1. (a) Business entities. For purposes of this regulation and Reg. § 23038(b)-3, a business entity is any entity recognized for California income and franchise tax purposes (including an entity with a single owner that may be disregarded as an entity separate from its owner under Reg. § 23038(b)-3) that is not properly classified as a trust under Reg. § 23038(a)(3) or otherwise subject to special treatment under the Revenue and Taxation Code. A business entity with two or more members is classified for California income and franchise tax purposes as either a corporation or a partnership. A business entity with only one owner is classified as an association taxable as a corporation or is disregarded; if the entity is disregarded, its activities are treated in the same manner as a sole proprietorship, branch, or division of the owner.

2. (b) Corporations. For purposes of the tax imposed under Chapter 3 of the Revenue and Taxation Code (commencing with Revenue and Taxation Code section 23501), the term corporation includes--

   1. (1) A business entity organized under a federal or state statute, or under a statute of a federally recognized Indian tribe, if the statute describes or refers to the entity as incorporated or as a corporation, body corporate, or body politic;
   2. (2) An association (as determined under Reg. § 23038(b)-3);
   3. (3) A business entity organized under a state statute, if the statute describes or refers to the entity as a joint-stock company or joint-stock association;
   4. (4) [reserved];
   5. (5) [reserved];
   6. (6) [reserved];
   7. (7) A business entity that is taxable as a corporation under a provision of the Revenue and Taxation Code other than subdivision (b) of Section 23038; and

   8. (8) Certain foreign entities -- (A) In general. Except as provided in subsections (b)(8)(B) and (d) of this regulation, the following business entities formed in the following jurisdictions:

      1. (B) Clarification of list of corporations in subsection (b)(8)(A) of this regulation -- 1. Exceptions in certain cases. The following entities will not be treated as corporations under subsection (b)(8)(A) of this regulation:

         1. a. With regard to Canada, a Nova Scotia Unlimited Liability Company (or any other company or corporation all of whose owners have unlimited liability pursuant to federal or provincial law).
         2. b. With regard to India, a company deemed to be a public limited company solely by operation of Section 43A(1) of the Internal Revenue Code (relating to corporate ownership of the company), Section 43A(1A) of the Internal Revenue Code (relating to annual average turnover), or Section 43A(1B) of the Internal Revenue Code (relating to ownership interests in other companies) of the Companies Act, 1956 (or any combination of these), provided that the organizational documents of such deemed public limited company continue to meet the requirements of Section 3(1)(iii) of the Companies Act, 1956.
         3. c. With regard to Malaysia, a Sendirian Berhad.
         4. 2. Inclusions in certain cases. With regard to Mexico, the term Sociedad Anonima includes a Sociedad Anonima that chooses to apply the variable capital provision of Mexican corporate law (Sociedad Anonima de Capital Variable).
      2. (C) Public companies. For purposes of subsection (b)(8)(A) of this regulation, with regard to Cyprus, Hong Kong, and Jamaica, the term Public Limited Company includes any Limited Company that is not defined as a private company under the corporate laws of those jurisdictions. In all other cases, where the term Public Limited Company is not defined, that term shall include any Limited Company defined as a public company under the corporate laws of the relevant jurisdiction.
      3. (D) Limited companies. For purposes of this subsection (b)(8), any reference to a Limited Company includes, as the case may be, companies limited by shares and companies limited by guarantee.
      4. (E) Multilingual countries. Different linguistic renderings of the name of an entity listed in subsection (b)(8)(A) of this regulation shall be disregarded. For example, an entity formed under the laws of Switzerland as a Societe Anonyme will be a corporation and treated in the same manner as an Aktiengesellschaft.

