 0.77 | 2.60 | 0.85 | 2.80 |
| 46.1 to 72.5 | 0.90 | 3.00 | 1.05 | 3.50 |
| 72.6 to 121 | 0.95 | 3.20 | 1.29 | 4.30 |
| 138 to 145 | 1.09 | 3.60 | 1.50 | 4.90 |
| 161 to 169 | 1.22 | 4.00 | 1.71 | 5.70 |
| 230 to 242 | 1.59 | 5.30 | 2.27 | 7.50 |
| 345 to 362 | 2.59 | 8.50 | 3.80 | 12.50 |
| 500 to 550 | 3.42 | 11.30 | 5.50 | 18.10 |
| 765 to 800 | 4.53 | 14.90 | 7.91 | 26.00 |
| Note: The clear live-line tool distance must equal or exceed the values for the indicated voltage ranges. |
| T (p.u.) | Phase-to-ground exposure | Phase-to-phase exposure | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| m | ft | m | ft | |
| 2.0 | 0.74 | 2.42 | 1.09 | 3.58 |
| 2.1 | 0.76 | 2.50 | 1.09 | 3.58 |
| 2.2 | 0.79 | 2.58 | 1.12 | 3.67 |
| 2.3 | 0.81 | 2.67 | 1.14 | 3.75 |
| 2.4 | 0.84 | 2.75 | 1.17 | 3.83 |
| 2.5 | 0.84 | 2.75 | 1.19 | 3.92 |
| 2.6 | 0.86 | 2.83 | 1.22 | 4.00 |
| 2.7 | 0.89 | 2.92 | 1.24 | 4.08 |
| 2.8 | 0.91 | 3.00 | 1.24 | 4.08 |
| 2.9 | 0.94 | 3.08 | 1.27 | 4.17 |
| 3.0 | 0.97 | 3.17 | 1.30 | 4.25 |
| Note 1: The employer may apply the distance specified in this table only where the employer determines the maximum anticipated per-unit transient overvoltage by engineering analysis. (Table 6 applies otherwise.) | ||||
| Note 2: The distances specified in this table are the air, bare-hand, and live-line tool distances. |
| T (p.u.) | Phase-to-ground exposure | Phase-to-phase exposure | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| m | ft | m | ft | |
| 2.0 | 0.84 | 2.75 | 1.24 | 4.08 |
| 2.1 | 0.86 | 2.83 | 1.27 | 4.17 |
| 2.2 | 0.89 | 2.92 | 1.30 | 4.25 |
| 2.3 | 0.91 | 3.00 | 1.32 | 4.33 |
| 2.4 | 0.94 | 3.08 | 1.35 | 4.42 |
| 2.5 | 0.97 | 3.17 | 1.37 | 4.50 |
| 2.6 | 0.99 | 3.25 | 1.40 | 4.58 |
| 2.7 | 1.02 | 3.33 | 1.42 | 4.67 |
| 2.8 | 1.04 | 3.42 | 1.45 | 4.75 |
| 2.9 | 1.07 | 3.50 | 1.47 | 4.83 |
| 3.0 | 1.09 | 3.58 | 1.50 | 4.92 |
| Note 1: The employer may apply the distance specified in this table only where the employer determines the maximum anticipated per-unit transient overvoltage by engineering analysis. (Table 6 applies otherwise.) | ||||
| Note 2: The distances specified in this table are the air, bare-hand, and live-line tool distances. |
| T (p.u.) | Phase-to-ground exposure | Phase-to-phase exposure | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| m | ft | m | ft | |
| 2.0 | 0.91 | 3.00 | 1.42 | 4.67 |
| 2.1 | 0.97 | 3.17 | 1.45 | 4.75 |
| 2.2 | 0.99 | 3.25 | 1.47 | 4.83 |
| 2.3 | 1.02 | 3.33 | 1.50 | 4.92 |
| 2.4 | 1.04 | 3.42 | 1.52 | 5.00 |
| 2.5 | 1.07 | 3.50 | 1.57 | 5.17 |
| 2.6 | 1.12 | 3.67 | 1.60 | 5.25 |
| 2.7 | 1.14 | 3.75 | 1.63 | 5.33 |
| 2.8 | 1.17 | 3.83 | 1.65 | 5.42 |
| 2.9 | 1.19 | 3.92 | 1.68 | 5.50 |
| 3.0 | 1.22 | 4.00 | 1.73 | 5.67 |
| Note 1: The employer may apply the distance specified in this table only where the employer determines the maximum anticipated per-unit transient overvoltage by engineering analysis. (Table 6 applies otherwise.) | ||||
| Note 2: The distances specified in this table are the air, bare-hand, and live-line tool distances. |
| T (p.u.) | Phase-to-ground exposure | Phase-to-phase exposure | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| m | ft | m | ft | |
| 2.0 | 1.17 | 3.83 | 1.85 | 6.08 |
| 2.1 | 1.22 | 4.00 | 1.91 | 6.25 |
| 2.2 | 1.24 | 4.08 | 1.93 | 6.33 |
| 2.3 | 1.30 | 4.25 | 1.98 | 6.50 |
| 2.4 | 1.35 | 4.42 | 2.01 | 6.58 |
| 2.5 | 1.37 | 4.50 | 2.06 | 6.75 |
| 2.6 | 1.42 | 4.67 | 2.11 | 6.92 |
| 2.7 | 1.47 | 4.83 | 2.13 | 7.00 |
| 2.8 | 1.50 | 4.92 | 2.18 | 7.17 |
| 2.9 | 1.55 | 5.08 | 2.24 | 7.33 |
| 3.0 | 1.60 | 5.25 | 2.29 | 7.50 |
| Note 1: The employer may apply the distance specified in this table only where the employer determines the maximum anticipated per-unit transient overvoltage by engineering analysis. (Table 6 applies otherwise.) | ||||
| Note 2: The distances specified in this table are the air, bare-hand, and live-line tool distances. |
| T (p.u.) | Phase-to-ground exposure | Phase-to-phase exposure | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| m | ft | m | ft | |
| 2.0 | 1.60 | 5.25 | 2.62 | 8.58 |
| 2.1 | 1.65 | 5.42 | 2.69 | 8.83 |
| 2.2 | 1.75 | 5.75 | 2.79 | 9.17 |
| 2.3 | 1.85 | 6.08 | 2.90 | 9.50 |
| 2.4 | 1.93 | 6.33 | 3.02 | 9.92 |
| 2.5 | 2.03 | 6.67 | 3.15 | 10.33 |
| 2.6 | 2.16 | 7.08 | 3.28 | 10.75 |
| 2.7 | 2.26 | 7.42 | 3.40 | 11.17 |
| 2.8 | 2.36 | 7.75 | 3.53 | 11.58 |
| 2.9 | 2.49 | 8.17 | 3.68 | 12.08 |
| 3.0 | 2.59 | 8.50 | 3.81 | 12.50 |
| Note 1: The employer may apply the distance specified in this table only where the employer determines the maximum anticipated per-unit transient overvoltage by engineering analysis. (Table 6 applies otherwise.) | ||||
| Note 2: The distances specified in this table are the air, bare-hand, and live-line tool distances. |
| T (p.u.) | Phase-to-ground exposure | Phase-to-phase exposure | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| m | ft | m | ft | |
| 1.5 | 1.83 | 6.00 | 2.24 | 7.33 |
| 1.6 | 1.98 | 6.50 | 2.67 | 8.75 |
| 1.7 | 2.13 | 7.00 | 3.10 | 10.17 |
| 1.8 | 2.31 | 7.58 | 3.53 | 11.58 |
| 1.9 | 2.46 | 8.08 | 4.01 | 13.17 |
| 2.0 | 2.67 | 8.75 | 4.52 | 14.83 |
| 2.1 | 2.84 | 9.33 | 4.75 | 15.58 |
| 2.2 | 3.02 | 9.92 | 4.98 | 16.33 |
| 2.3 | 3.20 | 10.50 | 5.23 | 17.17 |
| 2.4 | 3.43 | 11.25 | 5.51 | 18.08 |
| Note 1: The employer may apply the distance specified in this table only where the employer determines the maximum anticipated per-unit transient overvoltage by engineering analysis. (Table 6 applies otherwise.) | ||||
| Note 2: The distances specified in this table are the air, bare-hand, and live-line tool distances. |
| T (p.u.) | Phase-to-ground exposure | Phase-to-phase exposure | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| m | ft | m | ft | |
| 1.5 | 2.95 | 9.67 | 3.68 | 12.08 |
| 1.6 | 3.25 | 10.67 | 4.42 | 14.50 |
| 1.7 | 3.56 | 11.67 | 5.23 | 17.17 |
| 1.8 | 3.86 | 12.67 | 6.07 | 19.92 |
| 1.9 | 4.19 | 13.75 | 6.99 | 22.92 |
| 2.0 | 4.55 | 14.92 | 7.92 | 26.00 |
| Note 1: The employer may apply the distance specified in this table only where the employer determines the maximum anticipated per-unit transient overvoltage by engineering analysis. (Table 6 applies otherwise.) | ||||
| Note 2: The distances specified in this table are the air, bare-hand, and live-line tool distances. |
B. Alternative minimum approach distances. Employers may use the minimum approach distances in Table 14 through Table 21 provided that the employer follows the notes to those tables.
