Wright v. Young
297 Ga. 683
Ga.
2015
Check Treatment

WRIGHT v. YOUNG

S15A0896

Supreme Court of Georgia

SEPTEMBER 14, 2015

777 SE2d 475

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 14, 2015.

Miller & Key, J. Scott Key, for appellant.

Scott L. Ballard, District Attorney; Samuel S. Olens, Attorney General, Patricia B. Attaway Burton, Deputy Attorney General, Paula K. Smith, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Jason M. Rea, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

BENHAM, Justice.

This appeal arises from the trial court‘s denial of appellant Willie Wright‘s motion to vacate and set aside the October 26, 2010 final order and decree of divorce dissolving his marriage to appellee Kenya Young.1 According to appellant, who is incarcerated and acting pro se in this appeal, he never received notice of the final divorce decree. Appellant avers he first learned of the final divorce decree on October 2, 2014, in response to a September 2014 inquiry he made to the clerk of the trial court about the status of the divorce proceedings. Upon learning of the final divorce decree, appellant filed a motion to set aside on October 23, 2014. Without making any findings as to notice, the trial court denied the motion on November 6, 2014.

OCGA § 15-6-21 (c)2 provides in pertinent part:

... [I]t shall be the duty of the judge to file his or her decision with the clerk of the court in which the cases are pending and to notify the attorney or attorneys of the losing party of his or her decision. Said notice shall not be required if such notice has been waived pursuant to subsection (a) of Code Section 9-11-5.

Although OCGA § 15-6-21 refers to notice for decisions made on motions, its logic also applies to final judgments. See ; . The only cir-cumstance in which the notice requirement is waived under OCGA § 15-6-21 (c) is when the losing party has failed to file any responsive pleadings in the case. See OCGA § 9-11-5 (a); . Since the record shows that appellant filed an answer to the complaint for divorce, appellant did not waive notice.

The record does not show, however, whether the trial court notified appellant of the final decree of divorce. In addition, when it denied the motion to set aside the divorce decree, the trial court did not make any findings on the issue of notice. In such circumstances, the appellate courts have held that the order denying the losing party‘s motion to set aside must be vacated and the case remanded so that the trial court may make findings on the issue of whether notice was provided. See ; .

“[T]he issue is not whether the losing party had knowledge that judgment was entered, but rather whether the duty imposed on the court in OCGA § 15-6-21 (c) was carried out.” (physical precedent only). If on remand the trial court finds notice was not given, then the trial court must grant the motion to set aside the final judgment, re-enter the final judgment, and allow the losing party 30 days from the re-entry date to seek appellate review. ; . See also . If the trial court finds that notice was given, then the motion to set aside should be denied. See ;3 .

Judgment vacated and case remanded. All the Justices concur.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 14, 2015.

Willie Frank Wright, Jr., pro se.

Kenya L. Young, pro se.

Notes

1
We granted appellant‘s discretionary application for review (Case No. S15D0485) on December 22, 2014.
2
Chapter 6 of Title 15 of the Georgia Code concerns the obligations of Georgia‘s superior courts.
3
To the extent that , states that notice must be sent and received in order to deny a motion to set aside in these circumstances, it is disapproved. OCGA § 15-6-21 (c) only requires that the trial court give notice to the losing party. If the trial court has in fact given notice, then a motion to set aside may be properly denied whether or not the losing party actually received the notice.
Read the detailed case summary