      American Samoa, Corporation

      Argentina, Sociedad Anonima

      Australia, Public Limited Company

      Austria, Aktiengesellschaft

      Barbados, Limited Company

      Belgium, Societe Anonyme

      Belize, Public Limited Company

      Bolivia, Sociedad Anonima

      Brazil, Sociedade Anonima

      Bulgaria, Aktsionerno Druzhestvo

      Canada, Corporation and Company

      Chile, Sociedad Anonima

      People's Republic of China, Gufen Youxian Gongsi

      Republic of China (Taiwan), Ku-fen Yu-hsien Kung-szu

      Columbia, Sociedad Anonima

      Costa Rica, Sociedad Anonima

      Cyprus, Public Limited Company

      Czech Republic, Akciova Spolecnost

      Denmark, Aktieselskab

      Ecuador, Sociedad Anonima or Compania Anonima

      Egypt, Sharikat Al-Mossahamah

      El Salvador, Sociedad Anonima

      Estonia, Aktsiaselts

      European Economic Area/European Union, Societas Europaea

      Finland, Julkinen Osakeyhtio/Publikt Aktiebolag

      France, Societe Anonyme

      Germany, Aktiengesellschaft

      Greece, Anonymos Etairia

      Guam, Corporation

      Guatemala, Sociedad Anonima

      Guyana, Public Limited Company

      Honduras, Sociedad Anonima

      Hong Kong, Public Limited Company

      Hungary, Reszvenytarsasag

      Iceland, Hlutafelag

      India, Public Limited Company

      Indonesia, Perseroan Terbuka

      Ireland, Public Limited Company

      Israel, Public Limited Company

      Italy, Societa per Azioni

      Jamaica, Public Limited Company

      Japan, Kabushiki Kaisha

      Kazakstan, Ashyk Aktsionerlik Kogham

      Republic of Korea, Chusik Hoesa

      Latvia, Akciju Sabiedriba

      Liberia, Corporation

      Liechtenstein, Aktiengesellschaft

      Lithuania, Akcine Bendroves

      Luxembourg, Societe Anonyme

      Malaysia, Berhad

      Malta, Public Limited Company

      Mexico, Sociedad Anonima

      Morocco, Societe Anonyme

      Netherlands, Naamloze Vennootschap

      New Zealand, Limited Company

      Nicaragua, Compania Anonima

      Nigeria, Public Limited Company

      Northern Mariana Islands, Corporation

      Norway, Allment Aksjeselskap

      Pakistan, Public Limited Company

      Panama, Sociedad Anonima

      Paraguay, Sociedad Anonima

      Peru, Sociedad Anonima

      Philippines, Stock Corporation

      Poland, Spolka Akcyjna

      Portugal, Sociedade Anonima

      Puerto Rico, Corporation

      Romania, Societe pe Actiuni

      Russia, Otkrytoye Aktsionernoy Obshchestvo

      Saudi Arabia, Sharikat Al-Mossahamah

      Singapore, Public Limited Company

      Slovak Republic, Akciova Spolocnost

      Slovenia, Delniska Druzba

      South Africa, Public Limited Company

      Spain, Sociedad Anonima

      Surinam, Naamloze Vennootschap

      Sweden, Publika Aktiebolag

      Switzerland, Aktiengesellschaft

      Thailand, Borisat Chamkad (Mahachon)

      Trinidad and Tobago, Limited Company

      Tunisia, Societe Anonyme

      Turkey, Anonim Sirket

      Ukraine, Aktsionerne Tovaristvo Vidkritogo Tipu

      United Kingdom, Public Limited Company

      United States Virgin Islands, Corporation

      Uruguay, Sociedad Anonima

      Venezuela, Sociedad Anonima or Compania Anonima

   9. (9) Business entities with multiple charters. (A) An entity created or organized under the laws of more than one jurisdiction if the rules of this regulation would treat it as a corporation with reference to any one of the jurisdictions in which it is created or organized. Such an entity may elect its classification under Treas. Regs. § 301.7701-3, subject to the limitations of those provisions, only if it is created or organized in each jurisdiction in a manner that meets the definition of an eligible entity in Reg. § 23038(b)-3(a). The determination of a business entity's corporate or non-corporate classification is made independently from the determination of whether the entity is domestic or foreign. See Reg. § 23038(b)-5 for the rules that determine whether a business entity is domestic or foreign.

      1. (B) Examples. The following examples illustrate the rule of this subsection (b)(9):

         1. (ii) Result. X remains organized under the laws of Country A as an entity that is listed in subsection (b)(8)(A) of this regulation, and as such, it is an entity that is treated as a corporation under the rules of this regulation. Therefore, X is a corporation for California income and franchise tax purposes because the rules of this regulation would treat X as a corporation with reference to one of the jurisdictions in which it is created or organized. Because X is organized in Country A in a manner that does not meet the definition of an eligible entity in Reg. § 23038(b)-3(a), it is unable to elect its classification.