| T (p.u.) | Phase-to-ground exposure | Phase-to-phase exposure | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| m | ft | m | ft | |
| 1.5 | 0.67 | 2.2 | 0.84 | 2.8 |
| 1.6 | 0.69 | 2.3 | 0.87 | 2.9 |
| 1.7 | 0.71 | 2.3 | 0.90 | 3.0 |
| 1.8 | 0.74 | 2.4 | 0.93 | 3.1 |
| 1.9 | 0.76 | 2.5 | 0.96 | 3.1 |
| 2.0 | 0.78 | 2.6 | 0.99 | 3.2 |
| 2.1 | 0.81 | 2.7 | 1.01 | 3.3 |
| 2.2 | 0.83 | 2.7 | 1.04 | 3.4 |
| 2.3 | 0.85 | 2.8 | 1.07 | 3.5 |
| 2.4 | 0.88 | 2.9 | 1.10 | 3.6 |
| 2.5 | 0.90 | 3.0 | 1.13 | 3.7 |
| 2.6 | 0.92 | 3.0 | 1.16 | 3.8 |
| 2.7 | 0.95 | 3.1 | 1.19 | 3.9 |
| 2.8 | 0.97 | 3.2 | 1.22 | 4.0 |
| 2.9 | 0.99 | 3.2 | 1.24 | 4.1 |
| 3.0 | 1.02 | 3.3 | 1.27 | 4.2 |
| 3.1 | 1.04 | 3.4 | 1.30 | 4.3 |
| 3.2 | 1.06 | 3.5 | 1.33 | 4.4 |
| 3.3 | 1.09 | 3.6 | 1.36 | 4.5 |
| 3.4 | 1.11 | 3.6 | 1.39 | 4.6 |
| 3.5 | 1.13 | 3.7 | 1.42 | 4.7 |
| T (p.u.) | Phase-to-ground exposure | Phase-to-phase exposure | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| m | ft | m | ft | |
| 1.5 | 0.74 | 2.4 | 0.95 | 3.1 |
| 1.6 | 0.76 | 2.5 | 0.98 | 3.2 |
| 1.7 | 0.79 | 2.6 | 1.02 | 3.3 |
| 1.8 | 0.82 | 2.7 | 1.05 | 3.4 |
| 1.9 | 0.85 | 2.8 | 1.08 | 3.5 |
| 2.0 | 0.88 | 2.9 | 1.12 | 3.7 |
| 2.1 | 0.90 | 3.0 | 1.15 | 3.8 |
| 2.2 | 0.93 | 3.1 | 1.19 | 3.9 |
| 2.3 | 0.96 | 3.1 | 1.22 | 4.0 |
| 2.4 | 0.99 | 3.2 | 1.26 | 4.1 |
| 2.5 | 1.02 | 3.3 | 1.29 | 4.2 |
| 2.6 | 1.04 | 3.4 | 1.33 | 4.4 |
| 2.7 | 1.07 | 3.5 | 1.36 | 4.5 |
| 2.8 | 1.10 | 3.6 | 1.39 | 4.6 |
| 2.9 | 1.13 | 3.7 | 1.43 | 4.7 |
| 3.0 | 1.16 | 3.8 | 1.46 | 4.8 |
| 3.1 | 1.19 | 3.9 | 1.50 | 4.9 |
| 3.2 | 1.21 | 4.0 | 1.53 | 5.0 |
| 3.3 | 1.24 | 4.1 | 1.57 | 5.2 |
| 3.4 | 1.27 | 4.2 | 1.60 | 5.2 |
| 3.5 | 1.30 | 4.3 | 1.64 | 5.4 |
| T (p.u.) | Phase-to-ground exposure | Phase-to-phase exposure | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| m | ft | m | ft | |
| 1.5 | 0.81 | 2.7 | 1.05 | 3.4 |
| 1.6 | 0.84 | 2.8 | 1.09 | 3.6 |
| 1.7 | 0.87 | 2.9 | 1.13 | 3.7 |
| 1.8 | 0.90 | 3.0 | 1.17 | 3.8 |
| 1.9 | 0.94 | 3.1 | 1.21 | 4.0 |
| 2.0 | 0.97 | 3.2 | 1.25 | 4.1 |
| 2.1 | 1.00 | 3.3 | 1.29 | 4.2 |
| 2.2 | 1.03 | 3.4 | 1.33 | 4.4 |
| 2.3 | 1.07 | 3.5 | 1.37 | 4.5 |
| 2.4 | 1.10 | 3.6 | 1.41 | 4.6 |
| 2.5 | 1.13 | 3.7 | 1.45 | 4.8 |
| 2.6 | 1.17 | 3.8 | 1.49 | 4.9 |
| 2.7 | 1.20 | 3.9 | 1.53 | 5.0 |
| 2.8 | 1.23 | 4.0 | 1.57 | 5.2 |
| 2.9 | 1.26 | 4.1 | 1.61 | 5.3 |
| 3.0 | 1.30 | 4.3 | 1.65 | 5.4 |
| 3.1 | 1.33 | 4.4 | 1.70 | 5.6 |
| 3.2 | 1.36 | 4.5 | 1.76 | 5.8 |
| 3.3 | 1.39 | 4.6 | 1.82 | 6.0 |
| 3.4 | 1.43 | 4.7 | 1.88 | 6.2 |
| 3.5 | 1.46 | 4.8 | 1.94 | 6.4 |
| T (p.u.) | Phase-to-ground exposure | Phase-to-phase exposure | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| m | ft | m | ft | |
| 1.5 | 1.02 | 3.3 | 1.37 | 4.5 |
| 1.6 | 1.06 | 3.5 | 1.43 | 4.7 |
| 1.7 | 1.11 | 3.6 | 1.48 | 4.9 |
| 1.8 | 1.16 | 3.8 | 1.54 | 5.1 |
| 1.9 | 1.21 | 4.0 | 1.60 | 5.2 |
| 2.0 | 1.25 | 4.1 | 1.66 | 5.4 |
| 2.1 | 1.30 | 4.3 | 1.73 | 5.7 |
| 2.2 | 1.35 | 4.4 | 1.81 | 5.9 |
| 2.3 | 1.39 | 4.6 | 1.90 | 6.2 |
| 2.4 | 1.44 | 4.7 | 1.99 | 6.5 |
| 2.5 | 1.49 | 4.9 | 2.08 | 6.8 |
| 2.6 | 1.53 | 5.0 | 2.17 | 7.1 |
| 2.7 | 1.58 | 5.2 | 2.26 | 7.4 |
| 2.8 | 1.63 | 5.3 | 2.36 | 7.7 |
| 2.9 | 1.67 | 5.5 | 2.45 | 8.0 |
| 3.0 | 1.72 | 5.6 | 2.55 | 8.4 |
| 3.1 | 1.77 | 5.8 | 2.65 | 8.7 |
| 3.2 | 1.81 | 5.9 | 2.76 | 9.1 |
| 3.3 | 1.88 | 6.2 | 2.86 | 9.4 |
| 3.4 | 1.95 | 6.4 | 2.97 | 9.7 |
| 3.5 | 2.01 | 6.6 | 3.08 | 10.1 |
| T (p.u.) | Phase-to-ground exposure | Phase-to-phase exposure | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| m | ft | m | ft | |
| 1.5 | 1.37 | 4.5 | 1.99 | 6.5 |
| 1.6 | 1.44 | 4.7 | 2.13 | 7.0 |
| 1.7 | 1.51 | 5.0 | 2.27 | 7.4 |
| 1.8 | 1.58 | 5.2 | 2.41 | 7.9 |
| 1.9 | 1.65 | 5.4 | 2.56 | 8.4 |
| 2.0 | 1.72 | 5.6 | 2.71 | 8.9 |
| 2.1 | 1.79 | 5.9 | 2.87 | 9.4 |
| 2.2 | 1.87 | 6.1 | 3.03 | 9.9 |
| 2.3 | 1.97 | 6.5 | 3.20 | 10.5 |
| 2.4 | 2.08 | 6.8 | 3.37 | 11.1 |
| 2.5 | 2.19 | 7.2 | 3.55 | 11.6 |
| 2.6 | 2.29 | 7.5 | 3.73 | 12.2 |
| 2.7 | 2.41 | 7.9 | 3.91 | 12.8 |
| 2.8 | 2.52 | 8.3 | 4.10 | 13.5 |
| 2.9 | 2.64 | 8.7 | 4.29 | 14.1 |
| 3.0 | 2.76 | 9.1 | 4.49 | 14.7 |
| 3.1 | 2.88 | 9.4 | 4.69 | 15.4 |
| 3.2 | 3.01 | 9.9 | 4.90 | 16.1 |
| 3.3 | 3.14 | 10.3 | 5.11 | 16.8 |
| 3.4 | 3.27 | 10.7 | 5.32 | 17.5 |
| 3.5 | 3.41 | 11.2 | 5.52 | 18.1 |
| T (p.u.) | Phase-to-ground exposure | Phase-to-phase exposure | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| m | ft | m | ft | |
| 1.5 | 1.53 | 5.0 | 2.40 | 7.9 |
| 1.6 | 1.62 | 5.3 | 2.58 | 8.5 |
| 1.7 | 1.70 | 5.6 | 2.75 | 9.0 |
| 1.8 | 1.78 | 5.8 | 2.94 | 9.6 |
| 1.9 | 1.88 | 6.2 | 3.13 | 10.3 |
| 2.0 | 1.99 | 6.5 | 3.33 | 10.9 |
| 2.1 | 2.12 | 7.0 | 3.53 | 11.6 |
| 2.2 | 2.24 | 7.3 | 3.74 | 12.3 |
| 2.3 | 2.37 | 7.8 | 3.95 | 13.0 |
| 2.4 | 2.50 | 8.2 | 4.17 | 13.7 |
| 2.5 | 2.64 | 8.7 | 4.40 | 14.4 |
| 2.6 | 2.78 | 9.1 | 4.63 | 15.2 |
| 2.7 | 2.93 | 9.6 | 4.87 | 16.0 |
| 2.8 | 3.07 | 10.1 | 5.11 | 16.8 |
| 2.9 | 3.23 | 10.6 | 5.36 | 17.6 |
| 3.0 | 3.38 | 11.1 | 5.59 | 18.3 |
| 3.1 | 3.55 | 11.6 | 5.82 | 19.1 |
| 3.2 | 3.72 | 12.2 | 6.07 | 19.9 |
| 3.3 | 3.89 | 12.8 | 6.31 | 20.7 |
| 3.4 | 4.07 | 13.4 | 6.56 | 21.5 |
| 3.5 | 4.25 | 13.9 | 6.81 | 22.3 |
| T (p.u.) | Phase-to-ground exposure | Phase-to-phase exposure | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| m | ft | m | ft | |
| 1.5 | 1.95 | 6.4 | 3.46 | 11.4 |
| 1.6 | 2.11 | 6.9 | 3.73 | 12.2 |
| 1.7 | 2.28 | 7.5 | 4.02 | 13.2 |
| 1.8 | 2.45 | 8.0 | 4.31 | 14.1 |
| 1.9 | 2.62 | 8.6 | 4.61 | 15.1 |
| 2.0 | 2.81 | 9.2 | 4.92 | 16.1 |
| 2.1 | 3.00 | 9.8 | 5.25 | 17.2 |
| 2.2 | 3.20 | 10.5 | 5.55 | 18.2 |
| 2.3 | 3.40 | 11.2 | 5.86 | 19.2 |
| 2.4 | 3.62 | 11.9 | 6.18 | 20.3 |
| 2.5 | 3.84 | 12.6 | 6.50 | 21.3 |
| 2.6 | 4.07 | 13.4 | 6.83 | 22.4 |
| 2.7 | 4.31 | 14.1 | 7.18 | 23.6 |
| 2.8 | 4.56 | 15.0 | 7.52 | 24.7 |
| 2.9 | 4.81 | 15.8 | 7.88 | 25.9 |
| 3.0 | 5.07 | 16.6 | 8.24 | 27.0 |
| T (p.u.) | Phase-to-ground exposure | Phase-to-phase exposure | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| m | ft | m | ft | |
| 1.5 | 3.16 | 10.4 | 5.97 | 19.6 |
| 1.6 | 3.46 | 11.4 | 6.43 | 21.1 |
| 1.7 | 3.78 | 12.4 | 6.92 | 22.7 |
| 1.8 | 4.12 | 13.5 | 7.42 | 24.3 |
| 1.9 | 4.47 | 14.7 | 7.93 | 26.0 |
| 2.0 | 4.83 | 15.8 | 8.47 | 27.8 |
| 2.1 | 5.21 | 17.1 | 9.02 | 29.6 |
| 2.2 | 5.61 | 18.4 | 9.58 | 31.4 |
| 2.3 | 6.02 | 19.8 | 10.16 | 33.3 |
| 2.4 | 6.44 | 21.1 | 10.76 | 35.3 |
| 2.5 | 6.88 | 22.6 | 11.38 | 37.3 |
| Notes to Table 14 through Table 21: | ||||
| 1. The employer must determine the maximum anticipated per-unit transient overvoltage, phase-to-ground, through an engineering analysis, as required by § 1910.269(l)(3)(ii), or assume a maximum anticipated per-unit transient overvoltage, phase-to-ground, in accordance with Table R-9. | ||||
| 2. For phase-to-phase exposures, the employer must demonstrate that no insulated tool spans the gap and that no large conductive object is in the gap. | ||||
| 3. The worksite must be at an elevation of 900 meters (3,000 feet) or less above sea level. |
Appendix C to § 1910.269—Protection From Hazardous Differences in Electric Potential I. Introduction Current passing through an impedance impresses voltage across that impedance. Even conductors have some, albeit low, value of impedance. Therefore, if a “grounded” 1 object, such as a crane or deenergized and grounded power line, results in a ground fault on a power line, voltage is impressed on that grounded object. The voltage impressed on the grounded object depends largely on the voltage on the line, on the impedance of the faulted conductor, and on the impedance to “true,” or “absolute,” ground represented by the object. If the impedance of the object causing the fault is relatively large, the voltage impressed on the object is essentially the phase-to-ground system voltage. However, even faults to grounded power lines or to well grounded transmission towers or substation structures (which have relatively low values of impedance to ground) can result in hazardous voltages. 2 In all cases, the degree of the hazard depends on the magnitude of the current through the employee and the time of exposure. This appendix discusses methods of protecting workers against the possibility that grounded objects, such as cranes and other mechanical equipment, will contact energized power lines and that deenergized and grounded power lines will become accidentally energized. 1 This appendix generally uses the term “grounded” only with respect to grounding that the employer intentionally installs, for example, the grounding an employer installs on a deenergized conductor. However, in this case, the term “grounded” means connected to earth, regardless of whether or not that connection is intentional. 2 Thus, grounding systems for transmission towers and substation structures should be designed to minimize the step and touch potentials involved. II. Voltage-Gradient Distribution A. Voltage-gradient distribution curve. Absolute, or true, ground serves as a reference and always has a voltage of 0 volts above ground potential. Because there is an impedance between a grounding electrode and absolute ground, there will be a voltage difference between the grounding electrode and absolute ground under ground-fault conditions. Voltage dissipates from the grounding electrode (or from the grounding point) and creates a ground potential gradient. The voltage decreases rapidly with increasing distance from the grounding electrode. A voltage drop associated with this dissipation of voltage is a ground potential. Figure 1 is a typical voltage-gradient distribution curve (assuming a uniform soil texture).
B. Step and touch potentials. Figure 1 also shows that workers are at risk from step and touch potentials. Step potential is the voltage between the feet of a person standing near an energized grounded object (the electrode). In Figure 1, the step potential is equal to the difference in voltage between two points at different distances from the electrode (where the points represent the location of each foot in relation to the electrode). A person could be at risk of injury during a fault simply by standing near the object. Touch potential is the voltage between the energized grounded object (again, the electrode) and the feet of a person in contact with the object. In Figure 1, the touch potential is equal to the difference in voltage between the electrode (which is at a distance of 0 meters) and a point some distance away from the electrode (where the point represents the location of the feet of the person in contact with the object). The touch potential could be nearly the full voltage across the grounded object if that object is grounded at a point remote from the place where the person is in contact with it. For example, a crane grounded to the system neutral and that contacts an energized line would expose any person in contact with the crane or its uninsulated load line to a touch potential nearly equal to the full fault voltage. Figure 2 illustrates step and touch potentials.
