History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Casas
356 F.3d 104
1st Cir.
2004
Check Treatment
Docket

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. RALPH CASAS, Defendant, Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. FELICIANO NIEVES, Defendant, Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. WINSTON CUNNINGHAM, Defendant, Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. RAFAEL SEGUI-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant, Appellant.

Nos. 02-1623, 02-1624, 02-1785, 02-1674, 02-1794

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

January 20, 2004

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on January 20, 2004 is amended as follows:

At p. 41, l. 9, add “We note that Cunningham has not argued that the evidence was insufficient.”

At p. 55, l. 12, add “and the United States is free to retry Cunningham if it so chooses. See Montana v. Hall, 481 U.S. 400, 402 (1987); Burks v. United States, 437 U.S. 1, 6 (1978); Ball v. United States, 163 U.S. 662, 672 (1896).”

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Casas
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Date Published: Mar 2, 2004
Citation: 356 F.3d 104
Docket Number: 02-1623
Court Abbreviation: 1st Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In