            Example 2. (i) Facts. Y is an entity that is incorporated under the laws of State A and has two shareholders. Under the rules of this regulation, an entity incorporated under the laws of State A is a corporation for California income and franchise tax purposes and under Reg. § 23038(b)-3(a) is unable to elect its classification. Several years after its formation, Y files a certificate of continuance in Country B as an unlimited company. Under the laws of Country B, upon filing a certificate of continuance, Y is treated as organized in Country B. Under the rules of this regulation and Reg. § 23038(b)-3, an unlimited company organized only in Country B that has more than one owner is treated as a partnership for California income and franchise tax purposes (absent an election to be treated as an association). Neither State A nor Country B law requires Y to terminate its charter in State A as a result of the continuance, and in fact Y does not terminate its State A charter. Consequently, Y is now organized in more than one jurisdiction.

         2. (ii) Result. Y remains organized in State A as a corporation, an entity that is treated as a corporation under the rules of this regulation. Therefore, Y is a corporation for California income and franchise tax purposes because the rules of this regulation would treat Y as a corporation with reference to one of the jurisdictions in which it is created or organized. Because Y is organized in State A in a manner that does not meet the definition of an eligible entity in Reg. § 23038(b)-3(a), it is unable to elect its classification.

            Example 3. (i) Facts. Z is an entity that has more than one owner and that is recognized under the laws of Country A as an unlimited company organized in Country A. Z is organized in Country A in a manner that meets the definition of an eligible entity in Reg. § 23038(b)-3(a). Under the rules of this regulation and Reg. § 23038(b)-3, an unlimited company organized only in Country A with more than one owner is treated as a partnership for California income and franchise tax purposes (absent an election to be treated as an association). At the time Z was formed, it was also organized as a private limited company under the laws of Country B. Z is organized in Country B in a manner that meets the definition of an eligible entity in Reg. § 23038(b)-3(a). Under the rules of this regulation and Reg. § 23038(b)-3, a private limited company organized only in Country B is treated as a corporation for California income and franchise tax purposes (absent an election to be treated as a partnership). Thus, Z is organized in more than one jurisdiction. Z has not made any entity classification elections under Reg. § 23038(b)-3.

         3. (ii) Result. Z is organized in Country B as a private limited company, an entity that is treated (absent an election to the contrary) as a corporation under the rules of this regulation. However, because Z is organized in each jurisdiction in a manner that meets the definition of an eligible entity in Reg. § 23038(b)-3(a), it may elect its classification under Reg. § 23038(b)-3, subject to the limitations of those provisions.

            Example 4. (i) Facts. P is an entity with more than one owner organized in Country A as a general partnership. Under the rules of this regulation and Reg. § 23038(b)-3, an eligible entity with more than one owner in Country A is treated as a partnership for California income and franchise tax purposes (absent an election to be treated as an association). P files a certificate of continuance in Country B as an unlimited company. Under the rules of this regulation and Reg. § 23038(b)-3, an unlimited company in Country B with more than one owner is treated as a partnership for California income and franchise tax purposes (absent an election to be treated as an association). P is not required under either the laws of Country A or Country B to terminate the general partnership in Country A, and in fact P does not terminate its Country A partnership. P is now organized in more than one jurisdiction. P has not made any entity classification elections under Reg. § 23038(b)-3.

         4. (ii) Result. P's organization in both Country A and Country B would result in P being classified as a partnership. Therefore, since the rules of this regulation would not treat P as a corporation with reference to any jurisdiction in which it is created or organized, it is not a corporation for California income and franchise tax purposes.

         Example 1. (i) Facts. X is an entity with a single owner organized under the laws of Country A as an entity that is listed in subsection (b)(8)(A) of this regulation. Under the rules of this regulation, such an entity is a corporation for California income and franchise tax purposes and under Reg. § 23038(b)-3(a) is unable to elect its classification. Several years after its formation, X files a certificate of domestication in State B as a limited liability company (LLC). Under the laws of State B, X is considered to be created or organized in State B as an LLC upon the filing of the certificate of domestication and is therefore subject to the laws of State B. Under the rules of this regulation and Reg. § 23038(b)-3, an LLC with a single owner organized only in State B is disregarded as an entity separate from its owner for California income and franchise tax purposes (absent an election to be treated as an association). Neither Country A nor State B law requires X to terminate its charter in Country A as a result of the domestication, and in fact X does not terminate its Country A charter. Consequently, X is now organized in more than one jurisdiction.

3. (c) Other business entities. (1) For California income and franchise tax purposes, the term partnership means a business entity that is not a corporation under subsection (b) of this regulation and that has at least two members.