III. Protecting Workers From Hazardous Differences in Electrical Potential A. Definitions. The following definitions apply to section III of this appendix: Bond. The electrical interconnection of conductive parts designed to maintain a common electric potential. Bonding cable (bonding jumper). A cable connected to two conductive parts to bond the parts together. Cluster bar. A terminal temporarily attached to a structure that provides a means for the attachment and bonding of grounding and bonding cables to the structure. Ground. A conducting connection between an electric circuit or equipment and the earth, or to some conducting body that serves in place of the earth. Grounding cable (grounding jumper). A cable connected between a deenergized part and ground. Note that grounding cables carry fault current and bonding cables generally do not. A cable that bonds two conductive parts but carries substantial fault current (for example, a jumper connected between one phase and a grounded phase) is a grounding cable. Ground mat (grounding grid). A temporarily or permanently installed metallic mat or grating that establishes an equipotential surface and provides connection points for attaching grounds. B. Analyzing the hazard. The employer can use an engineering analysis of the power system under fault conditions to determine whether hazardous step and touch voltages will develop. The analysis should determine the voltage on all conductive objects in the work area and the amount of time the voltage will be present. Based on the this analysis, the employer can select appropriate measures and protective equipment, including the measures and protective equipment outlined in Section III of this appendix, to protect each employee from hazardous differences in electric potential. For example, from the analysis, the employer will know the voltage remaining on conductive objects after employees install bonding and grounding equipment and will be able to select insulating equipment with an appropriate rating, as described in paragraph III.C.2 of this appendix. C. Protecting workers on the ground. The employer may use several methods, including equipotential zones, insulating equipment, and restricted work areas, to protect employees on the ground from hazardous differences in electrical potential. 1. An equipotential zone will protect workers within it from hazardous step and touch potentials. (See Figure 3.) Equipotential zones will not, however, protect employees located either wholly or partially outside the protected area. The employer can establish an equipotential zone for workers on the ground, with respect to a grounded object, through the use of a metal mat connected to the grounded object. The employer can use a grounding grid to equalize the voltage within the grid or bond conductive objects in the immediate work area to minimize the potential between the objects and between each object and ground. (Bonding an object outside the work area can increase the touch potential to that object, however.) Section III.D of this appendix discusses equipotential zones for employees working on deenergized and grounded power lines. 2. Insulating equipment, such as rubber gloves, can protect employees handling grounded equipment and conductors from hazardous touch potentials. The insulating equipment must be rated for the highest voltage that can be impressed on the grounded objects under fault conditions (rather than for the full system voltage). 3. Restricting employees from areas where hazardous step or touch potentials could arise can protect employees not directly involved in performing the operation. The employer must ensure that employees on the ground in the vicinity of transmission structures are at a distance where step voltages would be insufficient to cause injury. Employees must not handle grounded conductors or equipment likely to become energized to hazardous voltages unless the employees are within an equipotential zone or protected by insulating equipment.
D. Protecting employees working on deenergized and grounded power lines. This Section III.D of Appendix C establishes guidelines to help employers comply with requirements in § 1910.269(n) for using protective grounding to protect employees working on deenergized power lines. Paragraph (n) of § 1910.269 applies to grounding of transmission and distribution lines and equipment for the purpose of protecting workers. Paragraph (n)(3) of § 1910.269 requires temporary protective grounds to be placed at such locations and arranged in such a manner that the employer can demonstrate will prevent exposure of each employee to hazardous differences in electric potential. 3 Sections III.D.1 and III.D.2 of this appendix provide guidelines that employers can use in making the demonstration required by § 1910.269(n)(3). Section III.D.1 of this appendix provides guidelines on how the employer can determine whether particular grounding practices expose employees to hazardous differences in electric potential. Section III.D.2 of this appendix describes grounding methods that the employer can use in lieu of an engineering analysis to make the demonstration required by § 1910.269(n)(3). The Occupational Safety and Health Administration will consider employers that comply with the criteria in this appendix as meeting § 1910.269(n)(3). 3 The protective grounding required by § 1910.269(n) limits to safe values the potential differences between accessible objects in each employee's work environment. Ideally, a protective grounding system would create a true equipotential zone in which every point is at the same electric potential. In practice, current passing through the grounding and bonding elements creates potential differences. If these potential differences are hazardous, the employer may not treat the zone as an equipotential zone. Finally, Section III.D.3 of this appendix discusses other safety considerations that will help the employer comply with other requirements in § 1910.269(n). Following these guidelines will protect workers from hazards that can occur when a deenergized and grounded line becomes energized. 1. Determining safe body current limits. This Section III.D.1 of Appendix C provides guidelines on how an employer can determine whether any differences in electric potential to which workers could be exposed are hazardous as part of the demonstration required by § 1910.269(n)(3). Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) Standard 1048-2003, IEEE Guide for Protective Grounding of Power Lines, provides the following equation for determining the threshold of ventricular fibrillation when the duration of the electric shock is limited:
where I is the current through the worker's body, and t is the duration of the current in seconds. This equation represents the ventricular fibrillation threshold for 95.5 percent of the adult population with a mass of 50 kilograms (110 pounds) or more. The equation is valid for current durations between 0.0083 to 3.0 seconds. To use this equation to set safe voltage limits in an equipotential zone around the worker, the employer will need to assume a value for the resistance of the worker's body. IEEE Std 1048-2003 states that “total body resistance is usually taken as 1000 Ω for determining . . . body current limits.” However, employers should be aware that the impedance of a worker's body can be substantially less than that value. For instance, IEEE Std 1048-2003 reports a minimum hand-to-hand resistance of 610 ohms and an internal body resistance of 500 ohms. The internal resistance of the body better represents the minimum resistance of a worker's body when the skin resistance drops near zero, which occurs, for example, when there are breaks in the worker's skin, for instance, from cuts or from blisters formed as a result of the current from an electric shock, or when the worker is wet at the points of contact. Employers may use the IEEE Std 1048-2003 equation to determine safe body current limits only if the employer protects workers from hazards associated with involuntary muscle reactions from electric shock (for example, the hazard to a worker from falling as a result of an electric shock). Moreover, the equation applies only when the duration of the electric shock is limited. If the precautions the employer takes, including those required by applicable standards, do not adequately protect employees from hazards associated with involuntary reactions from electric shock, a hazard exists if the induced voltage is sufficient to pass a current of 1 milliampere through a 500-ohm resistor. (The 500-ohm resistor represents the resistance of an employee. The 1-milliampere current is the threshold of perception.) Finally, if the employer protects employees from injury due to involuntary reactions from electric shock, but the duration of the electric shock is unlimited (that is, when the fault current at the work location will be insufficient to trip the devices protecting the circuit), a hazard exists if the resultant current would be more than 6 milliamperes (the recognized let-go threshold for workers 4 ). 4 Electric current passing through the body has varying effects depending on the amount of the current. At the let-go threshold, the current overrides a person's control over his or her muscles. At that level, an employee grasping an object will not be able to let go of the object. The let-go threshold varies from person to person; however, the recognized value for workers is 6 milliamperes. 2. Acceptable methods of grounding for employers that do not perform an engineering determination. The grounding methods presented in this section of this appendix ensure that differences in electric potential are as low as possible and, therefore, meet § 1910.269(n)(3) without an engineering determination of the potential differences. These methods follow two principles: (i) The grounding method must ensure that the circuit opens in the fastest available clearing time, and (ii) the grounding method must ensure that the potential differences between conductive objects in the employee's work area are as low as possible. Paragraph (n)(3) of § 1910.269 does not require grounding methods to meet the criteria embodied in these principles. Instead, the paragraph requires that protective grounds be “placed at such locations and arranged in such a manner that the employer can demonstrate will prevent exposure of each employee to hazardous differences in electric potential.” However, when the employer's grounding practices do not follow these two principles, the employer will need to perform an engineering analysis to make the demonstration required by § 1910.269(n)(3). i. Ensuring that the circuit opens in the fastest available clearing time. Generally, the higher the fault current, the shorter the clearing times for the same type of fault. Therefore, to ensure the fastest available clearing time, the grounding method must maximize the fault current with a low impedance connection to ground. The employer accomplishes this objective by grounding the circuit conductors to the best ground available at the worksite. Thus, the employer must ground to a grounded system neutral conductor, if one is present. A grounded system neutral has a direct connection to the system ground at the source, resulting in an extremely low impedance to ground. In a substation, the employer may instead ground to the substation grid, which also has an extremely low impedance to the system ground and, typically, is connected to a grounded system neutral when one is present. Remote system grounds, such as pole and tower grounds, have a higher impedance to the system ground than grounded system neutrals and substation grounding grids; however, the employer may use a remote ground when lower impedance grounds are not available. In the absence of a grounded system neutral, substation grid, and remote ground, the employer may use a temporary driven ground at the worksite. In addition, if employees are working on a three-phase system, the grounding method must short circuit all three phases. Short circuiting all phases will ensure faster clearing and lower the current through the grounding cable connecting the deenergized line to ground, thereby lowering the voltage across that cable. The short circuit need not be at the worksite; however, the employer must treat any conductor that is not grounded at the worksite as energized because the ungrounded conductors will be energized at fault voltage during a fault. ii. Ensuring that the potential differences between conductive objects in the employee's work area are as low as possible. To achieve as low a voltage as possible across any two conductive objects in the work area, the employer must bond all conductive objects in the work area. This section of this appendix discusses how to create a zone that minimizes differences in electric potential between conductive objects in the work area. The employer must use bonding cables to bond conductive objects, except for metallic objects bonded through metal-to-metal contact. The employer must ensure that metal-to-metal contacts are tight and free of contamination, such as oxidation, that can increase the impedance across the connection. For example, a bolted connection between metal lattice tower members is acceptable if the connection is tight and free of corrosion and other contamination. Figure 4 shows how to create an equipotential zone for metal lattice towers. Wood poles are conductive objects. The poles can absorb moisture and conduct electricity, particularly at distribution and transmission voltages. Consequently, the employer must either: (1) Provide a conductive platform, bonded to a grounding cable, on which the worker stands or (2) use cluster bars to bond wood poles to the grounding cable. The employer must ensure that employees install the cluster bar below, and close to, the worker's feet. The inner portion of the wood pole is more conductive than the outer shell, so it is important that the cluster bar be in conductive contact with a metal spike or nail that penetrates the wood to a depth greater than or equal to the depth the worker's climbing gaffs will penetrate the wood. For example, the employer could mount the cluster bar on a bare pole ground wire fastened to the pole with nails or staples that penetrate to the required depth. Alternatively, the employer may temporarily nail a conductive strap to the pole and connect the strap to the cluster bar. Figure 5 shows how to create an equipotential zone for wood poles.
For underground systems, employers commonly install grounds at the points of disconnection of the underground cables. These grounding points are typically remote from the manhole or underground vault where employees will be working on the cable. Workers in contact with a cable grounded at a remote location can experience hazardous potential differences if the cable becomes energized or if a fault occurs on a different, but nearby, energized cable. The fault current causes potential gradients in the earth, and a potential difference will exist between the earth where the worker is standing and the earth where the cable is grounded. Consequently, to create an equipotential zone for the worker, the employer must provide a means of connecting the deenergized cable to ground at the worksite by having the worker stand on a conductive mat bonded to the deenergized cable. If the cable is cut, the employer must install a bond across the opening in the cable or install one bond on each side of the opening to ensure that the separate cable ends are at the same potential. The employer must protect the worker from any hazardous differences in potential any time there is no bond between the mat and the cable (for example, before the worker installs the bonds). 3. Other safety-related considerations. To ensure that the grounding system is safe and effective, the employer should also consider the following factors: 5 5 This appendix only discusses factors that relate to ensuring an equipotential zone for employees. The employer must consider other factors in selecting a grounding system that is capable of conducting the maximum fault current that could flow at the point of grounding for the time necessary to clear the fault, as required by § 1910.269(n)(4)(i). IEEE Std 1048-2003 contains guidelines for selecting and installing grounding equipment that will meet § 1910.269(n)(4)(i). i. Maintenance of grounding equipment. It is essential that the employer properly maintain grounding equipment. Corrosion in the connections between grounding cables and clamps and on the clamp surface can increase the resistance of the cable, thereby increasing potential differences. In addition, the surface to which a clamp attaches, such as a conductor or tower member, must be clean and free of corrosion and oxidation to ensure a low-resistance connection. Cables must be free of damage that could reduce their current-carrying capacity so that they can carry the full fault current without failure. Each clamp must have a tight connection to the cable to ensure a low resistance and to ensure that the clamp does not separate from the cable during a fault. ii. Grounding cable length and movement. The electromagnetic forces on grounding cables during a fault increase with increasing cable length. These forces can cause the cable to move violently during a fault and can be high enough to damage the cable or clamps and cause the cable to fail. In addition, flying cables can injure workers. Consequently, cable lengths should be as short as possible, and grounding cables that might carry high fault current should be in positions where the cables will not injure workers during a fault.
