Watts v. SingletaryWatts v. Singletary
Versions:87 F.3d 12821996 WL 362540
PER CURIAM:
The Court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the Court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it (
BARKETT, Circuit Judge, dissenting:
I respectfully dissent from the order of the majority of the court in denying the petition of appellee Carl Watts for en banc rehearing. This case presents important issues which, for reasons stated in Judge Carnes‘s dissent, were erroneously decided.