   1. (2) Wholly owned entities -- (A) In general. Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph (c), a business entity that has a single owner and is not a corporation under subsection (b) of this regulation is disregarded as an entity separate from its owner for purposes of Part 10 (Personal Income Tax Law commencing with Revenue and Taxation Code section 17001), Part 10.2 (Administration of Franchise and Income Tax Law commencing with Revenue and Taxation Code section 18401), and Part 11 (Corporation Tax Law commencing with Revenue and Taxation Code section 23001), subject to certain statutory provisions which recognize the existence of otherwise disregarded entities for certain purposes including the tax and fee of a limited liability company under Revenue and Taxation Code sections 17941 and 17942, the return filing requirements of a limited liability company under Revenue and Taxation Code section 18633.5, and the credit limitations of a disregarded entity under Revenue and Taxation Code sections 17039 and 23036.

      1. (B) Special rule for certain business entities. If the single owner of a business entity is a bank (as defined in Revenue and Taxation Code section 23039), then the special rules applicable to banks will continue to apply to the single owner as if the wholly owned entity were a separate entity. For this purpose, the special rules applicable to banks under the Internal Revenue Code do not include the rules under sections 864(c) and 882(c) of the Internal Revenue Code.

      2. (C) Tax liabilities of certain disregarded entities -- 1. In general. An entity that is disregarded as separate from its owner for any purpose under this regulation is treated as an entity separate from its owner for purposes of--

         1. a. California income and franchise tax liabilities of the entity with respect to any taxable period for which the entity was not disregarded;
         2. b. California income and franchise tax liabilities of any other entity for which the entity is liable; and
         3. c. Refunds or credits of California income and franchise tax.

      3. (D) Examples. The following examples illustrate the application of subsection (c)(2)(C)1. of this regulation:

         Example 1. In 2006, X, a domestic corporation that reports its taxes on a calendar year basis, merges into Z, a domestic LLC wholly owned by Y that is disregarded as an entity separate from Y, in a state law merger. X was not a member of a combined reporting group at any time during its taxable year ending in December 2005. Under the applicable state law, Z is the successor to X and is liable for all of X's debts. In 2009, the Franchise Tax Board (FTB) seeks to extend the period of limitations on assessment for X's 2005 taxable year. Because Z is the successor to X and is liable for X's 2005 taxes that remain unpaid, Z is the proper party to sign the consent to extend the period of limitations.

         Example 2. The facts are the same as in Example 1, except that in 2007, the IRS determines that X miscalculated and underreported its income tax liability for 2005. Because Z is the successor to X and is liable for X's 2005 taxes that remain unpaid, the deficiency may be assessed against Z and, in the event that Z fails to pay the liability after notice and demand, a general tax lien will arise against all of Z's property and rights to property.

4. (d) Special rule for certain foreign business entities -- (1) In general. Except as provided in subsection (d)(3) of this regulation, a foreign business entity described in subsection (b)(8)(A) of this regulation will not be treated as a corporation under subsection (b)(8)(A) of this regulation if--

   1. (A) The entity was in existence on May 8, 1996;
   2. (B) The entity's classification was relevant (as defined in Reg. § 23038(b)-3(d)) on May 8, 1996;
   3. (C) No person (including the entity) for whom the entity's classification was relevant on May 8, 1996, treats the entity as a corporation for purposes of filing such person's California income tax returns, information returns, and withholding documents for the taxable year including May 8, 1996;
   4. (D) Any change in the entity's claimed classification within the sixty months prior to May 8, 1996, occurred solely as a result of a change in the organizational documents of the entity, and the entity and all members of the entity recognized the California income tax consequences of any change in the entity's classification within the sixty months prior to May 8, 1996;
   5. (E) A reasonable basis (within the meaning of Section 6662 of the Internal Revenue Code) existed on May 8, 1996, for treating the entity as other than a corporation; and
   6. (F) Neither the entity nor any member was notified in writing on or before May 8, 1996, that the classification of the entity was under examination (in which case the entity's classification will be determined in the examination).
   7. (2) Binding contract rule. If a foreign business entity described in subsection (b)(8)(A) of this regulation is formed after May 8, 1996, pursuant to a written binding contract (including an accepted bid to develop a project) in effect on May 8, 1996, and at all times thereafter, in which the parties agreed to engage (directly or indirectly) in an active and substantial business operation in the jurisdiction in which the entity is formed, subsection (d)(1) of this regulation will be applied to that entity by substituting the date of the entity's formation for May 8, 1996.