Appendix D to § 1910.269—Methods of Inspecting and Testing Wood Poles I. Introduction When employees are to perform work on a wood pole, it is important to determine the condition of the pole before employees climb it. The weight of the employee, the weight of equipment to be installed, and other working stresses (such as the removal or retensioning of conductors) can lead to the failure of a defective pole or a pole that is not designed to handle the additional stresses. 1 For these reasons, it is essential that, before an employee climbs a wood pole, the employer ascertain that the pole is capable of sustaining the stresses of the work. The determination that the pole is capable of sustaining these stresses includes an inspection of the condition of the pole. 1 A properly guyed pole in good condition should, at a minimum, be able to handle the weight of an employee climbing it. If the employer finds the pole to be unsafe to climb or to work from, the employer must secure the pole so that it does not fail while an employee is on it. The employer can secure the pole by a line truck boom, by ropes or guys, or by lashing a new pole alongside it. If a new one is lashed alongside the defective pole, employees should work from the new one. II. Inspecting Wood Poles A qualified employee should inspect wood poles for the following conditions: 2 2 The presence of any of these conditions is an indication that the pole may not be safe to climb or to work from. The employee performing the inspection must be qualified to make a determination as to whether it is safe to perform the work without taking additional precautions. A. General condition. Buckling at the ground line or an unusual angle with respect to the ground may indicate that the pole has rotted or is broken. B. Cracks. Horizontal cracks perpendicular to the grain of the wood may weaken the pole. Vertical cracks, although not normally considered to be a sign of a defective pole, can pose a hazard to the climber, and the employee should keep his or her gaffs away from them while climbing. C. Holes. Hollow spots and woodpecker holes can reduce the strength of a wood pole. D. Shell rot and decay. Rotting and decay are cutout hazards and possible indications of the age and internal condition of the pole. E. Knots. One large knot or several smaller ones at the same height on the pole may be evidence of a weak point on the pole. F. Depth of setting. Evidence of the existence of a former ground line substantially above the existing ground level may be an indication that the pole is no longer buried to a sufficient depth. G. Soil conditions. Soft, wet, or loose soil around the base of the pole may indicate that the pole will not support any change in stress. H. Burn marks. Burning from transformer failures or conductor faults could damage the pole so that it cannot withstand changes in mechanical stress. III. Testing Wood Poles The following tests, which are from § 1910.268(n)(3), are acceptable methods of testing wood poles: A. Hammer test. Rap the pole sharply with a hammer weighing about 1.4 kg (3 pounds), starting near the ground line and continuing upwards circumferentially around the pole to a height of approximately 1.8 meters (6 feet). The hammer will produce a clear sound and rebound sharply when striking sound wood. Decay pockets will be indicated by a dull sound or a less pronounced hammer rebound. Also, prod the pole as near the ground line as possible using a pole prod or a screwdriver with a blade at least 127 millimeters (5 inches) long. If substantial decay is present, the pole is unsafe. B. Rocking test. Apply a horizontal force to the pole and attempt to rock it back and forth in a direction perpendicular to the line. Exercise caution to avoid causing power lines to swing together. Apply the force to the pole either by pushing it with a pike pole or pulling the pole with a rope. If the pole cracks during the test, it is unsafe.
Appendix E to § 1910.269—Protection From Flames and Electric Arcs I. Introduction Paragraph (l)(8) of § 1910.269 addresses protecting employees from flames and electric arcs. This paragraph requires employers to: (1) Assess the workplace for flame and electric-arc hazards (paragraph (l)(8)(i)); (2) estimate the available heat energy from electric arcs to which employees would be exposed (paragraph (l)(8)(ii)); (3) ensure that employees wear clothing that will not melt, or ignite and continue to burn, when exposed to flames or the estimated heat energy (paragraph (l)(8)(iii)); and (4) ensure that employees wear flame-resistant clothing 1 and protective clothing and other protective equipment that has an arc rating greater than or equal to the available heat energy under certain conditions (paragraphs (l)(8)(iv) and (l)(8)(v)). This appendix contains information to help employers estimate available heat energy as required by § 1910.269(l)(8)(ii), select protective clothing and other protective equipment with an arc rating suitable for the available heat energy as required by § 1910.269(l)(8)(v), and ensure that employees do not wear flammable clothing that could lead to burn injury as addressed by §§ 1910.269(l)(8)(iii) and (l)(8)(iv). 1 Flame-resistant clothing includes clothing that is inherently flame resistant and clothing chemically treated with a flame retardant. (See ASTM F1506-10a, Standard Performance Specification for Flame Resistant Textile Materials for Wearing Apparel for Use by Electrical Workers Exposed to Momentary Electric Arc and Related Thermal Hazards, and ASTM F1891-12 Standard Specification for Arc and Flame Resistant Rainwear.) II. Assessing the Workplace for Flame and Electric-Arc Hazards Paragraph (l)(8)(i) of § 1910.269 requires the employer to assess the workplace to identify employees exposed to hazards from flames or from electric arcs. This provision ensures that the employer evaluates employee exposure to flames and electric arcs so that employees who face such exposures receive the required protection. The employer must conduct an assessment for each employee who performs work on or near exposed, energized parts of electric circuits. A. Assessment Guidelines Sources electric arcs. Consider possible sources of electric arcs, including: • Energized circuit parts not guarded or insulated, • Switching devices that produce electric arcs in normal operation, • Sliding parts that could fault during operation (for example, rack-mounted circuit breakers), and • Energized electric equipment that could fail (for example, electric equipment with damaged insulation or with evidence of arcing or overheating). Exposure to flames. Identify employees exposed to hazards from flames. Factors to consider include: • The proximity of employees to open flames, and • For flammable material in the work area, whether there is a reasonable likelihood that an electric arc or an open flame can ignite the material. Probability that an electric arc will occur. Identify employees exposed to electric-arc hazards. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration will consider an employee exposed to electric-arc hazards if there is a reasonable likelihood that an electric arc will occur in the employee's work area, in other words, if the probability of such an event is higher than it is for the normal operation of enclosed equipment. Factors to consider include: • For energized circuit parts not guarded or insulated, whether conductive objects can come too close to or fall onto the energized parts, • For exposed, energized circuit parts, whether the employee is closer to the part than the minimum approach distance established by the employer (as permitted by § 1910.269(l)(3)(iii)). • Whether the operation of electric equipment with sliding parts that could fault during operation is part of the normal operation of the equipment or occurs during servicing or maintenance, and • For energized electric equipment, whether there is evidence of impending failure, such as evidence of arcing or overheating. B. Examples Table 1 provides task-based examples of exposure assessments. Table 1—Example Assessments for Various Tasks Task Is employee exposed to flame or electric-arc hazard? Normal operation of enclosed equipment, such as closing or opening a switch The employer properly installs and maintains enclosed equipment, and there is no evidence of impending failure No. There is evidence of arcing or overheating Yes. Parts of the equipment are loose or sticking, or the equipment otherwise exhibits signs of lack of maintenance Yes. Servicing electric equipment, such as racking in a circuit breaker or replacing a switch Yes. Inspection of electric equipment with exposed energized parts. The employee is not holding conductive objects and remains outside the minimum approach distance established by the employer No. The employee is holding a conductive object, such as a flashlight, that could fall or otherwise contact energized parts (irrespective of whether the employee maintains the minimum approach distance) Yes. The employee is closer than the minimum approach distance established by the employer (for example, when wearing rubber insulating gloves or rubber insulating gloves and sleeves) Yes. Using open flames, for example, in wiping cable splice sleeves Yes. III. Protection Against Burn Injury A. Estimating Available Heat Energy Calculation methods. Paragraph (l)(8)(ii) of § 1910.269 provides that, for each employee exposed to an electric-arc hazard, the employer must make a reasonable estimate of the heat energy to which the employee would be exposed if an arc occurs. Table 2 lists various methods of calculating values of available heat energy from an electric circuit. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration does not endorse any of these specific methods. Each method requires the input of various parameters, such as fault current, the expected length of the electric arc, the distance from the arc to the employee, and the clearing time for the fault (that is, the time the circuit protective devices take to open the circuit and clear the fault). The employer can precisely determine some of these parameters, such as the fault current and the clearing time, for a given system. The employer will need to estimate other parameters, such as the length of the arc and the distance between the arc and the employee, because such parameters vary widely. Table 2—Methods of Calculating Incident Heat Energy From an Electric Arc 1. Standard for Electrical Safety Requirements for Employee Workplaces, NFPA 70E-2012, Annex D, “Sample Calculation of Flash Protection Boundary.” 2. Doughty, T.E., Neal, T.E., and Floyd II, H.L., “Predicting Incident Energy to Better Manage the Electric Arc Hazard on 600 V Power Distribution Systems,” Record of Conference Papers IEEE IAS 45th Annual Petroleum and Chemical Industry Conference, September 28-30, 1998. 3. Guide for Performing Arc-Flash Hazard Calculations, IEEE Std 1584-2002, 1584a-2004 (Amendment 1 to IEEE Std 1584-2002), and 1584b-2011 (Amendment 2: Changes to Clause 4 of IEEE Std 1584-2002).* 4. ARCPRO, a commercially available software program developed by Kinectrics, Toronto, ON, CA. * This appendix refers to IEEE Std 1584-2002 with both amendments as IEEE Std 1584b-2011. The amount of heat energy calculated by any of the methods is approximately inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the employee and the arc. In other words, if the employee is very close to the arc, the heat energy is very high; but if the employee is just a few more centimeters away, the heat energy drops substantially. Thus, estimating the distance from the arc to the employee is key to protecting employees. The employer must select a method of estimating incident heat energy that provides a reasonable estimate of incident heat energy for the exposure involved. Table 3 shows which methods provide reasonable estimates for various exposures. Table 3—Selecting a Reasonable Incident-Energy Calculation Method 1 Incident-energy calculation method 600 V and Less 2 601 V to 15 kV 2 More than 15 kV 1Φ 3Φa 3Φb 1Φ 3Φa 3Φb 1Φ 3Φa 3Φb NFPA 70E-2012 Annex D (Lee equation) Y-C Y N Y-C Y-C N N 3 N 3 N 3 Doughty, Neal, and Floyd Y-C Y Y N N N N N N IEEE Std 1584b-2011 Y Y Y Y Y Y N N N ARCPRO Y N N Y N N Y Y 4 Y 4 Key: 1Φ: Single-phase arc in open air. 3Φa: Three-phase arc in open air. 3Φb: Three-phase arc in an enclosure (box). Y: Acceptable; produces a reasonable estimate of incident heat energy from this type of electric arc. N: Not acceptable; does not produce a reasonable estimate of incident heat energy from this type of electric arc. Y-C: Acceptable; produces a reasonable, but conservative, estimate of incident heat energy from this type of electric arc. Notes: 1 Although the Occupational Safety and Health Administration will consider these methods reasonable for enforcement purposes when employers use the methods in accordance with this table, employers should be aware that the listed methods do not necessarily result in estimates that will provide full protection from internal faults in transformers and similar equipment or from arcs in underground manholes or vaults. 2 At these voltages, the presumption is that the arc is three-phase unless the employer can demonstrate that only one phase is present or that the spacing of the phases is sufficient to prevent a multiphase arc from occurring. 3 Although the Occupational Safety and Health Administration will consider this method acceptable for purposes of assessing whether incident energy exceeds 2.0 cal/cm2, the results at voltages of more than 15 kilovolts are extremely conservative and unrealistic. 4 The Occupational Safety and Health Administration will deem the results of this method reasonable when the employer adjusts them using the conversion factors for three-phase arcs in open air or in an enclosure, as indicated in the program's instructions. Selecting a reasonable distance from the employee to the arc. In estimating available heat energy, the employer must make some reasonable assumptions about how far the employee will be from the electric arc. Table 4 lists reasonable distances from the employee to the electric arc. The distances in Table 4 are consistent with national consensus standards, such as the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers' National Electrical Safety Code, ANSI/IEEE C2-2012, and IEEE Guide for Performing Arc-Flash Hazard Calculations, IEEE Std 1584b-2011. The employer is free to use other reasonable distances, but must consider equipment enclosure size and the working distance to the employee in selecting a distance from the employee to the arc. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration will consider a distance reasonable when the employer bases it on equipment size and working distance. Table 4—Selecting a Reasonable Distance From the Employee to the Electric Arc Class of equipment Single-phase arc mm(inches) Three-phase arc mm(inches) Cable * NA 455 (18) Low voltage MCCs and panelboards NA 455 (18) Low-voltage switchgear NA 610 (24) 5-kV switchgear NA 910 (36) 15-kV switchgear NA 910 (36) Single conductors in air (up to 46 kilovolts), work with rubber insulating gloves 380 (15) NA Single conductors in air, work with live-line tools and live-line barehand work MAD − (2 × kV × 2.54)(MAD − (2 × kV /10)) † NA * NA = not applicable. † The terms in this equation are: MAD = The applicable minimum approach distance, and kV = The system voltage in kilovolts. Selecting a reasonable arc gap. For a single-phase arc in air, the electric arc will almost always occur when an energized conductor approaches too close to ground. Thus, an employer can determine the arc gap, or arc length, for these exposures by the dielectric strength of air and the voltage on the line. The dielectric strength of air is approximately 10 kilovolts for every 25.4 millimeters (1 inch). For example, at 50 kilovolts, the arc gap would be 50 ÷ 10 × 25.4 (or 50 × 2.54), which equals 127 millimeters (5 inches). For three-phase arcs in open air and in enclosures, the arc gap will generally be dependent on the spacing between parts energized at different electrical potentials. Documents such as IEEE Std 1584b-2011 provide information on these distances. Employers may select a reasonable arc gap from Table 5, or they may select any other reasonable arc gap based on sparkover distance or on the spacing between (1) live parts at different potentials or (2) live parts and grounded parts (for example, bus or conductor spacings in equipment). In any event, the employer must use an estimate that reasonably resembles the actual exposures faced by the employee. Table 5—Selecting a Reasonable Arc Gap Class of equipment Single-phase arc mm(inches) Three-phase arc mm 1(inches) Cable NA 2 13 (0.5). Low voltage MCCs and panelboards NA 25 (1.0). Low-voltage switchgear NA 32 (1.25). 5-kV switchgear NA 104 (4.0). 15-kV switchgear NA 152 (6.0). Single conductors in air, 15 kV and less. 51 (2.0) Phase conductor spacing. Single conductor in air, more than 15 kV Voltage in kV × 2.54(Voltage in kV × 0.1), but no less than 51 mm (2 inches) Phase conductor spacing. 1 Source: IEEE Std 1584b-2011. 2 NA = not applicable. Making estimates over multiple system areas. The employer need not estimate the heat-energy exposure for every job task performed by each employee. Paragraph (l)(8)(ii) of § 1910.269 permits the employer to make broad estimates that cover multiple system areas provided that: (1) The employer uses reasonable assumptions about the energy-exposure distribution throughout the system, and (2) the estimates represent the maximum exposure for those areas. For example, the employer can use the maximum fault current and clearing time to cover several system areas at once. Incident heat energy for single-phase-to-ground exposures. Table 6 and Table 7 provide incident heat energy levels for open-air, phase-to-ground electric-arc exposures typical for overhead systems. 2 Table 6 presents estimates of available energy for employees using rubber insulating gloves to perform work on overhead systems operating at 4 to 46 kilovolts. The table assumes that the employee will be 380 millimeters (15 inches) from the electric arc, which is a reasonable estimate for rubber insulating glove work. Table 6 also assumes that the arc length equals the sparkover distance for the maximum transient overvoltage of each voltage range. 3 To use the table, an employer would use the voltage, maximum fault current, and maximum clearing time for a system area and, using the appropriate voltage range and fault-current and clearing-time values corresponding to the next higher values listed in the table, select the appropriate heat energy (4, 5, 8, or 12 cal/cm 2) from the table. For example, an employer might have a 12,470-volt power line supplying a system area. The power line can supply a maximum fault current of 8 kiloamperes with a maximum clearing time of 10 cycles. For rubber glove work, this system falls in the 4.0-to-15.0-kilovolt range; the next-higher fault current is 10 kA (the second row in that voltage range); and the clearing time is under 18 cycles (the first column to the right of the fault current column). Thus, the available heat energy for this part of the system will be 4 cal/cm 2 or less (from the column heading), and the employer could select protection with a 5-cal/cm 2 rating to meet § 1910.269(l)(8)(v). Alternatively, an employer could select a base incident-energy value and ensure that the clearing times for each voltage range and fault current listed in the table do not exceed the corresponding clearing time specified in the table. For example, an employer that provides employees with arc-flash protective equipment rated at 8 cal/cm 2 can use the table to determine if any system area exceeds 8 cal/cm 2 by checking the clearing time for the highest fault current for each voltage range and ensuring that the clearing times do not exceed the values specified in the 8-cal/cm 2 column in the table. 2 The Occupational Safety and Health Administration used metric values to calculate the clearing times in Table 6 and Table 7. An employer may use English units to calculate clearing times instead even though the results will differ slightly. 3 The Occupational Safety and Health Administration based this assumption, which is more conservative than the arc length specified in Table 5, on Table 410-2 of the 2012 NESC. Table 7 presents similar estimates for employees using live-line tools to perform work on overhead systems operating at voltages of 4 to 800 kilovolts. The table assumes that the arc length will be equal to the sparkover distance 4 and that the employee will be a distance from the arc equal to the minimum approach distance minus twice the sparkover distance. 4 The dielectric strength of air is about 10 kilovolts for every 25.4 millimeters (1 inch). Thus, the employer can estimate the arc length in millimeters to be the phase-to-ground voltage in kilovolts multiplied by 2.54 (or voltage (in kilovolts) × 2.54). The employer will need to use other methods for estimating available heat energy in situations not addressed by Table 6 or Table 7. The calculation methods listed in Table 2 and the guidance provided in Table 3 will help employers do this. For example, employers can use IEEE Std 1584b-2011 to estimate the available heat energy (and to select appropriate protective equipment) for many specific conditions, including lower-voltage, phase-to-phase arc, and enclosed arc exposures. Table 6—Incident Heat Energy for Various Fault Currents, Clearing Times, and Voltages of 4.0 to 46.0 kV: Rubber Insulating Glove Exposures Involving Phase-to-Ground Arcs in Open Air Only * † ‡ Voltage range(kV) ** Fault current(kA) Maximum clearing time (cycles) 4 cal/cm2 5 cal/cm2 8 cal/cm2 12 cal/cm2 4.0 to 15.0 5 46 58 92 138 10 18 22 36 54 15 10 12 20 30 20 6 8 13 19 15.1 to 25.0 5 28 34 55 83 10 11 14 23 34 15 7 8 13 20 20 4 5 9 13 25.1 to 36.0 5 21 26 42 62 10 9 11 18 26 15 5 6 10 16 20 4 4 7 11 36.1 to 46.0 5 16 20 32 48 10 7 9 14 21 15 4 5 8 13 20 3 4 6 9 Notes:* This table is for open-air, phase-to-ground electric-arc exposures. It is not for phase-to-phase arcs or enclosed arcs (arc in a box). † The table assumes that the employee will be 380 mm (15 in.) from the electric arc. The table also assumes the arc length to be the sparkover distance for the maximum transient overvoltage of each voltage range (see Appendix B to § 1910.269), as follows: 4.0 to 15.0 kV 51 mm (2 in.) 15.1 to 25.0 kV 102 mm (4 in.) 25.1 to 36.0 kV 152 mm (6 in.) 36.1 to 46.0 kV 229 mm (9 in.) ‡The Occupational Safety and Health Administration calculated the values in this table using the ARCPRO method listed in Table 2. ** The voltage range is the phase-to-phase system voltage. Table 7—Incident Heat Energy for Various Fault Currents, Clearing Times, and Voltages: Live-Line Tool Exposures Involving Phase-to-Ground Arcs in Open Air Only * † ‡ # Voltage range(kV) ** Fault current(kA) Maximum clearing time (cycles) 4 cal/cm2 5 cal/cm2 8 cal/cm2 12 cal/cm2 4.0 to 15.0 5 197 246 394 591 10 73 92 147 220 15 39 49 78 117 20 24 31 49 73 15.1 to 25.0 5 197 246 394 591 10 75 94 150 225 15 41 51 82 122 20 26 33 52 78 25.1 to 36.0 5 138 172 275 413 10 53 66 106 159 15 30 37 59 89 20 19 24 38 58 36.1 to 46.0 5 129 161 257 386 10 51 64 102 154 15 29 36 58 87 20 19 24 38 57 46.1 to 72.5 20 18 23 36 55 30 10 13 20 30 40 6 8 13 19 50 4 6 9 13 72.6 to 121.0 20 10 12 20 30 30 6 7 11 17 40 4 5 7 11 50 3 3 5 8 121.1 to 145.0 20 12 15 24 35 30 7 9 15 22 40 5 6 10 15 50 4 5 8 11 145.1 to 169.0 20 12 15 24 36 30 7 9 15 22 40 5 7 10 16 50 4 5 8 12 169.1 to 242.0 20 13 17 27 40 30 8 10 17 25 40 6 7 12 17 50 4 5 9 13 242.1 to 362.0 20 25 32 51 76 30 16 19 31 47 40 11 14 22 33 50 8 10 16 25 362.1 to 420.0 20 12 15 25 37 30 8 10 15 23 40 5 7 11 16 50 4 5 8 12 420.1 to 550.0 20 23 29 47 70 30 14 18 29 43 40 10 13 20 30 50 8 9 15 23 550.1 to 800.0 20 25 31 50 75 30 15 19 31 46 40 11 13 21 32 50 8 10 16 24 Notes: * This table is for open-air, phase-to-ground electric-arc exposures. It is not for phase-to-phase arcs or enclosed arcs (arc in a box). † The table assumes the arc length to be the sparkover distance for the maximum phase-to-ground voltage of each voltage range (see Appendix B to this section). The table also assumes that the employee will be the minimum approach distance minus twice the arc length from the electric arc. ‡ The Occupational Safety and Health Administration calculated the values in this table using the ARCPRO method listed in Table 2. # For voltages of more than 72.6 kV, employers may use this table only when the minimum approach distance established under § 1910.269(l)(3)(i) is greater than or equal to the following values: 72.6 to 121.0 kV 1.02 m. 121.1 to 145.0 kV 1.16 m. 145.1 to 169.0 kV 1.30 m. 169.1 to 242.0 kV 1.72 m. 242.1 to 362.0 kV 2.76 m. 362.1 to 420.0 kV 2.50 m. 420.1 to 550.0 kV 3.62 m. 550.1 to 800.0 kV 4.83 m. ** The voltage range is the phase-to-phase system voltage. B. Selecting Protective Clothing and Other Protective Equipment Paragraph (l)(8)(v) of § 1910.269 requires employers, in certain situations, to select protective clothing and other protective equipment with an arc rating that is greater than or equal to the incident heat energy estimated under § 1910.269(l)(8)(ii). Based on laboratory testing required by ASTM F1506-10a, the expectation is that protective clothing with an arc rating equal to the estimated incident heat energy will be capable of preventing second-degree burn injury to an employee exposed to that incident heat energy from an electric arc. Note that actual electric-arc exposures may be more or less severe than the estimated value because of factors such as arc movement, arc length, arcing from reclosing of the system, secondary fires or explosions, and weather conditions. Additionally, for arc rating based on the fabric's arc thermal performance value 5 (ATPV), a worker exposed to incident energy at the arc rating has a 50-percent chance of just barely receiving a second-degree burn. Therefore, it is possible (although not likely) that an employee will sustain a second-degree (or worse) burn wearing clothing conforming to § 1910.269(l)(8)(v) under certain circumstances. However, reasonable employer estimates and maintaining appropriate minimum approach distances for employees should limit burns to relatively small burns that just barely extend beyond the epidermis (that is, just barely a second-degree burn). Consequently, protective clothing and other protective equipment meeting § 1910.269(l)(8)(v) will provide an appropriate degree of protection for an employee exposed to electric-arc hazards. 