   8. (3) Termination of grandfather status -- (A) In general. An entity that is not treated as a corporation under subsection (b)(8)(A) of this regulation by reason of subsection (d)(1) or (d)(2) of this regulation will be treated permanently as a corporation under subsection (b)(8)(A) of this regulation from the earliest of:

      1. 1. The effective date of an election to be treated as an association under Reg. § 23038(b)-3;
      2. 2. A termination of the partnership under Section 708(b)(1)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code (regarding sale or exchange of 50 percent or more of the total interest in an entity's capital or profits within a twelve month period);
      3. 3. A division of the partnership under Section 708(b)(2)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code; or
      4. 4. The date any person or persons, who were not owners of the entity as of November 29, 1999, own in the aggregate a 50 percent or greater interest in the entity.
      5. (B) Special rule for certain entities. For purposes of subsection (d)(2) of this regulation, subsection (d)(3)(A)2. of this regulation shall not apply if the sale or exchange of interest in the entity is to a related person (within the meaning of Sections 267(b) and707(b) of the Internal Revenue Code) and occurs no later than twelve months after the date of the formation of the entity.

5. (e) Effective/applicability date.

   1. (1) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection (e), the rules of this regulation apply as of January 1, 1997, except that subsection (c)(2)(B) of this regulation applies to taxable years beginning after January 12, 2001. The reference to the Finnish, Maltese, and Norwegian entities in subsection (b)(8)(A) of this regulation is applicable on November 29, 1999. The reference to the Trinidadian entity in subsection (b)(8)(A) of this regulation applies to entities formed on or after November 29, 1999. Any Maltese or Norwegian entity that becomes an eligible entity as a result of subsection (b)(8)(A) of this regulation in effect on November 29, 1999, may elect by February 14, 2000, to be classified for Federal tax purposes as an entity other than a corporation retroactive to any period from and including January 1, 1997. Any Finnish entity that becomes an eligible entity as a result of subsection (b)(8)(A) of this regulation in effect on November 29, 1999, may elect by February 14, 2000, to be classified for Federal tax purposes as an entity other than a corporation retroactive to any period from and including September 1, 1997. However, subsection (d)(3)(A)4. of this regulation applies on or after October 22, 2003.

   2. (2) Subsection (c)(2)(C) of this regulation applies on and after September 14, 2009.

      1. (B) Transition rule. For business entities created or organized under the laws of more than one jurisdiction as of August 12, 2004, the rules of subsection (b)(9) of this regulation apply as of May 1, 2006. These entities, however, may rely on the rules of subsection (b)(9) of this regulation as of August 12, 2004.

      (3)(A) General rule. Except as provided in subsection (e)(3)(B) of this regulation, the rules of subsection (b)(9) of this regulation apply as of August 12, 2004, to all business entities existing on or after that date.

   3. (4) The reference to the Estonian, Latvian, Liechtenstein, Lithuanian, and Slovenian entities in subsection (b)(8)(A) of this regulation applies to such entities formed on or after October 7, 2004, and to any such entity formed before such date from the date any person or persons, who were not owners of the entity as of October 7, 2004, own in the aggregate a 50 percent or greater interest in the entity. The reference to the European Economic Area/European Union entity in subsection (b)(8)(A) of this regulation applies to such entities formed on or after October 8, 2004.

   4. (5) The reference to the Bulgarian entity in subsection (b)(8)(A) of this regulation applies to such entities formed on or after January 1, 2007, and to any such entity formed before such date from the date that, in the aggregate, a 50 percent or more interest in such entity is owned by any person or persons who were not owners of the entity as of January 1, 2007. For purposes of the preceding sentence, the term interest means--

      1. (A) In the case of a partnership, a capital or profits interest; and
      2. (B) In the case of a corporation, an equity interest measured by vote or value.

Note: Authority cited: Sections 19503 and 23038, Revenue and Taxation Code. Reference: Sections 17039, 17941, 18633.5, 23036 and 23038, Revenue and Taxation Code.

History

1. New section filed 1-9-98; operative 1-9-98 pursuant to Government Code section 11343.4(d) (Register 98, No. 2).

2. Change without regulatory effect amending subsections (b) and (c)(2) filed 6-4-2008 pursuant to section 100, title 1, California Code of Regulations (Register 2008, No. 23).

3. Editorial correction of subsection (a) (Register 2011, No. 17).

4. Amendment filed 5-20-2019; operative 7-1-2019 (Register 2019, No. 21).