5 ASTM F1506-10a defines “arc thermal performance value” as “the incident energy on a material or a multilayer system of materials that results in a 50% probability that sufficient heat transfer through the tested specimen is predicted to cause the onset of a second-degree skin burn injury based on the Stoll [footnote] curve, cal/cm 2.” The footnote to this definition reads: “Derived from: Stoll, A. M., and Chianta, M. A., `Method and Rating System for Evaluations of Thermal Protection,' Aerospace Medicine, Vol 40, 1969, pp. 1232-1238 and Stoll, A. M., and Chianta, M. A., `Heat Transfer through Fabrics as Related to Thermal Injury,' Transactions—New York Academy of Sciences, Vol 33(7), Nov. 1971, pp. 649-670.” Paragraph (l)(8)(v) of § 1910.269 does not require arc-rated protection for exposures of 2 cal/cm 2 or less. Untreated cotton clothing will reduce a 2-cal/cm 2 exposure below the 1.2- to 1.5-cal/cm 2 level necessary to cause burn injury, and this material should not ignite at such low heat energy levels. Although § 1910.269(l)(8)(v) does not require clothing to have an arc rating when exposures are 2 cal/cm 2 or less, § 1910.269(l)(8)(iv) requires the outer layer of clothing to be flame resistant under certain conditions, even when the estimated incident heat energy is less than 2 cal/cm 2, as discussed later in this appendix. Additionally, it is especially important to ensure that employees do not wear undergarments made from fabrics listed in the note to § 1910.269(l)(8)(iii) even when the outer layer is flame resistant or arc rated. These fabrics can melt or ignite easily when an electric arc occurs. Logos and name tags made from non-flame-resistant material can adversely affect the arc rating or the flame-resistant characteristics of arc-rated or flame-resistant clothing. Such logos and name tags may violate § 1910.269(l)(8)(iii), (l)(8)(iv), or (l)(8)(v). Paragraph (l)(8)(v) of § 1910.269 requires that arc-rated protection cover the employee's entire body, with limited exceptions for the employee's hands, feet, face, and head. Paragraph (l)(8)(v)(A) of § 1910.269 provides that arc-rated protection is not necessary for the employee's hands under the following conditions: For any estimated incident heat energy When the employee is wearing rubber insulating gloves with protectors. If the estimated incident heat energy does not exceed 14 cal/cm2 When the employee is wearing heavy-duty leather work gloves with a weight of at least 407 gm/m2 (12 oz/yd2). Paragraph (l)(8)(v)(B) of § 1910.269 provides that arc-rated protection is not necessary for the employee's feet when the employee is wearing heavy-duty work shoes or boots. Finally, § 1910.269(l)(8)(v)(C), (l)(8)(v)(D), and (l)(8)(v)(E) require arc-rated head and face protection as follows: Exposure Minimum head and face protection None * Arc-rated faceshield with a minimumrating of 8 cal/cm2* Arc-rated hood or faceshield with balaclava Single-phase, open air 2-8 cal/cm2 9-12 cal/cm2 13 cal/cm2 or higher †. Three-phase 2-4 cal/cm2 5-8 cal/cm2 9 cal/cm2 or higher ‡. * These ranges assume that employees are wearing hardhats meeting the specifications in § 1910.135 or § 1926.100(b)(2), as applicable. † The arc rating must be a minimum of 4 cal/cm2 less than the estimated incident energy. Note that § 1910.269(l)(8)(v)(E) permits this type of head and face protection, with a minimum arc rating of 4 cal/cm2 less than the estimated incident energy, at any incident energy level. ‡ Note that § 1910.269(l)(8)(v) permits this type of head and face protection at any incident energy level. IV. Protection Against Ignition Paragraph (l)(8)(iii) of § 1910.269 prohibits clothing that could melt onto an employee's skin or that could ignite and continue to burn when exposed to flames or to the available heat energy estimated by the employer under § 1910.269(l)(8)(ii). Meltable fabrics, such as acetate, nylon, polyester, and polypropylene, even in blends, must be avoided. When these fibers melt, they can adhere to the skin, thereby transferring heat rapidly, exacerbating burns, and complicating treatment. These outcomes can result even if the meltable fabric is not directly next to the skin. The remainder of this section focuses on the prevention of ignition. Paragraph (l)(8)(v) of § 1910.269 generally requires protective clothing and other protective equipment with an arc rating greater than or equal to the employer's estimate of available heat energy. As explained earlier in this appendix, untreated cotton is usually acceptable for exposures of 2 cal/cm 2 or less. 6 If the exposure is greater than that, the employee generally must wear flame-resistant clothing with a suitable arc rating in accordance with § 1910.269(l)(8)(iv) and (l)(8)(v). However, even if an employee is wearing a layer of flame-resistant clothing, there are circumstances under which flammable layers of clothing would be uncovered, and an electric arc could ignite them. For example, clothing ignition is possible if the employee is wearing flammable clothing under the flame-resistant clothing and the underlayer is uncovered because of an opening in the flame-resistant clothing. Thus, for purposes of § 1910.269(l)(8)(iii), it is important for the employer to consider the possibility of clothing ignition even when an employee is wearing flame-resistant clothing with a suitable arc rating. 6 See § 1910.269(l)(8)(iv)(A), (l)(8)(iv)(B), and (l)(8)(iv)(C) for conditions under which employees must wear flame-resistant clothing as the outer layer of clothing even when the incident heat energy does not exceed 2 cal/cm 2. Under § 1910.269(l)(8)(iii), employees may not wear flammable clothing in conjunction with flame-resistant clothing if the flammable clothing poses an ignition hazard. 7 Although outer flame-resistant layers may not have openings that expose flammable inner layers, when an outer flame-resistant layer would be unable to resist breakopen, 8 the next (inner) layer must be flame-resistant if it could ignite. 7 Paragraph (l)(8)(iii) of § 1910.269 prohibits clothing that could ignite and continue to burn when exposed to the heat energy estimated under paragraph (l)(8)(ii) of that section. 8 Breakopen occurs when a hole, tear, or crack develops in the exposed fabric such that the fabric no longer effectively blocks incident heat energy. Non-flame-resistant clothing can ignite even when the heat energy from an electric arc is insufficient to ignite the clothing. For example, nearby flames can ignite an employee's clothing; and, even in the absence of flames, electric arcs pose ignition hazards beyond the hazard of ignition from incident energy under certain conditions. In addition to requiring flame-resistant clothing when the estimated incident energy exceeds 2.0 cal/cm 2, § 1910.269(l)(8)(iv) requires flame-resistant clothing when: The employee is exposed to contact with energized circuit parts operating at more than 600 volts (§ 1910.269(l)(8)(iv)(A)), an electric arc could ignite flammable material in the work area that, in turn, could ignite the employee's clothing (§ 1910.269(l)(8)(iv)(B)), and molten metal or electric arcs from faulted conductors in the work area could ignite the employee's clothing (§ 1910.269(l)(8)(iv)(C)). For example, grounding conductors can become a source of heat energy if they cannot carry fault current without failure. The employer must consider these possible sources of electric arcs 9 in determining whether the employee's clothing could ignite under § 1910.269(l)(8)(iv)(C). 9 Static wires and pole grounds are examples of grounding conductors that might not be capable of carrying fault current without failure. Grounds that can carry the maximum available fault current are not a concern, and employers need not consider such grounds a possible electric arc source.
Appendix F to § 1910.269—Work-Positioning Equipment Inspection Guidelines I. Body Belts Inspect body belts to ensure that: A. The hardware has no cracks, nicks, distortion, or corrosion; B. No loose or worn rivets are present; C. The waist strap has no loose grommets; D. The fastening straps are not 100-percent leather; and E. No worn materials that could affect the safety of the user are present. II. Positioning Straps Inspect positioning straps to ensure that: A. The warning center of the strap material is not exposed; B. No cuts, burns, extra holes, or fraying of strap material is present; C. Rivets are properly secured; D. Straps are not 100-percent leather; and E. Snaphooks do not have cracks, burns, or corrosion. III. Climbers Inspect pole and tree climbers to ensure that: A. Gaffs are at least as long as the manufacturer's recommended minimums (generally 32 and 51 millimeters (1.25 and 2.0 inches) for pole and tree climbers, respectively, measured on the underside of the gaff); Note: Gauges are available to assist in determining whether gaffs are long enough and shaped to easily penetrate poles or trees. B. Gaffs and leg irons are not fractured or cracked; C. Stirrups and leg irons are free of excessive wear; D. Gaffs are not loose; E. Gaffs are free of deformation that could adversely affect use; F. Gaffs are properly sharpened; and G. There are no broken straps or buckles.
Appendix G to § 1910.269—Reference Documents The references contained in this appendix provide information that can be helpful in understanding and complying with the requirements contained in § 1910.269. The national consensus standards referenced in this appendix contain detailed specifications that employers may follow in complying with the more performance-based requirements of § 1910.269. Except as specifically noted in § 1910.269, however, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration will not necessarily deem compliance with the national consensus standards to be compliance with the provisions of § 1910.269. ANSI/SIA A92.2-2009, American National Standard for Vehicle-Mounted Elevating and Rotating Aerial Devices. ANSI Z133-2012, American National Standard Safety Requirements for Arboricultural Operations—Pruning, Trimming, Repairing, Maintaining, and Removing Trees, and Cutting Brush. ANSI/IEEE Std 935-1989, IEEE Guide on Terminology for Tools and Equipment to Be Used in Live Line Working. ASME B20.1-2012, Safety Standard for Conveyors and Related Equipment. ASTM D120-09, Standard Specification for Rubber Insulating Gloves. ASTM D149-09 (2013), Standard Test Method for Dielectric Breakdown Voltage and Dielectric Strength of Solid Electrical Insulating Materials at Commercial Power Frequencies. ASTM D178-01 (2010), Standard Specification for Rubber Insulating Matting. ASTM D1048-12, Standard Specification for Rubber Insulating Blankets. ASTM D1049-98 (2010), Standard Specification for Rubber Insulating Covers. ASTM D1050-05 (2011), Standard Specification for Rubber Insulating Line Hose. ASTM D1051-08, Standard Specification for Rubber Insulating Sleeves. ASTM F478-09, Standard Specification for In-Service Care of Insulating Line Hose and Covers. ASTM F479-06 (2011), Standard Specification for In-Service Care of Insulating Blankets. ASTM F496-08, Standard Specification for In-Service Care of Insulating Gloves and Sleeves. ASTM F711-02 (2007), Standard Specification for Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic (FRP) Rod and Tube Used in Live Line Tools. ASTM F712-06 (2011), Standard Test Methods and Specifications for Electrically Insulating Plastic Guard Equipment for Protection of Workers. ASTM F819-10, Standard Terminology Relating to Electrical Protective Equipment for Workers. ASTM F855-09, Standard Specifications for Temporary Protective Grounds to Be Used on De-energized Electric Power Lines and Equipment. ASTM F887-12 e1, Standard Specifications for Personal Climbing Equipment. ASTM F914/F914M-10, Standard Test Method for Acoustic Emission for Aerial Personnel Devices Without Supplemental Load Handling Attachments. ASTM F1116-03 (2008), Standard Test Method for Determining Dielectric Strength of Dielectric Footwear. ASTM F1117-03 (2008), Standard Specification for Dielectric Footwear. ASTM F1236-96 (2012), Standard Guide for Visual Inspection of Electrical Protective Rubber Products. ASTM F1430/F1430M-10, Standard Test Method for Acoustic Emission Testing of Insulated and Non-Insulated Aerial Personnel Devices with Supplemental Load Handling Attachments. ASTM F1505-10, Standard Specification for Insulated and Insulating Hand Tools. ASTM F1506-10a, Standard Performance Specification for Flame Resistant and Arc Rated Textile Materials for Wearing Apparel for Use by Electrical Workers Exposed to Momentary Electric Arc and Related Thermal Hazards. ASTM F1564-13, Standard Specification for Structure-Mounted Insulating Work Platforms for Electrical Workers. ASTM F1701-12, Standard Specification for Unused Polypropylene Rope with Special Electrical Properties. ASTM F1742-03 (2011), Standard Specification for PVC Insulating Sheeting. ASTM F1796-09, Standard Specification for High Voltage Detectors—Part 1 Capacitive Type to be Used for Voltages Exceeding 600 Volts AC. ASTM F1797-09ε 1, Standard Test Method for Acoustic Emission Testing of Insulated and Non-Insulated Digger Derricks. ASTM F1825-03 (2007), Standard Specification for Clampstick Type Live Line Tools. ASTM F1826-00 (2011), Standard Specification for Live Line and Measuring Telescoping Tools. ASTM F1891-12, Standard Specification for Arc and Flame Resistant Rainwear. ASTM F1958/F1958M-12, Standard Test Method for Determining the Ignitability of Non-flame-Resistant Materials for Clothing by Electric Arc Exposure Method Using Mannequins. ASTM F1959/F1959M-12, Standard Test Method for Determining the Arc Rating of Materials for Clothing. IEEE Stds 4-1995, 4a-2001 (Amendment to IEEE Standard Techniques for High-Voltage Testing), IEEE Standard Techniques for High-Voltage Testing. IEEE Std 62-1995, IEEE Guide for Diagnostic Field Testing of Electric Power Apparatus—Part 1: Oil Filled Power Transformers, Regulators, and Reactors. IEEE Std 80-2000, Guide for Safety in AC Substation Grounding. IEEE Std 100-2000, The Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standards Terms Seventh Edition. IEEE Std 516-2009, IEEE Guide for Maintenance Methods on Energized Power Lines. IEEE Std 524-2003, IEEE Guide to the Installation of Overhead Transmission Line Conductors . IEEE Std 957-2005, IEEE Guide for Cleaning Insulators. IEEE Std 1048-2003, IEEE Guide for Protective Grounding of Power Lines. IEEE Std 1067-2005, IEEE Guide for In-Service Use, Care, Maintenance, and Testing of Conductive Clothing for Use on Voltages up to 765 kV AC and ±750 kV DC. IEEE Std 1307-2004, IEEE Standard for Fall Protection for Utility Work. IEEE Stds 1584-2002, 1584a-2004 (Amendment 1 to IEEE Std 1584-2002), and 1584b-2011 (Amendment 2: Changes to Clause 4 of IEEE Std 1584-2002), IEEE Guide for Performing Arc-Flash Hazard Calculations. IEEE C2-2012, National Electrical Safety Code. NFPA 70E-2012, Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace.
Note to paragraph (a)(1)(i)(A): The types of installations covered by this paragraph include the generation, transmission, and distribution installations of electric utilities, as well as equivalent installations of industrial establishments. Subpart S of this part covers supplementary electric generating equipment that is used to supply a workplace for emergency, standby, or similar purposes only. (See paragraph (a)(1)(i)(B) of this section.)
Note 1 to paragraph (a)(1)(ii)(B): The Occupational Safety and Health Administration considers work practices conforming to §§ 1910.332 through 1910.335 as complying with the electrical safety-related work-practice requirements of § 1910.269 identified in Table 1 of appendix A-2 to this section, provided that employers are performing the work on a generation or distribution installation meeting §§ 1910.303 through 1910.308. This table also identifies provisions in § 1910.269 that apply to work by qualified persons directly on, or associated with, installations of electric power generation, transmission, and distribution lines or equipment, regardless of compliance with §§ 1910.332 through 1910.335.
Note 2 to paragraph (a)(1)(ii)(B): The Occupational Safety and Health Administration considers work practices performed by qualified persons and conforming to § 1910.269 as complying with §§ 1910.333(c) and 1910.335.
Note to paragraph (a)(2)(ii): For the purposes of this section, a person must have the training required by paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section to be considered a qualified person.
Note to paragraph (a)(2)(v)(C): The Occupational Safety and Health Administration considers tasks that are performed less often than once per year to necessitate retraining before the performance of the work practices involved.
Note 1 to paragraph (a)(2)(viii): Though they are not required by this paragraph, employment records that indicate that an employee has successfully completed the required training are one way of keeping track of when an employee has demonstrated proficiency.
Note 2 to paragraph (a)(2)(viii): For an employee with previous training, an employer may determine that that employee has demonstrated the proficiency required by this paragraph using the following process: (1) Confirm that the employee has the training required by paragraph (a)(2) of this section, (2) Use an examination or interview to make an initial determination that the employee understands the relevant safety-related work practices before he or she performs any work covered by this section, and (3) Supervise the employee closely until that employee has demonstrated proficiency as required by this paragraph.
Note to paragraph (a)(3)(i)(A): This paragraph requires the host employer to obtain information listed in paragraphs (a)(4)(i) through (a)(4)(v) of this section if it does not have this information in existing records.
Note to paragraph (a)(3)(i)(B): For the purposes of this paragraph, the host employer need only provide information to contract employers that the host employer can obtain from its existing records through the exercise of reasonable diligence. This paragraph does not require the host employer to make inspections of worksite conditions to obtain this information.
Note to paragraph (a)(3)(i)(C): This paragraph requires the host employer to obtain information about the design and operation of its installation that contract employers need to make required assessments if it does not have this information in existing records.
Note to paragraph (a)(3)(i)(D): For the purposes of this paragraph, the host employer need only provide information to contract employers that the host employer can obtain from its existing records through the exercise of reasonable diligence. This paragraph does not require the host employer to make inspections of worksite conditions to obtain this information.
Note to paragraph (c)(4): The briefing must address all the subjects listed in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.
Note to paragraph (d)(1): Installations in electric power generation facilities that are not an integral part of, or inextricably commingled with, power generation processes or equipment are covered under § 1910.147 and Subpart S of this part.
Note to paragraph (d)(2)(v)(E): If normal work schedule and operation records demonstrate adequate inspection activity and contain the required information, no additional certification is required.
Note to paragraph (d)(3)(ii)(F): For specific provisions covering accident prevention tags, see § 1910.145.
Note to paragraph (d)(5): See also paragraph (d)(7) of this section, which requires that the second notification take place before the machine or equipment is reenergized.
Note to paragraph (d): Lockout and tagging procedures that comply with paragraphs (c) through (f) of § 1910.147 will also be deemed to comply with paragraph (d) of this section if the procedures address the hazards covered by paragraph (d) of this section.
Note to paragraph (e)(4): The determination called for in this paragraph may consist of a check of the conditions that might foreseeably be in the enclosed space. For example, the cover could be checked to see if it is hot and, if it is fastened in place, could be loosened gradually to release any residual pressure. An evaluation also needs to be made of whether conditions at the site could cause a hazardous atmosphere, such as an oxygen-deficient or flammable atmosphere, to develop within the space.
Note to paragraph (e)(7): See paragraph (t) of this section for additional requirements on attendants for work in manholes and vaults.
Note to paragraph (e)(11): See the definition of “hazardous atmosphere” for guidance in determining whether a specific concentration of a substance is hazardous.
Note to paragraph (e)(14): See the definition of “hazardous atmosphere” for guidance in determining whether a specific concentration of a substance is hazardous.
Note to paragraph (e): Entries into enclosed spaces conducted in accordance with the permit-space entry requirements of paragraphs (d) through (k) of § 1910.146 are considered as complying with paragraph (e) of this section.
Note to paragraph (g)(1) of this section: Paragraph (h) of § 1910.132 sets employer payment obligations for the personal protective equipment required by this section, including, but not limited to, the fall protection equipment required by paragraph (g)(2) of this section, the electrical protective equipment required by paragraph (l)(3) of this section, and the flame-resistant and arc-rated clothing and other protective equipment required by paragraph (l)(8) of this section.
Note to paragraph (g)(2)(iii)(D): Distortion of the snaphook sufficient to release the keeper is considered to be tensile failure of a snaphook.
Note to paragraphs (g)(2)(iii)(G)(1) and (g)(2)(iii)(G)(2): Positioning straps that pass direct-current tests at equivalent voltages are considered as meeting this requirement.
Note to paragraph (g)(2)(iii) of this section: When used by employees weighing no more than 140 kg (310 lbm) fully equipped, body belts and positioning straps that conform to American Society of Testing and Materials Standard Specifications for Personal Climbing Equipment, ASTM F887-12 e1, are deemed to be in compliance with paragraph (g)(2)(iii) of this section.
Note to paragraph (g)(2)(iv)(A): Appendix F to this section contains guidelines for inspecting work-positioning equipment.
Note to paragraph (g)(2)(iv)(B): Fall protection equipment rigged to arrest falls is considered a fall arrest system and must meet the applicable requirements for the design and use of those systems. Fall protection equipment rigged for work positioning is considered work-positioning equipment and must meet the applicable requirements for the design and use of that equipment.
Note 1 to paragraphs (g)(2)(iv)(C)(2) and (g)(2)(iv)(C)(3): These paragraphs apply to structures that support overhead electric power transmission and distribution lines and equipment. They do not apply to portions of buildings, such as loading docks, or to electric equipment, such as transformers and capacitors. Subpart D of this part contains the duty to provide fall protection associated with walking and working surfaces.
Note 2 to paragraphs (g)(2)(iv)(C)(2) and (g)(2)(iv)(C)(3): Until the employer ensures that employees are proficient in climbing and the use of fall protection under paragraph (a)(2)(viii) of this section, the employees are not considered “qualified employees” for the purposes of paragraphs (g)(2)(iv)(C)(2) and (g)(2)(iv)(C)(3) of this section. These paragraphs require unqualified employees (including trainees) to use fall protection any time they are more than 1.2 meters (4 feet) above the ground.
Note to paragraph (g)(2)(iv)(E): Wood-pole fall-restriction devices meeting American Society of Testing and Materials Standard Specifications for Personal Climbing Equipment, ASTM F887-12 e1, are deemed to meet the anchorage-strength requirement when they are used in accordance with manufacturers' instructions.
Note to paragraph (i)(4)(i): If any hazardous defects are present, no operating pressure is safe, and the hydraulic or pneumatic equipment involved may not be used. In the absence of defects, the maximum rated operating pressure is the maximum safe pressure.
Note to paragraph (i)(4)(iii): Use of hydraulic lines that do not have check valves and that have a separation of more than 10.7 meters (35 feet) between the oil reservoir and the upper end of the hydraulic system promotes the formation of a partial vacuum.
Note to paragraph (j)(1)(i): Live-line tools using rod and tube that meet ASTM F711-02 (2007), Standard Specification for Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic (FRP) Rod and Tube Used in Live Line Tools, are deemed to comply with paragraph (j)(1) of this section.
Note to paragraph (j)(2): Guidelines for the examination, cleaning, repairing, and in-service testing of live-line tools are specified in the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers' IEEE Guide for Maintenance Methods on Energized Power Lines, IEEE Std 516-2009.
Note to paragraph (k)(2)(ii): Paragraphs (u)(1) and (v)(3) of this section specify the size of the working space.
Note to paragraph (l)(3)(ii): See appendix B to this section for information on how to calculate the maximum anticipated per-unit transient overvoltage, phase-to-ground, when the employer uses portable protective gaps to reduce maximum transient overvoltages.
Note 1 to paragraph (l)(8)(ii): Appendix E to this section provides guidance on estimating available heat energy. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration will deem employers following the guidance in appendix E to this section to be in compliance with paragraph (l)(8)(ii) of this section. An employer may choose a method of calculating incident heat energy not included in appendix E to this section if the chosen method reasonably predicts the incident energy to which the employee would be exposed.
Note 2 to paragraph (l)(8)(ii): This paragraph does not require the employer to estimate the incident heat energy exposure for every job task performed by each employee. The employer may make broad estimates that cover multiple system areas provided the employer uses reasonable assumptions about the energy-exposure distribution throughout the system and provided the estimates represent the maximum employee exposure for those areas. For example, the employer could estimate the heat energy just outside a substation feeding a radial distribution system and use that estimate for all jobs performed on that radial system.
Note to paragraph (l)(8)(iii) of this section: This paragraph prohibits clothing made from acetate, nylon, polyester, rayon and polypropylene, either alone or in blends, unless the employer demonstrates that the fabric has been treated to withstand the conditions that may be encountered by the employee or that the employee wears the clothing in such a manner as to eliminate the hazard involved.
Note to paragraph (l)(8)(iv)(C): This paragraph does not apply to conductors that are capable of carrying, without failure, the maximum available fault current for the time the circuit protective devices take to interrupt the fault.
Note to paragraph (l)(8): See appendix E to this section for further information on the selection of appropriate protection.
Note to paragraph (n)(1): This paragraph covers grounding of generation, transmission, and distribution lines and equipment when this section requires protective grounding and whenever the employer chooses to ground such lines and equipment for the protection of employees.
Note to paragraph (n)(3): Appendix C to this section contains guidelines for establishing the equipotential zone required by this paragraph. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration will deem grounding practices meeting these guidelines as complying with paragraph (n)(3) of this section.
Note to paragraph (n)(4): American Society for Testing and Materials Standard Specifications for Temporary Protective Grounds to Be Used on De-Energized Electric Power Lines and Equipment, ASTM F855-09, contains guidelines for protective grounding equipment. The Institute of Electrical Engineers Guide for Protective Grounding of Power Lines, IEEE Std 1048-2003, contains guidelines for selecting and installing protective grounding equipment.
Note to paragraph (o)(1): OSHA considers routine inspection and maintenance measurements made by qualified employees to be routine line work not included in the scope of paragraph (o) of this section, provided that the hazards related to the use of intrinsic high-voltage or high-power sources require only the normal precautions associated with routine work specified in the other paragraphs of this section. Two typical examples of such excluded test work procedures are “phasing-out” testing and testing for a “no-voltage” condition.
Note to paragraph (o)(4)(iii)(B): See appendix C to this section for information on measures that employers can take to protect employees from hazardous step and touch potentials.
Note to paragraph (p)(1)(i): Critical safety components of mechanical elevating and rotating equipment are components for which failure would result in free fall or free rotation of the boom.
Note to paragraph (p)(4)(iii)(C): Appendix C to this section contains information on hazardous step and touch potentials and on methods of protecting employees from hazards resulting from such potentials.
Note to paragraph (q)(1)(i): Appendix D to this section contains test methods that employers can use in ascertaining whether a wood pole is capable of sustaining the forces imposed by an employee climbing the pole. This paragraph also requires the employer to ascertain that the pole can sustain all other forces imposed by the work employees will perform.
Note 1 to paragraph (q)(2)(iv): If the employer takes no precautions to protect employees from hazards associated with involuntary reactions from electric shock, a hazard exists if the induced voltage is sufficient to pass a current of 1 milliampere through a 500-ohm resistor. If the employer protects employees from injury due to involuntary reactions from electric shock, a hazard exists if the resultant current would be more than 6 milliamperes.
Note 2 to paragraph (q)(2)(iv): Appendix C to this section contains guidelines for protecting employees from hazardous differences in electric potential as required by this paragraph.
Note to paragraph (q)(2)(x): Examples of unsafe conditions include: employees in locations prohibited by paragraph (q)(2)(xi) of this section, conductor and pulling line hang-ups, and slipping of the conductor grip.
Note to paragraph (q)(3)(vi): Thunderstorms in the vicinity, high winds, snow storms, and ice storms are examples of adverse weather conditions that make live-line barehand work too hazardous to perform safely even after the employer implements the work practices required by this section.
Note to paragraph (q)(4)(iv): Thunderstorms in the vicinity, high winds, snow storms, and ice storms are examples of adverse weather conditions that make this work too hazardous to perform even after the employer implements the work practices required by this section.
Note to paragraph (r)(1)(iv): A tool constructed of a material that the employer can demonstrate has insulating qualities meeting paragraph (j)(1) of this section is considered as insulated under paragraph (r)(1)(iv) of this section if the tool is clean and dry.
Note to paragraph (r)(1)(vi): Thunderstorms in the immediate vicinity, high winds, snow storms, and ice storms are examples of adverse weather conditions that are presumed to make line-clearance tree trimming too hazardous to perform safely.
Note to paragraph (r)(5)(iv): Paragraph (e)(2)(vi) of § 1910.266 prohibits drop starting of chain saws.
Note 1 to paragraph (t)(3)(ii): Paragraph (e)(7) of this section may also require an attendant and does not permit this attendant to enter the manhole or vault.
Note 2 to paragraph (t)(3)(ii): Paragraph (l)(1)(ii) of this section requires employees entering manholes or vaults containing unguarded, uninsulated energized lines or parts of electric equipment operating at 50 volts or more to be qualified.
Note to paragraph (u)(1): American National Standard National Electrical Safety Code, ANSI/IEEE C2-2012 contains guidelines for the dimensions of access and working space about electric equipment in substations. Installations meeting the ANSI provisions comply with paragraph (u)(1) of this section. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration will determine whether an installation that does not conform to this ANSI standard complies with paragraph (u)(1) of this section based on the following criteria: (1) Whether the installation conforms to the edition of ANSI C2 that was in effect when the installation was made, (2) Whether the configuration of the installation enables employees to maintain the minimum approach distances, established by the employer under paragraph (l)(3)(i) of this section, while the employees are working on exposed, energized parts, and (3) Whether the precautions taken when employees perform work on the installation provide protection equivalent to the protection provided by access and working space meeting ANSI/IEEE C2-2012.
Note to paragraph (u)(3): IEEE Std 80-2000, IEEE Guide for Safety in AC Substation Grounding, contains guidelines for protection against hazardous differences in electric potential.
Note to paragraph (u)(5)(i): American National Standard National Electrical Safety Code, ANSI/IEEE C2-2002 contains guidelines for the dimensions of clearance distances about electric equipment in substations. Installations meeting the ANSI provisions comply with paragraph (u)(5)(i) of this section. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration will determine whether an installation that does not conform to this ANSI standard complies with paragraph (u)(5)(i) of this section based on the following criteria: (1) Whether the installation conforms to the edition of ANSI C2 that was in effect when the installation was made, (2) Whether each employee is isolated from energized parts at the point of closest approach; and (3) Whether the precautions taken when employees perform work on the installation provide protection equivalent to the protection provided by horizontal and vertical clearances meeting ANSI/IEEE C2-2002.
Note to paragraph (v)(3) of this section: American National Standard National Electrical Safety Code, ANSI/IEEE C2-2012 contains guidelines for the dimensions of access and working space about electric equipment in substations. Installations meeting the ANSI provisions comply with paragraph (v)(3) of this section. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration will determine whether an installation that does not conform to this ANSI standard complies with paragraph (v)(3) of this section based on the following criteria: (1) Whether the installation conforms to the edition of ANSI C2 that was in effect when the installation was made; (2) Whether the configuration of the installation enables employees to maintain the minimum approach distances, established by the employer under paragraph (l)(3)(i) of this section, while the employees are working on exposed, energized parts, and; (3) Whether the precautions taken when employees perform work on the installation provide protection equivalent to the protection provided by access and working space meeting ANSI/IEEE C2-2012.
Note to paragraph (v)(5)(i): American National Standard National Electrical Safety Code, ANSI/IEEE C2-2002 contains guidelines for the dimensions of clearance distances about electric equipment in substations. Installations meeting the ANSI provisions comply with paragraph (v)(5)(i) of this section. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration will determine whether an installation that does not conform to this ANSI standard complies with paragraph (v)(5)(i) of this section based on the following criteria: (1) Whether the installation conforms to the edition of ANSI C2 that was in effect when the installation was made; (2) Whether each employee is isolated from energized parts at the point of closest approach; and (3) Whether the precautions taken when employees perform work on the installation provide protection equivalent to the protection provided by horizontal and vertical clearances meeting ANSI/IEEE C2-2002.
Note to paragraph (v)(7)(iii): See § 1910.141 for requirements that apply to the water supply and to washing facilities.
Note to paragraph (v)(8)(i): See subpart Z of this part for requirements necessary to protect the health of employees from the effects of chlorine.
Note to paragraph (v)(11)(xii): Locations that are hazardous because of the presence of combustible dust are classified as Class II hazardous locations. See § 1910.307.
Note to paragraph (w)(1): See paragraphs (m) and (n) of this section for requirements pertaining to the deenergizing and grounding of capacitor installations.
Note to the definition of “cable sheath”: A cable sheath may consist of multiple layers one or more of which is conductive.
Note to the definition of “deenergized”: The term applies only to current-carrying parts, which are sometimes energized (alive).
Note to the definition of “enclosed space”: The Occupational Safety and Health Administration does not consider spaces that are enclosed but not designed for employee entry under normal operating conditions to be enclosed spaces for the purposes of this section. Similarly, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration does not consider spaces that are enclosed and that are expected to contain a hazardous atmosphere to be enclosed spaces for the purposes of this section. Such spaces meet the definition of permit spaces in § 1910.146, and entry into them must conform to that standard.
Note to the definition of “guarded”: Wires that are insulated, but not otherwise protected, are not guarded.
Note to the definition of “hazardous atmosphere” (2): This concentration may be approximated as a condition in which the dust obscures vision at a distance of 1.52 meters (5 feet) or less.
Note to the definition of “hazardous atmosphere” (4): An atmospheric concentration of any substance that is not capable of causing death, incapacitation, impairment of ability to self-rescue, injury, or acute illness due to its health effects is not covered by this provision.
Note to the definition of “hazardous atmosphere” (5): For air contaminants for which the Occupational Safety and Health Administration has not determined a dose or permissible exposure limit, other sources of information, such as Safety Data Sheets (SDS) that comply with the Hazard Communication Standard, § 1910.1200, published information, and internal documents can provide guidance in establishing acceptable atmospheric conditions.
Note to the definition of “high wind”: The Occupational Safety and Health Administration normally considers winds exceeding 64.4 kilometers per hour (40 miles per hour), or 48.3 kilometers per hour (30 miles per hour) if the work involves material handling, as meeting this criteria, unless the employer takes precautions to protect employees from the hazardous effects of the wind.
Note to the definition of “host employer”: The Occupational Safety and Health Administration will treat the electric utility or the owner of the installation as the host employer if it operates or controls operating procedures for the installation. If the electric utility or installation owner neither operates nor controls operating procedures for the installation, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration will treat the employer that the utility or owner has contracted with to operate or control the operating procedures for the installation as the host employer. In no case will there be more than one host employer.
Note to the definition of “immediately dangerous to life or health”: Some materials—hydrogen fluoride gas and cadmium vapor, for example—may produce immediate transient effects that, even if severe, may pass without medical attention, but are followed by sudden, possibly fatal collapse 12-72 hours after exposure. The victim “feels normal” from recovery from transient effects until collapse. Such materials in hazardous quantities are considered to be “immediately” dangerous to life or health.
Note to the definition of “insulated”: When any object is said to be insulated, it is understood to be insulated for the conditions to which it normally is subjected. Otherwise, it is, for the purpose of this section, uninsulated.
Note 1 to the definition of “line-clearance tree trimmer”: An employee who is regularly assigned to a line-clearance tree-trimming crew and who is undergoing on-the-job training and who, in the course of such training, has demonstrated an ability to perform duties safely at his or her level of training and who is under the direct supervision of a line-clearance tree trimmer is considered to be a line-clearance tree trimmer for the performance of those duties.
Note 2 to the definition of “line-clearance tree trimmer”: A line-clearance tree trimmer is not considered to be a “qualified employee” under this section unless he or she has the training required for a qualified employee under paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section. However, under the electrical safety-related work practices standard in subpart S of this part, a line-clearance tree trimmer is considered to be a “qualified employee.” Tree trimming performed by such “qualified employees” is not subject to the electrical safety-related work practice requirements contained in §§ 1910.331 through 1910.335 when it is directly associated with electric power generation, transmission, or distribution lines or equipment. (See § 1910.331 for requirements on the applicability of the electrical safety-related work practice requirements contained in §§ 1910.331 through 1910.335 to line-clearance tree trimming performed by such “qualified employees,” and see the note following § 1910.332(b)(3) for information regarding the training an employee must have to be considered a qualified employee under §§ 1910.331 through 1910.335.)
Note to the definition of “line-clearance tree trimming”: This section applies only to line-clearance tree trimming performed for the purpose of clearing space around electric power generation, transmission, or distribution lines or equipment and on behalf of an organization that operates, or that controls the operating procedures for, those lines or equipment. See paragraph (a)(1) of this section. Tree trimming performed on behalf of a homeowner or commercial entity other than an organization that operates, or that controls the operating procedures for, electric power generation, transmission, or distribution lines or equipment is not directly associated with an electric power generation, transmission, or distribution installation and is outside the scope of this section. In addition, tree trimming that is not for the purpose of clearing space around electric power generation, transmission, or distribution lines or equipment is not directly associated with an electric power generation, transmission, or distribution installation and is outside the scope of this section. Such tree trimming may be covered by other applicable standards. See, for example, §§ 1910.268 and 1910.331 through 1910.335.
Note to the definition of “communication lines”: Telephone, telegraph, railroad signal, data, clock, fire, police alarm, cable television, and other systems conforming to this definition are included. Lines used for signaling purposes, but not included under this definition, are considered as electric supply lines of the same voltage.
Note to the definition of “minimum approach distance”: Paragraph (l)(3)(i) of this section requires employers to establish minimum approach distances.
Note 1 to the definition of “qualified employee (qualified person)”: An employee must have the training required by (a)(2)(ii) of this section to be a qualified employee.
Note 2 to the definition of “qualified employee (qualified person)”: Except under (g)(2)(iv)(C)(2) and (g)(2)(iv)(C)(3) of this section, an employee who is undergoing on-the-job training and who has demonstrated, in the course of such training, an ability to perform duties safely at his or her level of training and who is under the direct supervision of a qualified person is a qualified person for the performance of those duties.
[79 FR 20633, Apr. 11, 2014, as amended at 79 FR 56960, Sept. 24, 2014; 80 FR 60036, Oct. 5, 2015; 81 FR 83006, Nov. 18, 2016; 84 FR 68797, Dec. 17, 2019; 85 FR 8732, Feb. 18, 2020]